/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19967496
#PoweredByChainlink

>>19967515
Surprised this hasn’t gotten more “buzz”

Bump

>>19967496
Sorry if you're not 40x ICO and dumping. Buy Verasity unless you have $200K in LINK. then do nothing and wait for staking.

>>19967706
>Selling link to play shitcoin roulette

bump

>>19967496
Essentially what they're saying is there will be a third party (ChainLink)
that will automatically validate if a token conforms to their "token framework", "set of standards" etc.
DTCC is on there as a member. They're probably referring to their compliance oracle
The real beauty of this whole thing is, how much value does that really add?
What is the worth of this function that would normally be the job of traditional government agencies?

>>19967545
BTC dumped when this was announced.
Killed any price action for Link.

Just like with the BSN thing.

>>19968828
I want to not believe this
It's crazy, and generally speaking these types of things aren't true
But...there does appear to be a pattern

>>19968950
At this point you have to be delusional not to think this is somehow intentional.

>>19969024
Well...
We are still tied to bitcoin, to a degree
So naysayers would say yeah, if bitcoin dumps, obv link is going to dump
But it's the timing though
Every time we get some sort of good news and begin to take off, bitcoin proceeds to dump
I certainly have an eye on this

>>19968950
I didnt think nothing of it the first was it 2 or 3 times but now I refuse to belive anything else, its just too insane that we are stuck below $5, these fuckers actually think anyone with half a brain will sell.

>>19969064
>So naysayers would say yeah, if bitcoin dumps, obv link is going to dump
That's the point: it looks like BTC is getting dumped to keep Link from crossing key price levels.

No cryptos are safe from acute BTC dumps, not even Link which has been mooning consistently against BTC for two years.

>>19969064
> Tied to BTC propped up by tether
Fixed it for you.
Here's the scoop: for a long time now tether has been a centralized force in Blockchain markets. BTC still has it's volatility but tether prints brrrrrrr mass amounts of itself and no one raises an eyebrow. It's to claim BTC from OGs anons. Real libertarian OG cyberpunks who wanted to replace the state. Glowies come in with their meetings and such early days then figure out a way to disrupt volatility by introducing a stable coin to structure transactions.
They're dumping BTC every time link moons to disrupt the transfer of value. They're also replacing the vision of BTC because satoshi didn't want to cooperate with the existing financial system like Sergey does he wanted to completely replace it again begin anew. No more bailout remember?

>>19969415
>satoshi didn't want to cooperate with the existing financial system like Sergey does he wanted to completely replace it again begin anew.
That narrative sounds like bullshit when you realize Satoshi is actually working hand in hand with the glowies on Chainlink. I don't know why that shit idea of BTC replacing fiat still gets perpetuated on here because anyone in the right mind knows that dino bitch nigger boomer coin is dead in the fucking water. BTC was the test run for blockchain. Nothing more, nothing less.

>>19969415
>because satoshi didn't want to cooperate with the existing financial system like Sergey does
Smart contracts are a massive benefit for financial institutions, but they are essentially peer-to-peer.

>>19969415
Would it be sensible to say that Satoshi originally had a vision of not cooperating with the existing financial system but perhaps realized this wasn't going to happen?

As stated in an earlier post. The thing that really turns me on about ChainLink, outside of making money of course...
Is that, if oracles are going to take the roles of trust entities (governments), we can essentially privatize any function of the government that an oracle can replace
In other words, lets not tear down and replace the whole thing (unrealistic) but lets create more accountability and efficiency

>>19969456
Why does tether need to brrrrrr if no one is using BTC?
Also you're assuming sn = sn and I'm delusional but false premises and all. Glowies interact with blockchains through stablecoins
>>19969467
P2P is good but it's more the structure that concerns me especially when lending swaps and trades etc. happen with stables.
>>19969586
Whose ideals of accountability are we adhering to? If we assume that the attempt to circumvent and replace was unsuccessful because of infiltration then it makes sense to privatize because existing interests get a piece of the pie even if it's just to sell out, outright

>>19967545
we partnered with China government itself and gained about 40c
Nothing surprises me anymore.

>>19967545
Crazy that nearly all of the big companies listed there have connections to link that anons here found in 2017/2018
>digital asset
>DTCC

What's the point of this thread? The price is $4.59

Nobody cares about Chainstink

>>19969763
Keep hunting your "breadcrumbs" idiot

This project is going nowhere. It has been 4 years, it would have mooned already. Better luck next time kid. You had your pump and the smart people dumped

>>19969679
>>19969586
>>19969456
>>19969467
>>19969415
bump for interesting discussion

>>19969770
>Nobody cares about Chainstink
you do

>>19969586
>we can essentially privatize any function of the government that an oracle can replace
I allways thought we would end up with UN diplomat status or something. Cant have people extorting node operators, we need special rights and protection!
Do you have ideas for replaceable gov functions? Property and identity registration, contract law. But how do we "chainlink" the use of physical force?

>>19969024
>>19968950
the only counter argument ive accepted is that at the current sat value, we need btc to break 10k for LINK to break $5, and bitcoin doesn't want to break 10k

>>19969983
Link was pumping in USD and in sats after the BSN confirmation.

>>19969799
Checked. Face it anons the entire ecosystem has been corrupted if stable coins are the domain of three letters.
Anything that isn't dormant has probably been mapped and they're waiting. In the meantime they generate incentives to transfer value. Shitcoins for eth, defi for link for instance.
Keep your wealth by taking it off line cold storage anons. Back up your back ups. Be suspicious and be careful.