[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 92 KB, 1000x1000, 932329F4-14EC-4279-B293-943886657542.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731202 No.23731202[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What do you call this type of movement?

>> No.23731223 [DELETED] 

the bruh effect

>> No.23731231

Jette le.

>> No.23731238

>>23731202
The digger nick formation

>> No.23731245

>>23731202
the banana republic effect

>> No.23731253

mail in ballots being processed, retard

>> No.23731268 [DELETED] 
File: 8 KB, 229x250, 1589824098520.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731268

>>23731253
>mail in ballots being processed, retard

>> No.23731288

>>23731202
the seething chud

>> No.23731291

Law of (((democracy))))

>> No.23731295
File: 54 KB, 750x1000, 1591474512258.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731295

>>23731253

>> No.23731311

>>23731202
The "bringing unchecked bags and carts full of fraudulent ballots into the Detroit counting room at 4:30 am".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivT2z5UgHxo

>> No.23731412
File: 36 KB, 638x479, control theory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731412

1st order step response

>> No.23731421

>>23731202
rising hunter

>> No.23731427

>>23731202
Cheating

>> No.23731439

>>23731202
Hunter gets his pardon top

>> No.23731475

Le nigger ballot counter

>> No.23731487

>>23731253
>"its called 130,000 mail-in ballots in a row for biden and 0 for the other 2 candidates, retard"

>> No.23731505

>>23731202
I heard from family in usa that was done by negroes 2 make us all look bad. jews told what 2 do and portion out but negroes and other poc panicked and put all same time. jews has not much respect as before so not control as before. they destroyed 4 ALL of us and now we fear racist clown drumpf will stop everything. NO BORDERS!!! NO HUMAN IS ILLEGAL!!!

>> No.23731525

>>23731202
That’s the steal

>> No.23731531

>>23731202
COPE pattern

>> No.23731532
File: 59 KB, 556x556, 1604557665904.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731532

>>23731202
Kek. Also
>go back to /pol/

>> No.23731561

>>23731253
why do you think it is reasonable that 99% of them are biden

>> No.23731566
File: 79 KB, 600x800, 47C87D4B-254D-4573-8F60-D15DB10A7053.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731566

>>23731532
>go back to /pol/

>> No.23731578

>>23731202
"the sloppy job"
>>23731561
they were 100%, literally zero vote for any other candidate

>> No.23731630

>>23731561
it was literally 100%

>> No.23731649
File: 213 KB, 1467x472, michigan 138.339 votes added all exclusively for biden voter election fraud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731649

>>23731561
>>23731578
>>23731630
This, exactly 100%

>> No.23731653

>>23731202
so if the probability that a single mail in ballot for joe is 0.9 then the probability that 200k mail in ballots are all for joe is 0.9^200000 which is basically zero, how is it not trivially obvious that those graphs are impossible?

>> No.23731669

>>23731412
E Z

>> No.23731685

>>23731202
Based mail in Dems. Imagine complaining that mail in votes getting processed are all for Biden when Trump was against it and told his voters not to do it

>> No.23731697

The country of 32 IQ fat americains chart

>> No.23731703

>>23731685
even with a probability of 0.999 for a mail in ballot being for joe, the probability of 200k of them in a row being for joe is on the order of 10^-87, that graph is impossible

>> No.23731706
File: 57 KB, 600x600, verylegitballots.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731706

>>23731202
'hidden usb movement'

>> No.23731712

>>23731685
because even in the most degenerate shitholes like San Francisco, mail in ballots were 85-15 biden-trump

>> No.23731722

>>23731685
he specifically told his voters to vote by mail and in person, because it was up in the air if polling centers would be open at all with the coof
GOP pushed mail in voting hard, too

>> No.23731739

>>23731703
Imagine actually believing that math is applicable here. BAKA my head

>> No.23731745

>>23731561
>>23731578
>>23731630
>>23731649
>>23731653
>>23731703
The mail-ins are all Biden ballots because Trump supporters already voted in person.

>> No.23731758

>>23731745
see:
>>23731712

>> No.23731766

>>23731706
>This baby can fit so many fraudulent ballots in it

>> No.23731767

>>23731745
>>23731739
>>23731649
100% of trump supporters voted in person in michigan, do you not see that that is so absurdly unlikely that it may as well be an impossibility?

>> No.23731781

>>23731745
>Donald Trump: 0
>Jo Jorgensen: 0
>Howie Hawkins:0
>Don Blankeship: 0
>Pedo Joe: 140k
yeah totally legit
>>23731649

>> No.23731789

>>23731739
it's reasonable to assume that each vote is roughly independent, i was generous with my estimate of the probability, 140k votes in a row for a single candidate is fucking impossible

>> No.23731794

>>23731238
>Censoring on 4chan
Go back

>> No.23731795

Funny how the mail-in ballots only make a difference in those swing states that coincidently count them last.

>> No.23731797

>>23731745
Here is video proof of outside ballots being brought into the Wayne County (Detroit) counting place at 4:30 in the morning:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivT2z5UgHxo

These people are hauling bags, luggage, coolers, carts, ... into the counting area without anyone checking them.

This was around the time of that huge 100% Biden spike.
They also said they'd stop counting for a few hours, but then they counted anyway, 100% for Joe.
They probably wanted to lower people's guard while they hauled in all those ballots.

>> No.23731807

>>23731795
This.
Texas and Florida counted them first, and everything went very much as anticipated.
They wanted to see how many they needed first before pulling masses of ballots out of their ass.

>> No.23731821

>>23731767
It’s absurdly unlikely that anyone with a fucking brain would vote for Trump but here we are. Don’t get so ass blasted anyway, I’m a republican here and this will work out great for us. 4 year of Joe where he can’t do any crazy shit because we have the senate (which if you actually were committing voter fraud you’d rig to be in your favour) and then we can get someone competent in who doesn’t violate our party and country

>> No.23731822

>>23731202
ok /biz/ I beg you.
I have been reading about this graph all day on /pol/ (I've been going there since yesterday for obvious reasons) and what /pol/ thinks it represents (cheating) and also what leftists think, which is basically hahahahaha cope etc etc.
So when there's a thread on /biz/ about this, could one of the hundreds of actually smart people here explain to me: what is the rational, sensible, non-hysterical interpretation of this graph?
Nobody would cheat in a way that gave such an obvious trace, r-right?

>> No.23731829

>>23731822
he wins?
bump eet

>> No.23731831
File: 66 KB, 500x387, 1596337895237.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731831

>>23731231
>ça

>> No.23731833

>>23731822
>what is the rational, sensible, non-hysterical interpretation of this graph?
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivT2z5UgHxo

This is in Wayne county, which is where the spike came from.
They're hauling loads of unchecked bags, luggage, carts, ... into the counting place without anyone checking them.

>> No.23731838

>>23731202
hmm looks like the biden told supporters to mail votes and trump said don't pattern YOU FUCKING RETARD MONGOLOID

>> No.23731845
File: 31 KB, 917x1027, 1600975738466.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731845

>>23731833

>> No.23731846

>>23731838
>100% of 138k mail-in votes just for Biden
No.

See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivT2z5UgHxo
You can see them hauling in masses of outside ballots in Wayne county, Michigan.

>> No.23731849

>>23731789
It’s not though. Each vote is not roughly independent, you’re failing to accommodate other factors into your equation. It’s cute that you tried though.

>> No.23731856

fraud

>> No.23731857

>>23731838
you are aware that every other state also does mail-in ballots and did not experience any time in which 100% of the votes went to one single candidate

>> No.23731859
File: 184 KB, 1024x915, 1604467467629.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731859

>>23731846

>> No.23731878

>>23731202
the war fork

>> No.23731877

>>23731849
Wow that sure explains it lmao.

>> No.23731886

>>23731821
>I'm a republican
And that's the problem. You voted for a genocidal traitor who supports tearing down your country's history and culture for being "problematic" while supporting the sexual torture of children as "progressive."

I'm an American Nationalist, and when the time comes you're not going to weasel out of the consequences of betraying your country, far-left "centrist."

>> No.23731889

>>23731833
Yes, but that is the /pol/ explanation. I'm not saying it is wrong. I'm begging for an alternative, "haha I knew ghosts didn't exist after all" explanation from some big brain who can calm me down into not thinking this is pretty good evidence of cheating.

>> No.23731895

>>23731849
how does what one voter put on paper affect what the next voter puts on paper

>> No.23731901

>>23731889
>Yes, but that is the /pol/ explanation.
No, it's objective video proof.

Seriously, watch the video. The video fragment starts at 12:10.
(though theres a guy pulling a cart of ballots out of a van before that too)

>> No.23731907
File: 160 KB, 181x191, 1603415321171.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731907

>>23731202
The Sneed

>> No.23731910

>>23731889
so the logical explanation, is that they gathered up 130k Biden votes ahead of time that they knew were Biden votes but didn't count for some reason and then dropped them in all at once
that's the logical explanation, because if they were just being fed into a machine to be read it is a statistical impossibility due to human error alone that in a group of 130k people if told to specifically do X some idiot would accidentally do Y

>> No.23731919

>>23731822
God you're stupid. Go back

>> No.23731920

>>23731895
If you cannot grab this concept should you really be on a business board?

>> No.23731925
File: 384 KB, 960x765, 1604551770071.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23731925

>>23731889

On behalf of all of South America, even the countries I hate:

Haha America, now it's your fucking turn.

You've had your first Totally Legitimate Election, now just wait until they're announcing that because of government debt, taxes are going up and services are being slashed.

>> No.23731933

>>23731920
help me understand

>> No.23731935

>>23731910
>they gathered up 130k Biden votes ahead of time that they knew were Biden votes but didn't count for some reason
Yeah, because they brought them into the counting place at 4:30 am inside unchecked luggage when everyone thought they had stopped counting.

No counting place in the fucking world piles up 138k votes AFTER checking whom they're for.

>> No.23731936

>>23731822
Why not if you need it to happen right now before any outsiders can interfere and the lines are drawn anyway so people are going to go along with whoever their guy is on the issue? Integrity of the process is no longer a concern for anyone involved in any of this, things have gotten to the point where the other side are enemies and therefore it's ok to lie to them and so on. If they actually believe all the stuff they say about Trump in the places where most of the showrunners live aren't you an enemy too if you don't do something like this?

>> No.23731937

>>23731202
It was a estimate paper. Why do you maga fags keep acting like this is what actually happened?

>> No.23731944

>>23731886
Yawn, both candidates are fucked in the head. I’m not going to lose my 2A in the next 4 years and I can’t wait to vote Red in 2024

>> No.23731945

>>23731849
What the fuck are you talking about? His math is right, adding variables would only potentially make the model more precise, which is redundant at 0.000000....0003% probability events. You would have to actually add some incredibly meaningful factor and explain it well to make a dent in the improbability of 140k to 0. Obviously Trump telling people to vote in person doesn't cut it, and was already accounted for in the 0.9 estimate. So, you want that number higher, is that it? You want it at 99% of mail in votes for Biden? How about 99.99%? Sure, no problem I'll just multiply that number by itself 140,000 times oh look at that it turned into nothing again. You do understand how unconditional probability works, right?
If you even understand any of this, mount a god damn defense.

>> No.23731946

>>23731937
>It was a estimate paper.
haha what?

>> No.23731976

>>23731901
> no it's video proof.
I know. That's what it looks like.
That's why I want a level headed /biz/raeli to show the natural explanation for all this, how it was just a great misunderstanding and we can all have a big laff. Because if not, this is serious as all hell.
Kind of like many years ago when slashdot talked me down from thinking 9/11 was "tv fakery" due to some idiotic video compression artifacts (disappearing planes). For a while there, I just didn't see the, in hind-sight, obvious explanation and I'm hoping it's the same here.

>> No.23731987

the Nothing To See Here, Goy

>> No.23731993

>>23731202
The venezuelan election

>> No.23732004

>>23731976
>That's why I want a level headed /biz/raeli to show the natural explanation for all this
I'm European, I have zero vested interest in the US election.
If anything, I favor Biden economically because Trump is strongly in favor of stricter international trade.

Watching this blatant election fraud in a Western country however makes my blood boil.

>> No.23732032

>>23731910
Yes this is the best so far. And they would do this to promote their spin/narrative of the election.
However, they would have to know they were all Biden votes. Are you supposed to be able to set aside ballots that you know who they are for but have not been counted?
And moreover, it makes them vulnerable to accusations of cheating with the now famous graph for a very minor possible benefit.
Even if it is the most logical explanation so far, it still seems far fetched.
Unless they were ballots they had some reason to consider not adding into the mix unless they were absolutely needed...such as for some reason questionable ones?

>> No.23732042

>>23731919
> God you're stupid.
I know. But I bet you are too. You probably can't explain it either.
> Go back
I have. I'm here.

>> No.23732049

>>23732032
>Are you supposed to be able to set aside ballots that you know who they are for but have not been counted?
No.
They're counted in small batches by individual counters, and then tallied immediately.

There's no way 130k votes are piled up AFTER checking whom they're for, but BEFORE actually counting them.
This 130k Biden push came right after this happened in Wayne county: https://youtu.be/ivT2z5UgHxo?t=731

>> No.23732067

>>23731933
Ok let me give this a shot. You’re missing a bunch of extra factors, it’s not for example a pure 50/50 for which way someone votes. You need to account for votes already cast for each candidate, the overall difference in that area (say A already had 1million votes and B had 1.5million), the area and background of those who voted. Even then if you do coin flips you’re expected to get 6 heads in a row out of 100 at some point, max, and that’s in an independent 50/50 toss up. Recently at some political event thing somebody flipped 17. Look up that stats on that, it’s insane but it happens.

>> No.23732072

>>23732067
This is cope.

>> No.23732100
File: 49 KB, 498x573, 1601195196072.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23732100

>>23731202
Notice how it steeply increased and then went flat. This just means instead of consistently reporting the Joe Biden numbers throughout the night they tallied all the votes and then reported them all out at the same time. Not rocket science. If they tallied and reported the votes in a continuous fashion it would be a smooth curve that sharply increased past the red line.

>> No.23732128
File: 482 KB, 1000x1000, 1604570972894.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23732128

>>23732100
This

>> No.23732138

>>23731919
>asking for common sense is stupid
Die retarded faggot.

>> No.23732141

>>23732128
In every one of those charts, there's movement on both lines.
In this instance, Biden got 130k votes and nobody else got a single one.

>> No.23732148

>>23732100
I’ve never heard of them tallying the votes for one candidate only.

>> No.23732165

>>23731822
Milwaukee niggers aren’t the smartest when it comes to electoral fraud; they just brute force it and dare anyone to challenge it.

>> No.23732169

>>23732148
I didn't say they did. The chart is showing the reporting not the tallying. They may have tallied the votes in such a way that Biden's numbers were reported all at once but Trump's numbers were reported as they were counted. I have no clue how the reporting process works but I seriously doubt there's fraud going on here. That's just MAGA cope and Trump lost

>> No.23732192

>>23732067
>Look up that stats on that
So you have no idea how any of this works.
The "stats" on that is 0.5^17.
The "stats" on all the votes in a sample from a batch being Biden = the chance that a given vote in the batch is for Biden ^ the size of the sample. All the variables you want to add only goes into the estimate for the chance that a given vote in the batch is for Biden. But as I have already explained in an earlier post, it doesn't matter if we create a ludicrous model where we pretend that 99.999% of the votes in the batch are for Biden, when you multiply that chance by itself 130,000 times. The result is the same, which is it can't happen.
Think of it like this: Let's say the likelihood of a given vote in their office being Biden is extremely high, because they have 130k Biden votes and only one Trump vote. Still the odds of that sample of 130k votes from that batch of 130,001 votes NOT containing the Trump vote is, as you hopefully intuitively understand, miniscule. Now, adding more Trump votes to the batch doesn't make the odds of the sample not containing any of them go up - it makes it even more impossibly unlikely.
Their office obviously contained 130k Biden votes. The BEST likelihood for the scenario we have seen coming true (without cheating), given that we know their office contained more than zero Trump votes (which we know, due to more Trump votes coming in after) is if their office only contained ONE more Trump vote, in which case the chance of this happening is already ridiculously vanishing. But we know the office contained many more Trump votes. So the possibility of this happening by innocent chance is so astronomically low that it is not to be taken seriously.

>> No.23732210

>>23732169
But the Biden graph is also continuous until the bump. It doesn't check out.
And seriously, reporting one candidate continuously but not the other? Doesn't that sound far fetched?

>> No.23732248

>>23732165
If that's what it turns out to be, it's too blatant to be able to get away with it.
I mean, the video that has been linked a bunch of times here doesn't necessarily mean anything. I have no idea how this usually works, seemed like they let people in with a pass, I'm not sure that's untoward, and there's no proof or indication that anyone brought in ballots.
But the statistical improbability of the graph demands an explanation. It could not happen without something untoward - I'm not saying any fraudulent ballots had to be entered, but at the least they must have been setting ballots aside for this to be possible, which I can't see a charitable explanation for.

>> No.23732300

>>23732128
Also, other states are zoomed out
This happened instantly

>> No.23732315

>>23731649

Kek not even Stalin made it that obvious.

>> No.23732329
File: 149 KB, 756x480, 49193BB8-399B-4384-B2E6-B577FD016CD2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23732329

>>23731202
The start of a war

>> No.23732348

>>23731202
Based biden fucking /pol/ democracycucks

>> No.23732351
File: 45 KB, 500x375, 1585193060743.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23732351

>>23732169
>I have no clue how the reporting process works
>I seriously doubt there's fraud going on here

>> No.23732424

>>23731838
i know plenty of trump voters who voted by mail ahead of time

>> No.23732426

>>23731822
I would first look at the link between data input and data visualization. My suspicion would be that Google's election vote visualization had a bug. Barring that, I would verify data input. If the data they received matches what it looks like, I would check who is sending the data. Once you understand the data from there, you can see if the traffic makes sense.

Anyway, it's suspicious and warrants investigation. If more websites other than Google showed the same count increase, then the data source should be investigated.

>> No.23732443

>>23732141
Yeah this is the difference in those two graphs. That's what warrants investigation, not the simple batch reporting.

>> No.23732478

>>23731889
it’s possible that they dont count the votes at all, and that pattern and related controversy are all manufactured to distract us from other more important things. it’s even possible there is a real shooting war going on right now between the CIA and DHS, and the lockdowns are to keep us oblivious to it. does that make you feel better?

>> No.23732495

>>23731910
i dont think they seperate different voting cards into stacks based on who you voted for. each card has multiple elections on it anyway.

>> No.23732553

>>23732128
>instant is the same as a progression
KYS

>> No.23732593
File: 8 KB, 265x235, images (2).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23732593

>>23731295
Cope

>> No.23732622
File: 970 KB, 2560x1440, Screenshot_20201105-061425.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23732622

>>23731976
there’s nothing to say 911 wasnt tv fakery. theyve been known to doctor old footage to fix mistakes or add things. there’s the whole mandela effect psyop where they changed stuff like dolly’s braces in moonraker to make people think they were going crazy.
http://mileswmathis.com/mandela3.html

>> No.23732657
File: 308 KB, 1200x1965, le lefty face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23732657

>>23731845

>> No.23732692
File: 8 KB, 275x184, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23732692

>>23731202
the "chud fud"

>> No.23732805

so did michigan officials or whoever commented on this?
i agree that it's weird and can't be explained by "hurr biden mail-in votes", but can it be that someone just fucked up data entry and corrected it later? like you're summing up shit from all the counties and but you miss one number when summing up biden's shit and then you realise your mistake

>> No.23732938

>>23731202
The Butthurt Movement.

>> No.23733132

>>23731202
pump and dump

>> No.23733240

>>23731202
Fraud? Fraud.

>> No.23733297

Holy fuck America you have become a third world democracy lol.

>> No.23733315

The get ready for a Civil War.

>> No.23733386
File: 197 KB, 773x1000, pink-wojak-money-printer.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23733386

>>23731202
Can anyone make a gif of democrats furiously printing ballots? That would be pretty cheeky.

>> No.23733446
File: 71 KB, 814x561, 1604536509635.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23733446

>>23733386
Make it of Biden. Does anyone seriously believe the result?
>Trump winning handily.
>Oh dear we're all tired better stop counting.
>Would you believe it in the break hundres of thousands/ millions of votes for Biden appeared.
>Yes he is the most popular candidate ever despite every metric indicating otherwise.
>Yes America wants 40% CGT and 62% income tax for high earners.
>The impossibly huge numbers of those voting (which exceeds the number of registrants in contested states) proves it was a vote against Trump in spite of the fact his approval rating is above 50%.
What a fucking joke.

>> No.23733461
File: 59 KB, 655x527, 1596986526983.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23733461

>>23732100
Notice how there was a pause of a few hours which would have allowed anyone to calculate the number of votes Joe needed and add them to his tally.

>> No.23733483

>>23733446
And they kept counting anyway.

>"guys we're all tired, it's 4 am, we're gonna stop now and resume counting in five hours"
>post results half an hour later
>138k votes counted
>100% Biden

Nobody's buying this.
Plus there's video proof of people lugging in masses of outside ballots in their luggage during the count.

>> No.23733497
File: 88 KB, 620x441, 1604574451551.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23733497

>This is normal

>> No.23733560

Chad paradigm.
Joe biden confirmed chad

>> No.23733639
File: 31 KB, 600x450, flame.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23733639

>>23733497
a simple and pointed solution to this problem is for a mob to forcibly remove them from these corrupt "counters" form their home. bind their hands and feet together, and slowly burn a hole through their skull with an oxy acetylene torch, until the flame touches their brain.

>> No.23733654

>>23733497
>republican observers left for the night
did they really manage to pull off the "hey, look over there" gag?
lmao, i can't even get mad at that.

>> No.23733860

Do we really have people in this thread who think that out of a batch of 130k randomly selected/counted mail-in ballots, that not a single one would be from someone who voted other than Biden?
Come on now. Come THE GODDAMN FUCK ON, now.
Yes, we all know Trump discouraged his base from doing mail-in voting, which certainly led to Biden getting the MAJORITY of mail in votes
But even then, there's no way in hell Trump would get zero mail-in votes out of fucking 130k counted votes. The absolute, worst-case-scenario-for-Trump minimum votes that I could see Trump getting out of a 130k vote count, is 10 votes, not zero
Now if this was out of 1,000 to 5,000 counted votes, I could MAYBE believe he got zero. But over 100k is just too much
Ignore your personal feelings about this election for just one minute, and just use logic and common sense here

>> No.23734106
File: 42 KB, 558x592, angry fish colbert drumpf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23734106

>>23732657
return to tradition

>> No.23734146

>>23731649
This was already prebunked by Twitter. Why do you think the image is banned from posting there?

>> No.23734170

>>23731945
the one explanation I've seen is that the ballots were opened, sorted into piles of Trump/Biden/Other, and they dumped the Biden numbers first after counting a huge stack of them so they could report one big dump all at once.

>> No.23734201

>>23731412
>electronics brainlet
No, you idiot, it's called a jump stochastic process.

>> No.23734228
File: 22 KB, 532x350, 33458678.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23734228

>>23732141
>>23732300
>>23732553

>> No.23734238
File: 24 KB, 538x474, 0292C14E-DF9B-4683-8C70-F97DD4E11D87.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23734238

>>23731202
The fraud effect

>> No.23734261

>>23731833
That video is disturbing

>> No.23734262

>>23734146
>Why do you think the image is banned from posting there?
fugg, is it really?

>> No.23734265
File: 24 KB, 657x527, 1572219987315.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23734265

>>23731202
The (((whales))) bought

>> No.23734331

>>23734170
But then there should be a corresponding trump +15k stack

>> No.23734374
File: 193 KB, 613x803, pennsylvania pa philadelphia 23 277 votes all for biden.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23734374

>>23733860
It's happening in more places, too; see pic.

>> No.23734377

>>23734262
Yep. Twitter puts up that disinfo notice when it gets uploaded and won't let people post it.

>>23734331
No, of course not. They just invalidated all those ballots for being improperly filled out.

>> No.23734393

>>23731202
test

>> No.23734427

>>23734377
How is that not censorship?

>> No.23734430

Name is back to /pol/ and all poster including myself should be banned for 2 weeks for replying to this off topic thread

>> No.23734435
File: 374 KB, 709x649, 1587661383122.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23734435

>>23734377
>Yep. Twitter puts up that disinfo notice when it gets uploaded and won't let people post it.

that's perfectly reasonable and not suspicious at all

>> No.23734438

>>23733639
Oooor. and hear me out. Each ballot could be individually counted and verified to ensure that a vote was cast in a proper and legal manner by someone who is alive.

>> No.23734460

>mutt dems said they'd vote by mail
>WTF HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN
When do they start blaming Russian hackers again?

>> No.23734463

the frasier flop

>> No.23734479

>>23731649
No you cant just have the intern add one column then slightly later update the other column!!! They have to updated at the exact same time

>> No.23734480

>>23734460
Repubs also voted by mail, you know.

>> No.23734518
File: 57 KB, 719x947, 1604582716976.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23734518

AAAND I'M PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAAAANN

>> No.23734531
File: 161 KB, 600x684, 1604489603175.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23734531

>>23733386

>> No.23734540

>>23731202
Early voting by mail.

>> No.23734545

>>23734479
You'd have to round up all the votes going one way from hundreds of individual batches to get a 138k stack and THEN count them.
This would require counting them twice: first to sort them and then to "count" them.
That is not how this is done. They are counted and sorted at the same time, obviously.

Plus, there's more than just the presidential candidates on the ballots. They are never separated into piles according to presidential candidate.