/biz/ - Business & Finance

Maybe:

We’re pleased to announce that we will be contributing to that cross-industry effort by teaming up with Chainlink, Unibright and Anyblock Analytics in the EEA EMINENT Task Force.

>>18667354
Yes except the difference between the two is that one is actually being used and the other promises that it will be used.

>>18667497
>EEA EMINENT Task Force.
Lition is so much bigger than that.

LITwaffe is based

no

Sirs please delete I’m still trying to accumulate my 50K stack

>>18667785
No.

>>18667769
>>18667792
came here to say this
fucking krauts are worse than the pajeets

>>18667354
Got a good vibe from this. How much should I buy?

Fucking scam coin, the energy platform is decoupled from the blockchain, it's even a different website. And on the 'mainnet' you can't even inspect wallets, it just shows blocks and transactions. Not impressed.

>>18667931
100k will be enough

>>18668012
Not even that desu.

ETH LIT PNK ZCN TRB
the new biz based folio
i'm up 38% on average
/biz/ has good advice, you just need to sort thru the bullshit
ETH and ETH-related tokens, as always
don't fall for anything not on ethereum

>>18668011
Why do people FUD project they don't even understand? The energy sidechain is running the transactions yet because mainnet 2.0 hasn't launched. Lition Energy is a different business to Lition Blockchain hence the different websites.

>>18668291
>don't fall for anything not on ethereum
You're an idiot.

>>18668323
anything outside the ethereum is doomed
screencap this and suck my balls

>>18668312
'MAINNET V 2 SOON (TM)' fucking lol
How long are you waiting? One year? Two?

Lition is going to be huge, people just don't realise it yet because they are too focused on their energy use case, which is just one use out of countless for their technology.
They are the first to bring GDPR compliance to blockchain which is going to be a big driver of blockchain adoption by enterprises.
The recent news about Lition joining the EMINENT task force is just the newest breadcrumb that points in this direction.

>>18669491
At this point eminent is just a competitor to satsgang with how many literally who projects it has tried to pump

>>18669491
Lit did not join the EMINENT task force, it joined the EEA which is very different and even shitcoins like JNT are in it.

>>18669590
https://twitter.com/Lition_Block/status/1253319246010028032

Guess I was wrong

>>18669512
That must be the most stupid thing I've heard this week, congratulations.

>>18669590
Sure they did
medium.com/@mstephenw5/lition-joins-forces-with-eea-eminent-task-force-to-drive-innovation-and-adoption-eab6e9e2a974

>>18669491
>Lition is going to be huge, people just don't realise it yet because they are too focused on their energy use case
While I don't disagree that people are focusing too much on individual things, but I also think people are massively underestimating how valuable the energy use case actually is.
>>18669590

>https://medium.com/@mstephenw5/lition-joins-forces-with-eea-eminent-task-force-to-drive-innovation-and-adoption-eab6e9e2a974
Shut up.

>>18669703
I agree with your first point, I just think people always tend to compare Lition to the likes of Power Ledger and WePower although Lition has so much more to offer.

>>18667808
Kek

>>18669491
Based.

Can anybody explain me how the process of staking rewards works?
Like where do these rewards come from?
They are fees sent by the lition energy users.
But how are the fees set?
They're set at 0.01 USD says the whitepaper, but how?
And how are these replenished? Do they get bought in the market every day or every week or so?

I can't even buy this anywhere. Idex doesn't list it for us burgers and hotbit for some reason wont let me sign in.

>>18670157
Bidesk

>>18667354
>Guys, is LIT becoming our new posterchild like LINK is right now?
never forget this clusterfuck of cringe

>>18670428
Link?

>>18670428
Also I'm interested in faillition1.png

>>18670157
>hotbit

Clean your cache, try it with a different browser, make sure nothing relevant is blocked by your add-ons and settings.

>>18670502
it was heavily edited afterwards, but for a while they kept all the connection issues and the roastie who destroyed them during Q&A. Whatever is left, is on youtube

>>18670157
Idex + VNP or bidesk.com

>>18670657
I gathered it was on youtube, but which video was it? Did they live stream it? What are you even referencing?

>>18670694
it was the live stream of the mainnet launch.

Before they went back to beta net. They actually believed they were ready for mainnet.

It was a huge disappointment.

It was marketed as something done together with SAP, but all SAP did was rent them a conference room. NOBODY FROM SAP APPEARED

WLAN DIDN'T WORK

FUCKING LOHWASSER HAD TO USE MOBILE HOTSPOT TO SAVE THE DAY AFTER 10 LONG MINUTES OF CRINGE

>>18670756
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IgHbf-T_jw
This?
>They actually believed they were ready for mainnet.
You say this as if they were foolish to ever believe that it would be ready. Remember they had many advisors including Juergen Mueller.
>NOBODY FROM SAP APPEARED
It literally says "SAP CTO Juergen Mueller who held an introductory speech" in the description.

FUD.

>>18670801
BASED RETARD

I WROTE MAINNET

YOU POSTED TESTNET

R E T A R D

>>18670801
>as if they were foolish to ever believe that it would be ready
Lohwasser in person humbly apologized about this on an AMA

>>18670756
>>18670428

Literally pajeets and vodkaniggers have no other reason to fud except some fucking stupid internet problems lmao

>>18670833
blockchain broken. Still not fixed.

They postponed to fix to Q1 2020

AND STILL FAILED

>>18670831
I've literally asked you twice to send a link and I've gotten nothing but obscure responses from you. Just send me the fucking link of what you are talking about.

>Lohwasser in person humbly apologized about this on an AMA
No shit. What else was he going to do?

>>18670846
Sooner or later it will be fixed. We are getting our staking shekels and business connections. Train is leaving.

>>18670980
I don't give a fuck about helping you, even a 5yo kid could find it. People who follow LIT since long time know about it.
>>18671033
I hope so, 100k LIT here, still staking

>>18671049
>People who follow LIT since long time know about it.
Yeah I knew about the problem with consensus and the failed mainnet. You just posted an obscure picture saying "How embarrassing" and then referenced a video that doesn't exist on their channel anymore (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrJUW-A4X9UtpTG2px9rSeQ/videos).).

>>18671095
>a video that doesn't exist on their channel anymore
no shit, it was utter failure

>>18671116
Then why not say that at the very beginning? Why were you pretending this video still existed? Holy fuck you're a moron.

>>18671049
>I hope so, 100k LIT here, still staking
You don't deserve to get rich. Sell.

>>18671130
you absolute fucking idiot, I don't give a fuck about what they do with their youtube channel, I have no idea if it's still there, for what I know you might be just that dumb not to find it, I can't care less

>>18671141
i'm staked for 8 months more. literally staked since the first day. And even before LPS 2.0.

NEVER SELLING

>>18671141
>I don't give a fuck about what they do with their youtube channel, I have no idea if it's still there,
Stop moving the goalposts. You said:
>no shit, it was utter failure
It's either one or the other. It was either so obvious that it requires a "no shit" whenever someone points it out, or you had no way of knowing.

>>18671165
>>18671200
Whoops lol

>>18671200
I didn't know but I'm not surprised.

rotfl they actually deleted it
thanks for proving my point

>>18668291
>ETH LIT PNK ZCN TRB
ETH LINK UBT LIT

>>18671258
Delete your keys

>>18671304
keep seething Ranjesh

>>18671351
Says the one who's been speaking in broken English this entire time.