/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18623622

>>18623622
It means you can't sit on the toilet for 3 years when competition can put a product out in mere months.

>>18623633
His last line is the most bearish thing ive read in 3 years. Just market sold my stack.

>>18623674
No no sir, you can spend your entire life on the street.

>>18623622
Extremely bearish. I hold 10k and I'm not selling, but it's a painful reminder that this was never a sure thing and always has been a gamble. Will hold to 0 if it happens since I'm willing to take the gamble, it just sucks knowing this could easily fail.

>>18623718
You have an internal dev questioning the entire design of the system...if thats not bearish I dont know what else could be

>>18623711
Based street poster

>>18623622
first legitimate fud in years

Damn gonna sell my 10k stack now I guess 25x was all I was supposed to get :'(

>>18623767
>code rewrite
>bearish

hello pleb

>>18623737
>>18623767
It is bearish no doubt. If I was broke and all my worth was in LINK this would terrify me. As it stands I have 10k link with 22k in cash in a bank account. I'm not threatened, but it hurts to see this.

>>18623622
I've been saying this a lot, smart money jumped ship @ 4,4~, next months will be swing trading untill capitulation @ ICO price

>>18623622
This is a horrifying development. An internal dev admitting that the entire Chainlink product is fundamentally broken? Fuck this, I'm out. Selling now.

Omg i knew it, sold my stack

I’m tethering up for now until this is cleared up.

Lmao at all the bears in here.
For anyone new reading this and getting scared: buy more Chainlink. May will be exciting.

so is this fud stronger or weaker than a pornstar managing company funds

>>18623677
He is talking about a smartcontract,not about chainlink itself you absolute brainlet

>>18623633
codefag here elegant designs are good but not necessary more complexity more chance for buggy mess however if they know what they are doing it will be fine which it will considering chainlink went through security audits from outside

>>18623917
cope

>>18623945
You have a dev questioning the entire design of the system and a former porn actress managing the majority of Chainlink funds. What could possibly go wrong?

It’s not literal time retards.
He’s referring to the time-complexity of the data structure. He’s saying it can be optimized, such that the network performs more optimally.

This is why you’re just anons lmao

>>18623979
>a dev questioning the entire design of the system
He's talking about that one contract system (fluxaggregator) you derp.

Almost decent FUD this time discord trannies

Dont forget to dilate , wouldnt want that axe wound healing up.

>>18623992
Based

>>18623785
its probably nothing that cant be fixed but compared to past fud this is a disaster

>>18624013
this too lmao

>>18623992

Sure thing Rory

>>18623711
>streetshitpost?
>shitstreetpost?
>designatedpost?
Either way. NEW PARADIGM!

>>18624053
See >>18624013
and >>18623992

If you think this is "a disaster" it just shows how extremely new you are.
At the end of 2017 they had to rewrite EVERYTHING from Ruby to Go.

Much ado about nothing. New dev doesn't like the complexity of a SC and muses about a complete rewrite. Since he is no rookie he also knows this is expensive and in the end can again lead to a overcomplex system and then time has been wasted.

It happens all the fucking time in IT.

Itt a bunch of faggot fudders are acting all fed up to ensnare retard neurotypicals into a downward fud sell cycle. You people are so transparent its funny to watch you try all these different tactics.

>>18623992
>we're under time pressure
>not literal time
Cope-a-cola

>>18623917
What I read, hold my bags please

>>18624091
Im saying its a disaster COMPARED to the past years fud or 2/10. Even cybertechno machinations were spookier

First of all, samsondav is referring to ONE SPECIFIC contract. This thread is full of pajeets trying to fud retards. whatever.
Thomas is looking at it now. He doesn't seem to be very concerned. Samsondav admits himself he's not familiar with details of the contract. Just asking if it's needlessly complex.
Jeets gonna Jeet.

>>18623622
Thethering up, fuck this shit.
I don't want these 3 fucking years to be wasted. Fuck SIRGAY

>>18623622
sergay betrayed us all, we were supposed to be all in this together

>>18623951
>He is talking about a smartcontract,not about chainlink itself you absolute brainlet
This

>>18624215
ah

Touch tips?

Yawn

JASON WHERE IS MY PARSER?

>>18623622
delete this thread RIGHT NOW

>>18624366
sure bro

>>18623951
>actually replying to discord FUD

>>18623633
so glad i sold when i seen ethots shilling link. what a shitstorm its becoming.

We're basically looking at throwing 2 years of development through the window here. This issue should have been raised earlier. I mean, it's a good thing that the vulnerability was spotted in the end but the team should really get a grip, they've been a little overconfident lately.

>>18623862
>ico price
temper your fud fren you lost anyone stupid enough to believe you in the first place with that

Steve speaks

>>18623622

This explains the absolute silence from Sergey since late last year

>>18625760
Nobody here is smart enough to measure how important this is or isn’t. It could mean everything or nothing at all

If only biz could rub two brain cells together they could actually contribute helpful reviews to the repos instead of expending energy on speculation

>>18623622
Omg. If link drops to a buck I’ll eat my shorts.

There’s no recovery unless another team puli is up where these inept coders left off.

>>18625785
I thought where he’s staying there are severe lockdowns.

Or he got covid.

Who the fuck is propping link at over $1?

>>18625760
Can anyone comment on that pull request? Why didn’t Steve specify a branch where the “sidelined refactor” is?

it's over :(

>>18625897
>>18625920
shit takes time that can be better spent elsewhere
you know, like code that's used in the real world

>>18625574
No one with >110 IQ is buying your narrative, kike

>>18623633
This is how a parasite works.
He tries to criticize work from other people to make work for himself and falsely give the impression he is more competent.
The reason he leaves this kind of comments which can be openly seen and he has time to look for things to criticize is because he is not doing anything useful and may be a psychopath or manipulator trying to get to a higher power position in the company.

Sergey please scrutinize this person and triple check everything he is doing !
He may damage your company or parts of the code in an attempt to create problems which he can later solve.
It may also be an option to fire this person.
I don't think it will bring good results on a long term to keep this kind of person in a company as he will create more damage the longer he remains.

In the future you should use a psychiatrist to scrutinize for manipulators/psychopaths and prevent them from joining your company.

>>18623633
He didn't need to type an essay there. He is either incompetent or trying to FUD.

lol a whole lot of retards within this thread. should of just DR;NS

>>18623622
>Could it be "/////////////////////"?
Historically the team used these slash task to visually organize the icebox

Under time pressure to ship

Buckle up

>>18626747
The most intelligent post in this thread

>>18623622
It means the ORACLE ALLIANCE THING IS GOING TO BTFO LINK KEKEKEKEKEK

Fuck that dev just bought 100k

>>18626747
you got some point here

>>18623622
>>18623633
>"but as an outsider"
glad to be the only person here who can read. sage

>>18626747
can confirm that this is how i stay employed

>>18626747
This

>>18624255
thomas is based

>>18623622
Does nobody here understand the concept of technical debt

Holder since September 2017 and I sold my 200k stack after seeing this image.

>>18624330
I genuinely hope you get bone cancer.

>>18624330
Like, I see you in every $Link thread and I know we're a meme coin community and most of it is hilarious but you aren't. Is this all you do, too? I've never seen you post anything else. Please, if you're having suicidal thoughts just do it. Slam a steak knife into your heart, hang yourself; I don't give a shit. Just fucking die. No one in the world needs you and total strangers hate you this much. What an existence. I wish I knew your mother so I could throat-rape her, you fucking queer. Get the fuck out of here.

>>18623633
Fuuuuck I’m honestly thinking about selling while it’s still above 3.50. This shit could be headed sub 1.00

>>18626747
Based

>>18627299
Double Checked.
Thomas is a fucken animal.

>>18626747
>>18626836
>>18626792
>>18627161
>>18627299
>>18627615
>>18627656
Short of tweeting this with $Link cashtags, I think this is genuinely important for the team to see.

>>18623968
amateur codefag here, never had a professional position but I tend to know what the fuck I'm doing. Always willing to learn though. This is definitely true. I "work" with a team of a few other people on some hobby projects, and I actually find myself trying to criticize or simplify other people's shit, but I catch myself doing it and stop. There are smarter people who are better at it than I am, and I trust them to do it properly. More often than not, anytime I suggest "simplifying" something, there is a legitimate reason as to why it's coded the way it is and doesn't need to be changed.

>inb4 pretentious programmer faggots invade thread

holy shit the new logo is an imperfect symmetry, u lots are choosen for the mark of the beast

>>18627772
I'm also going to add on to this. From a more psychological standpoint, why the fuck would this nerd be writing paragraphs criticizing his own team's work IN PUBLIC? Like I said in my post above, I'm not a professional programmer, but in any line of work you keep that shit under wraps and discuss in-depth concerns like this behind closed doors. This mother fucker is either trying to seem more competent than he really is (see >>18626747), or is actually retarded

>>18624255
>>18627299
>>18627656
You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.

>>18627834

Based on the responses from Thomas and Steve, it seems like it's actually not an issue, the guy is just trying to complicate. He even leads off saying he doesn't know the code.

I did not mean for this post to be FUD though. Why is everyone overlooking the fact that they are pressured for time and they are making a release soon?

Sure it might be a simple version update, but then why such a rush?

>>18627882
>Why is everyone overlooking the fact that they are pressured for time and they are making a release soon?
Most of us have been waiting for three years brother. That may not seem like a long time, but it's long enough to stop worrying about specific time frames. We all know we're going to make a shit load of money from this, and at this point, I don't think any of us really care when it happens as long as its within the next five years.

TL-DR

LINK hires dumbass incompetent developers. They are in over its heads. Sell while u have time.
Once word spreads all 120IQs would have sold already and your stuck with the bags.

>>18627498
>>18627449
Lol its a meme

>>18627834
>I'm not a professional programmer, but in any line of work you keep that shit under wraps
Jesus Christ, this is what open source means. This type of conversation happens all the time and is healthy while sometimes unnecessary and painful. Sam seems to be a bit of a dick here, but who gives a fuck. His concern was addressed

>>18627956
>this is what open source means
Yes I understand that. But if this dude works for the company, then he's being an asshole for no reason. Are you really going to tell me that there is no other way for him to communicate his concerns except by publicly announcing them on the repo? If this was some random dude who doesn't work for chainlink, then sure, whatever. But it's not.

>>18627882
They have to beat Mobius to market. And clearly, are failing.

>>18628003
>Are you really going to tell me that there is no other way for him to communicate his concerns except by publicly announcing them on the repo?
It's normal code review process. This is what github was build for

>>18627904

I have been waiting too but yeah I understand. I am still interested and bullish and like to research the project, many around me have faded though.

>>18626747
spot-on analysis and solid advice. A+ post, best of thread winner.
signed,
10k link holder

>>18626747
Very based and redpilled. At my place if you say that kind of bullshit with no real suggestion of how the problem could be solved you will be told to fuck off. This kind of feedback is completely fucking useless otherwise.

You people have too much time on your hands.

>>18627797
Ouch

>>18628122
>hur dur github was built for code review so I better only utilize github and no other communication methods
Anyone with half a fuckin brain knows not to be a cocksucker like the dude in OP's pic related. I don't give a shit if it's "built for it". Anyone can build a website for anything, doesn't mean people are FORCED to follow through with your intended purpose.

>>18623622
dr;ns

>>18628222
newfag

>>18627736
>https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/pull/2732
DO IT

>>18623633
I SOLD YESTERDAY, STILL HAVE MORE

>>18623979
>You have a dev questioning the entire design of the system and a former porn actress managing the majority of Chainlink funds. What could possibly go wrong?
DUDE the fund manager thing is just for pussy,
You would understand if you got any pussy yourself

>>18623633
fuck

>>18624330
>we were supposed to be all in this together
THIS IS FUCKING BULLSHIT.
SERGEY PROMISED ME SPECIFICALLY THAT WE CAN DOUBLE TEAM THAT FUCKING E WHORE JESSICA.
RORY IS STILL CONSIDERING ALLOWING ME TO FUCK HIS WIFE IN FRONT OF HIM

>>18626747
>Sergey please scrutinize this person and triple check everything he is doing !
SERGEY NEEDS TO ANSWER ME FIRST.

WHERES THAT DUMB BITCH AT?

>>18626747
>Sergey please scrutinize this person and triple check everything he is doing !
>He may damage your company or parts of the code in an attempt to create problems which he can later solve.
>It may also be an option to fire this person.
FUCKKKKKKKK ITS REALLY JASON PARSNIP ISNT IT??

>>18627904
I'd like to have a shit load of cash on hand to scoop up cheap real estate. I was too young and had zero money for 2008.

>>18628122
>"we run the risk of shipping something expensively broken here"
Using this concern troll bullshit tone is not normal.
A normal person would say: "Someone more familiar with this function please confirm this solution."
or whatever. etc.

>>18628222
You're doing good work

>>18623633
>just a JSON parser

>>18624091
luckily they had nothing done and that just meant rewriting Seeger's cue cards for his only presentation

>>18626747
>Sergey please scrutinize this person and triple check everything he is doing !
>He may damage your company or parts of the code in an attempt to create problems which he can later solve.
>It may also be an option to fire this person.
>I don't think it will bring good results on a long term to keep this kind of person in a company as he will create more damage the longer he remains.

Chill out bro. They're specifically looking for these types of guys because the company works under an Idea meritocracy, where you want people to scrutinize each and every idea of yours so that you can be sure whatever ideas are presented stand firm. This is the basis of how 4chan always finds the best investments.

>>18631286
it would have been one thing if he offered constructive criticism, he didn't, notice steve's response: "i'm open to ideas", samson pointed out a criticism for the sake of criticism while at the same time raising concern over "shipping something expensively broken" in public, not only is that rude it's incredibly unprofessional