/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23235259
Rather poor fud.
Your main problem is no one cares about Ocean other than holders. Whereas everyone is gaining an interest in Quant due to recent news and the RealVision interview with Gilbert tomorrow.
Sorry brainlet, will not pass muster.

>>23235427

Not a single pay-for-play partnership with amazon/oracle and the rest of the abandoned portals will make up for the lack of adoption.

I just showed you that Quant Network is an abandoned shitcoin scam whose CEO is a pathological liar who previously failed at 3-4 businesses.
You are invested in a CV....

Meanwhile, Ocean has partnered with Roche, Daimler, United Nations, European Commission, contributed to paper with World Economic Forum, partnered with IBM on Xprize, Zuhlke. They are being shilled by the Berlin senate and the biggest banks in the world. Also recognized by Accenture, KPMG, Deloitte (CEO of Deloitte blockchain division shilled Ocean in a Quant conference ROFL) and have been working with PwC.
They are working with BMW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea5XEzKSRjY&feature=youtu.be&t=1356and with most of the giants in the automotive business via MOBI Consortium which was created after the work between Ocean Protocol and Toyota.
And there's plenty more that I probably left out.

>>23235469
Kek, this is a gypsy thread now.

>>23235503
Nobody cares about Ocean.
All eyes are on Quant. They are the ones working with Intel and MIT to integrate blockchain into the Internet.

>>23235531

The story of the whole IERC document

"An informative reference is not normative; rather, it only provides additional information. For example, an informative reference might provide background or historical information. Informative references are not required to implement the technology in the RFC. "

Hundreds of papers are being released on IETF on a daily basis. They usually expire after a while after being ignored completely

Make the switch to Ocean Protocol and stop embarrassing yourself

>>23235610
Nobody cares about Ocean.
This is a Quant board now.

>>23235638

It's an Ocean board because Quant doesn't even exist. Nobody gives a fuck about that illiquid IDEX shitcoin with 0 real usage. You can't refute the hard facts, you monkey, no matter how hard you try

You guys do know that Armenia is at war with Azerbaijan right now and you are literally just waiting for the exit scam

No one is using Ocean. If it were in use, the smart contract would not have been switched off as easily.

>>23235694
Anon, you can’t even speak English.
I don’t understand what you are trying to say.

>>23235736

No one is using Ethereum. If it were in use, the smart contract would not have been switched off as easily.

DAO hack.

>>23235748

Most likely because you're an imbecile

>>23235760
Kek, what a freak show of a thread.

>>23235774

I understand how it's like to find that your favorite shitcoin (Quant) is nothing but a hyped up money grab. Those stats are basically showing you the real deal. Everything else posted on these boards is nothing but emotional bullshit coming from dumbasses like you who know fucking nothing about tech and adoption.

Ocean Protocol bless

>>23235760
The dao hack was in 2016 - you’re right no one was using ethereum back then. You are claiming Ocean is being used globally by enterprise, but it’s impossible these companies would agree to switch off the contract and disrupt their workflows because of a hack. No one is using Ocean.

>>23235853
That’s the gypsy truth.
Nobody is using Ocean.
Nobody really cares desu.

>>23235853

Ethereum was at $1B market cap when the DAO hack happened

Kill yourself, dumbass :)

>>23235877

Even though the retarded monkey sees this picture, the retarded monkey continues with the delusional claims. He's contradicting the reality

>>23235885
What’s does marketcap have to do with usage you dumb fuck? Using your logic, XRP, BCH, LTC are the top most used coins.

>>23235259
OP, if you’re wondering where you can buy QNT, check:

Bittrex, CoinMetro, Idex, Uniswap.

Probably best to grab a stack ASAP as the price is about to explode.

>>23235920
Yes exactly. Silly argument.

Didn’t most of the Ocean team quit the project a few months after raising 30 million from the ICO?

lmao. A comparison for a project that is predominately closed source and works in the private enterprise industry (and selects random points from the SDK Bundle) and a project that has an open source nature is flawed from the start. But nice try, not sure why you are even inciting a war. lol

>>23235933
>price is about to explode.
when anon?

>>23235920
>>23235939

You are a stupid motherfucker if you think that I will go back to 2016 to track all the ERC-20 ICO's and adoption coming from enterprise just so I can prove you that Ethereum was much bigger than Ocean at the time.

GTFO

>>23236017
Sooner rather than later, fren.
I think Gilbert’s appearance on RealVision tomorrow could kick off price discovery as the boomer high net worths start buying.
Seems the likeliest catalyst.

>>23235638
>>23235694
>>23235610
Here's what I see...
$10 Quant
$.35 Ocean
Where is I be make money here?
Hmmmm.

>>23236069
i have 0 qnt anon :(
don't have money

>>23235980
OP was a Quant holder for 2 years. He sold his stack due to impatience and then started a FUD campaign on biz.

>>23236124
this has to be bait..
anon you're joking, right?

>>23235748
There was literally no grammatical problems whatsoever with what he wrote.

>>23235503
>listing 100 partnerships
Smells like a 2018 ICO scam

Why compare the two anyway? Different use cases, different target audience

>>23236158
I have money already. I am interested in moon shots.
There is already two orders of magnitude there...
There is a cap to how much these things will be worth.

>>23236179
you have no idea how this market works
they BOTH have a mcap of
$128,181,380 USD
qnt is rank 79 and ocean is 78...

there are 0 orders of magnitude anon
you NEED to read up on supply and how it affects price

>>23236212
When I invest there is moron.
one is two orders of magnitude more expense.
1.5 really, But if they are COMPARABLE...
Then...

>>23236212
nice id

>>23236241
Im actually going to stop what im doing right now to explain this to you

qnt mcap
127,130,431
qnt supply
12,072,738

Ocean mcap
128,418,408
Ocean supply
359,137,273

mcap divided with supply = coin price
127,130,431 / 12,072,738 = 10.53

lets try finding out the real price of Ocean
128,418,408 /12,072,738 = 10.63

see?

and now both prices if they had the mcap of eth

43,614,319,194 /12,072,738 = $3612 for qnt
43,614,319,194 /359,137,273 = $121 for ocean

>>23236320
Woah lad.
Let’s get to $1000 QNT first, then we can shoot for $3k and above.

>>23236163
Some sort of grudge between anons

>>23236340
literally never said it would have eth's mcap, can you not read

>>23236163
>>23236353
I heard of both before they mooned, considered buying in, but didn't. Fml. Still holding a huge bag of QNT now. Please let this shit actually appreciate in value and me be an early adopter with potential for amazing gains (>100x), even if I am not smart money (>1000x)...

>>23236353
OP and his supporters in this thread are bitter ex-Quant holders. They ditched QNT for Ocean and now can’t afford to buy back into QNT.
They fud QNT daily in a ludicrous attempt to drive down the price.
It’s really eating them up, kek.

>>23236377
You’re going to make it fren.

>>23236212
I said cap, not market cap.
Coins will not be worth infinitely much and your math is based on basically nothing but speculation.

>>23236433
>your math is based on basically nothing but speculation
it was a fucking example, again, i never said any of this will happen, i just explained it this way

>>23236392
Logically I feel as if I should. Doubly so if all the ideas such as qualcomc/intel chip integration and the odap protocol become reality. Hard to see projects like cosmos at #20 and Quant so low. Feels like it's easily the best bang for the buck investment in crypto that has obviously been kept under the radar for reasons of accumulation. Should be top 10 or higher... Also looking at >>23237018

>>23235259
npm download numbers are almost worthless since a bunch of mirrors will basically pull anything. it's comical that Ocean's garbage at least gets more pulls though.

>>23235259
hey don, take cobra's cock out of your mouth and maybe you'll be able to see the charts more clearly, also, see
>>23237086

>>23235503
seethe, retard

>>23235503

This is cringe tier 2017 shilling of a million meme partnerships that mean absolutely nothing.

Quant is a whole different animal and you'd be better off comparing ocean to someone else that's more on its level.


There's every chance ocean will make it to 1bn cap one day but it is not a quant tier coin in terms of legitimacy or real world acceptance and approval. Nothing has come close.

Go look at all the "partnerships" of similar chink vaporware like ven and the list is identical. It means nothing.

There are some things money can't buy in crypto, and that's where quant is operating. Can you really imagine Bruce Ponzi sitting down at a table with central bankers like Gil (someone post the picture) or being THE ONLY crypto at sibos, or THE ONLY coin to get on real vision?

Quant is on a new level altogether which makes it hard for some anons to understand. Ocean is a pumpy scammy popular crypto-style project whose CEO tweets price news and who is playing the "burn, swap, exchange" hype ladder game.

Quant is not even playing your game. Pick another coin the compare with to avoid embarrassment.

The only reason they get compared so much is that all ocean holders are former quanties and they need to prevent quant from outpacing it to avoid suicide.

>>23236380
I didn't ask you

>>23237152
I'm throwing away my Yu-Gi-Oh cards, as well watching me around the city is illegal. Watching the Amazing world of gumball is not illegal as well. As well back when I was underage, the act of looking at 18+ content was a matter of maturity when it came to death and violence but porn was a matter of the law but the law couldn't punish said actions as the result was just a responsible man who did no harm.

>>23237179
>Quant is a whole different animal

You are getting emotional and forgetting the statistics.

>>23237189
Now you know you can safely buy more QNT kek.

Also SIBOS offers packages for up to 15000 euros :))))

Gilbert @QNT paid for that shit because he's a master at pumping and dumping. No other crypto project would burn that amount of money to attend there and do completely fucking nothing

>>23237179
>THE ONLY coin to get on real vision?

Bruce and Trent are busy appearing in documentaries made by Arte Group which has tens of millions of viewers around the world.
https://www.arte.tv/de/videos/086942-000-A/internet-macht-zukunft/
https://vimeo.com/452863983

And when they're not in documentaries, then they are participating at European Commission data-related challenges. :))))

>>23237584
It’s not the same as RealVision.
They have money in the game so they only pick the best - like Quant.

>>23235259
i feel sorry for you OP, you're retarded beyond saving. if i were you i would just kms. goodluck with your life man. you're gonna need it.

>>23237229
>You are getting emotional and forgetting the statistics.

This is where we differ - I'm in this to make money. That's all.

Ocean is a piece of shit but I made 4.7x from it this year while QNT did nothing. That's called putting your emotions aside and picking the winner at the time.

Now Ocean is 6 weeks into what will likely be a 6mo+ bear period and I wouldn't touch it with a bargepole.

The time to buy was before it broke 1000 sats on the way up.

>>23237254
>No other crypto project would burn that amount of money to attend there

Ah yes other teams COULD have done that... they just didn't want to.

>>23237584

Still going to dump.


Here's the problem with you baghunters: you've only ever been in bull periods.

Donnie, you started in crypto not much over a year ago and all you've ever known is bull. Quant bull, bitcoin/eth bull, ocean bull, EWT, KSM, DOT... BULL BULL BULL.

You think that this is how it has to carry on continually, but you're mistaken.

All your coins have gone bear now and you don't understand why. Muh staking, muh v3, muh Trent the genius!!!

You're going to stress yourself out big time if you keep trying to swim against the current.

Screaming about shill points works when the TA is set up right and it's "ready to pop". On the way down it does absolutely nothing.

NOTHING could have kept bitcoin going up after December 2017, no amount of shilling in the world. The same very much applies to alts.

> money
> token loyalty

pick one

>>23237724

1st - I'm not Donnie
2nd - You went full bullshit mode. Reeks of desperation, but understandable since you're now invested in an illiquid abandoned garbage which is stuck on IDEX since forever. You can't even cash out to get back to the real chad project, Ocean.

>>23237795
Kek, someone put this guy out of his misery.
He’s so low-IQ he probably wouldn’t even notice.

>>23237795
Must be Valentin then

>>23237795
Post a selfie for us again to prove it’s you :)

Quant github is dead as fuck lol.

Imagine being on /biz/, in turn way ahead the curve of everyone else, then finding this GEM being shilled amongst all the food shitcoins and scams, but still not buying even a suicide stack. Not gonna fucking make it...

>>23238077
That is why most of us are all in on LINK.
???

what a pajeet thread, i feel disgusted

I think i picked the wrong one. I need to poorly fud qnt to buy back in at 3 bucks.
Back to sucking dicks

>>23238173
Link was ahead of the curve. Now it's being shilled by soccer moms on Twitter. Personally, I sold some of my link to get in on the ground floor of quant.

Supply of ocean is for retards. And cz will meep dumping until binance goes under

>>23238244
Nigger Quant is literally going nowhere just look at the fucking github.

>>23238344
It will go literally everywhere. 100 banks went live on Spunta today, btw. But you choose to stay poor. Strange to see, considering you bought link early. Maybe it was but dumb luck?

Gagik here, ask your questions regarding Armenian diaspora

>>23238464
Oh nice "partnerships". Refute the empty github or shut the fuck up pajeet.

>>23238577
> in it for the github

>>23238702
Oh so now development doesn't even matter lol okay.

>>23238577
Not sure what you mean. QNT isn't open source...

>>23238776
>>23238577
As a matter of fact, this is why coinbase (or binance?) won't list it. And Quant has no interest in showing its code to CZ and his scamance exchange.

>>23238776
Oooh I see, so why the fuck do they even have a github to begin with?

>>23238905
Private repos... How are you even allowed to be on the internet without supervision?

>>23238824
Or Kraken, Bitstamp, Bitfinex, Huobi, OKEx, Kucoin etc

>>23238945
Great. So where is the progress? Where do we stand right now? Cause you know, private repo or not you should still be able to see shit like that. So?

>>23236320
Thanks for the math
t. brainlet who bought some QNT yesterday

>>23239064
Obviously hidden. I don't know why you're even worried about development progress not being transparent when the team and all the people involved have such legit credentials. Imagine thinking that the founder of ISO307, a prominent member of INATBA would rugpull..

It's like a part of you wants to be convinced how legit the project is, but you've been hurt by scams and now you think everything is a scam.

>>23239283
i hold qnt but i dont know why you WOULDNT care about transparency and choose to just blindly trust credentials without dyor facts about your investments. its not impossible for people with great credentials to rugpull tens of millions as a nice way to end professional career and fuck off to some tropical island for the rest of their lives

>>23239437
This
>>23239283
Well LINK has both transparency AND legit credentials. If that's the best defense you can come up with, I'm out. Thanks for confirming my suspicions anons. Godspeed

>>23239502
Odds are he could have sold his company and overledger / the patents for way more already. But as has already been said... Your success with Link was just a fluke...

>>23239502
Apparently you're a dev that only cares about github progress. Guess the project is not for you then. Don't mind the papers they released not too long ago, or the most significant implementation in crypto (SIA) that was confirmed during the summer. Throw away your ticket to financial freedom anon. Do it!

>>23239720
>as has already been said
By you. Projections, assumptions. Opinion disregarded.
>>23239733
Nah, I just prefer my crypto bags to be decentralized and at the very least transparent. You do you, I do me.

>>23239767
Quant is hyper-decentralised.
Chainlink has, what, 26 super nodes? Hardly decentralised.
Ofc, the benefit of open source is it can be cloned. Say yellow to SushiLink kek.

>>23238344
Kek, these deranged Ocean fags that can’tt even keep up with the news.
SIA’s Spunta app went live today with over a hundred banks.
Hundreds of millions of transactions since March.
Billions of transactions of bandwidth.
Quant is in a league of its own.

>>23239928
>Network effect
>first mover advantage
>myriads of partnerships&integrations cause you fags salivate over that shit
>continuous development
>wef technology pioneer for 2020
>bsn
>InterWork Alliance
>t-mobile
>korean banks
Good luck trying to fork it though, just like BANDaid protocol.

QNT is CLEARLY a Scam... Ocean is legit

Who gives a fuck about them both? Focused on Dfinance listing next week. That's all that fucking matters

>>23239999
Yet the token has zero volume, no liquidity, zero price action. Nice.

>>23239999

"hyper decentralized" :)))))))))))

hahahahahaahahah

>>23240009
None of this stacks up against Quant, desu.
You do know Chainlink’s open source nature can work against it when it comes to enterprise?
They want someone to call and sue when the time comes. They would rather pay for proprietary solutions for critical infrastructure.
Don’t get me wrong, LINK is cool, but the real gains are to be made holding QNT.

>>23240127
Get with the program. Your knowledge of Quant is out of date,

>>23240188

You are an embarrassment to this thread. Fuck, you're making me cringe like no other has ever done it before

You must be Oli or Muscular, the dumbest and the most tech-illiterate QNT bag holders of them all

>>23235259
SAGE

>>23240157
>They would rather pay for proprietary solutions
Oldest FUD in the book, like check the archives this is 2018tier. Absolutely embarrassing.
So your argument is that LINK is just cool as opposed to QNT being super cool. Nice. I'll stick with plain cool for now.

>>23240255
It’s not fud. It’s the reality of enterprise.
Open source isn’t valued in the business world like you think it is.

>>23240237
Calm the fuck down.
Take a deep breath, buy some QNT and all will be well.

>>23240237
Wtf I'm muscular and I'm not dumb

At least I hold QNT

>>23240327
>open source bad hurr durr
I can smell the desperation from here. Perhaps try informing these guys.
https://interwork.org/membership/members/

>>23240397
It’s ok for the world not to match your ideals, anon.
It’s part of growing up to come to terms with this reality.

>>23240397

Activity on Chainlink vs activity on that scamware Quant

I mean, is there anything else to add ?

>>23240454
Nigger try disputing me with FACTS for once. Go on. So far your arguments are
>open source bad
>transparency not required
>exchanges, volume, liquidity are irrelevant
and literally your response to this >>23240009
was
>None of this stacks up against Quant
So far you have nothing.

>>23240009
And billions of market cap for a simple price feed token whereas qnt overledger network will be the implementation of odap, probably having its gateways find their way into Intel / qualcomm chips, etc. Banks are also only one vertical of Quant.

>>23240495
I’m digging all these Quant threads kept alive by retards.
Quant’s profile on /biz has risen maybe 10x in recent weeks.
Dunno why Gilbert is hiring more marketing people, he could just rely on Ocean fags to do the job.

>>23240531
One word brainlet: ODAP.

>>23240495
No that doesn't count because it is not open source and transparency in general is overrated.
Keep up with the thread.
>>23240537
>one vertical
Learn to write properly pajeet.
>>23240547
There you go again refuting nothing.
>>23240587
Once again zero arguments except ODAP. By the way could you provide any fucking sauce on that shit? Because except from twitter shill posting there is literally nothing else.

>>23240659
>he doesn't know about ODAP

>>23240659

ODAP doesn't exist. It's an idea published on IETF, a place where everyone can submit a paper. It's an informational paper that doesn't hold any weight and which will expire in a few months from now, like other thousands of papers that are submitted there on a daily basis.

Nothing to do with adoption or usage. Just more bullshitting

>>23240738
One word brainlet: ODAP.

>>23240709
Do you? What is it then? Any reliable sources?
Are you idiots even trying anymore?

>>23236261
top kek

>>23240802
One word brainlet: MIT.

>>23240777
Ok you're either braindead, pajeet with pis poor reading comprehension or a fucking bot.

>>23240802

He will be back in a few minutes with a copy paste. He has to consult with the head of the shills first because he doesn't know anything about the project on a tech level

>>23240837
Yes just like the twitter posts. Any more info?

>>23240659
Verticals Quant is targeting:
>1. Supply chain and logistics
( Retail chains)
>2. Healthcare and Pharma interoperability
>3. Multi chain digital asset industry + wealth management firms
>4. Traditional finance (exchanges + derivatives)
>5. Identity ( excluding KYC)
>6. RegTech ( AML/KYC)
>7. Taxation and Auditing
>8. Crime Agencies
>9. Legal Tech
>10. Multi chain smart contracts (needs to be kept separate)
>11. Wearable and IoT industry
>12. Enterprise Operations Analytics. ( SeeQ)
>13. Energy and power industry
>14. Airline industry
>15. Cybersecurity
>16. Artificial intelligence and User Entity Behaviour Analytics.
>17. Connecting Legacy systems and networks
>18. Telecommunication industry ( Telstra, Swisscom)
>19. Military intelligence and security
>20. STO Market ( something like Securitize)
>21. Remitance and Cross border trade
>22. Music and Intellectual Property
>23. Insurance tech interoperability (B3i, ACORD Standards etc.)
>24. Fashion and Clothing
>25. Open Banking and PSD2
>26. Metals and Mining
>27. Trade Finance
And it (ovn / odap) will be /the standard/.

>>23240869
Getting rich takes some work anon.
Why don’t you research ODAP yourself to get ahead of the crowd.
Kek.

>>23240909
>targeting
>aims
>literally the white paper of every shitcoin, ever
Nigger that's all fine and dandy but if I ask you for some reliable sources that indicate active development over all this why do I get the feeling that you're not going to provide them?
>>23240970
"The burden of proof is usually on the person who brings a claim in a dispute". That's you.
Why do you fags can't seem to back up your claims with solid facts? It's either pastas,ad hominems, strawmans and completely avoiding the issue.

>>23240970
BTW I'm already up 7000% thanks to LINK. What about you anon?

>>23241090
One word brainlet: Intel.

>>23241131
I'm up on link (was in since 20 cent), sold this summer, outpaced link 4x, and am now in qnt.

>>23241131
Sold all my LINK for QNT.
So I’ll probably do 7 million%.
What a timeline, kek.

>>23241164
No proof, no source just one liners. Here let me try.
Three(3) words brainlet: Fourth Industrial Revolution
One(1) more word brainlet: Derivatives
>>23241166
>Avoiding the issue
Just keep those fallacies coming fags KEK

>129 posts
>35 posters
>40 of these posts are two fags who fail miserably to justify their position on an illiquid shitcoin
>22 posts by (me)
Alright thread is dead none is coming to back you up I'm out.

>>23241281
LINK won’t be used for derivatives.
QNT will be, though.
You need to research more.
Sad!

>>23241379
>source: trust me bro
Okay saged and filtered

>>23235877
checked and truepilled

>>23237795
LOOK AT THIS DUUUDE
>>OHHOH NONO NOO

>>23235259
Hello gypsy

>>23240237
foolish

>>23240659
Your shit fud doesn't need refuting jeet, see >>23240909

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CHs4x2uqcQ

>>23241830
see>>23241090
For the last time you braindead mongoloids.
Where is the PROOF
>inb4 ODAP hurrr durrr

>>23241773
G

>>23241926
What proof do you want? If you want proof that everything will have unfolded, then wait 5 years and buy my qnt for $5k each.

>>23235503
Where’s the proof of working with Daimler?

My godcoin is superior to your shitcoin. If you don’t agree than you’re obviously retarded. Fight me slime.

Always love a quant fud thread

>>23242392

Daimler Marketplace built on Ocean.

Also, coindesk article
https://www.coindesk.com/mercedes-maker-daimler-tests-blockchain-for-supply-chain-data-sharing

Go kill yourself now

conclusion of thread: Quant is better. Oceanfags BTFO'd

>>23242392

Also,

This is Hartmut Mueller, Vice President IT Technology & Cross Functions at Daimler (Mercedes) shilling Ocean Protocol on Linkedin

>>23242808
sure bud. they're both shitcoins on the verge of mooning hard. the quamfy lounge is a cringe neckbeard shithole and the ocean crew is a wild festival bunch. both degenerates of their own standard. both coins will moon. one will moon harder.

>>23235259
>npm
dropped

Final score:

Quant 1 : Ocean nil

Private repository every heard of it fucking autists?

100 banks are live on Spunta/SIAchain which uses Overledger


Starting from March 1st, the Spunta infrastructure processed 204 million transactions related to the 55 banks migrated in the first two waves. The time required to complete the processing is about one hour per night. By the end of the year, the number of processed transactions is expected to exceed 350 million .

If this application will be applied to more complex cases, working at its full capacity, it was estimated that the infrastructure would be able to manage a total volume of 8.4 billion transactions . As term of comparison, Bitcoin’s blockchain in the entire 2019 managed 117 million transactions .

>>23244547

SIA hasn't mentioned anything about Quant in the last update LOL

>Private repository every heard of it

Yes, but what I'm showing is the fact that nobody even interacts with the API lol. Nobody is building on this garbage. Github searches show nothing about Quant-related repos coming from enterprise/users creating Mapps etc

>>23242807
Where’s the “partnership”, it’s just a proof of concept. I could deliver a POC as well. Doesn’t make it a partnership.

Where is proof Ocean are actual partners like you claim?

>>23244626
Imagine coping so hard. Kek.

>>23244626
Imagine coping so hard. Kek.

>>23244626
Enterprise has a different sdk lol you fkin buffoon. You need an apiKey to access it.

>>23244923
Fudblasted lmao

Seething romanian gypsy

We are all gonna make it $QNT

>>23244923

what coping ? They all used Gilbert for consultancy and then discarded the loser

Of course that ABI Labs is going to retweet that garbage as a gesture of gratitude LOL

Silvia Attanasio not saying anything about Quant should be enough. And since NTT Data are custom blockchain integrators, you best be sure that they customized and rolled out their own botched interop solution

>>23245577
White label maybe.