[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 262 KB, 2298x1086, EYeYvr_XgAEBzgg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19229340 No.19229340 [Reply] [Original]

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/266/1/kleiman-v-wright/

In the court filling CSW claimed the address 17XiVVooLcdCUCMf9s4t4jTExacxwFS5uh as his

Well the wallet in question just moved 50 BTC

>> No.19229367

>>19229340
he moved them retard check his twitter he really is sergey nazarov

>> No.19229376

creg is going to kill himself

>> No.19229390

>>19229340
he has a choice now: admit he lied about not having control, or admit he lied about the address being his.

tough spot for a man with middling iq and tenuous grasp of reality to be in...

>> No.19229401
File: 63 KB, 1077x1172, EMu4ExLUcAAMC1I.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19229401

>>19229340
Calvin Ayre is panicking. lol
>>19228287

>> No.19229453

>>19229401
>>19229340
lmao he is going to truly kill himself

>> No.19229512
File: 81 KB, 640x480, D1dSEW6WkAA9UR8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19229512

>>19229453
Calvin has essentially shit all over the bsv shills and they're still trying to clean up his diarrhea tweets. Hahahaha

>> No.19229549

hahahahaha
get shitted
his ass is going to be fucking GAPEING for air

>> No.19229565

>>19229401
look at that damage control...

>> No.19229586

>>19229512
well, calvin is looking out for #1. can't blame him desu.

calvin is quick out the gate with "maybe ira moved those coins..." so he can later say in court "you see, creg even lied to me about this stuff!"

smart move. 1 step ahead of his fat puppet.

>> No.19229627

>>19229340
>>19229367
>>19229376
>>19229390
>>19229401
>>19229453
>>19229512
>>19229549
>>19229565
>>19229586
cringe and retardpilled

>> No.19229646

>>19229627
the fact that you are no longer even engaging tells us what we need to know nchain pajeet.

>> No.19229665

>>19229367
creg betrayed us all we were supposed to be in it together sirs

>> No.19229695
File: 129 KB, 1152x2048, EQhX3BPW4AEaals.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19229695

>>19229627
Go lick calvin's ass, tranny shill

>> No.19229709

it means craig is satoshi you fucking stupid faggot

>> No.19229728

>>19229646
>>19229695
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.276.0.pdf
It's time for your reading, have fun guys

>> No.19229739

>>19229512
this guy looks like an untrustworthy pedophile

>> No.19229755

who cares if craig is fake bsv is still the original bitcoin

>> No.19229770

>>19229627

Can you give an honest, well-thought out rebuttal to the original point of CSW's choices here? He actually is going to be in trouble

>> No.19229791

I just wanted to prove him wrong.
nothing personal though, i just hate lying faggots

>> No.19229799

>>19229728
>https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.276.0.pdf
This is from August 2019?

>> No.19229809

>>19229791
at least post a signed message from that account then to dunk on his fat ass....

>> No.19229847

>>19229791
this is not satoshi nakamoto

>> No.19229872

>>19229791
Confirmed fake satoshi. The real satoshi has a 4chan pass that he bought $20 with $200k worth of bitcoin.

>> No.19229921

>>19229799
>17XiVVooLcdCUCMf9s4t4jTExacxwFS5uh
Oh, I get it. Somewhere in there he claims that address is his, right? So I'm looking at the address on blockchain explorer...what exactly am I seeing here? It looks like that address received 50 BTC back in 2009 from coinbase, then today it sent 50 BTC somewhere, then received a bit more?

>> No.19229939

LMFAO you guys are fucking worthless.

>> No.19229975

Kek calvin last comments litterally creating a legal cause to let craig sink with the ship.

He is literally saying that creg told him he knows nothing about lmao and he did not did the tx (which he claimed was from his wallet lmfao).

He is literally abandoning creg.

>> No.19230052

>>19229921
Yes he claimed it was his and now calvin is panicking because they were larping , it's the second fucking time this happen to them but this one got the attention of everyone due to being an early block 37 days after genesis.

And they did not owned that wallet which they claimed kek , they are so fucked.

>> No.19230057
File: 28 KB, 540x317, bch2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19230057

>>19229340

Consider the following three facts:

1) The sole purpose of moving the coins from the 2009 wallet is quite clearly to discredit Craig Wright.

2) The existence of Bitcoin SV hurts Bitcoin Cash. If you discredit Bitcoin SV, you hurt Bitcoin Core, and help Bitcoin Cash.

3) It is highly likely that the 2009 wallet belongs either to Satoshi, or to one of his intimate associates. Who else would leave those coins untouched for 11 years?

What does this all mean? The real Satoshi Nakamoto has returned, and is about to crash BTC to zero. The flippening is imminent. Prepare for 40x losses on one hand, and 40x gains on the other.

>> No.19230137

>>19230057
>The real Satoshi Nakamoto has returned

You made an spelling error. It's spelled Adam Back

>> No.19230164

>>19229340
CUCM

>> No.19230242

>>19230052
Hmmm...I have a pretty big BSV stack...

>> No.19230253

>>19230137
>an spelling error

>> No.19230267

>>19230057
So you're saying BCH is going to flip BTC, not BSV?

>> No.19230276

>>19230137

If barelysociable's video is correct, then Adam Back would see Craig Wright as a useful asset. He would have no reason to discredit him, because Wright is splitting the Bitcoin originalist community.

>> No.19230333
File: 104 KB, 670x632, 1589916304229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19230333

>>19229627

>> No.19230352

all in on BSV here
so I guess itw as all a big larp huh
well that sucks I literally thought abuot selling yesterday and buy back in under $100 lol

>> No.19230390
File: 84 KB, 1564x494, 7567665463.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19230390

>> No.19230399

>>19230352
It's still 195USD...I have 1000 BSV and I'm getting nervous...

>> No.19230413

>>19230399
shit some faggot had posted an image showing a 50% crash I thought it had really tanked lol

>> No.19230460

>>19230352
>>19230399
If you panic, panic first....-nasim taleb

>> No.19230468
File: 77 KB, 1242x509, satosh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19230468

>>19230267

Yes. BCH hard-forked from BTC a few years ago in order to follow the original vision of Satoshi. It has the support of Mike Hearn and Gavin Andresen, who were Satoshi's closest associates, and those to whom he entrusted the continuance of the project. The idea of BCH is to continue with Satoshi's vision of making Bitcoin a genuine digital currency--"peer to peer cash," as he says in his white paper. In order to do this, the memory-size of Bitcoin has to keep growing; and this is what BCH is made to do. But a company called Blockstream, with the backing of financial institutions and the Bilberberg Group, bought out BTC in the early days and hamstringed the memory-size. BTC is so crippled that, when the price goes to $20,000, you get transactions with $100-fees and three-day waiting-times. It can only work with second-layer technology which tracks and centralizes everything you do. BTC is now nothing more than a ponzi scheme without a use-case.

Satoshi would have been completely against all this. He wanted to increase the memory-size; picture related.

Now BCH was severely damaged when Craig Wright, pretending to be Satoshi, hard-forked from it, and split the anti-core community. BTC-supporters loved it when Wright did this; they have no good reason to discredit Wright. In other words, whoever does this is most likely to be a Bitcoin Cash supporter; and it is not unlikely that the candidate is Satoshi Nakamoto himself. He's here, and he's going to rescue us.

>> No.19230481

>>19230399
>Second wallet that they larped they owned moved
>This one was seen by the entire world while creg was livestreaming and from the first 37 days of btc history near genesis
>Holds 1000 bsv.

Yep , you are a retard.

>> No.19230566

>>19230468
Seems like a good time to split my hedge between bsv/bch

>> No.19230632

>>19230276
If barelysociable's video is correct discrediting Craig would make all the sense, since Craig is trying to pump Core

>> No.19230660

>>19229376
i really do hope so. im so sick of his bullshit and lies and turbo arrogance.

>> No.19230670

>>19230481
Yeah, I haven't done too badly with my crypto plays so my feelings aren't hurt...

>> No.19230693

>>19230632
Do you have a link to the video?

>> No.19230790

>>19229695

lol those shoes

a literal clown

A

LITERAL

CLOWN

>> No.19230921

>>19229791
Liar, I made the transaction, I am the real Satoshi.

>> No.19231012

>>19229847
WTF that trip

>> No.19231030

>>19230399
>>19230460
im literally trying to panic sell but my second phone with google auth is out of battery im recharging it right now. gonna cook a steak and sell later tonight, im scared to death it will have tanked 90% by the time I cooked dinner
fuck why did I have to fall for this larp
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

>> No.19231107

>>19229367
>>19230917

>> No.19231164

>>19230057
>If you discredit Bitcoin SV, you hurt Bitcoin Core, and help Bitcoin Cash.

What kind of delusion is this?

>> No.19231173
File: 67 KB, 700x434, IMG_20200519_020030_820.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19231173

>>19230399
> not holding BTC

Retard, I hope your fake Bitcoins that's owned by retarded geezer pedos goes to zero

>> No.19231231

>>19229847
what kind of magic is this?

>> No.19231320

>>19231164
the cashie kind get used to it they are all retards.

>> No.19231350

>>19231231
! = insecure algo

>> No.19231374

>>19229340
>Well the wallet in question just moved 50 BTC

they moved whilst he was busy livestreaming on twitch with some random cunt too.

>> No.19231420
File: 341 KB, 641x614, 1578839870886.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19231420

Sell your BSV now, buy back at 10.

>> No.19231447

>>19231374
no shit? real? ahahahahahaha

>> No.19231718
File: 108 KB, 1024x768, faggot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19231718

>>19229770
He will enjoy the butt fucking in Jail anon.
Gay ass conman.

>> No.19231723

>>19231164

>BCH was severely damaged when Craig Wright, pretending to be Satoshi, hard-forked from it, and split the anti-core community. BTC-supporters loved it when Wright did this; they have no good reason to discredit Wright.

>>19230468

>> No.19231850

>>19230057
Does bch have same vision of EVERYTHING AND WHOLE INTERNET stored on chain that bsv has?

>> No.19231935

>>19229847
That is Sashimi Nagasaki.

>>19231012
>>19231231
Fucking disgusting newfags. Go back to rebbit.

>> No.19232033

Theres not a shitcoin i hate more than BSV. I can't spit on this grave enough. STIFF

>> No.19232050

>>19229512
imagine the smell

>> No.19232118

>>19229340
How's so? Why don't you explain?

>> No.19232129

>>19231420
This. If you panic best to panic first

>> No.19232186

>>19231850
nobody needs it twice.

>> No.19232266

>>19231850
bch is fully focused on being "cash".
which is rather retarded because nothing with a fix supply can be cash. but whatever.

>> No.19232401

>>19230693
https://youtu.be/XfcvX0P1b5g

>> No.19232462

>>19229709
> it means craig is satoshi you fucking stupid faggot
Sure it does, and BSV is about to moon from the news. I think anyone who thinks this means Craig must be Satoshi should go all in on BSV right now. You just did, right? On this very bullish news?

>> No.19232502
File: 181 KB, 1313x1262, steam.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19232502

>>19232266

Bitcoin had its main period of growth when it was a cash system. It's been nothing but a pump and dump scheme since then, living in $4000-$10,000 limbo.

>> No.19232534

>>19229847
So did you use a brute force offline loop combining your username with every password until you got a trip that you liked?

>> No.19232609

>>19232502
I can’t stand that faggot.

>> No.19232728

>>19230468
>TC is so crippled that, when the price goes to $20,000, you get transactions with $100-fees and three-day waiting-times.
The transaction price and speed depends on volume. Sure, in a crazy bull run tx fees and times go up but if bitcoin were crabbing at low volume with a $20k price you wouldn't see $100 fees and 3 day transactions.

>> No.19232764

>>19232502
>Bitcoin had its main period of growth when it was a cash system.
it could only be a cash system in the inflationary phase. that's my point. most bitcoins in existence already mined. it's not working as cash any more until the adoption curve flattens out at around 10% adoption and the price stabilizes at roughly $1 billion a coin.

>> No.19232876

>>19230468
> pic related
But that's not too late. The point is not that you need a technical fork to increase block size, it's all about when/if you you think the time has come to actually do it.
BCH thinks the time is now, so they hard forked to act on that thought.
BTC thinks the time is "not yet" so they haven't added the two lines of code from Satoshi's post yet. BTC thinks that the need for higher block size has to prove itself before they do it, because it is not clear that doing it prematurely wouldn't hurt the system. Tokenomics aren't always clear cut and so far we have no empirical evidence that small blocks have hurt BTC price or adoption. In fact the evidence is to the contrary, as BCH will larger blocks has a smaller market cap than BTC, implying the tokenomics work less well with larger blocks. It doesn't prove it, but if the available evidence implies anything, it's that.
So BTC will wait until it is clear small blocks are hurting them, only then, if that actually ever happens, will they increase the block size (if it is clear small blocks are hurting BTC then the majority consensus will support this) and the two lines of code will be added to core.

>> No.19232958

>>19232728

>Sure, in a crazy bull run tx fees and times go up but if bitcoin were crabbing at low volume with a $20k price you wouldn't see $100 fees and 3 day transactions.
very cool. next time i need to pay for something with bitcoin i'll just monitor all of these variables and wait for an opening.

>> No.19233011

>>19230468
>when the price goes to $20,000, you get transactions with $100-fees and three-day waiting-times
we will see it is doubtful we see above $10 fees next time we go near an ath but it won't be $20k but rather $280k

>> No.19233038 [DELETED] 
File: 633 KB, 2625x2274, feesbtc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233038

>>19232876

The BTC community is religiously invested in the idea of second-layer technology, and of never increasing the block-size. The debate is done after the failure of Bitcoin XT, and the schism between the big-block and small-block communities is now too large ever to be healed. If you even mention increasing the block-size on /r/Bitcoin, you get banned. If you even mention BCH, except to ridicule it, you get banned. Even posting this video >>19232401, which actually posits that Satoshi Nakamoto _is_ the chief of Blockstream, Adam Back, will get you banned, simply because the first half of it gives an honest overview of the block-size debate. When people are that invested in a wrong idea, they won't change. To suppose otherwise is like thinking that somebody in a cult will change their beliefs, as the cult becomes more extremist, rather than go down with the ship. Most people do go down with the ship. By the time the inherent flaws in BTC's code become obvious to everybody, anybody with an ounce of sense will have already have jumped ship to BCH. Why waste time on something that doesn't work when you can already go to what already does?

>> No.19233072

>>19232876
heres the rub:
yes big blocks can lower fees, but they do nothing to "make a payment network". good luck waiting 10min for your confirmation while ordering coffee.
109iq and above realized this in 2016, namely that requirements for payment is different than collateral. in fact they realized that the resulting architectures induced by required features would result in mutually exclusive design changes - thus they require distinct projects to house them.
to say another way: its no accident that banks are one thing and visa another.

>> No.19233084
File: 50 KB, 161x127, bizjewesszoom.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233084

>>19230399
Dubs of getting anally fisted

>> No.19233108
File: 633 KB, 2625x2274, feesbtc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233108

>>19232876

The BTC community is religiously invested in the idea of second-layer technology, and of never increasing the block-size. The debate is done after the failure of Bitcoin XT, and the schism between the big-block and small-block communities is now too large ever to be healed. If you even mention increasing the block-size on /r/Bitcoin, you get banned. If you even mention BCH, except to ridicule it, you get banned. Even posting this video >>19232401, which actually posits that Satoshi Nakamoto _is_ the chief of Blockstream, Adam Back, will get you banned, simply because the first half of it gives an honest overview of the block-size debate. When people are that invested in a wrong idea, they won't change. To suppose otherwise is like thinking that somebody in a cult will change their beliefs, as the cult becomes more extremist, rather than go down with the ship. Most people do go down with the ship. By the time the inherent flaws in BTC's code become obvious to everybody, anybody with an ounce of sense will have already have jumped ship to BCH. Why waste time on something that doesn't work when you can go now to what already does?

>>19233011

See https://txstreet.com/beta.. The fees have already doubled since a week ago. $4.20 is the median fee as I write. Look at the waiting-times too, and all the people clogged up in the queue to make transactions. Miner capitulation is already happening. The problem is only going to get even worse.

>> No.19233157

>>19229367
Based

>> No.19233174

>>19233072
Read this too if >130
>https://craigwright.net/blog/economics/nodes-hash-rate-signalling/

>> No.19233182
File: 33 KB, 724x320, 1589985688156.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233182

>>19229390
>he has a choice now: admit he lied about not having control

He said he didn't have control until the courier arrived.

Well the courier did arrive in January, so he obviously has control.

What now corecuck?

>> No.19233216

>>19233072
woke

>> No.19233218

>>19233182
"i just spoke to creg and he said it wasn't him....must be ira that has control" --- calvin ayre, 2020-5-20

>> No.19233243

>>19233108
>The fees have already doubled since a week ago
you mean in a 40-50% miner capitulation we only increased to a median of $2.40

>> No.19233301
File: 37 KB, 398x376, 1581181981919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233301

>>19233182
>>19233218
Faketoshi is being btfo by karma non stop.

>> No.19233323
File: 73 KB, 960x739, business and finance.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233323

>>19229340
Damn, that's legitimately interesting. So I'm seeing four possibilities here:

1) Craig Wright is Satoshi and fucked his case over by moving the BTC before the final ruling;
2) Craig Wright isn't Satoshi (but is an early miner anyways) and fucked his case over by moving the BTC before the final ruling; or
3) Craig Wright isn't Satoshi, lied about the addresses, and someone fuck his case over by moving the BTC before the final ruling.

Most likely 3 obviously, but that would entail that whoever moved the BTC (not necessarily Satosh) is purposely fucking over Craig. Based!

>> No.19233389

>>19233323
This is not the first time it happened tough

address 16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT owner signed against craig in the past.

>> No.19233398

>>19233323
#3 very high probability.
remember this is second time to happen. last time the dude that rekted his address claim even dunked on his ass calling him a lying negro via signed message.

>> No.19233405

You idiots who STILL doubt Craig have no idea what's coming. Do you really think he would purposefully play himself? NO, he would not. This is part of the plan and those of you in denial will soon understand.

>> No.19233408

>>19233389
that was roger

>> No.19233443

>>19233218
Because Calvin or Craig would always tell their enemies exactly what they are doing on twitter. It's not conceivable that either of them could say "not me" to misdirect all of the crypto retards.

>> No.19233560

>>19233405
>trust the plan
thanks boomer

>> No.19233584

>>19233443
>publicly lying while court case is in process, where you've already been caught lying to the judge a couple of times.
ok

>> No.19233622
File: 484 KB, 924x922, fakeasfuck.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233622

>>19233389
fake and gay, pic related
>>19233301
this list and address everyone is posting is the list shadders produced which included extra addresses
the updated list craig provided this year was sealed

>> No.19233625

>>19233408
Still creg claimed it was his address in court , this time is hillarious tough it happened while he was livestreaming and the entire community saw the coins move , plus he also claimed this were his to the point that calvin is having a meltdown and going in public telling that creg told he did not moved the coins kek.

>> No.19233703

>>19233072
>good luck waiting 10min for your confirmation while ordering coffe
>what are zeroconfs
its almost as if this has all been discussed to death already and you brainlets still dont get it lmao

>> No.19233710

>>19233584
You aren't very smart are you?

1) Calvin isn't involved in the case. If he's lying, so what?
2) If Craig lied to Calvin in the phonecall, it would be in private, not a public statement.

What now cuck?

>> No.19233722
File: 129 KB, 640x677, eciw7fg6vye31.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233722

>>19229872
>One 4chan pass please

>> No.19233724

>>19233625
i'm sure he will come up with an explanation by tomorrow.

>> No.19233797
File: 111 KB, 868x644, bccafe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233797

>>19233703

>zeroconf

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/dx4jpd/this_is_why_zeroconf_doesnt_work_on_btc/

"People often ask "why do you guys claim zero conf doesn't work on BTC?"

Unfortunately many people here don't give good answers. Too often, people reply, "because BTC has RBF."

Of course it's true that a merchant can't accept an unconfirmed RBF transaction because it can trivially be reversed. But that isn't the problem. RBF is optional, and in theory a non-RBF transaction should work like a BCH transaction.

The problem is congestion:

Suppose it's 1:00 (all the way over on the left) and you accept a non-RBF txn paying a typical low fee.

Question: when will the txn confirm?

Answer: maybe it won't.

When a merchant accepts an unconfirmed transaction on a congested chain there is always the possibility that demand for onchain txns will increase and the unconfirmed txn will stay stuck for hours or days, or might never confirm.

Zero conf txns work on BCH because there is always enough slack capacity to ensure that no txn that pays a reasonable fee will ever get stuck.

Lack of capacity is what kills zero-conf, and this is why we must always be working to improve BCH capacity well in advance of possible future demand."

>> No.19233808
File: 54 KB, 1068x692, coffee-marcatcap-scale-a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233808

>>19233797
in reality...

>> No.19233811

>>19233011
I was paying $100 fees back in late 2017. This time it will get much worse.

>> No.19233895

>>19233797
>Zero conf txns work on BCH
it doesn't work anywhere unless you can cancel the order with no loss if the payment doesn't come trough...

cashies need to understand there is no consensus before the blockchain there is no consensus in the mempool. your low iq attempt at preconsensus unenforceable by the block validating ruleset doesn't work. not in a trustless byzantine fault tolerant manner.

if it worked we wouldn't even have a blockchain. why fuck around with proof of work if the mempool can order transactions??

>> No.19233919

>>19233811
that was pre segwit and pre lightning adoption.

>> No.19233952
File: 93 KB, 1200x650, baft.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19233952

>>19233808

Your picture posits the Lightning Network as the solution to the problem, when it is the Lightning Network that _is_ the problem. The LN necessarily destroys privacy. If you don't have privacy any more, why would you even hold Bitcoin? The use-case is destroyed.

Furthermore, even if the LN did achieve widespread adoption (which it won't--that's been "18 months away" for years now, and always will be), it could only service a fraction of a percent of the world's population. In other words, BTC can't scale to widespread adoption with the LN, hence BTC is a scam coin and _will_ collapse when the ponzi is found out.

>> No.19234072

>>19233952
>The LN necessarily destroys privacy.
hahahahha oh boy.
>it could only service a fraction of a percent of the world's population.
we will see, but it's a huge multiplier in tx/sec that's the main thing. if all the dirt transactions went to lightning then the block size will be adequate for a while still. not forever.

these painful periods are like birth of a new epoch for bitcoin. it always comes out stronger always leads to innovation and adoption.

lightining is not a magical solve everything solution it's just one piece of the scaling puzzle.

>> No.19234130

>>19234072
but the best thing about lightning is it's uniquely suited for buying coffee because it's trustless instantaneous payment. you as a payee have no custodial risk and the business that accepts it can be reasonably certain it will receive the payment. they can ensure this themselves or leave it to professionals to watch their interest who cares. it's still a vast improvement over the current fully trustful and fully custodial banking model.

>> No.19234282

>>19233952
Either way that picture makes Bitcoin look gay. Serious fucking flaming ass gay

>> No.19234297

>>19229847
Holy shit that's neat

>> No.19234426

Why isnt it dumping yet?

>> No.19234695

>>19232958
> next time i need to pay for something with bitcoin
Yup, just as next time I need to pay for something with gold I'll do the same.
But I don't think there will be such a time, rather when I need to pay for something I use BCH or more likely cash/VISA, and when I need a store of value I buy BTC.

>> No.19234723

>>19233072
Completely agreed! It is only if the small blocks hurt BTC's use case as a store of value that they would have to increase, whereas for a crypto targeting the spending use case increased block size does make sense (I question to what extent the use case makes sense, but that is a different discussion).

>> No.19234725

>>19229739
How is he a pedophile

>> No.19234755

Nothing has been proved you're all retards. 50BTC was moved but there's no way to know who it was. I don't care who they think it was.

>> No.19234774

>>19234297
It is proof that tripcodes are not fully secure.
Very cool mathematically, though.

>> No.19234806

>>19233108
/r/Bitcoin is, like all other subreddits, a dishonestly moderated shitshow. That the bitcoin "community" throws a hissy fit at the mention of big blocks doesn't mean the actual bitcoin network wouldn't move to bigger blocks if it became apparent it would be needed to save the network. The "inherent BTC flaws" you speak of are only flaws when targeting a spending use case which BTC doesn't, and it is not yet clear that BCH/BSV do not also suffer from ultimately crippling inherent flaws when it comes to the spending use case.

>> No.19234843

>>19233443
> they lie all the time, you have to know which claims are true and which are lies
> the claim that Craig is Satoshi is true

>> No.19234945
File: 47 KB, 593x394, iangrigg_craig.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19234945

>>19234843
We know Craig is Satoshi not because he said it, but because it's the only possible conclusion (and the obvious one) once all the evidence is examined.

Satoshi wanted digital cash - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted scaling on chain - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted big server farms - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted micropayment capability - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted instant payments - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted a protocol set in stone - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted Gavin to carry the torch of Bitcoin forward - Gavin testified that Craig Wright was definitely the person behind Satoshi

Did it click yet? 1+1 = 2

Logic is a wonderful thing

>> No.19234966

>>19229340
ITS THE END FOR DRUMPF THIS TIME

Sorry I forgot what board this is

>> No.19235006
File: 203 KB, 828x334, 71867AAC-F065-4C3E-B3DC-1B4C5487C009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19235006

Um why would the coins go here? Bros was this nick szabo ? I could him being based enough to do this. And you’re going to tell me he wasn’t mining in the first month when he came up with the idea bit gold?

>> No.19235112

>>19234945

The transaction from the 2009 wallet today proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Wright is not Satoshi. Which is what makes it all the more likely that Satoshi made that transaction in order to destroy the only competitor to BCH.

>> No.19235142

>>19234966
The funniest fucking part is that it actually means nothing and they don't even know why because they can't take the time to read a court document lmao

>> No.19235181
File: 129 KB, 1426x296, 1542368527010.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19235181

>>19235006
Nick Szabo is Satoshi. Segey knows this as well and has either worked with him or been involved as well.

>> No.19235310

>>19234945
Oh yeah.. wow.. you must be right.
Hey.. you know who else might want everything Satoshi wanted? Oh I don't know.. maybe some guy pretending to be Satoshi?

>> No.19235371

>>19235142
>CSW: I own these addresses
>Address Owner: No he doesn't (cryptographically signed)
>CSW: Oh, I don't have them until the bonded courier arrives lol
>CSW: Courier arrived, I own these addresses
>*random transaction from supposedly owned address*
>BSVjeets: THIS MEANS NOTHING!
The cope is getting pathetic. At this point CSW could even admit to not being Satoshi and you cucks will still perform mental gymnastics to believe that he is.

>> No.19235441
File: 88 KB, 742x604, 5636.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19235441

domp it

>> No.19235490

>>19235006
>>19235181
>>/biz/thread/S19095496
remember this guys? op the faggot angrily deleted his thread after being so thoroughly btfoed his anus turned into a black hole.

>> No.19235583

>>19235490

Actually, I was the OP of that thread. It got 404'd by jannies because you were spamming code snippets the entire rime. Did you ever end up finding any real code that Szabo wrote? Code that can actually be run?

>> No.19235584

>>19235371
What are you holding?

>> No.19235663
File: 13 KB, 229x221, 9E1E604E-8E2B-4F31-A9F7-2A2CD0A21753.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19235663

>>19235584
COPE

>> No.19235773

>>19235583
he wrote both bitgold both his own computer parseable programming language you were absolutely btfoed.

>> No.19235778
File: 471 KB, 924x922, (((kleiman)))_submitted_altered_doc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19235778

>>19235371
>CSW: I own these addresses
>Address Owner: No he doesn't (cryptographically signed)

Fake doc with fake address was submitted by Ira Kleiman

>> No.19235806

>>19235778
i have no doubt that the document in question is fake anon
but i also have zero doubt ira didn't make it but craig did and gave it to ira when he tried to con him.

>> No.19235857
File: 1.12 MB, 751x2511, maxwell_document_alteration.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19235857

>>19235806
lol that's a cope. Craig exposes this fraud for what it is.

>> No.19235892

>>19235857
Oh yes for certain sir, Craig really destroyed the fraudsters!! :D BSV #1!!!

>> No.19235920

>>19235857
and i still won't believe a fucking thing craig says after he has been caught on lies than what should be humanly possible.

but the documents were in most likelihood produced by craig and are indeed forgeries just as the ones craig later submitted as alternative. none of them are real everything is fake. and he always have someone else to blame when they catch him.

>> No.19235929
File: 159 KB, 1024x906, fs9bfd9p6e531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19235929

>>19235892
This but unironically

>> No.19235962

>>19235773

Cool! I've never seen the Bitgold code before. Got a link?

>> No.19236046

>>19235962
www.google.com

>> No.19236188

>>19235806
why would craig give ira a document pertaining details of a loan of 600,000 bitcoins between uyen nguyen and himself?

>> No.19236251

>>19236188
because he tried to con him after dave died remember? he "offered his assistance" in case they find a wallet.dat file on faves computer. then he tried to feed them a tale of a partnership and joint bitcoin mining. probably to get them greedy and hooked. but instead the kleimans sued him.

>> No.19236274

>>19235490
I remember listening to that podcast with navel and navel says something like “you designed bitgold but can’t code heha” and szabo said real quick “no I can definitely code”. I was like fuck yeah.

>> No.19236288

>>19235583
I just read the thread you got fucked up.

>> No.19236366
File: 79 KB, 726x746, 4a3t3a4t3t3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19236366

>>19236251
that's an interesting warp of reality anon

>> No.19236423

>>19234806
This is correct. Explained much better than I tried to yesterday

>> No.19236433

>>19236366
nope, it literally what happened.

Hello Louis,
Your son Dave and I are two of the three key people behind Bitcoin:
https://bitcoin.org/
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/04/what-is-bitcoin-explained
If you have any of Dave’s computer systems, you need to save a file named “wallet.dat”. (ex. 23 p. 2)

>> No.19236452 [DELETED] 
File: 38 KB, 350x400, Greg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19236452

>>19235778
Greg list

>> No.19236481
File: 9 KB, 337x337, 1471947655592.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19236481

>>19229340
Can anyone give me a quick rundown on what's going on?

>> No.19236526

>>19236481
everyone thinks craig is btfo by an early miner that moved coins
craig groupies try to explain away how this actually helps their case

>> No.19236543

oooh secret hamburger

>> No.19236605
File: 63 KB, 1125x388, Satoshi_kills_corecoin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19236605

>>19236481
Craig is Satoshi and he is starting to move his coins.

Coretards are freaking out because they know their days are numbered. Pic related. We just had a reward halving...

>> No.19237221

>>19236605
This dude gonna get dusted. You think you can destroy BTC and not be lmfao

>> No.19237373
File: 47 KB, 1243x447, 1575915651771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19237373

>>19237221
He has friends in high places. Nobody has touched him until now, and nobody will touch him going forward.

But what you WILL do, is sit here seething and coping while he wins.

>> No.19237653

>>19237373
When did he post this?

>> No.19237720

>>19232876
This

>> No.19237826
File: 83 KB, 648x546, D_7GEoZXkAAbyAY.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19237826

>>19237653
Don't know the exact date. Sometime last year.

>> No.19237865

why wouldnt he just say he was satoshi from the beginning instead of having to go through all of this shit

>> No.19237880

When did you realize Aussie Anglos were pajeet scammer tier scum?

>> No.19238505
File: 7 KB, 480x360, greggles.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19238505

>>19237880
t.seething bignose