/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19466108
The Toilet Witch predicted this.

Technical retard here, what does this mean?

>>19466264
Payments for nodes that have collateralized stake

>>19466279
Yeah but when?

this has nothing to do with chainlink

>>19466279
Also any more info to add? I will gobble it all up just like sergay and his bigmacs.
Ty though.

>>19466284
>>19466305

When is the wrong question.
In programming, when a “commit” is made and “merged” it is immediately live to anyone running the latest code.

The answer is: already
The next question should be:
When will the nodes be updating their code in production?

>>19466332
The answer is: I don’t know.

What I do know: they’d be fucking retarded not to start staking and earning more on collateralized contracts.

Does this mean you will be able to run a node yourself right now, out the gate?

I don’t know. I wouldn’t recommend you do so anyway. Most of us, including myself, are not qualified to run a node. A malicious actor could fuck you by corrupting your nodes data with the intent of just bankrupting you.


Why would they do that? Losing stake means you have to buy back in. The more stake lost and the more actors needing to buy back in, the higher your buy back in price will be as the fucked / independent bad nodes themselves will need to compete to buy up link on the free market.

My recommendation is take your percentage cut like a man and stake with one of the CL network Sergey hand picked operators. They will take a good chunk, but you will never be “fucked”

>>19466410
TLDR
Reddit tier brainlet explainatjon:

Staking is available for nodes
Don’t know when they’ll update but should be soon
You should not stake your own node as many would be happy to fuck you out of your link by hacking your node and making you provide bad data

>>19466332
shut up nerd and tell me when I get my lambo

>>19466436
In the future just leave this post out, if they cant read what you wrote above and understand it, they don't deserve the knowledge.
Also you're doing good work anon. I don't think many understand the risk for early operators.

>>19466459
Within 6 years a 1k stack will make your worth 10 million

Don’t believe me: fine
You’re rich either way.
The 4iR is just beginning.

10,000 people will become multi millionaires

1,000 will become billionaires

A small price to pay for what is to come. So many will be unemployed.

There are many pieces to the puzzle falling in line. The most important are the following:

1. One main blockchain as a source of reference
2. An oracle network with incentivized good behavior and collateralized trust
3. Trustworthy tamperproof IoT edge devices

1. Ethereum Mainnet
2. Chainlink
3. Ledger IoT trusted enclave devices

>>19466514
>6 years

I will be dead by then for FUCK sake.

>>19466514
I don't know who this guy is, but I like him!

>>19466514
>10,000 people will become multi millionaires
Only 10k ppl have a 1k+ stack?

>>19466523
just play some MMOs the 6year wait will be over in a flash.

>>19466562
Sounds about right, there is some pic around with the numbers but I didn't save it. Maybe some kind anon will post it.

>>19466562
Literally no one knows about chainlink except here

Can you buy this shitcoin on uniswap or?

>>19466598
coinbase or gemini, plus lots of other places.

>>19466562
I said multimillionaire. I did not limit the multimillionaire cap to 10 million. Many anons will have tens if not a few hundred million.

>>19466514
theres 2000 billonaires in the world right now retard

>>19466616
Yes. Making that 3,000 for the automation that will replace hundreds of millions is a footnote in the direction humanity is headed.

Also, trillionaire class will be formed during this time.

Just as millionaires were the elite of the 2iR, billionaires the elite of the 3iR, trillionaire class will be the result and elite of the 4iR.

>>19466616
I would also keep in mind the 1,000 billionaires is an overly generous assumption.

I myself would be hard pressed to hold a massive stack past 1k a coin

>>19466514
Six years
really?

>>19466679
Till 10,000 USD a coin.

>>19466689
How long do you think until we hit $40?

>>19466514
I thought you were talking about bitcoin and not chainlink, what a waste of trext.

>>19466652
sounds pretty fuckin based

>>19466726
like 2 months

>>19466245
Who?

>>19466689
2025 is my projected expectation that we come out of the wood work, 1000 link is fine but most of us have in the 10k plus range. RSR I suspect will make a couple of millionaires / give a couple of hundreds of thousands.

if you've lookes into that protect what are your thoughts?

>>19466889
The Toilet Witch.

>>19466332
>>19466410
>>19466436
>>19466514
Based and thanks for answering.

>>19466917
I don’t care for RSR.
I’m not a crypto fan by any means beyond capacity for utility in the 4iR.

Everything else doesn’t matter to me.
Doesn’t mean your favored projects aren’t good. Doesn’t mean they are good either: just not what I’m looking for or care for.

>>19466978
I honestly think those who hold at least 1K LINK will be in the 100's of millions maybe more.
Not to mention the passive income. (I got some LP)


So basically staking is ready and nodes need to update?

>>19467039
So you're telling me my 1000 link is going to give me financial freedom

>>19467067
Yes.

>>19466591
what about the commercial that was on TLC yesterday?

1000 USD is fud. Link will unironically be worth over 10'000 USD per token.

>>19467092
Take your meds schizo

>>19467077
I'll come to you, suck your penis and swallow when it hits $1k. Screencap this

>>19467114
No thank you, that is gay.

>>19466880
Don't play with my emotions like that anon.

>>19467120
He's not wrong, time will tell.

>>19467120
I unironically believe it with the events lined up for July and the potential for staking to be announced in this timeframe, but I've been wrong before.

>>19466459
based

>>19467039
Within two decades, that’s possible, I guess.

I can’t speculate that far out. I only know what the current decade holds.

>>19467232
>I can’t speculate that far out. I only know what the current decade holds
Kek, anon is 19 years old

>>19467324
Decade short, just like me

>>19467039
if staking is live and working won't that be reflected by an increased amount of LINK that LP token holders get in the next payment or two? assuming LP is actually staking their own of course

>>19467402
Idk how it works man. I just want my life to being reeeeee. Fuck waging everyday.

>>19466562
>>19466584
https://ethplorer.io/address/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca#tab=tab-holders&pageSize=100&holders=100
1.7k link is around top 10k holders
There's 150k wallets now so top 10k is about the top 7% of holders.
10k link is top 2% of all holders.

>>19467489
>pRHWKLTg
it's impossible to know coinbase or binance individuals wallets tho

>>19466679
>>19466689

>>19466726
6 years

>>19466514
A...Ass B-blaster...?

>>19466514
You should make a trip. Also, how do you secure your tokens? Paper wallet or hardware wallet like ledger? I’ve got a ledger nano S atm. I realize it’s not the most convenient device but that’s fine. I’m purely interested in security. What’s your take?

>>19467599
No.
>>19467661
Won’t make a trip. I’m here to share my observations and nothing more. You’ll probably find me based on writing style sometimes. If I wanted to be known by a name I’d be on reddit. Notoriety is for fools.

Nano S is what I use. For every landmark, I.e. 100, 1000, 5000, 10,000 usd, I will split my link incrementally into hardware wallets. I anticipate staking via a hardware wallet will be possible as is done with Tezos, and also in Solidity you can delegate your funds to be used by a contract, so that’s where I think my route is.

oh god christ

>>19466514
Based. Will believe when I see that green dildo.

>>19466305
it's been months and i just realized that honkler is "riding the tiger" in this gif. based meme magicians thank you for blessing us with your talents

>>19467599
It's clearly sergey

>>19466514
It’s real. All of it

>>19467910
Thank you for being intuitive enough to preemptively answer my next question about staking via a hardware wallet. Godspeed anon

>>19468106
No problem. All the best

I really do not know how unrealistic this seems to people. Chainlink will eventually be like Microsoft and Apple. Literally behemot decade old companies traded for pennies once, mooning endlessly while the average joe never looses the perception the train already departed.
APPL did a 2x in 12 months crazy for stocks
MSFT did a 3x in 3 years.
Links fellow is going to be a 800USD to 1400 USD pump in a matter of couple months sometime in the next 5-7 years. cap this

>>19467910
I am understanding on your regards to making a trip, but notoriety in itself is not bad. Notoriety is needed for business if you plan on venturing further into ownership, saying that notoriety in totality is for fools is misinformation and you could be leading people with good potential astray.

>>19468291
I’m speaking of notoriety in this context.

>>19466917
what is the RSR make it stack?

>>19466514
Comfy. Thanks for stopping by anon

>>19466514
So where does Bitcoin fit in the puzzle?

Wall of fucking text. Can someone explain to a meathead

>>19466562
>>19466584

>>19466108
Imagine buying this shit instead of ARPA (which you can stake on Binance, today)

I'm not going to staking my precious linkies!

>>19466108
There isn't a single mention to staking in this release you retards

>>19466410
What would you see as an appropriate level of expertise to run a node. Have been working away on it with a friend but neither of us has any real experience.

Of course, you could just be fudding about neet nodes.

>>19466108
Why has there been no massive green dildo if staking is live? non tech person asking

>>19469217
Bro....

>>19469313
Staking ain't live.

>>19469391
how often do the nodes update their code?

>>19469217
Version 0.8.5 is closer to version 1.0
Inb4 steve starts deleting things n calling it progress
Praise kek
Inb4 they add additional digits to versions

Why is this important if staking isn't almost live, reeeeeeeeee

>>19469420
>Next update is 0.8.5.1.2

>>19467559
Bro $80.000 in 2026, 42 got a quantic encrypted message from the future

Ya this isn’t happening. Let’s be real. More likely a dump to 1.8 where it was after google pump

>>19466332
nodes have to update by Thursday with every fortnightly release that comes on the Monday

t. node op

>>19469812
>t. node op
KYC or non-KYC?

>>19469812
So, live two days from now?