/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19228287
This would be even more bearish for bitcoin

>>19228340
why?

who?

>>19228287
so he doesn't know?

>>19228369
Do you lnow how much btc dave mined? If his family has access to that harddrive and decided to sell...

>>19228287
This would mean hes got BTC and maybe BSV. You absolute jackass.

Literal who?

>>19228408
so dave is satoshi then?

>>19228408
>hard drive
thimbdrive i believe actually

>>19228371
CALVIN FUCKING LIED TO US! THIS ISN'T CRAIG MOVING THE COINS! BSV IS GETTING ATTACKED REAL BAD RIGHT NOW! CALVIN IS PANICKING

DAMAGE CONTROL

LMAO

FAKETOSHI BTFO

>>19228287
hahahahahahah craig claimed this was his, he is fucked due to lying in court now confirmed.

HOLY SHIT. GOOD NIGHT BSV. GOOD FUCKING NIGHT.

>>19228426
There are theories that suggested so but who knows. Maybe it is that blockstream nerd

>>19228563
Yooooo Satoshi fucked Craig up.. Gotta love it

>>19228408
>Do you now how much btc dave mined?
enlighten me

now this is as bullish as it gets

>>19228287
yep. i vote we give this oldfag the presidential medal of honor.
he singlehandled destroyed creg.
forced him into "perjury trap"

>>19228436
Then why is only BTC moving LEL

>>19228938
Who would even notice a 50 bsv tx? That's like the monthly salary of a burger flipper

>>19228675
This is the second wallet craig claimed that moved without him doing kek.

>>19229293
yeah, last dude even dunked on his fat ass afterwards...

>>19229155
The fact that the BSV and BCH is untouched and only BTC is moving is OMINOUS for the coretards LOL

Im so fucking erect right now

>>19229324
all 3 are tanking you lying coping jeet, and BSV is tanking the most among these 3 lmao

>>19229324
lmao wtf bsv and bch have way worse loses today and btc only fell like 2% while this literally fucked craig meme bullshit by making it clear that he lied.

Calvin is panicking due the fact they used this wallet to larp and then said they could not access it.
Meanwhile the wallet moved.

>>19229324
>The fact that the BSV and BCH is untouched and only BTC is moving is OMINOUS for the coretards LOL

>>19229503
calvin is at least 15iq > creg.
thats why he's out first with his: "beats me, maybe ira has control of those coins".
he wants to set evidence so he can say "creg lied to even me".

this is hugely negative for bsv. basically curtain call.

Looking forward to the Death of BSV Shills around here

Pop a Bottle Biz

>>19229537
hahahaaha yes he just said on twitter that creg didn't do it and is saying that ira side may have satosj coins now.

He is escaping and leaving craig to sink kek.

>>19228771
a lot

>>19229920
exactly. was genius move desu.

poor fat creg is probably going to drink himself to death tonight....

>>19229963
The move of the coins also happened while he was livestreaming lmao , this is hillarious.

>>19228287

Consider the following three facts:

1) The sole purpose of moving the coins from the 2009 wallet is quite clearly to discredit Craig Wright.

2) The existence of Bitcoin SV hurts Bitcoin Cash. If you discredit Bitcoin SV, you hurt Bitcoin Core, and help Bitcoin Cash.

3) It is highly likely that the 2009 wallet belongs either to Satoshi, or to one of his intimate associates. Who else would leave those coins untouched for 11 years?

What does this all mean? The real Satoshi Nakamoto has returned, and is about to crash BTC to zero. The flippening is imminent. Prepare for 40x losses on one hand, and 40x gains on the other.

>>19229155
>You can make almost 10k flippin' burgers

>>19228287
Calvin, once again, has successfully caused most BTC'ers to completely disregard all of this now; in doing so they will not feel obliged to do their own research, as always.

Scoreboard:

Calvin: 176
Core-tards: 0

>>19229503
There was never any doubt that Craig lied, this changed nothing for a single person in the world with a brain

>>19228287
kek. calvin is satoshi and also max headroom. check em

>>19229422
I'm talking about the satoshi BTC coins moving you retard, not the market.

>>19229324
>>The fact that the BSV and BCH is untouched and only BTC is moving is OMINOUS for the coretards LOL
>>Im so fucking erect right now

you dumb nigger:
>implying all have to be moved at the same time
>implying selling the most valuable coins first before a spooked market front-runs you is bad

kys pajeet.

>>19228287
>Satoshi's wrath

>>19231453
Seething

>>19228287
To all the privacy advocates who say bitcoin isn't anonymous enough: Who moved this money?

>>19230092
>What does this all mean? The real Satoshi Nakamoto has returned, and is about to crash BTC to zero. The flippening is imminent. Prepare for 40x losses on one hand, and 40x gains on the other.
But why BCH? Makes no sense.

>>19229324
So now that BSV and probably BCH are going to zero, will you cucks come back home to BTC or have your years of pathetic fud actually brainwashed you to such a degree that you won't? You probably won't. That just makes all of this even sweeter. Keep hating money, fools!

>>19232114
LOL at you corecuck, BTC is a dead shitcoin.

>>19232163
>btc is dead
>$9500
what a loser

>>19230092
>2) The existence of Bitcoin SV hurts Bitcoin Cash. If you discredit Bitcoin SV, you hurt Bitcoin Core, and help Bitcoin Cash.
Can you explain the logic of this one? I would think BSV dying would be (marginally) bullish for BTC and (very) bearish for BCH.

>>19230297
Interesting perspective. Can you put in BSV in that score board as well? Actually, I can do it for you:

BSV: rekt

>>19231453
Also
> implying someone who just sold 40 BTC has any interest in the lose change acquired by selling 40 BSV/BCH.

>>19232163
> IT IS BTC THAT IS DEAD, AT $10k, NOT MY SHITCOIN CLONE AT <$200 THAT JUST HAD THE ONE THING GOING FOR IT SHOT TO SMITHEREENS!!!
> IT'S DEAD I TELL YOU! THE BLOCKS ARE TOO BIG!!! REEEEEEEE

>>19232213
BSV and BCH are trying to do the same thing: restore the original vision of Bitcoin as fast peer to peer cash using big blocks.
If BSV dies, all of its dev work, real world adoption, and momentum of ScamVersion will likely unify behind BCH (the real Bitcoin)

>>19232114
So now that it is PROVEN that Satoshi is moving his BTC, and can start dumping on the market anytime, while leaving BCH/BSV dormant, how does it feel to hold a dead coin walking?

>and thus the dumpening began.

craig wright is an intelligence asset employed to disrupt crypto adoption while compromised alternatives (xrp, libra) are developed

>>19232830
objection!
he is a tool not an asset.

>>19231785
gas yourself, nigger.

>>19232444
I'm not worried by Satoshi moving some coin, in fact I welcome it. It will be good for BTC.

>>19232421
Oh I see how you mean, yes that seems possible. It's also a possibility BSV will drag BCH down with it.

>>19228426
I always had and still have the theory that Dave Kleiman was Satoshi. Because of the peculiar way the original C++ bitcoin code was written. The original client was a Microsoft-y Windows C++ application written by a diligent amateur. Traditional crypto code is usually Unix-targeted based on the GNU toolchain. People like Hal Finney or Adam Back would never ever write code like this.

Dave Kleiman though was a "Microsoft MVP" writing several technical books on Windows security.

t. C++ software dev

>>19232031
>>19232213

Will copy here the post which I made on another thread; the specific part which answers your question is this:

>BCH was severely damaged when Craig Wright, pretending to be Satoshi, hard-forked from it, and split the anti-core community.

-

BCH hard-forked from BTC a few years ago in order to follow the original vision of Satoshi. It has the support of Mike Hearn and Gavin Andresen, who were Satoshi's closest associates, and those to whom he entrusted the continuance of the project. The idea of BCH is to continue with Satoshi's vision of making Bitcoin a genuine digital currency--"peer to peer cash," as he says in his white paper. In order to do this, the memory-size of Bitcoin has to keep growing; and this is what BCH is made to do. But a company called Blockstream, with the backing of financial institutions and the Bilberberg Group, bought out BTC in the early days and hamstringed the memory-size. BTC is so crippled that, when the price goes to $20,000, you get transactions with $100-fees and three-day waiting-times. It can only work with second-layer technology which tracks and centralizes everything you do. BTC is now nothing more than a ponzi scheme without a use-case.

Satoshi would have been completely against all this. He wanted to increase the memory-size; picture related.

Now BCH was severely damaged when Craig Wright, pretending to be Satoshi, hard-forked from it, and split the anti-core community. BTC-supporters loved it when Wright did this; they have no good reason to discredit Wright. In other words, whoever does this is most likely to be a Bitcoin Cash supporter; and it is not unlikely that the candidate is Satoshi Nakamoto himself. He's here, and he's going to rescue us.

>>19232949
Tool or asset, Craig Wright belongs to the Chinese.

>>19234214

>picture related

*

>>19232012
True nobody knows. This is actually a really good point I don’t see a lot of people making.

>>19234104

>>19234337
It’s all so confusing. Satoshi also prob thought that bandwidth and hardware would be much greater than it is today I believe he even mentions this too.

>>19228287
nice fud m8, just bought some more

>>19234337
Adam Back was Satoshi. The Barely Sociable videos are too good and coincidences are right on the money. Adam Back was for a blocksize that would grow as the network grew. Now he isn't because of Blockstream's investors. He found himself stuck in the middle between the decentralized Bitcoin community and the business side of investors of Blockstream. You can't please both sides at once. Bitcoin at the end of the day, is not what it was when he first released it.

>>19228287
im the real creg

>>19234576
It doesn’t seem right man. Satoshi trying to kill BTC. He couldn’t done it a different way. Why not stay anonymous through BTC talk. Why leave before Mike Hearn and XT why not give in put on this major problem before you vanished? Why not in 2014 your last post be. Raise blocksize when need be. Then leave?

>>19234669
That makes no sense. If you kill BTC you lose everything and so do your (investors)

>>19234576
the good pastor and michelin star chef inventor of smart bombs and concert pianist... how could he not invented bitcoin. there is no way he would lie about that right?

>>19234243
no i mean he is a tool

>>19234669

The 2009 transaction today is strong circumstantial evidence to show that Adam Back isn't Satoshi. According to barelysociable, Blockstream, which Adam Back runs, has done everything possible to destroy the BCH community. Now BSV competes with BCH. Craig Wright was the best gift that Blockstream could have asked for; and if Craig Wright is discredited beyond a shadow of a doubt, BSV is dealt a severe blow. That leaves the anti-core community strong and unified.

Additionally, the writing style and temperament of Satoshi don't match those of Adam Back, (Satoshi was literate, mature, and dignified,) nor do his views on scaling and the block size.

>>19234781
He also happen to know everything there is to know about Bitcoin and have more than 800 blockchain patents. If he wasn't Satoshi, I think Satoshi would be extremely humbled of Craig's total mastery of his invention, and also be proud that he is scaling Bitcoin exactly like he described.

>>19234718

Satoshi's last message was to name Gavin Andresen as his successor, and he spoke extensively about scaling the block-size in his 2011 correspondence with Mike Hearn. He also wrote publicly about it on Bitcointalk. I think that he was amply clear about what he wanted before making his departure.

>>19235216
>That leaves the anti-core community strong and unified.
here is where your theory falls apart. dissenters won't unite ever. they will keep forking until they have a billion fork with absolutely no trace of consensus.

>>19232195
The only loser here is you faggot. Keep spamming this thread with your garbage.
>KYS

It's going to be wild when Craig wins. Screencap this, retards.

>>19229155
>$10,000

>>19235368

BCH is a number of years old and SV is the only fork which has even the remotest amount of traction.

>>19236181
i'm just saying cashies can't unite. they are people that can't understand consensus nor can participate in it. they are doomed to fragment forever. latest issue that toe bch apart was the dev tax. it basically became a small civil war as it was pushed to release. right now bch has two contending forks fighting for dominance.

>>19228287
fuck off. he blocked me. i dont even remeber why

>>19236286
>can't understand consensus
>softforks
https://medium.com/@adam_selene/the-segwit-15-attack-b0ecbb926777