/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19403409
wat

>>19403409
>Link above 4$ ?
>Better load that short on BTC

>>19403409
so when does it stop happening?

>>19403409
Unequipping TA microscope and checking the timestamps. Which happens first?

>>19403517
When you notice it's habbening

>>19403517
Literally never. It’s been like 7 times now. Wtf gives what’s the reason?? Why would they want to keep it suppressed??

Maybe its sergey

>Sergey market selling 500k every few days.
>WTF WHY IS CHAINLINK SUCK UNDER $4?!?! IT MUST BE A CONSPIRACY, THEY MUST BE SUPPRESSING THE PRICE!!!

You guys are retarded.

>>19403619
lul

>>19403619
>>19403631

t. Laughed at these threds before, not laughing now. What the fuck

>>19403543
Maybe it's maybelline

>>19403543
see>>19403773

>>19403409
the absolute state of your delusion of grandeur

>>19403879
Link went over $4 exactly five times since the March crash.

And every single one of those five times, BTC took a big dump within hours.

>>19403409
3 way arbitrage. When Sergey dumps his linkies it makes altcoins like Bitcoin or Ethereum dump too since Link drives the market.

>>19403619
Kek

>>19403409
Imagine not shorting the most obvious top of a lifetime

>>19403619
> he doesn’t know

They released the coronavirus to crash the market to buy cheap linkies.

>>19403409
That doesn't make any sense you stupid pajeet.

>>19403409
Oh ofcoursse you need to pump it up with the gold finance and regressive taxes

>>19404668
No it doesn't.
And yet it keeps happening.

>>19403773
Kek

Sergey is Satoshi.

>>19404871
If it keeps happening, and BTC is up 2k from all your examples from a month ago while LINK has gone sideways, at which point do you realize, maybe LINK is gay

>>19406338
Every time Link tries to break out (i.e. go above $4), Bitcoin takes a huge dump.

>>19406390
Ya, and then BTC gains. Stay poor

>>19403409
This is fake

>>19406403
>Ya, and then BTC gains
Yes.
After successfully suppressing Link, Bitcoin then goes on to make gradual gains.

>>19406448
k, sounds good, keep us posted

>>19406525
Not sure what you're struggling with here.

>>19403517
When you get in a leveraged short position

>>19406537
youre obviously retarded. Link does not matter, its a low market cap shitcoin. if anybody wanted to manipulate it they would just pump it to the moon and use the excess liquidity provided by losers like (You) to get out of the position. Heres a homework for you: try to calculate the approximate liquidity that whales would need to cause a "dump" like in your picture(we had multiple other "dumps" in the last 4 months and most of them did not align with chainlinks price action but thats also painfully obivous). You will quickly realise that it would not worth it to anybody to use this method to manipulate altcoins. It would be extremely risky and even the biggest whales need time to allocate enough capital to cause something like this.
But please keep these posts going.
They are very entertaining. /biz/ is getting good again, the scam threads are so much fun!

>>19406899
>Link does not matter
Then why does Bitcoin dump every single time Link goes over $4?

>>19406915
>replying in a minute
what an obsessed faglord
i wrote a pinescript thats can help us solve this """mystery""". You can access my chart here: https://www.tradingview.com/chart/FdLEDnf2/
the pinescript is dead simple, it just draws a vertical line when link is above 4$. I also put the btcusd ticker to the chart. Not that the usd ratio would mean anything for a shitcoin like link but ill bite the b8.
So if we look at the times link was above 4$ we see 2 things: its not "breaking out", its not rare for link to go above 4$. The second is that bitcoin obviously leads the linkusd ratio, if btc dumps link dumps. But the negative pivot points for the btcusd value pair(the points where the positive trend changed to negative) all happened BEFORE link ventured above 4$. So btcusd is independent from link, even by your retarded non-sensical standards. I marked the btcusd pivots with red vertical lines, see for yourself.

>>19407293
/thread

>>19407293
Link has been over $4 exactly five times since the March crash. See pic.
And every single one of those five times, BTC took a big dump within hours (usually sooner).

There is no squirming away from this very obvious, and literal fact.

>>19403409
nobody cares enough to supress your webscraper.. it just sucks

>>19407711
ok its a troll
noone is this retarded, not even linkies
gg made me reply

>>19407790
The absolute undeniable truth:

1) exactly five times did Link go over $4 exactly five times since the March crash (for more than a few hours)
2) every single one of these five times, BTC took a big dump within hours

Outside of any implications of suppression, there is no denying these two simple statements.

>>19403409
BULLISH AS FUCK!