/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21564877
its over

futures is so gay just trade le coin know what i mean?

What does this mean I'm retarded

>>21564877
Nigga what’s the joke

>>21564955
perpetual manipulation

>>21564955
it means we can predict the future of chainlink now. it's going to 81k tomorrow according to the binance future teller.

>>21564877
So now I can short link at 75x leverage?

>>21564955
China man bad

>>21564978
>another 3 years of price suppression

>>21564877
holy shit this why we dumped?

>>21564955

>>21565001
Expect 'unexpected maintenance' after you do.

>>21565023
they will always have futures on every major asset. BTC has futures, ETH has futures, XMR has futures, and so on. there's nothing you can do about it unless you wanna trade uniswap shitcoins for the rest of your life

>>21564955
Jews and chinks will manipulate the price to Short you.

I don’t think binance can manipulate link’s price that much. Especially with the rise of dexes.

We should petition the chainlink team to only dump on dexes

>>21565056
This is very bullish. They’re categorizing it as a crypto blue chip

>>21565001
you can, i would not advise it though.

>>21565058
Oh fuck

>>21564955
FUCK CHINKS JEWS AND JANNIES

>>21565104
we basically already had futures with LINK though, because you could already trade it with high leverage on binance if you wanted to short it with leverage.

>>21565125
shhh let him

>>21564877
so it's going down 75%?
that's all i am seeing here.

Biz is, of course, dumb, and doesn't understand how being able to short a market drives its price upward.

>>21565382
It literally doesn't

>>21564978
>perpetual manipulation
why? could you explain to a mongoloid like me?

>>21564955
There's always a dump when a coin gets futures. Followed by crabbing for a really long time. Link will not be an exception.

>>21564955
it means you can lock in the price of your linkies

>>21565026
Leo Melamed shall bend at the knee to Sergey Nazarov.

>>21565555
checked

Welcome to the new era of LINK barting or dumping any time it becomes profitable for binance.

>>21564955
When you’re on binance and see coins marked as ___x means that is the multiplier CZ thinks a coin will pump. Means link is gonna 75x from here at least

>>21564955
it can pump up to 75x

>>21564955
Checked. But it's fucking over.... they're going to short this scam to the ground.

>>21564963
>>21564955
It means you're about to get your asses shorted back to under $10

LINKTARDS UUUNNNIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEE

>>21564877
You can short every stock in the world. Guess what they keep doing? Going up

>>21565007
Im not feeling too good

>>21564877
ah fuck well this is just bad
defi shorts and longs already caused price manipulation
this will just cause insane price fluctuations and chainlink's actual product wont affect price anymore
fuckin chinks man, gotta ruin everything

>>21564877
It's over you should've sold the top.

>igor
>yes grichka
>he short
>what do you want to do?
>squeeze to 1000, pomp eet

NO NO PLEASE YOU CANT JUST SUPPRESS THE PRICE FOR 3 YEARS ALLOW US TO MOON FOR 2 MONTHS THEN SUPPRESS THE PRICE FOR ALLAH KNOWS HOW LONG PLEASE NOOOOOOOOO

>>21566181
Wait
>futures=volatility
>more opportunities to swing
Nvm bros I'm okay

>>21564877
That's it. I'm pulling out. Not bad for a run from $3 to $14. Jumping to XRP now. See you at $10 :>)

This has been out for a good minute. Why is this new?

>>21566181
You had one entire day to sell the top, fagget. See you at $10.

>>21564877
>coin margin
what does that mean, crypto can be used as collateral?

>>21566040
You don't understand just how crypto works. The market is completely maniputed. cz bogs any time too many shorts or longs pile up. Remember he bought like 200k link for 1c and he probably owned millions before that. If enough people take out 75k longs then he will make 10x as much just selling 5% of his linkies, recouping the liquidation costs, and then buying them back at the lower price. The czinks now own link's price movements and it will only go up when it is profitable for them that it goes up.

Old News, this was posted like a month ago

https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/5a0d2bc6a20f41ec9cf915c5f2fe5875

>>21565555
checked. get out then but in at target price of $5, digits never lie

>>21565545
Then why do this in the fist place? Whats the benefit?

>>21564877
Oh well it's over

>>21566400
exchange gets to charge interest for lending to you

it's literally a casino game.

>>21566400
exchange makes interest off the margin loan and fees from trading.

>>21566400
I can literally see her mustache

>>21566400
She looks like her nose smells

>>21566400
it's not a "benefit" or "harm" type thing. it's just another tool for degenerates to fuck you over.

>>21566591
>can't unsee it
Still would though, she's got a banging body

>>21566390
>https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/5a0d2bc6a20f41ec9cf915c5f2fe5875

OLD fucking NEWS

So how relevant is the panic

>>21566461
>>21566522
Thanks frens
>>21566591
U still would lick it

>>21566400
Market makers have enough money that whatever they do becomes true.
They have a vested interest in you not making it and keeping the gains coming at a steady, non-alarming pace for themselves, so they'll short every time it looks bullish and pump it every time it looks bearish, and they'll always be right because they ARE the market.

>>21565469
Infinite digital money to short vs retail retards that barely have money to pay their rent

>>21566296
One day? It was almost 3 days of top.

>>21566400
To control asset price. If you play ball correctly, you don’t get destroyed. If you’re for freedom and liberty, they literally collar you with digital spells and wizardry like gold.

>>21565007
try an eternity of price suppression

>>21566591
>Thinking women don’t grow mustache

Women can grow hair everywhere men can, just to a lesser extent.

>>21565023
Google partnership got exposed today too.
Remember last year's Google Pump?

Well this year it is Google Dump:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-17/-link-marines-are-making-an-obscure-cryptocurrency-red-hot?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_medium=social&utm_content=business

>More than a year ago, Google posted a blog about how to use a service like Chainlink to make data from its data warehouse BigQuery available on a blockchain.

>“There isn’t a formal partnership or any kind of agreement in place,” said Daniel Gabis, a Google spokesman.

It's all over cryptocurrency news right now, Google and Chainlink do not work together. All lies. Google logos removed from Chainlink website too. You cannot even find the Google tweet anymore.

>>21566778
Does that mean I'm supposed to like it?

>>21565430
What eventually happens if you sell something you don't own?

>>21566151
>"chainlink's actual product wont affect price anymore"

>stinkers literally think that Link's relentless pump over the last month has been based on the "actual product"

>>21564912
they have to stick to futures because everybody withdraws their linkies lol

>>21564877
SAWRRY ROUN REYE, FERRER RUCK REXT TIME

>>21564877
BULLISH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIyBFNjc1kY
ITS MONKEY SEASON LETS FUCKING GOOOOO

>>21566822
wasn't this pasta from another thread

>>21564877
If you aren't selling Link to all in on Tellor at this point there's no hope

>>21566822
Guess what: a "formal partnership" is something you can apply for, see pic.

What Google did with Chainlink is much more valuable than that.

>>21566880
You already like it on men why not on women?

>>21568124
Yep they gave google employees a bunch of link and told them "big things soon™" then dumped 700k sloppy linkies right on their face. Now those google employees are angry and they want justice, social justice, so they contact their Jewish frens and hatch a plan to write fud. But they were all of them deceived for in secret, Sergey of Nazareth had already written all the fud that could ever come true and spammed /biz/ with it for three fucking years!

>>21566591
You mean HIS moustache

>>21565941
More like they lure in degenerates with "biG gAInz" and liquidated thier ass

>>21568124
>“There isn’t a formal partnership or any kind of agreement in place,” said Daniel Gabis, a Google spokesman.
i appreciate the hopium in a time of need, but Google has many formal partnerships with large companies that do not fill out a form (lol)
this is for companies that Google typically wouldn't have an open line to or be interested in that may have something to offer
with Chainlink, they're keeping an open line with them to gauge the need for decentralized oracles to see if it's something that their users would need for anything else besides bigquery for example
by saying they don't have an formal partnership or any agreement in place with chainlink, they're essentially letting everyone know that they're not directly affiliated with chainlink in any capacity (and implies that they currently have no desire to work with them directly)
that being said, Google isn't necessary right now for Chainlink to be the standard in the next 5-10 years, they just need to keep their heads down and keep working and if it's truly necessary for this world, then it'll all work out
if not, then it's not
right now though, i'm more concerned over the fact that price will be insanely manipulated with defi leveraged short/long positions being visible to all and now crazy leveraged futures being introduced, it always leads to manipulation and the only winners are whale traders

>>21569043
>but Google has many formal partnerships with large companies that do not fill out a form (lol)
Source pls.

>>21569073
>Source pls.
Intelligence and common sense. Do you think every single company google is partnered with clicked that button and applied to be a partner for GCP? Obviously not if you know anything at all about business. GCP is only a small part of Google.

>>21569786
>Do you think every single company google is partnered with clicked that button and applied to be a partner for GCP?
The ones that get to call themselves formal "partners", yes.
Especially when talking about startups.

If times have been rough for you, these helplines may be helpful:

National Sudoku Prevention Lifeline: 1 800278255

National Problem Gambling Shitcoins Helpline: 1 8005224700

Hopium Abuse and Discord Tranny Mental Health Services Administration's National Helpline: 1 8006624357

Newly added helplines:

Sudoku Prevention Lifeline Live Chat available here.

Crisis text hotline available by texting HOME to 741741 (686868 for Canada, 85258 for UK) for crises such as the feels, sudoku, depression, emotional abuse, bullying, self-harm, loneliness, etc.

>>21569816
Come on dude lol. They have so many partnerships and sure, for a startup, this form is filled out, but when partnering with huge companies in that sector, they clearly don't stop them in their proposal and say "could you please fill out our form first so we can review your application to become a partner Intel"
pic related

>>21569786
this anon is right, i mean come on they're obviously not going to ask any of the companies in my pic to fill out a form first for a formal partnership lmao

>>21564877
So I can short link with 75x margin now?
I cant lose!

>>21569914
Those are massive and well-established companies that made their mark on the tech world long ago.
Chainlink is a startup.

The vast majority of Google Cloud "partners" signed up via the partnership program.
What Google Cloud did with Chainlink is much more valuable than that.

>>21569853
Never.selling.faggot.

>>21566660
>Infinite digital money to short vs retail retards that barely have money to pay their rent
But this can also be done with shorting on AAve.... ah no sorry ya need a collateral

By the way it was an old news that link had futures on leverage abilitated

ALSO THINK ABOUT THIS: When bull FUTURES JEWS gonna LONG and the psycological effect will be GREATT

>>21570236
I'd agree, but Google's representative on this clearly stated that they are not formal partners nor do they have any sort of agreement in place
this very clearly means that Google is keeping an open mind to this sort of tech and would like to keep in contact, but don't want to be officially involved
this isn't bearish or bullish imo, it's super neutral which to me is good news because Google is known to only hop into things officially when they know for certain it will be profitable for them, and that's going to still be years down the line if it's going to be with Chainlink
i have no doubt in my mind that Google has some team working on their own version of to be ahead of the curve if there should ever be a boom in need for decentralized oracle services
right now there are many things incomplete with Chainlink which is good news, a lot of progress to be made and it will all be great
at worst, it'll at least be a project that stays in active development which is always good

>>21570450
>but Google's representative on this clearly stated that they are not formal partners
Because Chainlink never applied via the partnership program.
What Google Cloud did with Chainlink was much more valuable than that.

>nor do they have any sort of agreement in place
What, like a contract?
lmao

This is what Google Cloud did before Chainlink ever publicly uttered a word on the matter:
1) Google Cloud ran a Chainlink testnet node
2) Google Cloud posted a deep dive on Chainlink+BigQuery
3) Google Cloud tweeted about it on their main Twitter handle

And only THEN did Chainlink even acknowledge this was even a thing.

Nolinkers have been seething about this so much since then, that they put up a whole army of strawmen to try and minimize this very simple timeline.

>>21570628
i understand what happened, but i don't think you understand the relationship between chainlink and google (GCP)
it's one where they keep in touch, but it was integrated to give developers another tool when using bigquery (that's all)
are they possibly working together on something more right now? sure, it's likely since they still talk on a weekly/monthly basis according to sergey, but it's all speculation on all sides, including mine
i've always been bullish on link and will continue to be until there's a solid reason not to be, but what you're doing is putting hopium out there
which is totally fine, i do the same, but i acknowledge that it's pure speculation
don't ever get super attached to the point where you can't see the true picture, always try to look at it from a few steps back as someone who doesn't want something like this to be huge
i don't discredit it at all, quite the opposite, but i don't blow it out of proportion either
hopium isn't good for anyone
well except for twitter so people FOMO in like they have been since hopium is being shilled by the boatload by the largest chainlink bull accounts, which i guess is good but natural growth in the long-term (at least 3-5 more years from now) is what i'm in it for

>>21571025
>but i don't think you understand the relationship between chainlink and google (GCP)
I don't care.

Whatever it is, it does not change this very simple fact:
1) Google Cloud ran a Chainlink testnet node
2) Google Cloud posted a deep dive on Chainlink+BigQuery
3) Google Cloud tweeted about it on their main Twitter handle

And only THEN did Chainlink even acknowledge this was even a thing.

Go short x10

>>21571049
yes, that's fine, google posted it first then chainlink did
good on them, doesn't change the fact that it's only a tool they provide their users on their platform that costs them absolutely nothing and gives their platform another tool giving users yet another reason to use them
they do this all the time
i just don't get why everyone's so obsessed with this google blog post about how devs can now use chainlink if they'd like with bigquery, when chainlink has had so many actual partnerships
people just want to tell people Google is a partner so bad just for the name instead of explaining to people the rest of the real partnerships and integrations that matter and are actually being used daily in big projects

>>21571440
>it's only a tool they provide their users
holy cope lmao

>>21564877

>>21571473
i'm long link lmao ive been for 3 years
all im saying is there's actual partnerships we can show people that are truly huge, but people like you can only focus on the google post because they want to tell people link is partnered with google and it's huge
it's not huge, wasn't huge, possibly in the future they may do something huge together, but thats speculation
jesus christ, you're so thickheaded
just sell please, having people like you in the community is a huge sell signal
sacrifice yourself for the greater good of chainlink

the days of binance are numbered

real Dexes with all the functionality of binance coming soon. They will grow in liquidity as liquidity pools become actually profitable.
then all it takes is one slip up from CZ that shows the manipulation and people will flee to Dexes, leaving CZ with hopefully a ton of debt.

>>21571532
https://gist.github.com/allenday/c5cddaa76ebd18208af9764c79b682f8
They are literally giving you crumbs if youre diligent enough to look

>>21571440
>i just don't get why everyone's so obsessed with this google blog post about how devs can now use chainlink if they'd like with bigquery
because blockchain has been relatively useless besides shuffling value since bitcoins inception, some interest in a way to connect data to blockchain from the worlds largest data consumer/provider is something the entire space should be happy about

>>21571532
Here's a protip: "partnership" is a meme word pushed by Chink crypto scammers.
As soon as you fixate on that word, you fall into the fudders' strawman trap.

1) Google Cloud ran a Chainlink testnet node
2) Google Cloud posted a deep dive on Chainlink+BigQuery
3) Google Cloud tweeted about it on their main Twitter handle
All before Chainlink ever acknowledged this was a thing.

That's what this always was.

>>21566628
oh it was just a coordinated fud by discord trannies

>>21564955
Same what happened to gold and silver, bankers will manipulate the price and make a fortune controlling the shorts.

>>21571557
oh ffs dude it's the same dude that made the blog post offering chainlink as a tool for GCP users
all he's doing is updating it for more use cases to make available for their users
please guys please you're starting to drive me mad, chainlink has so many amazing partnerships and you're focusing on this integration? nobody's using it there yet
it might be huge yes, but let's talk about literally the hundreds of partnerships where chainlink is securing an insane amount of $ for
this is more bullish than just saying look breadcrumbs by google guy, he works for google, it's a google thing, google is huge and its a huge google partnership
>google says they're not a formal partner
you guys: "because they're building a new earth with the use of chainlink so they don't even want to admit yet that they're partnered"
you guys are schizo or something
so many great things chainlink has done and u choose to ignore those and chase a nothingburger
please sell guys, you're all massive sell signals

>>21571689
>the blog post offering chainlink as a tool for GCP users

Semantics: the last bastion of the copelet.

>>21571649
futures and options should not be allowed to have higher marketcaps than the underlying asset

in fact they should be banned completely but that will never happen

>>21571733
we all know why

>>21571701
>Semantics: the last bastion of the copelet.
you're literally talking about yourself here

>>21571756
Google Cloud:
>literally shills Chainlink by name

You:
>i-it's just a blogpost offering Chainlink as a possible, optional, available, non-commital, elective tool ;____;

>>21565001
Don't
>>21565045
This

>>21567210
You become classed as a reputable financial institution?

>oogle perdner shep

>>21571809
sigh, anon, i don't wanna argue with you
in the end, you were smart enough to pick up link early as was i
thats where our similarities end clearly, so im just going to drop it because you're not able to understand what i'm trying to say
i'm insanely bullish on chainlink, always have been, more now than ever and it's because of things that actually use it every day to secure billions of $ at this point
we've made it, but you're still trying to push hopium
still, good luck with everything

>>21572136
>i don't wanna argue with you
You certainly did, you just didn't have anything to back up your bs.

>>21572156
my point was Google made a very clear statement
you took that statement and "read between the lines" because i guess you're a psychic and proceeded to tell people how this is huge and that not being formally partnered is insanely huge
guess you know better than what the google spokesperson said
i'm happy for you, but i'm gonna go now
if i ever need a tarot card reading or a palm reading i'll find you

>>21572199
>my point was Google made a very clear statement
One that in no way changes what happened between Google Cloud and Chainlink.

gj attacking that strawman though.

>>21564877
UH OH STINKIES

>>21564877

This shit right here will be the biggest roadblock to $20+ for Link. If Link continues to its reputation of liquidating shorts, then we'll see another pump in the near future. As for now, I expect continued crabbing between $12 ~ $17 because of chinks and other big time whales manipulating the market.

>>21572209
>that in no way changes what happened between Google Cloud and Chainlink.
Google Cloud and Chainlink, sitting in a tree,
K I S S I N G

>>21572156
>>21572199
>>21572156
>>21572199
Fuckin justed lmfao i love linkie vs linkie violence sometimes
Ngl tho this dude justed you at every angle
Was a good read but he really killed you with that psychic bit
Kek

>>21566660
>Infinite digital money to short vs retail retards that barely have money to pay their rent
But this can also be done with shorting on AAve.... ah no sorry ya need a collateral

By the way it was an old news that link had futures on leverage abilitated

ALSO THINK ABOUT THIS: When bull FUTURES JEWS gonna LONG and the psycological effect will be GREATT

>>21565072
yes a bunch of neets will buy up the hundreds of millions that CZ will dump on you kek

>>21572199
>you took that statement and "read between the lines"
What are you even saying?

>>21566822
>Google logos removed from Chainlink website too.

literally still on the website

>You cannot even find the Google tweet anymore.

literally still up on twitter

>https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1139217022477361152
>https://twitter.com/GCPcloud/status/1139242028498374656
>https://twitter.com/GCPcloud/status/1141669527790465024
>https://twitter.com/GCPcloud/status/1209179382188773381

>>21571588
you need to go back

>>21572613
Based.

>>21572645
Self-aware post

>>21565555
based

Link is the new XRP kek. Shitcoin.

Short this shit into oblivion.

>>21566378
House always wins

I have never seen so much coordinated official FUD in all my fucking life.

The Bloomberg article written by an 80 IQ midwit SJW so you could interpret ANYTHING from it, Binance announcing 75X shorts, even fucking Coinbase finally pushes LINK news after two weeks from coindesk and it’s pic related.

We have to be close now. This is fucking insane.

>>21564877
LMAOOOOOOOOOO IT'S OVER FOR LINKJEETS

PIC REL

WHAT, DID YOU THINK THIS PUMP WAS ORGANIC? KEK INSIDERS BEEN WAITING TO SHORT THE SHIT OUT OF THIS SCAMTOKEN. YOU ALL GOT PLAYED. LINKJEETS ON SUICIDE WATCH.

IS THIS BEARISH? CAN SOMEONE ANZWER PLEASE?

Can someone give an honest answer. So sad im just a linklet hoping my 300 links can give me one month of freedom

Oh fuck, that's it. I'm selling everything.

>>21573306
patience fren

>>21573306
small pullback, relax

I’m out...sold for x176 my initial investment ($).

75% discount incooooming

I bought in at $0.23 and I sold today at $17. I made a pretty fat stack but I've never been this sad to make money, actually heartbroken right now

>>21573894
This...I’ve bought 0.09 and sold at +/-16.50$. Insane gains so couldn’t resist selling.

Why would they only short it and not go long?

>>21574071
Godspeed my man. I decided I would leave my original investment in my wallet and move the rest over to my bank account so I can start fresh with something new and try to live out the Chain link experience a second time. Either way it's been an honour to be a link marine.

Worst case scenario I'll just be the guy who sold BTC at $800 in 2016 but for LINK

>>21565045
RSR is on maintenance in Kyberswap. Is that bad?

>>21573035
dude how new are you, do you fall for this tranny shit? x75 Futures have been around for literally months, now there's even 125. Stop arguing with the people that are stealing the linkies from under you and buy buy buy. I just moved 25% of my stack from XOR to LINK again preceding this pump. 16.50-17 is the floor I doubt it will go lower, if it does I suggest you buy that shit because you have literally 10 days.

>>21565555
Price locked in at $5555!