/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19590190
Those who know about Chainlink already own it. Those who already own it knew about these connections ages ago. If you had no idea what it was and saw this post, would you rush to buy it?

>>19590260
If this cannot generate any new interest, nothing will.

>>19590190
that's why it's almost at ath, and it's been known. lag time, newfags buying in. bitcoin below 5$.

>>19590277
Time to sell question mark

>>19590190
>link is a normie coin

>>19590277
Nice digits.
Keep in mind people will be buying ChainLink and using it without even realizing it.

Only big brains who make smart contract applications need to know and utilize ChainLink. Everyone will consume products which consumes ChainLink.

>>19590328

>>19590190
reminder that crypto "journalist" have been shilling their various shitcoin bags in a similarly subtle ways every week for the past 3 years then have their article spammed on /biz/ so their value has diminished over time

>>19590297
>that's why it's almost at ath
Nope, Link was around 4.50 when this announcement was made.

>>19590353
we are so early

>>19590260
This. Everyone in crypto has settled into teams by now. Price movement is really going to come down to industry use and the next bull run for new normie money. This is all the start of industry use. When link stops funding the nodes itself there will be positive upward pressure.

When this will happen who knows, after staking for sure. Anyway i just keep buying.

>>19590355
The article is merely respresenting the facts.

>>19590328
>>19590353
>>19590376
Link is many things, but definitely not a normie coin.

>>19590277
The price will be driven up by institutional adoption and use, not just normies buying it en mass. The same way Ford don't announce 'Hey, our cars work thanks to these Bosch electronics (for example), companies will be offering services running on Chainlink without naming it. The end user doesn't care.

>>19590190
Just stop fucking telling people and buy regularly, I mean you're only going to pump the shit stack you have.

Anyone with half a brain knows where it's going, so get more money together and buy more, plebs always give themselves away by trying to pump their stack.

>>19590388
iota literally partnered with major car and smart electronics manufacturers in 2017. volkswagen had a slide about iota in THEIR presentation. where did it get them?
microsoft never mentioned chainlink anywhere. some remote branch of microsoft happened to join an association chainlink also joined. wow.

>>19590190
I don’t need to be fucking reminded

>>19590377
Checked btw

>>19590490
>iota literally partnered with major car and smart electronics manufacturers in 2017.
iota also reached number 6 at the height of the Dec 2017 bubble.

Meanwhile Link can't even break top 10 in a bearcrabmarket.

>some remote branch of microsoft happened to join an association chainlink also joined
This is headcanon.

>>19590735
Trump is going to wipe the floor with him.

>>19590765
kek

>>19590602
yes this tactic helped the first companies dump bags and was a major success, but chainlink is now doing the same thing other projects did in '16 and '17. also with success, it already went above a billion in mcap and made the founders and ico buyers rich. the same success is impossible because a lot of people will remember all the more credible hype that still lead nowhere. so only newcomers and retards will be blinded by it, in diminishing numbers (bitshares is now #96)

>>19590444
>'Hey, our cars work thanks to these Bosch electronics (for example),

you must not go to many trade conventions then. shit like that is pretty common.

>>19590787
>yes this tactic helped the first companies dump bags
That's Azure.
Microsoft was trying to get as many crypto projects as possible on board with Azure.

>chainlink is now doing the same thing other projects did in '16 and '17
Except Chainlink never announces anything first.
It's always the other side making the announcement.

>also with success
Not at all, see OP.

This is all a test. If doing nothing is too much for you sell and fuck off.

Seriously sell and never come back to /biz/ it’ll be better for your health. Especially don’t come back when the singularity happens, for your own sake.

>>19590836
>It's always the other side making the announcement.

ya sure. it's not like shitcoiners haven't paid people to use and shill their products or anything.

>>19590836
>Except Chainlink never announces anything first.
microsoft never announced anything though, it's usually bagholder journalists making the announcement

>>19590940
In 99% of the cases, "partnerships" between shitcoins and major companies are announced by the shitcoin.
With Link that's never the case.

>>19590953
>it's usually bagholder journalists making the announcement
The InterWork Alliance itself made this announcement you derp.
Cointelegraph merely reported it.

This is such strange cope.

>>19590953
>>19590940
You know these fuds only work on newfags and reddit, right?

>>19591092
you're hopeless. enjoy being poor i guess.

>>19591124
kek you got btfo

>>19590444
checked. stop soon feeding new fags.

>>19591124
And you're retarded.
Cointelegraph only reported exactly what InterWork Alliance itself stated.
"Muh journalists shilling their bags" is utterly irrelevant here.

>>19591114
yeah. the kind of people I want to prevent from buying into your PnD bullshit, faggot.

>>19591237
>PnD bullshit
better call Nasdaq and tell them what they got themselves into.

>>19591263
is this all you retards can come up with? no fundamentals other than being a bunch of bagholders shilling to retards into false get-rich-quick bullshit? holy fucking shit. Good for Nasdaq, this is not specific to any fucking shitcoin by the way.

>>19591288
That's a lot of seethecope lmao.

>>19591237
>>19591288
holy fuck faggot, seethe more

>>19591092
internetwork also announced hedera, neo and other cryptos as their members, they mentioned literally nothing special about chainlink (it was only the cointelegraph "journalist" that decided to list it that way), yet i haven't seen any bagholders complaining about it not making their shitcoins 10x. only and exclusively linkies.

>>19591465
Hedera and NEO, yes.
NEO as a "sponsor" though, and Hedera is a minor name that is also partnered with Link.

It makes perfect sense for cointelegraph to single out Link.

>>19591092
internetwork also announced hedera, neo and other cryptos as their members, they mentioned literally nothing special about chainlink (it was only the cointelegraph "journalist" that decided to list it that way), yet i haven't seen any bagholders complaining about it not making their shitcoins 10x. only and exclusively linkies.

>>19591514
see >>19591508

>>19591508
L M A O

see
>>19591124

>>19591537
See >>19591535

>>19590816
To business partners maybe; not so much to the average purchaser wandering into the showroom.

>>19590376
you are so fucking based