/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21306900
Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

>>21306900
only about 200k :(

>>21306900
>but holding that level would be imposs-
stopped reading, not selling

>>21306900
half a million
but i think its going to $100 at least

Lol, way more than that, frendo.

$32 unironically seems like a bearish estimate to me

>>21306900
if it goes that high i'll be in the six figure range.

>>21306900
>holding that level would be impossible
This is correct as $1k is FUD

>>21306900
Only 38k

how can you he an expert and yet know so little
literally say band has a bigger potential
instead of understanding why chainlink is so far ahead they just pull some 2 second thought out of their ass
also chainlink pumping only because of defi

>>21306900
But holding that level would be impossible.

I am a linklet and i only have 154.77. But if hits that price i will have almost 5K USD to spent with little girls.

>>21307124
Just fucking sold my entire stack

>>21306900
FUD

Based cointelegraph editor pumping his bags

>>21306900
Normies, basedboi devs who missed out, and "crypto journalists" have still not realized that Link isn't going to retrace, or that the internal tokenomics of staking are going to push the price far beyond what they think is "possible" "probable" or "likely".

>>21306900
I hate that scummy clickbait PnD sites like this report on Link now. We've come this far, and still they understand nothing!

>>21306900
nice fud op

Another article that pushes the $32 meme, why this number?
https://en.ethereumworldnews.com/chainlink-link-hitting-32-is-possible-but-risky-crypto-analyst/

>>21306938 >>21306942 >>21306951 >>21306962 >>21306964 >>21306993
>>21307020 >>21307044 >>21307077 >>21307104 >>21307124 >>21307159
>>21307165 >>21307184 >>21307188 >>21307197 >>21307199 >>21307247

>>21307446
prob some basic bitch TA that recognizes the obvious parabolic lines but fails to realize fundamentals like staking tokenomics, SWIFT volume, and just a lack of appreciation for Sergey in general. There is literally no way LINK falls off a cliff after 32, unless that is an upside down cliff in upside down world where you "fall" upward, past the moon and saturn

>>21307596
About stacking rewards, do you think we gonna get it when we reach 20$?

>>21306900
>analyst predicts 32$
kek anal memes predicted 1000$ eoy a long time ago analyst btfo

>>21307446
>32
>2020
>14.46
What these numbers means? 32 is a strong number, but 33 is more strong enough. 14 are two 7 and 46 is 7x6 + 2.

>>21307446
Because they refer to the same analyst
are you stupid?

>>21307647
>do you think we gonna get it
nigger

>>21307104
>instead of understanding why chainlink is so far ahead they just pull some 2 second thought out of their ass

Explain why it's not just another gaycoin ponzi scheme, I dare you

>>21307777

>>21307813
i will not
go read the archives if you are really interested

>>21307907
Because you dont know lmao

bois will my 21 links make it? bought in at 3 bucks

>>21307931
you caught me anon
good job

32 eoy is not even fud it's just low iq

>>21307931
Have you noticed the stench of bum piss in your leftist filled hellhole of a neighborhood?

Lmao this is the new best FUD they have. First they give a very lowball target and then say yeah it might reach that, but it will dump straight back down.

>>21307235

Called $25 a month ago

$32 back down to $5 where its sustainable.
Unless you're a leaf, a cup of coffee isn't $32.

>>21306900
>predicts
holy shit it must be true