[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 31 KB, 1000x1000, chainlink-bestebank.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22458031 No.22458031 [Reply] [Original]

16 more days until Chainlink fails to deliver ANYTHING at all, and flakes out on the Q3 Oracle integration.

>> No.22458051
File: 68 KB, 620x620, 709C4775-4439-4FB8-B7DE-B8B1DF649716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22458051

Why would it be a CL fail if Oracle fails to do their integration in time? It’s not CL integrating Oracle

>> No.22458076

stfu everyone knows corona pushed all this up at least 6 months stop pretending to be a prophet you're just an xrp bagholder

>> No.22458132

Imagine staking your financial future on the word of a fat bald Brazilian.

>> No.22458154
File: 2.73 MB, 4656x3492, oracle blockchain users slide 1 of 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22458154

>>22458051
>if Oracle fails to do their integration in time?
lmao what?

Oracle has no need for Defi price feeds.
Oracle needs feeds for pic related, real external data.
And Chainlink has 16 days to deliver, but they won't.

Six months ago, Oracle announced they would integrate Chainlink by Q3.
And Chainlink knowingly flaked.

>> No.22458160

Ari confirmed staking isnt coming until late 2021

>> No.22458172

>>22458132
lmao, the Oracle integration has nothing to do with Fernando.
It doesn't even have anything to do with Ian Keane.
This is out of their hands.

>> No.22458316

>>22458051
Cope

Sergey has done absolutely nothing in 3 years. Nothing. Big whitepaper, lots of promise, real world this secure that. Not one single speck of it has materialized.

All the guy has done is dump tokens, diversity hire, and present the same old tired slides at con after con while wearing the same shirt.

>oh lol some huge step forward for Link could happen but it won't but that isn't Links fault
Such cope.

>> No.22458356

>>22458031
You forgot.. still centralized oracles

>> No.22458387

>>22458356
Nope, the oracles were decentralized from day 1.
The data sources were even decentralized from day 1.

>> No.22458407

>>22458076
Based. Gas the xrp kikes

>> No.22458429

I love the amount of ignorant straight out of high school imbeciles on this board that read oracle and think that it means anything.

Oracle is a centralized cloud provider, it doesn't mean SHIT, you can be "integrated" to amazon, and it doesn't mean shit, it's a fucking vaporware scam lmao.

In fact I could make a cryptocurrency based on AWS tomorrow in a few hours and it wouldn't mean that I'm "partnered" with amazon web services.

How about you techlets actually bother to research into what scam project you're investing into?

>> No.22458431

Just remember, the token is literally not needed, and the end game is to be a bloomberg terminal.

>> No.22458501

>>22458429
See pic in >>22458154

Oracle has MASSIVE use blockchain use cases right now, and they need oracles.
Chainlink however is years away from moving beyond Defi, so it's very likely Oracle will start looking at competitors.

>> No.22458506
File: 38 KB, 679x684, image460.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22458506

attention TRANNIES and KIKES
just letting u know im up 500k so far and will not be selling, you may now continue wasting your time, thanks

>> No.22458519

that nervous feeling u had as a kid when a project was due and you bullshitted around and when time to present u made up excuse after excuse

>> No.22458533
File: 3.82 MB, 196x388, 1579605036719.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22458533

>>22458501
>looking at competitors

>> No.22458553

>>22458533
Oracle wanted Chainlink in Q3, but Chainlink is years away from delivering.
Of course Oracle will be looking at competitors.

>> No.22458617

>>22458501

>competitors

Such as?

>> No.22458633

>>22458617
lmao, google it boomer

>> No.22458735

>>22458633

No you have to provide the evidence on this one.

>> No.22458760

>>22458735
Nah, there aren't any Chainlink competitors at all.
Everyone will just wait a few years until Sergey finds it in his heart to actually release something.
Carry on.

>> No.22458827

If I announce I'll eat 100 McDonalds cheeseburgers in the next 3 hours, then fail to do so, is this the fault of McDonalds for not ensuring I ate the full 100?
What a total cripplet..

>> No.22458844

>>22458827
Nice cope.

>> No.22458855

>>22458429
>Oracle is a centralized cloud provider, it doesn't mean SHIT, you can be "integrated" to amazon, and it doesn't mean shit, it's a fucking vaporware scam lmao.
This is not just one of those "partnerships" where someone launches on GCP and claims a partnership with Google, you illiterate twat. Oracle is making CL data sources an integral part of their blockchain product. This is Oracle building an integration with CL, not CL claiming a relationship with Oracle.
>How about you techlets actually bother to research into what scam project you're investing into?
The fucking irony. If you knew what you were talking about you would feel so stupid right now.

>> No.22458857

Besides, there's 2.5 weeks left, and if Oracle drift from their roadmap, who cares?

>> No.22458893
File: 52 KB, 534x534, Ehr7pdJUwAEPMc5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22458893

>>22458387
>decentralized data

>> No.22458899

>>22458844
>>22458760
Come on, say it. Say band, or whatever link rip off you are heavily invested in so we can all laugh at you. Or name 1 competitor, go on. 1 single comptetitor.

>> No.22458904

But..but...muh Microsoft Word integration. Ahahahaha XDD

>> No.22458914

>>22458172
Nodes can provide any data you want today. The “Chainlink” price feeds are assets for which Chainlink is currently providing payment to the nodes since staking isn’t live yet. If some organization like oracle wants other data, that can be done right now, with Oracle paying the nodes instead of Chainlink.

>> No.22458921
File: 425 KB, 1125x1074, D74CF4D6-6157-44D2-93D0-1A4C5AEE1AD5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22458921

Anyone else see this?

>> No.22458946

>>22458760

You made a claim, now provide evidence to support it.

>> No.22458979

>>22458893
The first three nodes all served ETH/USD, and all three used a different data source.
That means the oracles were decentralized (three independent ones) and the data sources were decentralized too (also three independent sources).

>>22458899
I've been invested 100% in Chainlink since ICO, but the fact is they're flaking.

>>22458946
Yeah, I totally believe that you haven't heard of any Chainlink competitors.
Very credible.

>> No.22458993

>>22458979
>since ICO
No.
You'd have no business here.

>> No.22459008

>>22458899
theres no competitors because link has no solution for the oracle problem
>were going to use collateral to decentralized data
then how do you determine which source gets penalized
>a centralized average
what if the average is wrong
>it wont
why?
>cause?

Link has never had any benefits over regular contracts. Its like using holograms when you have VR

>> No.22459043

>>22458914
Chainlink today works without staking, TEEs, mixicles, ... because Chainlink is the guarantor for the network.
If Oracle were to integrate Chainlink oracles, it would either need staking/TEEs/mixicles to be operational, or it would need Chainlink to be the guarantor for non-Defi feeds.
Neither will happen by end of Q3.

>>22458993
lel ok.

Here's a thing: I turned like 2k USD into hundreds of thousands, but I'm simply not selling.
And honestly, the way things are going right now I'd rather see Chainlink crash and fucking burn for being THIS slow and ineffectual.

>> No.22459045

>>22458979
>data sources were decentralized too
you cant decentralize a data source. its not open software. If someone nukes a data source, the data source is gone

>> No.22459079

>>22459008
There would be many various ways to determine how/if/when a node is faulty.
You're ignorant and full of shit.

But none of this matters when Chainlink refuses to actually release anything.

>> No.22459101

>>22459045
>you cant decentralize a data source
Based Brainlet.
You can use various data sources for the same feed.

You can't decentralize a Bitcoin node either, but the Bitcoin nodes are still decentralized.

>> No.22459266

>>22459101
>you cant decentralize a source!
how?
>using sources!!!
thats not a source. thats sources
>...
based retarded linkee
>>22459079
>There would be many various ways to determine how/if/when a node is faulty.
theres not. as soon as the first multi million dollar collateral penalty happens, chainlink will be haulted and there will be giant dispute over if the source should have been penalized or not

>> No.22459394

>>22458076
this

>> No.22459506

>>22458979
If the feeds are governed by one entity free to add and remove oracles, and change the feed structure - they're not decentralized. Chainlink feeds are not and never have been decentralized. Few understand

>> No.22459573

>>22459506
Damn you’re an idiot

>> No.22459624

>>22458031
Your not worthy of Link, leave pleb

>> No.22459654

>>22459573
If they add in 50 nodes that give data from a source they control, they would change the feed outcome. They could do this, yet they are trusted not to. This is not trustless. This is centralized. (You) don't understand. Few do.

>> No.22459688

>>22458316
>lots of promise
>from Chainlink

Chainlink was radio silent for years you zoomer spastic

>> No.22459706

>>22458076
Fuck XRP and fuck anyone who holds it unironically

>> No.22459754
File: 58 KB, 512x297, happipepes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22459754

>>22458031
> tfw youve been here long enough to know that fud is bullish
learn from this newfags

>> No.22459766

>>22458031
Where's that oracle q3 integration powerpoint slide spamming faggot at? Fucking nigger getting BTFO'd so hard haven't seen him post in days

>> No.22459850
File: 189 KB, 1315x739, 3C370346-2912-4D01-920B-B824290285EF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22459850

>>22459766
I’m right here you faggot. We still have more than two weeks

>> No.22459915

>>22459850

Chainlink is full of promises, but it just fails to deliver. What Ari is doing with Chainlink Labs is great, but there's no real world application really. I guess they could pivot to being a think tank, or a blockchain consulting firm, would make more sense really. Inb4 fudding, no I'm not fudding, just a little bit concerned for all the anons that invested their life savings in this R&D circlejerk

>> No.22459946

>>22459915
Well fuck

>> No.22459988

>>22459915
Truly the Cardano of oracles, few understand

>> No.22460014

>>22458031
oh my, you have no idea how hard this scam token will pump

>> No.22460027

>>22458031
>>22458132
>>22458076

The level of fierce anti-project sentiment--- not just toward Chainlink but toward any project--- just sounds so sad to me. All I really see when someone sacrifices precious, irreplaceable moments of their time spent alive to make an entire thread to denigrate some project they're not invested in is someone who has no hope or future and needs other people to fail or suffer for themselves to feel accomplished. It's the attitude of someone who obviously takes crypto so personally because it's their all-in, golden ticket to having a happy life because that will never happen through their work or creativity or likability as a person. It's the type of person who marries their investment not just because they're a bad investor but because they feel a personal attachment to something that sometimes gives them money, treating them better than any person ever has, and promises to make them rich. It's a sad, personal bond with what you buy and a fierce rejection of what you don't buy. Fudding other projects with such energy is the flipside of marrying your investment; you identify the competitors to your married project with every person who's ever rejected or bullied you.

I've already made it and i'm secure enough in my prospects in life even outside of money that I don't have to come on here to shit on other people's investments. What a sad way to live

>> No.22460206

>>22458760
lmao shill btfo

>> No.22460352

>>22458617
fantom

>> No.22460390
File: 58 KB, 1280x720, jew.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22460390

Only Link Marines should be able to trade link.

>> No.22460421

>>22460027
Exactly this

>> No.22460532

>>22459266
>thats not a source. thats sources
Jesus christ.
You simply use multiple sources for the same item/price/asset/feed/...

>theres not
Except of course there are.
For one thing, with a signed source the end user can verify on-chain what the identity of the source API is.
Just to give you one example.

>> No.22460554

>>22459506
>If the feeds are governed by one entity free to add and remove oracles, and change the feed structure - they're not decentralized.
Protip: the contract operator isn't supposed to be decentralized.
The contract operator decides what the contract looks like for him.

You have NO idea what any of this is about.

>> No.22460565
File: 77 KB, 793x476, Screenshot from 2020-09-13 10-40-16.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22460565

why didn't my stop loss work? what a piece of garbage!

>> No.22460593
File: 6 KB, 293x315, LINK.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22460593

i didnt read anything in this thread and i will never sell any LINK. bye

>> No.22460621
File: 402 KB, 784x920, F16A2D7A-A703-4E2A-A7F1-4F50AF7D7059.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22460621

Arbitrum mainnet is soon

>> No.22460657

DRNS;

>> No.22460676

>>22458031
Just like last year

>> No.22460701

>>22458855
Checked
That was pasta. Also this is how I realized link was a winner, high iq anons sperging out and btfoing pasta like this.

>> No.22460922

>>22459266
>a giant dispute over the network functioning as intended

no, absolutely not.

>> No.22461325

>>22460621
Isn't that from 6 months ago already?
lmao

>> No.22461390

>>22460532
>You simply use multiple sources for the same item/price/asset/feed/
yes, that still means a source can be corrupted because a source is a centralized source. You cant decentralized a source by adding a 100 neet nodes who get their info from that centralized source
>For one thing, with a signed source the end user can verify on-chain what the identity of the source API is.
what the fuck does that have to do with anything. You mean KYC a source? That still doesnt make something bullet proof. Are you implying taking the average of multiple KYC sources fixes the problem? kek
>>22460922
>>a giant dispute over the network functioning as intended
congrats, you found out why no serious company takes chainlink serious at all

>> No.22461439

>>22461390
>that still means a source can be corrupted because a source is a centralized source
lel the whole point of using multiple sources is so you can still use the others if one craps out.

>what the fuck does that have to do with anything.
It means the source can be held accountable instead of the node.

Holy fuck you're amazingly stupid.

>> No.22461519

>>22458921
Yes, I did notice.

>> No.22461527

>>22461325
Regardless he says staking before eoy

>> No.22461529

But if they do deliver what will happen then

>> No.22461608

>>22461439
if a centralized source craps out, the neet nodes that get their info from that source crap out too. What the fuck do you think is going to happen, the neet nodes are going generate the values from the corrupted centralized source magically?

>held accountable
if you want sources to be held accountable USE A REGULAR CONTRACT. lel. With the shitlink network, you are basically letting a bunch of neet nodes act like a federal court.
And then if collateral happens, and a company loses millions of dollars, you think they arnt going to bring it to an actual court?
No company wants their financial state settled through a russian ponzi network were a bunch of racist 4chan neets dictate the network. Chainlink is such a stupid idea, its like have DOGE coin in the top 10 mc's.
>amazingly stupid
nah, i think im right. hence why you have 0 customers at all except for literal shitcoin nothingburger companies like Kava and Synthetix, which sergey has to keep funded with dumps.

All of this is explained in a lot more detail in the Zeus Capital documents anyway. But Linkies ignore those just like how trannies ignore that cant have a biological period.

>> No.22461659

>>22461608
>if a centralized source craps out, the neet nodes that get their info from that source crap out too
Which is exactly what things like signed sources remedy.

>if you want sources to be held accountable USE A REGULAR CONTRACT
Accountability doesn't change a single thing about the benefits of smart contracts.

>All of this is explained in a lot more detail in the Zeus Capital documents anyway.
Good one.

>> No.22461905

it even fucking says Q3 and beyond under where oracle integration appears and not to mention this is a slide from last year BEFORE coronahoax happened

>> No.22461949

>>22461519
>>22458921
accumulation?

>> No.22461961

>>22458031
Not gonna lie i want that Quake 3 Oracle more then anything
It's been decades since the last q3 update

>> No.22461982

>>22458633
Kys lol

>> No.22461993
File: 80 KB, 850x400, 003DBDD9-4495-4330-B290-BC31566EA74F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22461993

>>22458031
Chainlink is a long term hodl, think boomer stock timeframes.

>> No.22462467

>>22461993
You just pulled that out of your arse. Admit it. You have no idea, really.