/biz/ - Business & Finance

waht dis?

>>19654963
imagine having a bag and shill it to dump it

>>19654967
>he doesn’t know

Elrond looks more powerful to me,

what do you think?

Coinbase rejected. Lolololololol

ETH 2.0 in 2020 instead of 2030

>>19655033
This is just a new list and old ones are still under evaluation.

>>19655093
This

>>19655078
>40 validators
>calls it eth 2.0 in 2020 instead of 2030

poor people's logic right here.

>>19655227
>bitcoin only had 1 node in 2009
>therefore, the network will never grow, better not buy a bag!

Shut the fuck up retard

There really has to be something wrong with this project.
Their Github is amazing and the innovation is really good.
Yet they are not able to get on par on the same level as Algorand or Hedera.
Is there something wrong with the tokenomics of this project or the marketing?
Want to buy 25 million but something is telling me not to do it because there is something fishy.
>Can the fudders and shillers of this project enlighten me why I should or should not buy a bag?

>>19654963
This fucking nigger coin sbould be gassed for how much it has jewed me

>>19656089
This is stopping me too. On paper it seems amazing, something is clearly going wrong behind the scenes to suppress this shit

>>19654967
>there are people here who don't know the BBQ and gizem feet memes

>>19656089
The unlocks have been relentlessz truly was made by a Chinese jew.

>>19656089
There is something wrong, it's centralized right now. The team runs the majority of the validators to keep the chain secure while they're figuring out a solution for the whale problem (whales able to get too many seats).

probably would work out well enough though as Binance supply is largely traded instead of staked, won't hit 66.66% staked.

everything else is great. fully sharded, 1000 tps per shard, silicon valley ex-amazon google apple team, fees not even 1 cent, binance connected, easy porting over of dApps from Ethereum to upgrade etc.

There's a binance AMA on the 14th. maybe worth seeing to make a decision. or waiting to see what solution they come up with to enhance their staking.

>>19656089
There is something wrong, it's centralized right now. The team runs the majority of the validators to keep the chain secure while they're figuring out a solution for the whale problem (whales able to get too many seats).

probably would work out well enough though as Binance supply is largely traded instead of staked, won't hit 66.66% staked at higher amounts staked overall.

everything else is great. fully sharded, 1000 tps per shard, silicon valley ex-amazon google apple team, fees not even 1 cent, binance connected, easy porting over of dApps from Ethereum to upgrade etc.

There's a binance AMA on the 14th. maybe worth seeing to make a decision. or waiting to see what solution they come up with to enhance their staking.

>>19656141
Do you think it's being suppressed or there are a lot of potential buyers like us who are just not buying because something seems really off?
>>19656150
Care to explain?
>>19656178
I am not sure what you are talking about.
>>19656289
Care to explain the whale problem what you mean with that?

If you are holding it on Binance isn't it automatically staked?

Yeah from a technical perspective compared to other platforms this should be in the marketcap around Algorand and Hedera, the fact it is not is a huge red flag for me.

Thank will put it in my agenda see what they are planning for future developments.