/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19067925
you're ignoring the most obvious error of your gay theory:
why would someone with over 1m btc be obsessed with spending his time slaving away trying to convince normies to use his liquid sidechain so he can make a few pennies per transaction?
see how gay and stupid your brain is?

>>19067925
reaction of people: none... because it doesn't surprise anyone.
>>19067972
he's a CEO and working on what he loves, pea sized brain

>>19067925
this beta faggot isn't satoshi
quit simping

>>19068283
he is
how does that make you feel ?

>>19067972
Because being rich and having a lot of money wasn't the endgame of creating Bitcoin.
>>19068199
>he's a CEO and working on what he loves, pea sized brain
This. He left Bitcoin's development to Gavin so he could establish Blockstream.

Look at how identical the Hashcash and Bitcoin whitepapers were written.

>>19067925
Why is he so afraid of Craig Wright?
I know CSW is not Satoshi but Adam seems genuinely afraid of him.
Did CSW fuck him in the asshole without consent?

>>19068299
it makes me feel there are too many simps on this board

>>19068432
He's not afraid of him. His recent Twitter back and forth conversation with Calvin Ayre suggests Back isn't batting an eye at Craig or the nChain team. BTC will win in the end because of the plausible deniability that Adam is Satoshi.

>>19068432
The truth is that they worked together.
Don't forget that all of them have a NDA(!) that may be lifted one day. (It has been confirmed by literally everyone).
Hal, Adam, Craig have signed it, together with Dave.
All of them were part of the initial group.

>>19068515
It's not crippled. There is a consensus of the path Bitcoin will go as far as what Blockstream has planned for the future. Do big blocks work better for larger adoption? Sure. The current block size keeps the network decentralized. Big blocks kill the idea of decentralization and trustlessness.

>>19068515
>there are more BTC on ethereum then on the lightning network.

The jews must be seething. He exactly knows what he is doing. He is getting nice payments from the jews. And then at some point will simply switch over to BCH or ethereum.

>>19068575
Does it? Why do bigger blocks kill decentralization and trustlessness?
We don't need to go towards 1GB blocks but let's say, for the beginning, 2MB blocks, which btw. Blockstream CEO agreed to be the better solution

>>19068539
This is most likely the truth. A lot of the figureheads we know so well from the crypto space that had a fork in the road in developing Bitcoin. Bitcoin is decades of work coming together in 2009.
>>19068580
Could happen this way. I believe in Ethereum advancing this technology forward. This all is just beginning.

>>19068638
-Larger blocks lead to less hashers running full nodes, which leads to centralized entities having more power, which makes Bitcoin require more trust, which weakens Bitcoins value proposition.

-Bitcoin is only useful if it is decentralized because centralization requires trust. Bitcoins value proposition is trustlessness.

If they could program a block size that changes size due to the transaction volume over time, that would make more sense. A flexible, adjusting block size, not a one size fits all (big or small).

>>19068734
First of all, a non-mining node is not a real node. It has no power for decisions.
Your second point obviously doesn't need any sort of argument as first point was wrong already.

Your third point, non-fixed block size, is how Bitcoin and therefore SV works. Blocks doesn't get filled -> smaller size = variable block size. More transactions coming = bigger block size.

Satoshis Vision

>>19068734
>>19068877
trustfullessness

>>19068539
So CSW drugged Adam Back and actually raped him in the asshole.
Is that what you are suggesting?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qhyFKPK4KY
after watching the above interview. it's like he's explaining the origins of bitcoin and how it got started/got in his mind, but he can't say outright that its him. you can tell he looks awkward as fuck lying too

>>19069076
Craig was provably active in the cyberpunk scene since before the 2000's.
You can make jokes and whatever but just being retarded as you're is simply stupid.

>>19069076
>>19069158
Here a picture from 2006 which shows that goes towards what >>19068665 said
>Bitcoin is decades of work coming together in 2009.

>>19069158
>Craig was provably active in the cyberpunk scene
*as an intel agent

>>19069510
Together with Adam you mean?
And no, simply invited.

>>19069510

>>19069158
>>19069278
How is drugging a person and then fucking them in the anus without their consent a joke?

>>19069278
literally imagine writing that in 2006. my heart breaks for creg sometimes...so needy, such a need to be center of conversation, but so unqualified with low iq ideas.
his lack of a dad really fucked him up!