/biz/ - Business & Finance

OH NO NO NO LINKPOOLIANS WE GOT TOO COCKY

>>20580674
>there will only be 1 leading node provider
>nobody could possibly want to query 10+ nodes for more accurate and tamper-proof data

>>20580710
you're right, there won't be 1 leading node operator. there will be a few leading node operators.
hurr durr chainlink is decenturulized

Fake

>>20580782
I don't necessarily think it's a fault of chainlink that the network can't be infinitely decentralized as a result of both the initial capital needed (for node collateral) and the technical know-how as well as the infrastructure to support little to no downtime and fast responses.

Yes, it will likely be monopolized by a few dozen entities, hopefully more, but you can't expect a solution to exist where retarded NEETs hosting a node on their raspberry pi and 10Mbps internet can compete with those who dedicate significant time and capital towards the same operation.

>>20580674
How can you tell? Do you read nazi German?

>>20580674
Can anyone link the post from t-systems? Can’t find it

>>20580870
i agree with you on all of that and think that that's how it should be, but that's why it annoys me when people talk about how chainlink is truly decentralized. just can't be due to the points you just made that everyone that's got some common sense can figure out. you're a smart one anon, not many of us around these parts nowadays.

>>20580913
call her and ask
according to the fake website she is head of the project

>>20580674
everyone will offer staking you frens
linkpool just had some +%

>>20581022
That's a man

>>20580986
At the end of the day, if Chainlink reaches even 1% of its total uninhibited potential, we're all gonna make it
just gets comfier by the day

>>20581022
Would

>>20581022
How many linkies to sniff her stinky

>>20581036
for about 65 ETH/LP
Ouch

>>20581079
yeah, meanwhile
it was way cheaper back then