/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19313359
God I want to be her pusyslave

>>19313359
I thought raiblocks team mozarella‘d all their funds away?

>>19313748
That was req. Get your memes straight. Raiblocks is paying whores to code

>>19313359
why are you so sure there will be next bullrun

>>19313726
Simp

>>19313872

>>19313359
Look, everything will only be worth as much as we want, when we want and how we want. You are posting here on /biz/ do you realize that /biz/ is a machine? If /biz/ really does a thing it it is a success. And Nano will be shit. Because I say it is shit. Get it ?

>>19313359
>next bullrun

>>19313359
Nice FUD. Nano is a prerequisite for smart cities and integrated m2m networks. Including AI. Zero fees, instant transactions. Data can be encoded for fractions of a percent of a single penny using recent developments. At this stage of the game, where we can pull 1000x TPS without any additional overhead or even transaction fees, we can already do what IOTA has been trying to do. And this is through a backdoor technique, encoding data into the last decimal points of a transaction, to be read and commands executed by the receiving application. Nano is going to topple BTC and be worth $1000 per coin easily.

>>19314034
We may benefit from oracles, ironically enough, to maintain a decentralized execution and confirmation of the data sent between the block lattice and whatever decentralized application is executing commands.

>>19313920
Hahahahahahha

Imagine not investing in this goddess

>>19314317
Are you kidding me? Imagine investing in an unstable woman?

>>19314496
okay incel

nano 1k by 2021.
capture dis salty haters

>"Time flows like a river, and history repeats."

>The reason why BTC has increased in value so much is because it is not specific to any one function, except value and the secure transfer thereof. Much the same, ETH is valuable because it is not specific to a single concept, idea, or industry. It can be programmed to do numerous things, much like a computer. These properties, along with the first mover advantage, make them potentially ubiquitous inventions, with use cases increasing as society and technology evolve. Coins that are specific with their use cases on the other hand, will unlikely ever grow at a comparable rate, outside of speculation and action from market movers, short term pump and dumps. Think Dragonchain, Po.et, BAT, DBC, Dentacoin, etc. They are inherently limited by design. Anything these coins do, can be done by either BTC or ETH on their own, or in certain situations when combined with a centralized database or structure. There really isn't a need for 90%+ of these coins to exist in the first place when a simple traditional based server works fine. Decentralized systems only matter when it comes to (a) wealth, (b) censorship, and (c) public immutable data.

>>19314518
Okay then. You can choose. I either never mention this scam while I watch you burn (which u will) or I mention it and you will still crash and burn.

>>19314537
>Which brings me to Nano, formerly known as Raiblocks. Nano has the first mover advantage when it comes to a decentralized DAG. It is much the same as BTC in many ways, and matches the definition of a currency as defined by Satoshi in the original white paper. What is unique about it, is that it takes sub 1 second to send, and has zero cost associated with its use. Because of this, Nano utilizes hardly any electricity and can be used in real world situations much like a credit or debit card, such as when buying a cup of coffee in the morning. These may seem like small improvements, however the implications are anything but. One serious barrier to the adoption of BTC is exactly this, the delay it takes in confirming a transaction. This is the main reason why the Lightning network is being built. So that BTC can actually be used as a currency. Unfortunately, the Lightning network will centralize BTC and turn lightning nodes into de-facto banks, or middlemen, calling into question this supposed solution to the scaling and latency problems BTC faces.

>>19313359
>Nano will be worth $100 next bullrun.

>>19314548
>This is why Nano is so valuable, and why it is the next 100x at minimum. It continues where BTC left off, and does not sacrifice decentralization in exchange for speed. It has no specific use case, outside of being a unit of value transfer, meaning it can be used as ubiquitously as BTC can. In fact, it has many more use cases than BTC as well, thanks to the zero fee and sub 1 second transfer model. This means that computers can use it to transfer value throughout complex systems. It also means that it can be combined with both centralized and decentralized platforms, such as instant messengers, social media, IOT, online games, and more. It means that it can be used for microtransactions without loss of value. It can be used for instant donations without loss of time. As it is decentralized, it can be used for any sort of business, be it a standard flower shop or a high risk online pharmacy. Because the network utilizes such a small amount of data for every transaction, it also is environmentally friendly, meaning it will not fall under scrutiny in regards to its footprint, nor face adoption troubles or the legal issues that are seen with BTC when exposing it to environmentally conscious individuals and organizations, such as governments.

>And all of these things are currently happening before our eyes.

Don't say I didn't warn you.

>>19314562
lmao ^^you don't even see what is actually going on before your eyes

>>19314562
>Don't say I didn't warn you.
Please warn me man. I am scared. Shivering in my boots as it were

>>19314598
Exactly what I thought, you cannot come up with a single piece of FUD. The future is knocking, and guess what, you ain't coming inside with it.

Don't feel too bad though, it requires a certain level of autism to be able to predict the future based on developing tech as it is being released. To understand the intricacies and potential of new technology is something reserved for certain classes of people. It is quite evident you do not belong to this group. Begone.

>>19314630
lol what are u talking about? still that scam coin? good luck

>>19313920
Now there's a take that aged well.

>>19314669
How low is your IQ? Seriously? You have made it clear that you are the type of retard who tries to win arguments through ad hominem. So I am curious, have you ever been tested?

>>19314724
I am really dumb. Pronanly 80 iq.

Well, at least you know your place.

>>19313359
Nice just bought 100k

>>19314828
And you, dear Anon donÄt know your place, which is funny because you clearly overestimate yourself

>>19314857

>>19314898
Me be dumb negro. Me be saying 80

>>19314928
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZYAq_js_E4

>>19314527
this. momentum increases next month, then blast off in july

>>19314898
people who give a shit about IQ would've been a few points higher otherwise

>>19314898
your IQ must be low if you believe the test is valid

What the fuck is this shit? You got bots running? Are you talking to yourself? Nobody cares about anything that isn't BTC.

>>19315474
try and see where you get

>>19315804
enjoy your floppy disks

>>19315804
>he doesn't know

>>19313920
>DEBT IS MONEY WE OWE TO OURSELVES

>>19313920
oh damn just got this guy on the latest peter schiff podcast