/biz/ - Business & Finance

It's actually happening.
The most significant event in blockchain enterprise adoption history.

>>23665783
>>23665815
if you dont know its better. because in that case you wont put a penny into this shitcoin. give ONE usecase that iexec is better at doing than aws and I will gift you 50 link (you need it badly). pro-tip: dont even say COST because no its not cheaper its more expensive.

This is a Quant board now.

>>23665875
No, I want you to stay poor.

>>23665875
its on the blockchain. google nand amazon will BEG to use this but can't yet because it is not compliancing to the reguliatories YET. This will change with eRLC and every entreprise in the world will fight each others for some of this token

>>23665925
i want you to stay poor too. spend all of your money on rlc, put every penny into your shitcoin. these guys have hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and will be able to take home a good salary while being in development hell forever.

>>23665931
google has their own cloud service platform and have no signs that they are interested in blockchain besides for the sake of a small investment to hold a competitive edge.

>>23665875
It creates a secure, decentralized environment where all these major data companies can share data with each other.
For the individual, it's also a supreme option since I can simply one-click sign in with Google and purchase computing power with no vendor lock in and with a single gasless txn.
iExec has streamlined and simplified the process of having on demand processing so much that I can do it instantly from the palm of my hand with no strings attached.
This is the next step for every fucking tech company; having their services this readily available, AND in a superior cost effective manner, WITH the ability to share data with eachother.
I mean we about to be RICH rich

>>23665875
It is cheaper what the fuck are you on about

>>23665971
>this amount of cope
very unhealthy

>>23666040
why are you in this thread? It makes no sense for you to be in this thread, you do realize that don't you? Except if you FUD it in order to get more... Which is most likely the reason you're here

>>23665986
but you dont NEED that. thats the definition of an unnecessary middlemen. why do these major data companies need or care about sharing data within each other? each is centralized to run all tasks independently. and for people who purchase computing power right now with the palm of your hand you can access the entire beautiful aws dashboard with a plethora of tons that are not just virtual machines. that is what people dont understand, aws, gcp and everything are not just cloud computing providers they offer a whole array of different services. iexec is trying to optimize just one thing that aws does and even still it is not a good solution.

>>23666025
it is not cheaper because you have to pay per task, this itself means that rlc will never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever be able to compete with centralized providers. it is completely absolutely retarded for someone to think that a pay per task basis is a good idea.

>>23666040
stfu

>>23666084
>thats the definition of an unnecessary middlemen

iExec takes no fees. There is no middleman idioit. Amazon google microsoft are middlemen. iExec is p2p.

YOU DONT EVVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT HAHAHAHAHAHAH STAY POOR!

Pay per task is inherently cheaper as you don't waste money on unneeded usage

>>23666084
They are not competing with centralized providers dude.
Companies literally have no reason not to list their services on the decentralized marketplace.
It's like packaging your product and putting it on the shelf at Walmart. Is Walmart a middleman? No one sees it like that.
Not to mention, dapps that use Iexec can be accessed with only ETH as the rest will be handled on iExec on the backend.
It cannot be any more practical and functional.
iExec's vision is slowly coming to fruition and eRLC is the final step.

>>23665783
is that the process mapping of NEC becoming the world reserve currency?

>>23666084
AHHHAHHAHAH SEEEETHING!
COPE, STAY POOR FUCKER AHAHAHA;
NSMDO

>>23666197
Going to rlc instead of aws is a middle men idiot fees or no fees. and pay per task is more expensive. one print hello world at one task would add up over time when I can do that close to free at an infinite amount of times on aws

>>23666242
AWS definitely wont endorse iexec in any regard by them listing their own computing power on iexec. iexec can list them and use aws and offer an enterprise tier but not the other way around.

>>23666513
AHAHAHA YOU ARE SO STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

S T A Y P O O R

>>23666513
LMAAOOAOOAOAOAO LOOOK ATA THIS RETARD; LITERALLY POINT AND LAUGHHH AKAKAKAKKAKAKA

stay poor and kys shitffuudeer ok

>>23666536
you stay poor. you probably are bagholding like a retard above 1 dollar after you got shilled to it by chico crypto. be honest, how under the water is your position?

>>23666489
stfu

>>23666513
Google will.
Google is working with EOS. They want to get involved in Blockchain.
iExec has directly talked about Google 3 different times. They were working together in the cloud computing program since before it was even public.
Think about this shit man.
And if Google joins the decentralized marketplace, Amazon will, because Amazon will do whatever it takes to stay competitive and they all know about how much money is moving on Ethereum.
You REALLY think they dont wanna tap into that?
You REALLY think iExec is releasing eRLC for no reason?
Come on man.

>>23666197
>>23666242
>>23666489
>>23666536
Seething discord faggots

>>23666564
I bought at 20 cents HAHAHAHA DIE FUDDING NIGGER ST AY POOOOOOOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>23666827
Seething? I'm euphoric because I'm not a retard and digital oil is dirt cheap right now. It's honestly unbelieveable. I just reached 10k last night.
If iExec takes 5% of the marketcap of cloud resource providing giants (the ones that have been working with iExec) at 87 million supply it means each barrel will be over $11k
10k x 11k = 110 million dollars.
You really think I'm seething? Cute.

>>23666084
>>23666513
In all honesty, you're wrong. You DO NOT pay per task. That is not true and is very false. I don't even know where you get shit like that from

The contrarian faggots always in iexec threads are so cringe
A fucking json parser is worth 10 billion dollars
Iexec is barely 50m... go find a new project to fud

The ultimate red pill is that for RLC to advertising AWS and Microsoft Cloud services without fear so openly would mean theres something there.

Also how did RLC join all these programs that all these other massive companies are in while only being a small start up? Think about it.

>>23667042
Not to mention they're the only blockchain company in these programs.
My personal opinion is that these companies don't want to show their hand and pump the price and neither does iExec.
So these program listings are the only way to show investors that they're collaborating.
On the QnA the team mentioned that they are actually working with Nvidia on GPU shit may talk about it soon. They aren't just joining the programs.
And how did iExec get in Googles program before it was even public?
There are things happening behind closed doors, it's apparent, and they're all waiting for compliancy to play ball.

>>23667143
So you think theyre buying for cheap right now ready to use RLC on the marketplace in February? Thays not great news for price action though..

>>23667042
I think the point of that demo screen was to show how much cheaper genesis mining was
The EU is trying to move away from being dependant on the US cloud providers

>>23667169
That's exactly what I think they're doing.
It's digital oil, why would they want their competitors and investors to own the supply? Where are the 70/87 million barrels currently?
The price action is a funny thing because once enterprise adoption is a confirmed reality, it's jumping straight into top 5 MC. It would be counter productive for this to happen before companies can use the marketplace.

Stop posting this IYKYK cringe pajeet tier shit
Everyone with a brain knows this is a high IQ play in crypto right now. I don't need to see indonesian shilling tactics to know this is a buy.
You make the image of this token worse when you post such low effort drivel

>>23667248
I think people are just excited to see everything start falling into place. We all know the price action on RLC is going to be incredible, and we know how much information iExec has yet to divulge on the details of aformentioned collaborations.
Interesting times indeed.

>>23667216
And, of course, will be given the red carpet treatment to get on coinbase. They deserve it over most of the listings currently on CB

NSMDO