/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22592214
Based

Dipping now, but waiting to buy more to make it in moon at eoy

>>22592575
YOUR PAJEETRY COULDN'T BE MORE OBVIOUS. I'M AN RLC BAGHOLDER AND THIS SHIT JUST MADE ME SELL. HOLY FUCK.

IT'S REAL

https://www.ngi.eu/ngi-projects/ontochain/

>>22592818
nothingburger

>>22592690
BENCHOD

>>22592690
YOUR PAJEETRY COULDN'T BE MORE OBVIOUS. I SOLD ALL MY RLC AND THIS SHIT JUST MADE ME BUY. HOLY FUCK.

>>22592690
>>22593143

YOUR PAJEETERY MEEMERY JUST MADE ME BUY A HECKIN BMW i8

>>22592690
What? Dont we got the EU contract?

>>22592690
Also if you were a bag holder why are you saying you are going to sell?

>>22594064
No prove except for the hype tweet from iExec. If it turns out to be an exaggeration once again we'll be going back to sub $1 again. Fucking ironic that the price could actually be higher without doing anything.

>>22592690
FUCK YOU FOR SELLING NOW ITS DIPPED FUCKING HARD YEAH FUCK YOU YOU FUXKING XUNT WHAT THE FUCKING SHIT YOU PRICK FUCK ME I HAD A SHIT TON OF THIS NOW IM DOWN 1%

>>22594121
I just hope man im fucking needing this, missed link, i thought we were good.

Also im sorry im talking positive on it i get it now

>>22594064
>>22594121
>>22594164
Here is the EU project - read it. Iexec mentioned by name https://www.ngi.eu/ngi-projects/ontochain/

>>22592818

>>22594364
NOTHINGBURGER SHIT WHAT'S SO SMUG FOR?

>>22594360
Thankyou

This thread is blessed

I love all my iexec bros even though we are effectively funding the EU to cuck euros

>>22592818
desu it kind of sounds like Iexec are helping build something that RLC wont be used for

>>22595064
No, Gilles stated they are directly planning around tokenomics with what they doing this year

>>22594360
Based. We are all making it.
>>22595064
In order to use decentralized distributed computing (iExec) you need to use RLC. Period.

can anybody tell me why this is supposed to be a good project with a good ROI? It's basically just cloud computing? That's not a very big market is it?

>>22595680
Do yourself a favor and Google cloud computing market projections.

>>22595680
>It's basically just cloud computing?
>That's not a very big market is it?

>>22595794
okay so right now the market is about 250 billion in total, let's assume that this doubles in the coming years to 0.5 trillion. How big will the share of decentralized cloud computing be compared to centralized cloud computing. What are the advantages and disadvantages of decentralized cloud computing versus centralized cloud computing?

>>22595958
well it's not like it's oil or something.

>>22596172
0.001% maybe. How many companies today would care if their compute providers calls itself decentralized or not ?

>>22596172
>>22596185
>>22596210
Imagine not understanding cost savings opportunity

>>22596230
>>22596230
cloud computing is free, if you get windows you have free cloud computing installed, so there are no costs when it comes to cloud computing. Any other advantages you can think of mister know-it-all?

>>22596289
>cloud computing is free

>>22596230
imagine not understanding that you can already do anything iexec is trying to do on platforms like vast.ai or fluidstack since years. Big companies still don't use them because clouds have huge datacenters, with all kinds of advantages (latency, bandwidth, interconnect, SLAs, support + all the cloud software on top such as AWS S3 etc.) vs ranjeet who is running is raspberri pi iexec worker in his rat invested mudhut

>>22596346
Not even nearly the same thing. You clearly don't understand what iExec is.

Confidential computing is something only iExec can do, and is extremely valuable. As well as the way iExec enables data renting in combination with iExec's overall tech stack.

There's more, but I want you to stay poor.

>>22596383
>Confidential computing is something only iExec can do
and by this I mean the only decentralized tech that can do it. I know it exists centralized but again decentralized lowers costs and increases use cases.

>>22596408
How does is "lower cost" if only centralized clouds are offering this in the first place ? You think AWS is going to make some nice cheap prices only specially for iexec. Also that market is clearly a niche of a niche, which is what my 0.001% marketshare comment was about.

>>22596469
Decentralized computing is lower cost than centralized computing. I'm done spoonfeeding your dumb ass lmao stay poor RETARD

>>22596383
>Confidential computing is something only iExec can do, and is extremely valuable.
Well, no. Regulators in first world countries would not allow for companies to place their infrastructure in shared hosts if there were disproportional risks of different environments coming into contact.

>>22596490
haha seething, clearly you have not clue, you dumb fucker. If youre so smart, answer this: why did iexec close all public worker pools and is now only focusing on deploying on centralized clouds, hmm?

>>22596553
>why did iexec close all public worker pools
For the v5 update

>>22596561
https://explorer.iex.ec/mainnet
YIKES.

>>22596574
I'm glad you care so much about my financial investment anon, but I'm not selling my digital oil.

>>22596553
why are you so invested in this project?
for such a so-called worthless project... iexec is living rent free in your head

>>22594360
>22594373 #

You are all delusional. This shit is like XRP and Ripple. I used to be into RLC and had a bag. But all these RLC threads are worse than XRP on Reddit. Delusional bag holders

digital dog shit

>>22596703
I doubt you know what a blockchain is

>>22596289
>cloud computing is free
Yes for your 256kb wav files maybe
Do you think commercial uses are free? Are you some kind of commie?

>>22592214
kek pamp it meme. try it with LOKI in there though

>>22596858
The bogs are French, pajeet. They are involved with iExec.

>>22596767
I am a white heterodoxual christian male and I hold Fantom tokens crypto currencies. Cloud computing IS free also for large files, think about it, if Windows can give everybody in the world 500 gb free cloud computing then nobody needs paid cloud computing anymore! IT's FREE!! sometimes you just gotta be smart and use those brains anon!

Why doesn't moon moar?

I mean: the fucking EU is partner with it why the fuck doesn't moon moar?

>>22596882
Nothing is free faggot.
>>22596992
It will again soon but according to biz RLC is the only coin that needs sustained news in order to pump meanwhile shitcoins that do nothing pump for no reason all of the time.

ngi...
I feel like they dropped an m somewhere

>>22597029
you just called me a "faggot", I take offense to that! It is contrary to my christian beliefs and my heterosexuality. Where is the Biz 4chan moderator? MODERATOR PLEASE GIVE THIS ANON A TEMPORARY BAN! let him think about his sins, when he learns how to behave properly and socially he can come back here.

>>22596882
>cloud computing then nobody needs paid cloud computing anymore!
If it's free then why would we need RLC?

>>22597029
>It will again soon but according to biz RLC is the only coin that needs sustained news in order to pump
I am starting to think that simply no one looks at it like no one looke at Amazon ages ago

>>22597207
exectly my point!

>>22597214
Sure? just like they skipped Amazon stock or google?

>>22597251
>just like they skipped Amazon stock or google?
yes and Chainlink too

>>22597251
Everyone did. Everyone says wow I wish I invested in <insert shit here> because they thought it was dumb when they heard about it.

Google? God what a fucking stupid sounding name. It'll be worth zero

Cant wait to tell my kids I held my RLC stack through the relentless pajeet Fud posts. I'll be the coolest dad ever.

>>22597290
that is so true! you know who is a good investor? Alec Baldwin! I saw a secret video of him just recently on youtube in which he said you should have bought Amazon stock or Google in the past. This really makes me think! If you pick a good investment early you can become rich!

Here is the video! Please keep this a secret, it's an insider video if you want to make massive gains.We don't want to get the SEC involved!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SEGWJbxToE

>>22597385
Good find, anon
Exiting insider stuff, ngl
Underrated video

>>22596882
It’s not free. They’re gathering big data and feeding it to their ai. You trust msft, googl, amzn, aapl to build an ai, or would you prefer a trustless blockchain?

>>22596882
>500 gb free cloud computing

>>22597608
This, am I really on a board that doesn't understand the difference between storage and computing?

>>22597561
good point! However remember the Terminator! if we decentralize AI who can shut it down?! this might be the end of the human civilization. IEXEC needs to stop now! the name is suspicious "I Execute" this could be referring to the point of view from the self aware decentralized Iexec AI system. Maybe Iexec is the mark of the beast! think about it, only those who take a cloud computing chip in their right hand or forehead will be able to store stuff in the cloud! the rest of mankind will be eradicated! this has all been prophosied.

>>22597290
>Everyone did. Everyone says wow I wish I invested in <insert shit here> because they thought it was dumb when they heard about it.
FUCKING. THIS. BRUHA

>>22597750
are you retastartled? They are the same dummy! you can save files in the cloud, this is cloud computing, I don't know what else it could mean.

>>22597836
Nice larp

really liking the vibe in this thread guys really bullish, getting the "total world domination" feel

>>22597561
>You trust msft, googl, amzn, aapl to build an ai
who cares? not normies

>>22597768
Lmao, they’re already killing you. They’ve been killing you, and pointing the finger at various scapegoats, from terrorism, to communists, to covid. The industrial health care system is the third leading cause of death. Whereas people were feeding big Corp data, now big Corp will feed the blockchain. It will be fully automated, self-feeding data. You can’t put the genie back in the bottle. You can’t stop it anymore than people could stop the train or planes or the computer. Coin holders will be the new masters. Maybe you think being poor or sucking dick will change the system. Lmao. Ask the people from shitistan how that works.

>>22596346
literally none of them will imagine because they are bagholding neets high on emotion hoping for the next big fat green dildo thinking they can check out of waging forever.

>>22596383
>Confidential computing is something only iExec can do

no it isn't. fully homomorphic encryption can be used on any general purpose software that can eval boolean circuits and says you're a retarded faggot. But guess what NEET? Confidentiality is overrated, and as others have said, most clouds have on-prem "secure room" friendly services as well.

>>22597941
OMG you have so many good points that my mind has been blown away by all those insightful facts regarding the fundamental aspects of human control and conspiracy. If only my brain could contain as much information as the 500 gb free cloud computing that Windows (another such commercial entity) is distributing to its users. Why do the give away 500 GB cloud computing away for free for each user? Are they trying to get people accustomed to uploading their lives on the AI cloud like skynet? what if Windows actually wants all people to upload their minds so they can control everybody! you are stuck there forever, with no escape, you cannot die, ever, you are stuck inside the Windows cloud, maybe we ll be posting here for millions of years, till some asteroid hits and we can finally RIP?

>>22598110
that is actually true, also cloud computing is already pretty secure. You can secure your cloud with an encrypted password already, so that issue has already been fixed!

>>22594360
>ngmi.eu
we know anon, we know

>>22598269
Yes that's actually the reason. You should upload your brain to the iExec cloud though, we have digital orgies (not possible with centralized systems).

>>22598421
Ngl, I cant wait to have my first digital orgy. Except im the only male

>>22598421
I am a christian, sex is a repulsive sin!

I just read on Google this article;

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/how-amazons-aws-continues-to-dominate-2019-10-02

AWS cloud computing is already worth more than 200 billion US. So Iexec can go to 1 billion maybe? that's about a 10x from here, how high do you think RLC can go?

>>22598733
Fool.
It will take up to 5% of every major cloud providers market cap, resulting in a token worth over 11k.
Steel yourself.

>>22598549
You do not have to take part in the orgies. But the option will always be there.

Also, sex is only a sin if used for enjoyment only and not to bring humankind forward like with procreation. Digital orgies, however, are an important step in our evolution. It is necessary to connect our brains together to advance our species to the next level. The pleasure is just a nice side effect that you can choose to ignore.

>>22596703
>XRP and Ripple

>>22598733
Why does everyone hinge on the cloud computing aspect of RLC when it has the best oracles too?
No one ever talks about the oracles which already have sgx tee and staking.

>>22598795
Can I run a sim where I upload my friends list from FB so I fuck every girl I went to HS with, all at the same time?

EU IS BACKING IEXEC UP WHERE'S THE X1000 MUUUUN?

>>22597385
Bro why did you dhare this with anons u fuckiwit

>>22596346
>imagine not understanding that you can already do anything iexec is trying to do on platforms like vast.ai or fluidstack since years. Big companies still don't use them because clouds have huge datacenters, with all kinds of advantages (latency, bandwidth, interconnect, SLAs, support + all the cloud software on top such as AWS S3 etc.) vs ranjeet who is running is raspberri pi iexec worker in his rat invested mudhut
this fud got me

>>22596289
I feel so bad for anyone who knows you anon

>>22596703
Yrah threads are shit but u are double digited iq apu

>>22598977
iExec results can connect to smart contracts
Only IQs above 105 can understand what that means

The fudders are so low IQ they defend json parsers are revolutionary tech

>>22598795
well if you put it like that I will reconsider. I agree, sex is not a sin if it's not enjoyable, I think that's why everybody should be circumcized.

>>22599115
Can you say

INTERNET
OF
TNINGS

>>22598861
I guess, in the future you could create an artificial intelligence that will adopt some traits of your school mates. But it won't be the real thing. Also, having orgies with AIs, I mean ... Anon, I don't judge but this doesn't bring humandkind forward. It's also less pleasurable than with real persons. It's basically like masturbation or having sex with a doll. In the digital age, however, everyone will be willing since there are no downsides. No stds, no pregnancies.

>>22599200
Rape is also not possible

>>22598962
sorry, I just wanted to know what it feels like to be Gordon Gecko. I must say, I have barely ever felt anymore powerful than when I posted the inside video...

>>22599115
> iExec results can connect to smart contracts
Cool. Any pajeet devcan, its extremely easy using geth/truffle. Execute that on a secure enclave in AWS or GCP and you can write your results to a smart contract tamperproof, replicating exactly everything iexec would enable, without jumping through 100 hoops and using the shit-tier UI and bugged tools iexec tries to provide.

>>22599409
The absolute state of iExec fud

>>22599409
I don't know exactly what you are saying but I think there is no difference at all between uploading a smart contract on Iexec or the Google cloud. You just sign up a nice contract, get it checked by a laywer, and voila, you have got your smart contract. Now all you need to do is use a scanner then you can get a digital copy on your computer. Then after you have the digital copy you just upload the smart contract to the Google Cloud, or Amazon cloud. I am not sure how it works with Iexec but I think they can do that the same. If you are worried that your smart contract gets stolen or hacked you can use an encrypted password!

>>22599574
Based

What price EOY, frens?

>>22596469
Go read a microeconomics book and look up for Oligopoly.
Then look up to free market.
Then Monopsony.
A decentralized market will allow iExec to act on the later two.

>>22599446
>>22599574
> the state of iexec shills, trying to shill their digital dogshit to devs without ever having programmed a smart contract or even used a cloud

>>22599790
> implying that free market doesn't already exist in choice of clouds
> implying that iexecs measily & bad software could even match 0.0001% of what GCP & AWS are providing with their software cloud stacks

>>22600150
> implying that free market doesn't already exist in choice of clouds
It isn't, its's an Oligopoly.

> implying that iexecs measily & bad software could even match 0.0001% of what GCP & AWS are providing with their software cloud stacks
What's a marketplace where they can compete with each other and with other smaller players?

>>22597251
Calm down etoro