/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22839803
i would but you are just faketoshi

>>22839803
N

>>22839803
I

>>22840016
G

G

E

>>22840039
E

>>22840070
R

>>22839934
>>22840016
>>22840022
>>22840039
>>22840070
>>22840076

>>22839803
Must be flu season like a disease it tries to infect this board with their shit posts.

>>22839934
>>22840016
>>22840022
>>22840039
>>22840070
>>22840076

satoshi how can we recruit builders en-masse without satoshi proof? we are losing the narrative war

>>22839803
I'm for Craig and BSV because we need a Satoshi who sucks cocks and eats ass and gets fucked in his ass with cocks and eats cum.

>>22839934
>>22840016
>>22840022
>>22840039
>>22840070
>>22840076
Impressive, very nice indeed

>>22839803
It could be you senpai, I know craig lurks in these depths.

When does bsv take over btc in terms of market dominance?

Whats your favourite song?

>>22839934
>>22840016
>>22840022
>>22840039
>>22840070
>>22840076
>N thread fails
>random Creg thread succeeds

who are you again?

>>22841564
N

>>22840935
There are plenty of builders, we don't need React Rangers at this point in time

I

G

>>22840154
My sides

>>22841701
yeah i was just thinking about how a good layer1 token solution would be more beneficial than all the other shit ive been trying
what do you think of migrating the bch slp solution to bsv?

>>22841754
>a good layer1 token solution
why do you fags insist on every piece of shit information to be public burden?
weather data shittokens private encrypted audit trails. is the concept of side-chains so hard to grasp?

>>22841883
im interested in a scaling POW token solution.
POS results in "issuers control the network", POW results in race to minimum viable profitabilty.

if you just want to argue on what satoshi said, i can give you quotes too.
“Long before the network gets anywhere near as large as that, it would be safe for users to use Simplified Payment Verification (section 8) to check for double spending, which only requires having the chain of block headers, or about 12KB per day. Only people trying to create new coins would need to run network nodes. At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to specialists with server farms of specialized hardware. A server farm would only need to have one node on the network and the rest of the LAN connects with that one node.

The bandwidth might not be as prohibitive as you think. A typical transaction would be about 400 bytes (ECC is nicely compact). Each transaction has to be broadcast twice, so lets say 1KB per transaction. Visa processed 37 billion transactions in FY2008, or an average of 100 million transactions per day. That many transactions would take 100GB of bandwidth, or the size of 12 DVD or 2 HD quality movies, or about $18 worth of bandwidth at current prices.

If the network were to get that big, it would take several years, and by then, sending 2 HD movies over the Internet would probably not seem like a big deal. "

>>22842220
>im interested in a scaling POW token solution
well bitcoin will scale exponentially which beats linear any day. don't be stupid don't muck around with shitcoins.

not even satoshi thought it's a good idea to put every bollocks shit on a single blockchain. and in this regard it's irrelevant what he predicted about bandwith growth.

bitcoin right now can do billions of transactions per second with 1mb blocks. let that sink in! the base block size will be increased in time obviously but first we become a few thousand times more efficient than the cash forks, then we implement a trustless pruning network, and then we implement a self adjusting cap that don't limit adoption growth for real demand but still acts as dos protection.

>>22839803
wen $1mil bsv sir?

>>22839934

>>22839934
>>22840016
>>22840022
>>22840039
>>22840070
>>22840076