/biz/ - Business & Finance

Probably, yes.

>>23584770

Same thing retard. We went through this yesterday. I know you know that. Go jump on the Zoracle Link fud train brainlet.

>>23584770
Probably a white label senpai.

IIN + LINK = LIINK

>>23584797
Missed yesterday, what's the QRD on Liink & Link? Are they linked?

>>23584797
>he doesnt have a bag of zoracles

IC3 IC3 BABY

I thought swift gpi = Link

What's going on? I missed yesterday

transforming neets into kangz

>>23584877
Delusional link has nothing to do with liink

>>23584870
White label product integrations fren or Sergey got royally fucked over after doing all the work.
He seems really bored in recent streams so I'm thinking lots happening he can't discussing

>>23584905
okay faggot we moon after the election

at the current stage there are a shitload of (((coincidences))) but nothing definitive
basically either we’re going to the moon or sergey just got his lunch ate

>>23584905
You do realize that Christine Moy, the global head of Liink, is in the candid paper, along with several other chainlink guys.
Not to mention JP Morgan is a part of ic3

>>23584955
Yeah I don’t think so keep thinking that ur erc20 token actually does something.

>>23584770
anon, I...

>>23584991
I’m searching but I think it’s just breadcrumbs, what happened to the swift partnership wasn’t that fake?

>>23584999
Checked

>>23585017
Oh fuck
So when $1k?

>>23585028
GPI LINK is Swift's whitelabel version of LINK just like Liink is IIN + LINK

>>23584770
no, Zoracles is about to kill LINK

finance.yahoo.com/news/zoracles-develops-next-generation-oracle-093003499.html

>>23585088
so it's like deco with a silly name?

Thank you frens. We're going to make it

>>23585088
zora's inorganic shilling is bizcode for exit scam incoming

>>23585069

even if I read that image a trillion times I wouldn't know what it said. What does it say?

>>23584999
Checked and ERC-677 Pilled

>>23585118

>>23585162
a few days ago anon said to be happy for this in relation to Liink and Chainlink and posted this image as proof before the thread died with only a few replies.

>>23584822
I have 50k Link. I'll leave the new Mobius to you faggots who are 3 years too late.

>>23585017

This is all nice but how does the Link token itself fit into all this? I don't want to end up like XRP bagholders who think Ripple=XRP.

>>23585326
I'm not informed on the matter but I have a feeling the token is not involved.

>>23585326
it's the same network. It's like asking how fiat currency fits into the MasterCard/visa system when they have their own internal float (credit money denominated in fiat)
Link is the same through adaptors to denominate link into fiat but link is the native erc 677 token with the features that allows chainlink to work.

>>23585326
>>23585426
Every single use of third-party oracles will require Link tokens.
Why are you even asking this?

>>23585430

Thanks anon. I always think negatively about this stuff because Link sounds so huge sometimes that it sounds to good to be true.

>>23584770
Do cars kill Bridgestone?

Do you guys actually think jpm is going to be down to pump a bunch of autist permavirgin's bags and not just get sergey to implement their own private network and pay HIM (key word) a service fee/commission?

>>23585440
cope
the token will be a legacy feature when they give weth and other tokens transferandcall functionality

>>23585472
They're literally as bad as XRP bagholders. Of course they don't understand.

>>23585430
source?

>>23585451
The problem is a misunderstanding of the old systems. Not all money is the same regardless if it's "all usd" or whatever fiat. If you work for a bank you know the difference between credit money and cheques for example. They have different functions too but their limitations are accepted as dogma whereas crypto has so many copies it's difficult to keep track of.
I'd avoid copies as a rule of thumb regardless of the problems with first mover advantage.

>>23585497
>cope
With what?

>when they give weth and other tokens transferandcall functionality
Anyone can make a token with that. Doesn't mean you can use it in the Chainlink network.

>>23585517
you want a source on money being different by function? has /biz/ fallen this far?

>>23585517
Link node operators are paid in Link. Like how ETH is gas, link is gas

>>23585612
Now, let that sink into the Ganges.

>Liink
how is that even legal

>>23585612
technically link is both eth and gas

>>23585517
>retard asks for source
>is sauced a random medium article written by joe blow
>”aww this suffices my desires”

First of all, FUCK OFF back to plebbit, second of all, /biz/ is a source. Cunt

Look, all I'm getting from this is JP Morgan is using Link to power it's banks. Time to fucking buy.

>>23585638
they just misspelled

>>23585742
This is one of millions of possibilities. We just win

>>23585440
>>23585612
You guys are going to end up just like XRP. There are what, 12 nodes in TOTAL on the link network? And of those, only about 3 honest ones that provide their own market data?
You really think they’re going to pay NEETs billions of dollars instead of just asking those nodes to accept other forms of payment? Be real. They can cut you out and save $5b, and you know they’d cut you out if it saved them $1.

>>23586020
Vrf

>>23586020
According to the great reset, many individuals will be retrained and reskilled away from repetitive work that will be automated so yes lots of people will get involved in node operation or invest in nodes as a service because they missed link.
And there are more than twelve nodes. They have to provide honest data or be blacklisted and banned from the network.

>>23585118
no, it's not even close
>>23585156
kek
I hope you actually believe that

>>23586020
>There are what, 12 nodes in TOTAL on the link network?
117

>And of those, only about 3 honest ones that provide their own market data?
What?
"honest"?
"their own market data"??
What the fuck are you talking about?

>You really think they’re going to pay NEETs billions of dollars instead of just asking those nodes to accept other forms of payment?
Why does it matter what anyone is paid in?
Tons of users will hardly know they even used Link tokens, that's the magic of smart contracts.
But the Link tokens are indeed the unavoidable standard for the network's staking/compensation backend.

>They can cut you out and save
Whenever they want to use third-party oracles, they'll have to pay in Link tokens (knowingly or otherwise).
Whether they'll use need nodes or not is irrelevant to this.

>>23586020
> other forms of payment
Yeah I wrote about this above. Link is the native unit of account for the network. You can have an adaptor for other units of account but they will just be converted to LINK.
Token not needed faggots have been spamming that shit since the beginning and they have no idea how clearing works on the other side of the ledger in traditional systems so they think its all usd when it's not.

>>23586276
>need nodes
*neet nodes

>>23586230
Provide a substantial usecase argument or fuck off. I'm not reading any links. You explain it if you're so bullish on it.

>>23586276
>>23586292
> 69cash ID
nice ID bro

>>23586307
nah

>>23586329
fucking ace

>>23584991
Seems more likely that they are stealing LINK's ideas than becoming partners

>>23586491
> can't explain own investment beyond scammy one liners
smart choice bro you wish people gave a shit about your project but you pay jeets to copy paste "features" and recite satagang shill lines.
> dyor
> buy now or stay poor

>>23586572
So it's a shadowfork?

>>23586572
>using tech literally owned by Chainlink
>"stealing ideas"

So wrong on so many levels.

>>23586589
you realize you're talking to someone else?

m8 you need to learn about ids

>>23586572
>>23586594
Right now this appears to be the case — JPMCoin runs on Quorum, which was acquired by ConsenSys, but there’s no evidence to suggest it’s anything but a closed loop yet
The DECO/Town Crier in CanDID thing actually points to this as the most distinct possibility: >>23585472
I’m still holding my bags for as long as I can though, I’m currently all-in and not about to eat a loss

>>23586614
no you're all from the same shill discord.
>>23586307
>Provide a substantial usecase argument or fuck off. I'm not reading any links. You explain it if you're so bullish on it.
still waiting

>>23584999
The trips of logic have spoken. Imagine not realising LINK prices are between 20 minutes and 6 hours behind real-time. What a waste

>>23584770
**ATTENTION ALL NEW FAGS**
THIS IS A SCAM. THIS THREAD IS FULL OF CURRYMUNCHERS

where do I buy this on uniswap

>>23585472
>>23586634
>their own private network

You're retarded.
Any Link user can set up "their own private network".

How are we three years into /biz/ being a Link board when completely oblivious fags like you still post nonsense like this?

>>23586666
chekd

I bought some Chainlink today (20 tokens) and I smelled my Ledger...and it definitely isn’t “stinky.” There is basically no smell at all...

Did I get ripped off? I often hear people saying that their Chainlink tokens stay stinky. How do I know if my Chainlink tokens are counterfeit? My gf doesn’t smell anything either...

And if my tokens are legit...it’s seems unlikely to me that they will be $1K EOY.

I saw all the reviews “My linky stays stinky, $1KEOY.”

Is there some sort of customer service number for Chainlink?

-Paul

>>23585044
Checked, $1k is inevitable

>>23586679
I’ll admit I’m retarded and late to the game, but that’s why I’m trying to figure it out with constructive bullying
the permissioned network shows no ties to link beyond breadcrumbs right now, it seems to be an entirely closed loop on JPM’s own blockchain with only accredited institutions gaining access without any need for external nodes
Isn’t that exactly why the entire board has been speculating on Moon or Hell for the past two days?
>inb4 xrp fud ripplefags get the bullet too

>>23586723
the final step is to stick your ledger (after loading it with link coins) into your anus. that should decentralise your Oracle if you know what I'm saying.

>>23586654
>Imagine not realising LINK prices are between 20 minutes and 6 hours behind real-time.

Look up meta oracles.
https://blog.chain.link/introducing-chainlinks-meta-oracle-capabilities-for-defi/
"By allowing users to actively prevent pricing inefficiency/slippage through a common method of traditional financial markets, pricing bands, Chainlink's meta oracles can provide a way to define just how much price difference between an on-chain liquidity pool's price and the larger off-chain market's true price a user would be willing to accept"

Not to mention the fact that Maker's oracle has a one-hour delay built in as well, and for a reason. It allows for an emergency shutdown in case of trouble.

>>23586822
Permissioned or not, closed loop or not, ... it does not matter for oracles, which work off-chain.

And I guess you could call this: >>23585017
"breadcrumbs", if you really want.

>>23584770
>he doesnt know how to connect the dots
lol ngmi

>>23584877
Chekt for truth

>>23586020
>You really think they’re going to pay NEETs billions of dollars instead of just asking those nodes to accept other forms of payment?

Yes, because it gives the illusion that this is just market forces at work. The only way they can obliterate 30+ million high paying office drone jobs without causing a massive political and social crisis is by making it appear to be self-directed. A 5 billion dollar payout or w/e pays for itself in the first year, and actually the move probably makes them money since it's inflating an asset they also held.

worst case scenario that this is bad news. Can we get at least a x5 from here on other use cases like DEFI?

>>23585028
Do you even know what breadcrumbs are?

>>23586608
>using tech literally owned by Chainlink

You have no evidence of that.

You really think big corporations are going to come out and announce Chainlink - bruh - hardly anyone knows wtf chainlink is - 3 years and we’re still early as fuck. 1000 EOY is fud

>>23585217
Link to this thread?

>>23587474
also they will end up with the link when neets buy nouveau riche trinkets from globohomo manufacturing subsidiaries

>>23586761
Paul Allen.. ?

*I've got to get in this "Link" thing now*

>>23585217
>>23587687
>>23488627

Band is dead. Those bags must be heavy. Really heavy

>>23584770
>Luuuke did I ever tell you about Liink? It killed Link and it was a good fren.

bump

>>23584910
White Label vs Private Label – What’s the Difference?
We’re going to settle the White Label vs Private Label debate once and for all. White Label and Private Label are often used interchangeably. However, there is a difference which most people don’t understand. Some people will say that “Private Label” has to do with products and that “White Label” has to do with services. But this assertion that one term has to do with products and the other does not is incorrect. We know this because of the etymology of the word White Label: “The name derives from the image of a white label on the packaging that can be filled in with the marketer’s trade dress. Its origins can be traced to white label promo vinyl records.” So, we see that Private Label is not exclusive to products.

>>23584859
lyl @ that picture

1k eoy

Liink is a fork of Link.

>>23584770
yes, sergey is furious right now

>>23584859

Brilliant remix of a classic

>>23587614
Except JPMorgan is literally mentioned in the header of the CanDID paper.
See >>23585017

>>23584985
((()))?

>>23584770
No. DIA is a better spec hodl tho.

>>23592629
They funded the study
Their current head of blockchain was an author of it, she’s been working at JPMC for 17 years
Read the paper yourself retard
Anon is right, there’s no direct implication that LINK will be used, just a huge opportunity if the permissioned system uses outside oracles

>>23593539
>They funded the study
And why would they do that?

Why does this thread even exist? So FUD is the entire banking information network merging to use Link oracles? It'd be more effective to post shit like "ha industry standard is 11.70" fucking idiots

>>23593591
Because one of their blockchain devs was being groomed to replace John Hunter and that’s how Moy got the promotion
>https://www.linkedin.com/in/christine-moy-b6109164
Same investment as paying for an executive’s mba

>>23593658
Talk about reaching lmao