/biz/ - Business & Finance

I just saw that Kamala Harris' press secretary is the head of communications at Twitter, if that I true the world is absolutely fucked. Also they censored the leak from biden's corruption, but then let Trumps leaked taxes goes trending. I think twitter has a large legal trouble coming

Better buy a vpn soon boys if you're on Bidens shitlist the libs will be coming with torches and pitchforks soon

Isn't it up to twitter who they can ban?

>>23304484
Not unless they want to start taking responsibility for what they don't ban.

>>23304536
what do you have in mind?

or rather who

>>23303828
twetch.app
>nooo muh faketoshi
don't worry they hate him there too

>>23303828
Twitter, Facebook and google all censor the truth and are openly blatant about it.

Fuck the internet if it can’t be free.

is there any platforms competing vs twitter/

>>23304566
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/twitter-needs-to-decide-if-its-a-platform-or-a-publisher
You don't remember people talking about this shit a few months ago?

Ohhh fuck, the redditor influx was bad enough

>>23303828
Cant wait for jack to go to jail

>>23304960
ikr, fucking faggots and niggers flooding here from every corner of the goddamned normienet.

>>23304919
no i am new to twitter and only follow crypto shit, will read this though

>>23305045
Never forget that this too is the fault of JEWISH tech and media moguls.
Look into it.

>>23305560
i don't buy into most conspiracy theories or whatever you want to call them

>>23303828
They are preparing to nuke all social media platforms.

Twitter CEO Fag Dorsi has been called to testify in front of the Senate judiciary commitee next friday as well.

>>23306039
Buckle up, the next 2 weeks will be fucking nuts.

>>23306039
will this affect youtube as well?

>>23305600
>still thinking those who rule you are honest
ngmi

>>23306280
i don't think they are honest, just that most conspiracies imply control over the world i don't think is possible. they may have enormous influence but not precise control.

>>23306154
Yes, any "interactive computer service".

>Section 230 says that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" (47 U.S.C. § 230). In other words, online intermediaries that host or republish speech are protected against a range of laws that might otherwise be used to hold them legally responsible for what others say and do. The protected intermediaries include not only regular Internet Service Providers (ISPs), but also a range of "interactive computer service providers," including basically any online service that publishes third-party content.

If they nuke this regulation, it means every social media company will be legally liable for ANYTHING that is hosted on their platform, including everything any user uploads. The ramifications are massive.

HOWEVER

I have a suspicion that the FCC is going to revamp the law instead of scrapping it entirely, that is, to strengthen the obligation not to censor for political reasons. Right now the language is very vague and is more like a guideline rather than a strict provision, so the tech companies doesn't give a fuck.

>>23306495
>it means every social media company will be legally liable for ANYTHING that is hosted on their platform, including everything any user uploads
Jannies on suicide watch

>>23306596
kek
>>23306495
seems really big, so do you think they will step down with politically discriminatory bans? it seems like they would have to depending on how they change the legislation

>>23306495
but wouldn't that also kill this site?

>>23306713
probably only this site. any laws the globalist establishment passes only apply to free speech zones/actual right-of-center conduct, they don't apply to centrist establishment/left/far left/communists/etc. literally, 4chan will be targeted, and twitter/reddit/facebook/etc will continue censoring per usual and being flooded with cp because they are leftist and if you're leftist anything you do is O.K.

>>23304617
>Twitter, Facebook and google
>the internet
Hahahahaha normies get what they deserve

>>23306713
I imagine they would move to a ruleset similar to cripplech*ns and only ban things illegal in the US. Unironically an improvement to current moderation (like the /tv/ jannies being no fun allowed SJW trannies and the /int/ jannies hypersensitive weebs and russian shills)

>>23303828
should had used gnu social get cucked faggot NIGGER

4chan seems like the last place to be hurt by this.this is the most free speech oriented of the platforms , no?

>>23306697
To be honest, the way things are right now, any change to the law would have no effect in reality. Democrats/liberals can ignore any and all laws without consequence anyway, so even if the law is revised and they find themselves in a situation where their blatant censorship is in direct violation of a statute, they will simply continue to censor.

Why? Well, because they are never held accountable for their crimes anyway. If the Trump admin is not going to prosecute anyone for anything, then a stricter law is meaningless. No accountability means bad behavior continues.

It's too late anyway because nothing will change before november 3rd which is all that matters. If Trump wins, all these cunts like Dorsey go to jail for sedition, insurrection and treason regardless of any change to CDA 230.

>>23306784
Maybe in 2007

I think the stock market has decided trump will win. When something bad happens to Biden it pumps, when something bad happens to trump it dumps

>>23306808
compared to 2007 4chan, it's less free yes. but 4chan still makes these other platforms look like a joke when it comes anonymity and freedom of speech

>>23303828
>scientific evidence against the lockdowns
LMAOOO OP is an idiot that deserved to get banned

>>23306806
I can't wait to give Palantir more of my sheckles.

>>23303828
anti-science weirdos should be round up and shot (*through legal channels).

>>23306039
It was fucking 3 paragraphs long when it only needed to be the last 2 sentences. God i hate chitty pie soooo much.

>>23306957
t. Anti science weirdo who doesn't undedstand the scientific method

>>23304983

He looks like he loves cock, big black cheesy dick.