/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23155262
Were going to form a perfect h&s
.. deal with it

>>23155287
do we not need to reach 160k sats again and then go down for that?

>>23155262
zoom out

>>23155262
It’s down $0.30, fucking relax nigger

>>23155315
zoom out what faggot? it was 20$ a month ago, then 18 then 17 then 16 then 15 then 14 then 13 then 12 then 11 then 10 then 9 then 8, now 10 yeah, but it's gonna dump again below 8 soon, this shitcoin is fucking dead

>>23155262
I haven’t been on biz in weeks. I have over 20,000 link. You idiots are still here worried about the price when the fucking world is imploding and there is literally nothing we can do anymore? Who gives a fuck? We are all fucked. Normal life is never returning

>>23155312
I hope so badly that the democrats rug pull the dollar as a last measure to stop trump. I want the link price to implode and never recover. And I have a lot of link. Fuck all of you faggots

>>23155477
based cynical anon

>>23155418
Not dead. They've effectively established dominance as leading oracle platform and they will not be undone. Now you just need to wait for greater adoption of crypto overall. Have patience. think long term anon. Don't miss out on massive gains. Hodl.

>>23155365
this is what they said when it dumped from $20 to $19.70

>>23155477
This. Niggers have been rampaging with impunity for HALF A FUCKING YEAR
HALF
A
FUCKING
YEAR
WITH NO END IN SIGHT, NO CONSEQUENCES
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK

>>23155523
>just wait a decade bro

>>23155523
>just hold another 4 years
They’re dumping 500k tokens of this shittoken weekly, every major partnership hasn’t been real, the normies that were hype on this were burned, and there’s competition coming from everywhere that other big names are actually going to use.

Quit trying to gaslight people, this shit is dying a slow death.

>>23155621
Do you actually believe any of the shit you just typed or are you being paid to fud? It's okay, you can tell me, I'm never selling anyway. I'm really curious.

>>23155621
Hehe good one

>>23155262
Link is not a scamcoin friend, it is a scamtoken. Important distinction.

See, when Sergey thought up his scam he knew he could pull off the social engineering side of things. He had everything: he was fat, had no problem wearing the same clothes every day, had picked a cheerful shade of blue for his shirt, and had a handful of nice talking points he could put in slides and repeat at conferences for....well 3 years at least.

What he didn’t have was any knowledge at all of blockchain. Technical knowledge anyway. In come Ari Jules who basically said he could get the scam up and running faster if he could build it on ETH, so voila! Server didn’t know the difference and frankly didn’t care. He just did a ctrl + f on his PowerPoint and replaced “coin” with “token” and Link was born.

>>23155566
This 1000%

>>23155694
>Google
confirmed fake
>Oracle Q3
Q3 is over and still you can hear a rat piss on cotton about the partnership its so quiet
>500k dumps
Every Friday on your retarded heads
>Competitors
Been making news lately. LINK will soon be left behind
>DECO
muh 2 Pajeet and a Chink college project used to launder money for Ari in the sale like TownCrier
>Mixicles blah blah blah
nowhere to be found, but here's some PowerPoints about making sure lil Suzy is 18

>Do you actually believe...
Yes.

>>23155891
prove any of this or die in a house fire, faggot

>>23155566
>no consequences
and that is where you are wrong

and it's still fucking DUMPING. The biggest piece of shit the whole crypto market has is chainlink, no doubts

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

it has had 200 fake partnerships over the years. Swift, google etc.

people are starting to realize that it's a scam company that just pumps fake partnership after fake partnership and that nothing ever materializes.

they have 0 users for their product that aren't bribed or subsidized by the Chainlink company. Not a single one. And they never will, because their product, centralized oracles, is literally air.

it has dump like 0.50 cents on a couple minutes, my fucking god what an absolute piece of shit, it's going sub 10$ so fucking quickly

ran into the 200ma on the 4hr and smart money sold or shorted

>>23155937
>Google
"“There isn’t a formal partnership or any kind of agreement in place,” said Daniel Gabis, a Google spokesman."
>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-17/-link-marines-are-making-an-obscure-cryptocurrency-red-hot
>500k Dumps every week
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xf37c348b7d19b17b29cd5cfa64cfa48e2d6eb8db
>Oracle Q3
Q4 starts on 1 Oct. Dig up a link yourself on the last time the partnership and integration was mentioned. You wont find shit.
>DECO
https://www.deco.works/team.html You'll never hear about this shit again. Money laundering like the 20 shell site startups.

>die in a house fire
That's what your portfolio has been doing the last few weeks holding LINK. Thanks for playing. You faggots still cant talk shit to save your life. Tranny shills

>>23156046
right, like if 4chan could influence a billion dollar market, but large enough holders can, that do coordinated insider trading and market manipulation, and are playing with their freedom, in discords and on twitter, while using public blockchains

>>23156013
Based.

>>23155937
>>23156080
Chainlink has literally over 100 partnerships that have been radio silent for several years.

The radio silence proves that the partnership was fake and never intended to materialize, only deceive low Iq investors (you)

it is literally a proven fraud, by any definition of the word fraud. It's not an opinion or open to argumentation, it is literally a proven fact.

>>23156080
>"“There isn’t a formal partnership or any kind of agreement in place,” said Daniel Gabis, a Google spokesman."

>>23156303
How is it Chainlink's fault if people who want to partner with them haven't moved forward yet?

>>23156331
Since that blog post Google hasn't mentioned Chainlink a single time, other than to deny any partnership.

It has been 100% silent for more than 12 months, which proves with 100% certainty that it was a fake partnership and that Sergey/Chainlink are liars and criminals.

Literally a proven fact.

Also Swift hasn't mentioned Chainlink in 4 years, yet they were still claiming a partnership to scam low IQ investors like yourself a few months ago.

>>23156331
That was addressed in the link
>More than a year ago, Google posted a blog about how to use a service like Chainlink to make data from its data warehouse BigQuery available on a blockchain.

You're pathetically stretching that post out harder than LINK does on its Twitter. You shills are pathetic. Post the Q3 oracle slide next

>>23156411
>>23156444
t. still can't cope

>>23156404
kek, it means the partnership was fake, not that the company hasn't moved forward.

Chainlink has done this literally over 100 times. Literally every. single. partnership over a period of 4 years.

To scam low IQ investors like yourself. And it worked, the teams has sold hundreds of millions worth of LINK and are all multimillionnaires, yet they have a centralized product with 0 users that they don't bribe to use.

And you're still defending them today. How fucking low is your IQ?

>>23156502
>Chainlink has done this literally over 100 times.
Except Chainlink never announces any partnerships.
Ever.

>>23155418
It's a bit weird that there haven't been half a dozen 500K dump posts today. Maybe they're letting the cow graze back up to 12 before the milking machine goes back on.

>>23156444
>You're pathetically stretching that post out harder than LINK does
How am I stretching anything?
All I did was post an image of what Google Cloud posted.

>>23156553
Its been denied by Google themselves, in an interview with BLOOMBERG. What did you even try to accomplish with your post?
>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-17/-link-marines-are-making-an-obscure-cryptocurrency-red-hot

>>23155891
>computer science is dumb bros pump pump pump I need to coom!
That's you.

>>23156595
>Its been denied by Google themselves
Pic related has been denied?

>>23155365
>It’s down $0.30, fucking relax
down?
we are talking about chainlink, right?
It's up 8% since yesterday
this is a weird fucking thread

>>23156595
Also I asked how am I stretching anything, since all I did was post what Google posted.
Please answer this simple question.

>>23156596
This is your LINK heavy portfolio.

>>23155477
based and doompilled

>>23155418
Yeah yeah we all know you have a stack

>>23155477
Female panic-mind

>>23156665
I see 2 Tweets talking about a demo that are going on 1.5 years old and a near 1 year old retweet.

I posted a 2 month old article from Bloomberg that follows up on your shit tweets.
>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-17/-link-marines-are-making-an-obscure-cryptocurrency-red-hot

I'm going to sit and laugh until a gaslit tranny can present something new or with actual evidence like I have. You shills are terrible when called out. NEVER COULD A LINK FAG BACK UP ANYTHING HE HYPES UP

Prove me wrong, until then Im laughing

>>23155621
alot of normies that owned stinklink made shittons of money buying a scam. chainlink is special in the sense that it triggers autistic delusional images of grandeur in even the most reasonable of people. that's why it's awsome

>>23156750
Please answer the simple question: how am I "stretching" anything when all I'm doing is posting what Google posted?

>>23155571
Its going to be dec 2021 and you still wont make it even to that. Ungrateful zoomie brat faggot, itll be 100% your fault when you miss the boat

>>23155694
Hes fudding but hes not being paid

>>23156013
Lol this is the SOLE fud you faggot swingies have.
>all these amazing partnerships/integrations
>UHHH THEY'RE FAKE HERE SEE THIS LINK YOU CAN BARELY INTERPRET IT AS SUCH

>>23156080
Stop spoonfeeding this redditor/swinger. Ill give you 1 tho, Q3 could mean financial q3 which is right now to EOY and even if they meant normal q3 they could just be taking a while

>>23156411
>liars and criminals
Your Indian is showing. Dont be so aggressive, you need to be more subtle with your fud.

>>23156672
Idk im still up over $20k, doesnt seem like a fire to me latelet

>>23156970
2020 Fiscal Quarter Dates

Q1 2020: January 1 - March 31

Q2 2020: April 1 - June 30

Q3 2020: July 1 - September 30

Q4 2020: October 1 - December 31
> https://investinganswers.com/dictionary/q/quarter-q1-q2-q3-q4

>>23156769
Because he is a fudding tranny addicted to swinging

>>23157000
he is american, which makes it even more absurd, considering the regulations and sanctions.

>>23157076
Either way could just be taking a while. Like when game devs give a release date and backtrack it. Same impatient brats start an uproar then too.

everything chainlink does can be done with a centralised data feed provider which works perfectly for traditional markets and crypto is small as fuck. chainlink is cringe because is tries to solve a problem where there is none

>>23155891
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>23157157
>everything chainlink does can be done with a centralised data feed provider
A centralized oracle you mean?

>>23157157
>this 3 year old fud
Good luck dwingie bear faget hope you con some redditors