/biz/ - Business & Finance

>If you don't believe it's Adam Back name one (1) thing that suggests he's not.

he said he isn't

>>19105676
the names don't match, retard

>>19105676
Satoshi posted from California. That's been known for a long time.

>>19105755
False

>>19105781
Not false. Adam Back types like a scatter brained moron. Satoshi typed like a professional.

Adam Back is not even Japanese you absolute retard.

>>19105676
>name one (1) thing that suggests he's not.
He said hes not.

This dick head would have proven it already

Satoshi wanted digital cash - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted scaling on chain - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted big server farms - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted micropayment capability - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted instant payments - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted a protocol set in stone - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted Gavin to carry the torch of Bitcoin forward - Gavin testified that Craig Wright was definitely the person behind Satoshi

Did it click yet? 1+1 = 2

Logic is a wonderful thing

>>19105676
He's not Hal Finney.
Fuck I hate you retards.

>>19105998
Craig Wright is also not Japanese, he's Australian. Try again, retard.

>>19105998
Satoshi said data onchain was BitDNS. BSV is not Bitcoin

>>19105998
Based

>>19105676
This is why i believe he is Satoj:

- The only person Satoshi knew and was inspired/based his work from, but never contacted.
- The only person interested in the topic (being an eminence on it) that:
a) kept quiet in the topic for 4 years
b) knew about rare bugs on bitcoin while being quiet (?!)
- He literally worked on nothing during Bitcoin was being developed and some time after release and Satoshi was active: no software, no papers, no patents.

The three points above make no sense, he didn't explain (smart guy, didn't even mention after latest allegations) and point directly at him, literally, unironically 100%

>>19105676
Technically he is right. He is not Satoshi alone. Just a part of it, along with nick szabo and probably Hal Finney. I am 100% convinced, that he is a part of Satoshi. Look what he did before, look what he is doing now, look at the whitepaper where there are citations from many coming from cypherpunk except himself. Adam Back is a Part of nakamoto

he doesn’t have charisma. by the look of him, he’s more like second guy. i can’t see any intelligence and charisma to organise and run big schemes

>>19106054
And who does? Creg?
Fuck off NPC

>>19106010
this could be true, Hal was an arrogant fuck so it'd make sense that he would make a pseudonym to congratulate himself.

man if this guy is satoshi i would be really disappointed.
i've been following him on twitter for years purely for laughs as this guy is a moron, and his balding hairline is my go-to thing when i need to puke
how am i supposed to believe in crypto after all this if he really is satoj?

>>19106010
also he looks kinda Japanese so probably

>>19106093
honestly it just shows BTC is just another shitcoin.
bullish for Eth.

>>19105676
Is this bullish or bearish for LOKI tho?

>>19105998
Based and stiffed

>>19105726
The real Satoshi would deny he is Satoshi. So this actually suggests the opposite.

>>19106197
im not satoshi
am i satoshi now?

>>19106197
this.
Also one of the 1000 reasons why Craig isn't Satoshi

>>19105998
almost trips confirmed

>>19105676
Bitcoin was created by a litteral bond villain. Who else would create such a thing or have the resources to do so.

Craig Wright had a little involvement but he is 99% liar faggot.

This glow nigger i follow on Twitter seems legit.

https://twitter.com/RedundantDesign/status/1260209919577387008?s=19

ive seen that guy in a cuck porno

>>19106328
yes he did claim that first BTC he had was payment for that

>>19105676
>name one (1) thing that suggests he's not
Satoshi is not one person.

>>19105676
>name one (1) thing that suggests he's not
Adam is perpetually butthurt about not getting recognition for his actual work: hashcash while satoshi regarded as a genius when he basically just put 3 things together: bit gold, hashcash, blockchain

>>19106206
>proof of denial
nice
still better than proof of whining

craig is satoshi ,bsv is bitcoin

>>19106528
lol imagine actually believing this

>>19105676
The whole thing seems way too intentional. I'd rather trust gavin than anyone else. I hate saying this but to me the fraudster is probably satoshi. Blockstream is a bunch of assholes. Given that gav had a lot of communication with satoshi and met craig I see no other explanation. This guy is a blockstream set up.

>>19106838
>I'd rather trust
that's your problem. maybe one day you understand cryptography.

>>19105998
This.

>>19106052
Everything Adam stands for is the opposite of what Satoshi wanted. Try harder.

>>19106872
but also this, and lot's of other small things that point to be satoshi a completely different personality than craig. they are basically polar opposites except they both favor capitalism.

>>19106886
lol keep telling yourself that!

>>19106859
>that's your problem. maybe one day you understand cryptography.
Satoshi is a real person in the real world with real consequences. Not some non-physical entity living in the blockchain. Maybe one day you will understand politics.

>>19106933
come on nothing that fraudster ever said or wrote about bitcoin is true. stop posting his bullshit!

Satoshi, sir, are you reading these? Please pump the coin one last time. Before miners crash it to Valhalla. Domo arigato sensei!

>>19106914
Satoshi wanted digital cash - Adam wants e-gold
Satoshi wanted scaling on chain - Adam wants tabs and lightning
Satoshi want big server farms - Adam wants raspberry pis
Satoshi wanted micropayment capability- Adam celebrates high fees
Satoshi wanted instant payments - Adam disabled it
Satoshi wanted a protocol set in stone - Adam fucked the protocol beyond recognition
Satoshi wanted Gavin to carry the torch of Bitcoin forward - Adam back kicked him out

Therefore we can conclude with 100% certainty, that Adam is a huge faggot Jew, and definitely not Satoshi.

>>19106953
Cope.

>>19106859
Listen I get the whole trailing nonsense about putting them off with fake clues etc. I get that the guy can be a decent candidate and the video did put good effort in doing so. I can understand that some people are disappointed by the conclusion as they expected a somewhat genius or perhaps a villain-like individual or a rebel. There's just something not clicking in here. The "evidence" seemed to match too easy with the conclusion. Yes yes the simplest answer usually tends to be right I get that too. Call me a schizo but why would you produce over 2hs of content and use craig's shadowimage of satoshi and start doing the saga at the heigh of the BSV drama pump?
Im not here to defend csw, vitalik said it best really, if csw is satoshi it wouldn't elevate our opinion of him but rather of satoshi.

>>19106978
how do you know satoshi is not one of the biggest miners? i was wondering about this if i was satoshi how would i leverage my position without moving my coins... maybe he withdrawn and started investing into mining equipment all along. and i'm not talking about craigs larp that fell apart in court where his own wife confirmed craig never mentioned bitcoin to her pre 2013 before he asked her to lie about it to the ato.

>>19106985
bollocks all of it sorry. it's not black and white like you insinuate at all. you keep telling those lies to yourself and your friends and you all will miss out on the big picture and also on the moonshot.
>>19106989
so you still don't understand.
>proof of tweets
>proof of word documents
>proof of whining
>proof of cussing
>proof of screenshot of emails printed out and scanned
>proof of degrees from degree mills
that is all craig has as proof and it's all absolutely fucking worthless. but go on do yourself harm who cares.

>>19106997
i really don't care about any of that. speculating on who satoshi is is ultimately pointless.

satoshi will let us know who he is whenever he feels like doing so.


-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
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=3FTe
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

>>19107076
Alright bad boy have it your way. We've got too many maxis and cultists around here.

>>19107053
The evidence that Craig is Satoshi is now so great, that nobody who has examined all the evidence will be able to deny it unless they are paid to.

That is you. A little monkey paid to squawk, because the fact that Craig is Satoshi is very inconvenient to the interests of your employers.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CraigIsSatoshi/top/?t=all

>>19105998
Craig Wright is a literal retard who can't produce anything the court asks for.

>>19107076
This guy buys drugs online

>>19107329
Nah just a blockstream shill.

>>19105998
Preach it.

>>19107193
there is no evidence that craig is satoshi
but i get what you are saying i did not read 80k pages of craigs fabrication myself.

>>19107355
fuck blockstream if i had to choose who to bomb nchain or blockstream i would pick blockstream. just to prove to you smoothbrain faggots bitcoin wouldn't give a fuck if they disappeared without a carbon trace.

>>19107381
well when the halving happened anyone with a working braincell knew 40% of the hashpower will capitulate at those prices. some speculated the futures market may be used by miners to ensure profitability but apparently they don't do that.
in 4 days difficulty corrects until that some congestion is expected.

>>19107404
You are making the false assumption that he has any interest in signing in public. Already addressed here >>19106933

He has nothing to gain by doing that. You would just pivot to the new narrative: that he stole the keys. Because proof of possession is not proof of creation. It's like saying if you steal a car key it's proof that you made the car.

He has signed in private, and blockstream cucks can't cope with that.

>>19107527
>You are making the false assumption that he has any interest in signing in public.
it's not false it's simple game theory. his interest is best served by signing. because he would get what he wants and still enjoy plausible deniability in court.
>Because proof of possession is not proof of creation.
exactly you are close to getting it. he would legally be insulated form the repercussions because even if he signed nobody could legally prove he is satoshi but for those people that he tries to prove it it would be more than enough proof.

this pretty much concludes that craig can not sign because he does not posses any of satoshis private keys and never did becasue satoshi was a big and loud proponent of wallet backups.

>He has signed in private
absolutely worthless

there are two main ways to fake a satoshi signature
1) signature reuse (a tx signed by satoshi is passed on as "random" message or "satre").
2) a failure to prove a hash that is verified in a signature belongs to an intelligible and not reused message. because from the public keys anyone can generate a valid signature for random "h(m)" such is the nature of ecdsa.

>>19107457
Are you forgetting 2017 and $50 transaction fees?

>>19107584
>because he would get what he wants
You have no idea what he wants. Your entire position is ridiculous and nonsensical. You say he should prove he created Bitcoin by signing, but also acknowledge that signing doesn't actually prove anything about who created the system.

Therefore signing doesn't even satisfy the requirement that you yourself put forward and there is no point doing it.

Conclusion: you are a certified retard, and your arguments are tainted with a political agenda. I can smell your paid opinions a mile away.

>>19107595
no but we are not getting anywhere near that this time. if you look at fees per bitcoin block it's getting substantial to subsidy especially in congestion. pretty bullish imo.
>>19107709
i know what he wants: fame, recognition, money, for the uneducated masses to polish his gigantic ego.you can come up with any lame ass justifications given craigs personality that's all he really wants. but even if he would want actual progress for bitcoin under his ideas and guidance the game theory would still hold.

>>19107709
>You say he should prove he created Bitcoin by signing, but also acknowledge that signing doesn't actually prove anything about who created the system.
legally it doesn't because there is no way to prove a private key was created by the person who uses it. but in practice because of the nature of private keys and crytpography it makes it astronomically more likely. so much that 99.99% of the people would take it for a fact.

maybe it clicks in your brain who knows you are all about clicking.

>>19106249
>trusting anything Craig says
In 2020, there are literal retards who still think craig is satoshi

>>19107820
yeah so far all we have proof for is some of his more clumsy lies and deceptions. the testimony of his ex wife was absolutely golden.

>>19107752
Increase the block sizes and BTC will remain king.

>>19107856
i agree it has to be done soon.assuming ln wants to do a visa level tx throughput with monthly settlements 100mb base block size would be necessary in the future.

so best would be to make the max block size self adjusting with a single consensus hard fork. the blocks need to be constrained at all times but unbound over time. because of bitcoins security and economic model. it's not easy because it requires off-chain metrics for a good and proper self adjust algo. but may be a way around that taking notes from monero.

>>19107918
but before increasing the block size there is some other work that needs to be done: make bitcoin a byzantine fault tolerant trustless pruning network.

discarding old blocks and junk data stored in them is essential for keeping the global burden manageable.

>>19107918
Or you could restore the protocol back to the whitepaper and have uncapped blocks. Sorry blockstream and Cz fucked it for you.

>>19107918
Good luck convincing any core cuck of increasing the block size, they will just ban you after complaining they wont be able to run a node off a raspberry pi with some shitty usb 2.0 external drive.

>>19107971
there's always this retard

>>19108011
Cant dispite this block was able to handle 1 million transactions. Faggot.

>>19105676
>Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto
no he isn't, but keep coping Barely Sociable

>>19107193
>"no one can change the protocol"
>forks the coin and resells the altcoin as the true bitcoin because he can't change the protocol

>>19105781
bitcoin is off berkley db lol
try again

adam writes exactly like satoshi. he is satoshi.
keep coping, girls

>>19106010
it's not Hal

>>19107988
Everyone at blockstream are complete retards. Anyone who believes they are acting in good faith and have the best interest in mind for BTC have to be lobotomized.

>>19108073
Segwit forked off and BTC is the altcoin.

Reminder, stop using BTC as electronic cash! Its for lambo owners only!

>>19107971
>Or you could restore the protocol back to the whitepaper and have uncapped blocks.
that's just going full retard in a devolutionary luddist way.

>>19108119
imagine how smooth your brain has to be to believe this obnoxious lie...

>>19108119
>any altcoin that forked Bitcoin before segwit is now Bitcoin

>>19108128
why are you still mad? you have bch and bsv if you want fast tx. oh that's right, nobody gives a fuck...

>>19107988
but they will be that's the point because the 300gb and growing blockchain would be reduced to a few gigabytes.

>>19108166
Picture makes me extremely uncomfortable
Who the fuck wears a tee over a shirt

>>19108135
Whats wrong with 300mb and segshit free bitcoin? Didnt you suggest 100mb blocks before? Seethe corecuck.

>>19108108
we all know luke is a fucking retard. he also has some mad genius in him, but he generally did more harm then good. he is a flat earther christian fundamentalist idiot.

>>19108201
to hide bobs

>>19108202
segwit is the second biggest innovation built on the bitcoin protocol. first was ps2h. people are only fudding segwit because they don't get it. they have been fed some easily repeatable lies and they are parroting them like a bunch of fucking brainlets.

>>19108202
also i suggested unbound blocks over time. not in any given moment but over time. why have a fixed hard cap block limit? eventually the network will grow beyond it.

>>19108242
yes blockspace in unbound blocks have no value. and thus transactions can't sustain miners. that is known.

>>19108242
and nobody gives a single fuck bsvtard, that's why bsv = 0.02 btc.

>>19108252
Oh so this?

>>19105998

>>19108309
no bchsv just went full retard with removing block limit altogether opening up to their minority hash shitfork to dos attacks.

over time means it can keep naturally growing with real adoption but being there for every single block.

one naive way is the block limit is being adjusted to a moving average of block size and miners can only add more transactions into a new block if they defer some of their block reward to an anyone can spend address.

this ensures that in times of congestion when fees go up the miners can include more tx when it's economically worth it and the sma will make the block cap to adjust up to real demand. but nobody can dump stupid big blocks on the network without paying out of the ass for it.

Satoshi is a black man

>>>/fit/55581870

>>19108322
that's most likely a larp tho. satoshis account was compromised. lot's of people larped as satoshi. but none of them have his keys. when all said and done only the keys can prove anything. rest is speculation.

>>19108438
wtf did I just see

>>19108401
Good thing real adoption is being built on the locked down protocol then. Developers hate when what they build is no longer compatible, hey. The sooner btc sorts their shit out, they can actually be peer to peer electonic cash, and more. But you're fucking with the ligning meme and shite block sizes, and 2 week wait times of 1 s/b enabling the rich to bleed investors dry. I have no idea why people defend bats like cz. Delist bsv because it threatens his bottom line? As if he has the best interests for bottom feeders like biz posters.

>>19107965
fuck off with the prunes gradpa

>>19108527
rofl dude bchsv is the farthest from a "locked down protocol" there is. it has abandoned satoshis consensus not once but twice. it's a literal shitcoin. and the best thing about it is it took all the massive brainlets and trolls with it.

>>19108561
Screencapped. Didnt like the real adoption post?

>>19108561
Cope.

All the gains went with the real Bitcoin protocol. If you wanna stay poor, buy the BTC ponzi kek

>>19108539
it's the future. there is no point keeping junk forever. you can run an archiving node nobody will or can stop you. but the rest of mankind is only interested in the ledger. which represents the actual value in bitcoin.

it is the only one trustless permissionless publicly auditable and secure byzantine fault tolerant distributed ledger that is.

the blockchain is a means to the end many retards see it as something that in itself represents value but it isn't. it's just the worst and least efficient form of database that bitcoin uses to reach byzantine fault tolerant consensus on the ledger.

>>19106985
i honestly hate adam with a passion
fuck this cucklooking pos
he's been working on lightning for how many years now?
>d-dont worry guys, instant payments coming soon in 2018!

>>19108616
depends on your source and when you start counting, if you look at bitfinex data it's down 13% from bitcoin since the fork.

>>19105676
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfcvX0P1b5g&feature=youtu.be

>>19108611
there is no adoption on bchsv only spoof and worthless unverifiable junk. the sv crowd built shittons of trustful centralized "services" on top of their idiotic luddist chain and are very proud of this progress. i'm skeptical as fuck any sane person sees any value in it. but we will see in a few years.

>>19108642
Adam is a literal pump and dump scammer. Imagine thinking this clown is Satoshi, it's so ridiculous it defies belief.

Blockstream is the worst kind of scum on the planet.

>>19108712
>pump and dump scammer
he doesn't sell the sats he stacks

>>19108684
>blockstream attempts to lowkey shill adam back as satoshi and sacrifice leddit in the process because they are desperate and losing
lmao

>>19108667
sorry my mistake!!
-13% since that fork, but btc is up 50% so... that's -42% in bitcoins perspective.

mea culpa

>>19108712
in 5 years people will cry not following his advice

>>19108712
>Imagine thinking this clown is Satoshi
it's retarded as fuck, but thinking craig is satoshi is a hundred times more retarded really.

>>19108698
>>19108698
>worthless unverifiable junk
umm sweety, on btc, the data is just coins just moving between wallets and exchanges
it's literally worthless and the actual worthless junk nobody wants to see except the money laundering division of the fbi
my guess is that's why you want it pruned

>>19108698
I might add all this text from this thread in an op_return and put it on the immutable ledger to remain forever. For a penny. Youre right, we will see in a few years, but ill have proof of your stupidity and blindness on the blockchain forever. And if im wrong, well it wont be on the blockchain and ill have to come back to btc. Hopefully lightning will be available in 2056 and i can buy a coffee.

adam literally killed bitcoin in 2017 by making it unusable and forcing good people in the scene to fucking leave as they were censored and bullied by blockstream cucks
now we have hundreds of fucking btc forks, even on eth, and people stopped looking at btc as a currency, its now a fucking store of value

oh, and his excuse for keeping it unusable is
>lightning is coming soon guys so you can use it for coffees!
>just a decade more and you can use OUR channels to transfer your bitcorns because the main chain is for BIG txs only!

now this guy claims he's satoshi
>aaah, actually i'm not satoshi ;)
>but this is what a satoshi would say right?
> ;;))))))))) blockstream

honestly makes me seethe

Why delusional cashies keep spamming this thread? kys
/thread

>>19108803
no m8 the coins moving is literally the entire point and entire value proposition of bitcoin.
dude the fbi can run an archiving node who cares. nobody else will need to. and bitcoin will scale much better with much smaller burden then the idiotic cash forks.

>>19108808
your ledger would also be immutable if it was byzantine fault tolerant. but aside that what value your worthelss brainlet shitpost represent? it's not wroth a penny it's not even worth a thousandth of a penny.

>>19108808
also you ironically prove my point, because placing a bunch of "data" useless unverifiable text on an ""immutable"" blockchain doesn't make it true nor makes it useful. sometimes i think altho i have very low opinion on linkies but they are literal geniuses compared to cashies.

thank you! sincerely best demonstration ever.

>>19108808
you can buy a coffee with sidechains already

>>19105676

>placing the burden of proof on others

Here he is yesterday trying to throw us off the trail.

>>19106077
>
satoshi literally samefagging

>>19108908
your scaling model expects big rich players to come in and pay retarded fees to use your money transfer system
on bsv everyone pays a little bit, your system is doomed to fail.

>>19108982
You fail to see the bigger picture anon. Youre a lost cause. Unironically throughout this entire thread you have strengthened bsv's argument. Your last post,
>and bitcoin will scale much better with much smaller burden then the idiotic cash forks
Illustrates how locked you are in your thought process. Bitcoin ((will never)) scale with the likes of blockstream and cz running the show. Unverifiable? Not necessarily. Accountability? Absolutley. What my op_return input will one day show, however, is how spastic corecucks and their hivemind were.

>>19109007
i could buy coffee on main chain for almost a decade until adam """satoj"" back stepped in and made it unusable

>>19106015
has your brain been fucked by some mongol or wtf is your problem that only BSV has it, namely Metanet.
You corecucks are retarded as fuck, seriously.

>>19109040
not really if you would bother to take a look at fee rewards on bitcoin you would see it would work wonderfully. sv fees are too small to amount to anything unless some miraculous sudden mass adoption happens (yeah keep hoping that) and again by some miracle the network can handle the load also as opposed to the normal adoption curve bitcoin exhibited before the block limit started constraining the blocks and forcing segwit adoption (which was an asshole i condemn move however much sense it makes).

segwit beautifully demonstrate the separation of transactional/financial data from the technical aspects of transacting and the proofs required to do so. but it's just the first baby step. we have a long way to make bitcoin more efficient to ensure it will scale to mass adoption.

the hardest part is educating the people about the real value proposition of bitcoin especially because it's perceived role is constantly changing with circumstances and need.

>>19105726
Craig Wright said he is, but he isn’t.

>>19109146
>Bitcoin ((will never)) scale with the likes of blockstream and cz running the show.
that's just like your shitty unverifiable opinion presented as fact brainlet.

like i said you are proving my point perfectly.

>>19109170
>Metanet
that's an other fine example that craig is a semi tech illiterate moron who fluked his physics class.

>>19109167
what kind of coffee? cappooccino?

>>19107434
>fuck blockstream if i had to choose who to bomb nchain or blockstream i would pick blockstream.

same
nchain is a nonfactor
while blockstream is actively sabotaging the project for years

didn't blockstream get most of its initial funding from literal rothschilds? was it 200mil or something?

i understand reddit believing this shit as most of crypto subreddits are moderated by blockstream anyways, but it baffles me that on 4chan of all places people would choose to believe in rothschilds

>>19109219
yes, mr. lightning, gregory, that worked for Dr. Craig Satoshi Wright, obviously you're not able to understand it.
Same as you never understood that Bitcoin is turing complete

>>19105676
This will surely be the end of BitCoin and Craig Wright

>>19109219
Accountability.
You honestly dont believe that cz doesnt have his finger in the pie?

>>19109305
reply to the wrong spam... meant >>19109247

>>19108242
>pick any shitcoin
>"see its cheaper than btc this means its better"

>>19109167
And why the fuck do you want to bloat an immutable ledger with a shitmochaccino transaction?
Nobody gives a shit storing your useless 1$ worth tx, not me, not other 50000 full nodes

>>19109341
are you a miner? not? then you're not a node.
for that exact reason nobody will ever care about your feelings nor opinion.

>>19109172
when the 1 mb limit was put in place there weren't big mining farms with industrial internet connections and hardware
it can handle it easily today, like amazon/google/nsa data farms

btc can't scale for mass adoption, they will announce soon POS probably because they can't do lightning network

btc role hasn't role hasn't changed in 3 years, it's still hodl for retirement, and you can do that without even moving it from an exchange, just keep it on coinbase and make zero fees! nice!

>>19109341
ah yes because HODLING that 0.0783 of btc is gonna make you afford that lambo in 2054
and cheap transactions is the only thing that prevents bitcoin from MOOOOONING

>>19109341
Ladiest and gents, the dumbest shitposter in this thread.

>>19109146
I am collecting all their their bullshit to put on the blockchain. It will be remembered forever - all the lies and all the trashing we had to go through to make Bitcoin scale.

>>19109398
>hold on your coins long term in an exchange
>2020

>>19109775
this how nuts forkcoin bagholders are

>>19109780
at this point im not sure if people are being sarcastic or not

>>19109301
i really don't think the matter all that much. not how opensource development works. if there is a need and there is consensus the community can leave them in the dust under 15 seconds.

>>19109305
bitcoin is provably not turing complete. all turing machines can emulate all other turing machines. call me when you can emulate a subleq machine on bitcoin!

>>19109398
i completely agree that 1mb back then is roughly the equivalent to 8 to 32 mb today. however i don't agree that constant hardfork adjustments to the limit is a good idea and removing the limit altogether is the worst idea ever.
>btc can't scale for mass adoption
that's one of the most retarded statements out there after "man can't fly" and "we can't break the sound barrier"

>>19109398
i'm personally doing the opposite btw, i use cold store for my btc holds, use bitmex for strategic hedging with fraction of my holds and use coinbase as spend wallet for pocket money because no fees.

very excited about lightning the potentials are huge in micropayments. and yes my hub will probably be coinbase. why lie about it. exchanges are the best positioned to become the biggest hubs.

>>19110429
Imagine unironically shilling the lightning Jew lmfao

>>19110485
lightning is fucking awesome.
i don't like the routing part there are issues with it that make the mast layout completely unworkable long term.
i think lightning with a direct channel and no routing alone has tremendous potentials for micro-payments in public transportation on demand streaming cloud gaming etc...

i'm not saying routing is impossible to fix i'm saying it either gets fixed or worked around or the network adopts a shape that mitigates the issue to non-consequential...

>>19110689
*mesh layout

>>19105676
its a JEWWWWWWW

>>19110689
lightning is patented by nchain

>>19110862
of course... i don't know how many patents nchain has at this point but not a single one of them been upheld in court to my knowledge. so far it has been a money sink.

>>19110299
1mb is no different from 21 million coin limit. You cant just go and say "lets go change it bro".
Thats what retards cant understand.

>>19110862
Lightning is an open source protocol, patent trolls are irrelevant.

>>19105749
>the names don't match, retard
this. god you people are dumb

>>19111050
you can say that obviously but pretty much everyone has to agree. and no it's not the same. the 1mb limit is a technicality it was a crude early form of dos protection. however it's role changed recently. so yeah removing it is not a n option raising it is.

raising the 21m coin limit would brake consensus sure as hell.

>>19111104
There is no consensus is raising the 1mb blocksize just like there is no consensus to raise 21 million. Someone that doesn't want nodes to be big datacenters and is holding real money in BTC and uses it as a gold alternative isn't going to support a blocksize increase so nigs can transact on it.

>>19111043
it isn't working so it's not worth acting on yet and that goes for most of their patents
>>19111081
lol, blockstream tried to patent it
and failed

>>19111081
you're fucking stupid.

>>19105676
>name one (1) thing that suggests he's not
creg is satoshi

>>19111206
sorry for your brain damage you are like the polar opposite of cashies equally retarded.

>>19109856
you are right he does sound like a false flagging sv cuck. gonna ignore it i guess.

how many "creg is satoshi" posts are actually core chads larping for the lulz?

The typing style is even the exact same for the most part, I'm surprised that people didn't think Adam was Satoshi before the video about it even came out.
>satoshi types like a scatterbrained idiot

So scatterbrained its clearly intentional. He still types in British English, double spaces and follows the same grammatical pattern as Adam.

>adam said he isn't

Adam has claimed a LOT of things over the years, half of its provably bullshit. The dude has no credibility.

>>19113084
fuck knows most of them sound genuinely retarded but sufficiently advanced trolling is indistinguishable from authentic idiocy.