/biz/ - Business & Finance

It's all technicals really. BTC makes a new ATH, all alts follow, XRP included. Then the dump cycle repeats. Zoom out the whole XRP chart from the beginning and you'll see the phases.

>>23679986
Check Nov/Dec '14 and compare that to '17 and today.

>>23679767
Why would ripple short their product and pay moneygram to provide liquidity for 20+ billion XRP volume you flaming retard. This makes 0 sense and you have no understanding of Ripple and Moneygram partnership.

>>23680176
Explain this to a newfag.
It seems Banks don't need to buy XRP to make use of Ripplenet.
I don't even understand the purpose of XRP.

>>23679986
except XRP didn't follow.
Majority of the alts mooned the last 4 months except XRP which topped $0.30

>>23680798
Kek lurk moar. RippleNet is not on demand liquidity nor will it solve the interoperability issue that’s coming with all the CBDCs that are coming. You think US will accept digital yuan when they know China is controlling their own citizens’ expenses? There needs to be a bridge.

>>23680899
according to my captcha its 3 bridges

>>23680176
OP's image says
>The scam that XRP is trying to pull is making "average joe investor" believe that XRP value is directly linked to the cost and net worth of t he network.

This is fundamentally untrue. I suggest everyone DTOR, especially when it comes to FUD claims.

it's all I'm going to say because I don't care to argue or spoonfeed with people who haven't done their due diligence.

>>23679767
Don't ask questions. Trust in the plan.

>>23680899
Not a single mention of Ripple.. nice try tho

>>23680959
hello Baba

>>23681096
Which bridge currency are you suggesting they're going to use?

>>23680933
Can you explain to a newfag why he is wrong?

>>23681160
Gee, I don't know, maybesomething that is being sold for pennies on shoddy chink exchanges to neckbeard basement dwellers that sounds quite plausible to me

>>23681096
Uhhhhh there’s like 10 banks (at this moment) that have timelines with Ripple/XRP/ODL/DLT. Not spoon feeding retards though.
I have yet to see any bank saying chainlink.

>>23680899
quant overledger atomic swap cbdc for another and solved, your token is not needed

>>23681206
Do banks actually buy XRP thereby influencing the price of XRP?
That is the million dollar question.


The dude who made that thread said this.
The XRP token is nothing more than a ”vehicle” for transferring value from point A to B. The assumption that ”ripple’s partners” buy/invest XRP tokens is deillusional. Ripple makes revenue licensing RippleNet to their business-partners. You see.. Ripple the company pays other companies to use their technology (ripplenet) You’re not required to buy XRP tokens in order to make use of RippleNet. It’s included in the service.

token not needed. Can anyone debunk this please?

>>23681291
there is nothing to debunk

>>23681198
>I don't have an answer
good talk.

>>23681175
>Can you explain to a newfag why he is wrong?
Yes

>>23681314
>I'm having trouble with reading comprehension and any sort of thinking in general

yup, real nice talking to you

>>23681332
I asked you a question, you could not answer it so you responded with empty sarcasm.
Somehow I'm the one who can't think.

>>23679767
For 4 years, XRP has been the absolute worst crypto anyone could invest in.

I truly hope all the Ripple kikes and their shills with burn in Hell for all eternity.

XRP ruined my life.

>>23681291
>says XRP ledger
>token not needed
Wew lad
>>23681221
Sorry but your token is erc20 and it’s actually inflatable. If holders vote for it they could just create more. *maybe* it’s needed but sounds like shit to me buddy.

>>23681357
> I don't care to argue or spoonfeed
> good talk
> hey you used some nasty words I don't understand

you are a special kind of faggot, aren't you?

>>23681392
Which words didn't I understand?

>>23681380
>Sorry but your token is erc20 and it’s actually inflatable. If holders vote for it they could just create more. *maybe* it’s needed but sounds like shit to me buddy.
Hahahahha what the fuck you don't understand how quant works do you nigga hahahahhaha

>>23681538
>he doesn’t know holders can vote to increase supply
Oh no no no noo

>>23681492
you are a special kind of faggot, aren't you?

XRP will never be worth anything serious i’m in XRP for the Free Spark tokens and then i’m going to dump my XRP hopefully around $.80-$1.

>>23681626
You have yet to articulate a response, or argument.

>>23679767
Wow, people actually bought because of Baba? There are credible sources and dedicated communities for research but people would rather listen to literal whos on Twitter? Why?

>>23681359
It didnt go to zero, but its still top 10

>>23679767
>>23680798
>>23680844
>browses XSG thread
>still listens to goys who think XRP is the same as any other crypto
honestly, just sell your XRP. you dont deserve to make it

>>23681857
>trust the (((media))) goy
>ignore the mason
you guys the absolute worst. I will never ever have any pity for poor people again.

So what will become the standard after WEF and CBDC? XRP or LINK? OP image basically said that XRP are worthless but the company has good "solutions" to sell to central banks, LINK is a great token and one of the bosses (Ari something) has ties with JP and other major banks but how high can a erc20 token go? BTC is just boomer coin, I don't think it won't have much ROI in 202x.

>>23682199
>retards still think that russian scam has anything to do with the nwo
just stop. these posts are going look really embarrassing a year from now.

>>23682081
Why do you do this to yourself? What other areas in life do you self-sabotage?

>>23682242