/biz/ - Business & Finance

Everyone on biz who isn't a retard has a stack, anon. Don't tell me you fell for the FUD, did you?

i haven't read about this shit for years but isn't it literally like instanteanous, free transactions

seems kind of based

I am currently down on some Uniswap gems, worried I am going to miss out on insane gains if I pull out now. Ugh, going to wait and hopefully at least break even then I guess I will buy a stack when it dips.

>>19629509
>Uniswap
>gems
Anon, I...

>>19629509
Uniswap is for PnD nothing else. You'll get burned sooner or later.take some profits out at least

>>19629739
I am at a loss currently

>>19629800
Get out while you can then. Once it pumps and dumps it's over with

This shit is like TRON, it may well pump but it's still hot trash. You are playing musical chairs if you buy this shit.

>>19629886
idk, that is what I thought but it has been pumping non stop for the past month. What would you recommend instead?

>>19629870
What is a good amount of NANO?

>>19629913
As much as you can afford, really.

nano is the future. amazing price still

It's retracing atm too, now is as good a time as ever. 13k sats.

>>19629886
If you think Nano is hot trash, then all of crypto is hot trash lmao
Every coin has gone through its hurdles. Nano is appealing because the feeless aspect, and split second transaction confirmation

Ok, I am transferring my ETH to Binance now.

>>19629886
>> like TRON

stopped reading right there.

NANO isn't like TRON at all. NANO isn't even like BITCOIN.

>>19630021
wait for the pullback to stop before buying in. Someone moved 40k nano to binance @ 1350. We are at 1275 now. Wait for it to stabilize and buy as it reverses. Might be at that point now, will see.

Scam

>>19630115
imagine having 40k nanies and selling near bottom prices.

>>19630159
It was some trader who wanted to break even. Even traders with long term bearish predictions are showing TA that suggests 13k to 18k is a solid bullish zone. Not sure what the guy was thinking really.

It's going down now, why would you buy the top

I am thinking I am going to wait until 1250, good idea?

>>19630191
>> the top

zoom out.

I sent two NANO transactions to the same address recently within 5 seconds of each other.
Second transaction was orphaned. Will the NANO ever go through?

>>19630195
Wait until trend reversal. It will stabilize and then when it jumps up a bit is when you buy. >19630191 Kind of has the right idea, but we are only at a short trend top. The real top is $37, and the next resistance is at 18k sats. But we are definitely retracing from a 100% gain in a 1 month period, and 20% gain in 24 hours, so a pullback is to be expected. Prob want to wait at least an hour or a half hour, but preferably as soon as sentiment gets bullish again, which as mentioned will be after it stabilizes and starts increasing in price again.

>>19630235
No such thing as orphaned transactions, but a receive block needs to be published. Which wallet are you using? I recommend Natrium. The Nano Wallet is depreciated as is Canoe, both are prone to errors. Import your seed with Natrium instead and it will be recognized.

Looks like it might have bottomed, buy now?

>>19630262
I sent it from Natrium to an exchange.

>>19630278
Wait for 1275-1280 assuming it doesn't drop lower.

>>19630280
Exchanges don't typically receive instantly like wallet to wallet. So it will go through in a few minutes. What is the txid? Want to make sure you aren't a troll.

>>19630278
Buy now

going up again

imagine missing out on this coin because you fell for 3 year old zackfud

>>19630308
Don't want to dox my wallet but here is the message

>>19630344
Where did that message come from? Doesnt look like Natrium to me. Nano doesnt have blocks, so there is nothing to 'Orphan'. If you can't provide a tx id I have to assume you are trolling because Nano threatens you in some way. Miner perhaps? Or uniswap biz scammer?

Nano is also asynchronous, there is no such thing as one tx being superseded by another. Next time learn a bit more about your opponent before trying to attack it.

>>19630344

troll - nano receives are asynchronous, it doesnt matter which order you recv

Ok, I got in at 1270, I hope I don't regret this. Thank you for your help anon. I will consider buying more if it continues to go up.

>>19630344
>Nano is also asynchronous, there is no such thing as one tx being superseded by another. Next time learn a bit more about your opponent before trying to attack it.
>>19630344
maybe the exchange is scamming him - what exch?

>>19630427
Nah it's definitely a troll. The scammers here are threatened by legit projects. Nano seems to be a favorite, but you see other legit projects attacked too.

>>19630412
Not a troll, transactions show up as pending in block explorer

Poor fag here, I have 10K LinuxServer Nano coins
https://blog.linuxserver.io/2020/05/31/deploying-your-own-crypto/

When moon?

Also it looks like their faucet still has plenty to give
https://wallet.linuxserver.io/#/nano.linuxserver.io/address/nano_3wae8k5chcp99emtexx11um1iun3shjras1yhsywqm3o9ismriqdworj383o

>>19629947
>instantaneous transactions
Cool so theoretically you could every transaction in the world using like 2 nano kek what a joke, fast transactions = bearish. Slow transactions = bullish, encourage hodling.

>>19630451
>Source: dude trust me bro

>>19630450

>>19630477
assuming this isn't inspect element fud, which I think it is, then it is an issue with your exchange. Nano tx can't be orphaned. They can be left pending, but they are confirmed as soon as the receiving wallet performs the necessary proof of work. I am still calling troll.

>>19630512
It's not a troll, but believe whatever you want. I believe in NANO too but I'm not sure why this happened, thankfully it is not a significant amount.

Contact your exchange about it then. Nano doesnt even use blocks and transactions can be processed in any order.

>>19630111
Yes it is.
>muh usecase is different
a scam is a scam.

>>19630675
How is it a scam?

Free transactions, instant confirmation, zero inflation, permissionless, am I missing something?

Does anyone have the contract? Etherscan is just giving me meme tokens

>>19630742
NANO isn't an ERC20. It is a top 50 coin, completely unique technology. It is on binance and kucoin. Rumored to be listed on coinbase at the end of this month too.

>>19630742
https://www.binance.com/en/trade/NANO_BTC

>>19630459
Thanks faggot I was in their discord since forever but forgot to register

>>19630742
Never go full retard

Sounds like he fell for the Vitalik FUD

>>19630533
i sent one nano to my phone wallet then another one few seconds after and nothing was orphaned or whatever. probably an exchange issue.

>>19630788
Fucking lol. Muh "coinbase listing" has been touted by Nano bagholders since 2017 newfag.

>>19630948
He is fudding. Nano can handle 500 transactions per second at the moment without issue. Even after it doesn't cause transactions to be lost. There have been zero lost tx on the nano network to this date.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/9lm00c/will_nano_be_unusable_due_to_slow_sync/

>>19630977
How is it a scam though? It sounds like you just don't like it.

the massive bags of people that bought this at $30+ will keep it from moving. Franchesco "The Bomber" controlling a significant portion of the stolen nano will also keep it from mooning.

>>19631143
>>19630977
>>19630460
>>19630127
>>19629886

>>19629509

>ngmi

>>19631210
Thanks, I pulled out though. Hopefully I didn't buy the top @ 1270 for NANO. It is holding so far.

Nano make transaction in 150ms..

>>19631143
lmao. no one that bought at 30 dollar is still holding. you don't really understand how markets work.

Shut up you fucking nanoids. You're all going to lose your money. Fucking psychopaths

>>19631964
>>19631196

>>19629276
everything is going up. hell zill pulled a 10x. get lost with your shiling

>>19631984
Thanks, I am starting to see what is going on. FUD like this was why I stayed away from NANO, but it seems like it isn't really based in reality.

>>19630688
it's only a scam to miners. everyone else knows it's legit
$4 before 6/15

>>19630928
imagine trusting to your money to that retard

>>19629276
Whale death gasp. Buy AAVE.

nano is based. anyone saying it's a scam is a fee-collecting rent seeker whose wallet is about to get lighter.

>>19632159
Its just meme FUD, no way Vitalik never said that.

>>19632222
he created a literal ponzi that allowed for hundreds of scams. that faggot set crypto back 5 years minimum. he's a piece of shit

I just deposited 500 nano to binance but got some error so i did it again and it went through but now i have 1000 nano on binance. Wtf why did they double credit me? Should i try withdrawing all 1k and deposit again to double it again lol

>>19632334
Withdraw quick and never use that account again
(If you liked my advice you can tip me :3)

>>19632334
nice 2017 era FUD

You niggers are really scared, aren't you?

>>19632334
lies.

>>19632222
CHECKED and witnessed

you get so used to the dubs, trips, quads, and greens, it becomes a way of life. Kek is a generous god.

>>19629509
>I will wait till it magically pumps again
>Then get out with no profits
>To gamble on the next shitcoin because it started pumping and then I remembered how brilliant it is.
>All this will work perfectly

>>19632511
Fair enough, but I think Nano actually might have legs. I am done with sub 100 coins.

>>19632570
sell your bag
and get yourself a bag

>>19632610
Aren't we all playing musical chairs here, fren? I will HODL this time though.

>>19632625
musical chairs is for the scam cryptos that need constant development to generate hype and muh store of value meme. NANO is the only coin that can deliver on the promise of p2p digital cash right now.

>>19632674
seems like the marketing arm sucks donkey balls desu tho. they should hire a team to make memes and I bet it would pump like crazy

>>19632674
also, better store of value cause no inflation.

>>19632692
that's why we're here
>>19632714
true facts. i was attempting to make fun of the fact that batcoif had to adjust its marketing line to SoV when it couldn't deliver on satoshis original intent

BTC is worth giving respect to I feel. But it is outdated tech and I think it will eventually crash due to the ledger getting too bloated. If the cost and/or fees drop too much this is more or less an inevitability I think.

Hey Nanons, am I going to make it?

>>19632786
i was a BTC fan because it used to be about being your own bank and eliminating the corrupt financial system; but due to emergent centralization, it has become what it was designed to replace. and you're right, it deserves respect because of the original idea. colin solved the problems inherent in BTCs design, but he wouldn't have done it without BTC paving the way.

>>19632829
we're all going to make it fren

>>19632999
Highest trips possible checked

>>19632999

>>19632999

Are we still gonna go up?

>>19633230

>>19633269
It's still at +11% in 24 hours and +100% in the last few weeks. How much more dicking do you need you slut. At least give chad nano some time to eat a sammich and take a nap. Fucking whore.

>>19633269
in my meditation last night, i saw in my mind's eye $4 on june 15th. i was the anon last night that saw $1.22 for yesterday

>>19633345
we need more volume for $4

>>19633670
i'm just reporting what i see

Is this gearing up for another pump soonish? I see some movement.

consolidating on support

>>19634452
seems to be, fren

>>19634483
>>19634465
im scared to add to my stack.
BTC is gonna make a move soon.

>>19634550
Last time BTC moved NANO only dropped maybe 50 sats and it recovered +100 within 24 hours. I wouldn't worry about BTC. NANO has had solid +10% gains, BTC not so much. Any money that leaves NANO for a BTC ride is going right back in it anyways.

uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

>>19634622
inb4 nano 2xes overnight.

AMERILARDS ARE WAKING UP

QUICK BUY BUY BUY

>>19634622
>>19634655
kek is with us frens

>>19634810
can someone make some NANO PEPES? :D

>>19634828

>>19634828
anons already have.
>>19634853
this one needs to be updated. still has troy in it. lmao

>>19634853
lmao

>>19634828
I think the Link marines paid someone to make hundreds of chainlink memes. Might be a decent investment.

I was even thinking how one could make a website that hires pajeets and/or auto generates memes on a cost per meme basis. Since the value of an original meme is so cheap you could even use something like NANO as the preferred payment method. Kind of like a coinslot machine but paying a website to create you OC. God I need to sleep.

>>19633670

btw to the anon that got me to buy in at 1275, ty I appreciate it. Shit usually drop 5-10% right after I buy in, but then again I have been fucking around on uniswap so I shouldn't be surprised

>>19634955
checked. kek has blessed your purchase

Nano goes up, Chainlink goes down.

Coincidence?

>>19635057
Dont worry nano will fall soon. All these mongoloid nanoids will lose all their money.

>>19635496
>:3 it isn't a party until nano fudder shows up

UwU :x

>>19635571
You should probably start selling before you lose all your Daddy's money. This vaporware is all backed by fucking neats dadies money. "No daddy this is the coin. This coin will take us to the moon. I swear daddy. Just need to buy a suicide stack". Fucking lol. Daddy is going to spank you hard when you lose his money

>>19635985
sounds legit

>>19632829
must have a rich fucking "daddy"

idk about spanking at this age but I can't speak to your home life. you trying to tell us something bro?

>>19632201
Fucking based, spitting fire as the developer and ceo

>>19635985
I know enough about psychology that this comment actually has me worried about nanofudder. projection and what not. After all, we can only see in the outer world what we know from the inner. Wondering if we should call family services

>>19636121
hes "spanking" that fire too, check the COO

>>19636087
Just you wait nano fag. Your time is coming

>>19636256
LMAO

>>19636256
You are alright nanofudder, always good for a laugh

If you believe NANO will surpass ETH or even BTC, all you need is a stack of 1000. At ETH's current market cap, 1000 would be worth over $200k, and at BTC's market cap 1000 would be worth over $1M. I'm still 95% in BTC, but if there is any contender that could beat BTC, its NANO.

>>19636256
>no u
>why aren't my shitcoins mooning
>AAAAAAAAAAAA