/biz/ - Business & Finance

yes

>>19893839
Yes. With a handful of low level scammers and genuine mentally ill anons missed in

>>19893866
*mixed

What's the deal with this pompous, gaudy logo?

>>19893839
>Do you sincerely believe that all BSV supporters and users are fake/paid by Calvin and that there is no genuine interest in big block bitcoin?
Yes

>>19893839
some actual retards may be out there. can't rule it out.

>>19893839

Nobody wants shit vision with some major darth vader like ass leading the way

I am a full time quant and only invested in BSV and ETH. There are no other projects with a decent chance to become global digital cash and run contracts on the chain. Micro transactions will for sure be a game changer.

>>19894267
Can confirm I am an actual retard who is a former nsa turned civilian senior data engineer. I have to handle data, processing and transmission at scale my entire career. Anyone who thinks scaling on chain is not only wrong but not possible is an arm chair tard with no real experience. 520 bsv stack, stay poor and delusional core cucks

>>19894598
nice try nsa

here is the basic philosophical difference between the 3 forks all other bullshit boils down to this:
btc: don't trust, verify!
bch: trust, but verify! (weird ideas about preconsensus for 0-conf)
bsv: trust, don't verify! (let the miners handle the blockchain you can ask them about your tx)

inb4 spv works trustless on a minority hash shitfork: no it doesn't.

I got BTC at $3 and crowdsale ETH. Unfortunately, BSV is legit.

>>19894769
Like I said, arm chair techies. Are you capable of forming your own original thoughts and opinions or only copy pasting?

>>19893839
You mean this pic related retard? Lol, a zoomer trapped in a boomers body

>>19894812
sorry that nobody buys your larp.
if you truly worked for nsa you understood the need for verifying information for it to have any value whatsoever. a gargantuan garbage dump of unverifiable information is absolutely worthless. it's just global burden with no benefit to anyone.

>>19893839
I wish I was paid for telling the truth.

>>19894896

>absolutely worthless

engineer working one one of the worlds largest public cloud computing fleets. bitcoin was always destined to end in datacenters, satoshi said so himself. your raspberry pi does fuck all so you might as well shove it up your ass.
>t.1000 BSV stack

>>19894896
SPV works you fucking brainlet. Imaging crippling the entire network only to verify your transaction with a raspberry pi lmao.

>>19894769
More like:
btc: when the subsidy ends, tx bandwidth becomes scarce resource, so people will be willing to pay high fees
bsv: when subsidy ends, massive tx volume will bring high aggregate fees

full nodes prevent you from following a chain that breaks rules, but it doesn't prevent you from following a chain that censors transactions. Attacks will start after subsidy becomes negligible.

>>19894896
Who is verifying your bank deposits this second? Your emails? Any of your data at all? Where are the raspberry pis making sure all these systems are accurate and honest? The companies (miners). Imagine that

I have no idea if it's actual literal drooling retards or very clever trolls on dozens of layers of irony

>>19894997
Imagine requiring people to leave a "mandatory promotional tweet" to use your junk platform, lmao

>>19895054
Imagine being a company and trying a shitty marketing campaign... Hmm wasn't that difficult. Did you have a point?

>>19893839
yes all 200 of them

>>19895031
>Attacks will start after subsidy becomes negligible.
sure sure magically miners decide to all cut down their main source of income

>>19895033
what a fucking mouthbreather larping cuck. toddler level of understanding of bitcoin too.

>>19895220
You think you understand the game theory here, but you don't. Keep holding BTC, friend

>>19895151

>25k moneybutton users
>13k lightning network nodes

>>19895021
spv works for bitcoin yes. not the shitforks. spv to be trustless the chain has to have a byzantine fault tolerant consensus.

>>19895220
>>19895303
You are so close to understanding, but you haven't fully thought through the no-subsidy environment

>>19895290
i have been doing it for a while sure as hell won't stop b4cause of a bunch of creggies yapping.
but do tell what incentives you think change when fees overtake subsidy exactly?

>>19895329
you are implying implication but refuse to show your hand that's called bluffing

>>19895280
Please elaborate with an actual point if you are capable.

>>19893839
No.
I was a bsv holder, up until the mess Craig made in court by crying and shitting himself publicly
Then I sold

>>19895303
>b-but btc miners could just switch over their hash and 51% attack it!! Not safuu, right CZ? Right??

>>19895395
>former trump supporter here

>>19895420
it is what it is 1-2% of btc hashrate is a joke and can be reorged by any mid sized bitcoin miner. which makes spv not trustless because the history is not actually immutable. so fucking simple...

>>19895391
my point was you have no clue what you are talking about if you compare bitcoin to centralized services based on trusted authority.

>>19895440
Current trump supporter here

>>19895540
oh and also the little fact that bitcoin protocol can only validate one data: the ledger or utxo set if you like.
everything else is basically garbage and will be pruned.

also one last question why you cucks follow a drama queen that even botched a suicide?

>>19895508
If someone would attempt a 51 attack starting another chain it would incentivise more "good" hash onto chain to capitalize on the huge cumalative reward when the non fraudulent chain takes back over and takes their block and tx rewards.

If you try and say, well a bunch of miners could conspire to form so much hashpower that this can't happen, then you have to admit the same can be said about BTC. Game theory dictates it won't and it hasn't, just the same as bsv, the same mechanics are in place

>>19893839
Maybe there is a use case for this? However I am against bitcoin cash / bitcoin sv because of the scammers behind it.

>>19895508
Yes miners will definitely risk their million dollar investments to 51% attack a chain and to double spend some micro transactions.

bsv is a flytrap for d-krug pseud paypiggies

>>19895566
Say something nice about him then.

Yes. All BSVtards are shills. Nothing special is happening in BSV. It will never scale unlike BTC and ETH. It can't do microtransactions. Don't ever look into it.

>>19895623
Do you think him being driven to the point of suicide by subversive satanic kikes make us support him more or less?

>>19896474
it's gonna be a more from me lad

I think it's funny all the BSV threads being made by core cucks, desperate seeking peer validation that CSW is a fraud. Why so worried guys?

>>19893839
No, actually. I think most of you are homosexuals, same as Craig. You recognized Craig early on as one of your own, and you desperately want him to succeed on your behalf.

>>19896474
So if he hates "kikes", why does he tongue kiss gay kikes?

>>19893839
What's your point? BSV is about to massively scale. You're the ones looking stupid trying to fud.

>>19894598
Can confirm you're an actual retard too.

The reality is, most of you fucks have been spoon fed literal shit from corecucks and ethereum pedos. None of you faggots are capable of understanding what is really happening. Your shitcoins are going to zero. BSV won't even be worth as much as you think. But in 20 years you could not imagine a world without it.

>>19893839
Only brainlet followers who will never make money are pro btc and against bsv.

Computer engineer here, was in bitcoin before it had a price, already millionaire. Used to chat daily with gavin, big blocker, currently (obviously) all in bsv. Long term there is no doubt in the superiority of bsv, though short term proof of social media and hate against craig wright might keep price suppressed for a while, but investing should be done on a 10 year timeframe minimum. It is incontrovertible that craig wright is the founder of bitcoin, he is also an autost with zero social skills and a huge ego, and a liar who has forged documents. These things are not mutually exclusive. But anyway long term hell be irrelevant, bsv is technically superior and the best devs have already switched to it.

Lightning is a joke.

it's never been bsv vs btc. It's bsv vs hyperledger, r3, swift, bsn, chainlink, defi
Everyone in BSV underestimates the power of corruption.
There is nothing more geopolitically critical than money. Thinking bsv has to win because it is objectively the best system from the users point of view is naive. The current monetary system is more like a system of control, the things that we view as negatives are positives to those who benefit from it

>>19893839
No! I sincerely believe that people like you try to promote a known scam now further, just to not lose as much.

>>19893839
Can attest showed bobs for 2 eth

>>19893839

I
The offspring ov the stellar race
My halo fallen and crushed upon the earth
That I may bring balance to this world
I
Son ov perdition
From sheer nothingness transgressed
Unto the highest self, to utmost freedom
To explore the starry nature ov my rage
I pulse ov existence
The law ov nature undenied
I hold the torch ov Heraclites
I
divine Iconoclast
Injecting chaos into my veins
With life accepted
With pain resurrected
Is the embrace ov God in man profound
The joy ov a dawn
The ecstasy ov dusk

Where great above meets great below
Let it be written!
Let it be done!

creg will die in jail soon.

>>19898264
Retard alert

>>19898999
>>19899384
LOL @ these 2 clowns