/biz/ - Business & Finance

Chainlink is not a good coin. I would rather own a good coin, BTC

link is going to moon but i like tezos better atm because it will also moon and i can stake at the same time

>>18540131
If BTC moons then the mempool will get clogged up and the whole thing turns to shit

>>18540198
No

>>18540203
Yes

>>18540207
No

>>18540117
Everyone bought it. The people who say they didn't or repeat the same old fud, are trying to get it to drop so they can buy more cheaper. This is the actual state of things now.

>>18540212
Yes

>>18540246
Explain

>>18540252
I already did.

>>18540117
Because every little normie faggot you can think of has bought in and is shilling it right now.

Even Winklevoss tweeted about it a few days ago.

Sell while you still can.

>>18540272
>normies are starting to become aware
>that means they all bought already
That's not how it works.

>>18540272
Only a retard would sell now. And you know it.

>>18540221
>>18540272
>everyone already bought in

>>18540272

I dont give a fuck if some rouge normies hanging from the last bullrun sold their Vechink and XRP for a lunch money stack of LINK.

don't overestimate their numbers. LINK doesn't need them nor reddit to moon and it never has and we always said this. The reason we used to FUD them out of it was to price them out of making it. once it passed 1-2% most OGS stopped fudding it because goal achieved: DENY REDDIT OF A CHANCE OF MAKING IT. they were priced out.

>>18540270
Incorrect

>>18540316

passed 1-2$ i meant.

>>18540272

This is most definitely the truth. We're not in a bull run yet, this thing is primed to drop. Almost 100% certainty

>>18540314
I clearly meant everyone on /biz/

>>18540117
I took a vow of poverty, anon. Becoming a millionaire so quickly would seriously dampen my spiritual growth.

>>18540320
BTC is crippled. There is nothing more to explain.

>>18540203
this has literally happened every time and if you think otherwise you are the newest of newfags

>>18540117
i sold at $2... waiting for a dump

>>18540339
price ≠ transactions

>>18540117
Can I buy it with chainlink because I've been all in for 2 years you stupendous faggot.

>>18540373
The two have increased on the same timeline since it began. I doubt that correlation is magically going to stop now. It's a digital novelty now. Like beanie babies only it's even more worthless.

>>18540117
Vaporware scamcoin? That about sums it up. Literally an unnecessary and useless piece of shit that any coin could implement with one line of code.

>>18540117
Why would I buy a double top?

>>18540316
This, desu

>>18540421
Glorified json parser

>>18540407
wrong. you may think that, because the popularity of the network goes up when the price goes up. but the number of transactions happening today is the same amount that were occurring when btc was at $17,000

>>18540359
a dump to where though? it might never go back as low as 2 now

>>18540498
Wrong

>>18540519
normies and niggers are in. we need to drop below $1 to shake them out

no use case. The memes are okay, but will go out of fashion soon enough to make it not worth jumping in

>>18540524
explain how. you can literally look up the stats. here you go:
https://www.blockchain.com/charts/n-transactions

>>18540475
Chainlink is network that reads JSON files and sends the data to smart contracts. (That's called an "oracle".) Useful, but not a good investment since the idea can easily be copied and 66% of the tokens available are not in circulation. Also, although they claim that it solves the "oracle problem" (The oracle problem being that oracles are centralized, not decentralized.), it doesn't, since the data being fed through the ChainLink network still comes from a centralized API feeding data to ChainLink through a JSON file. For some reason link holders think this gives it a future valuation of at least $100,000,000,000, which is absolutely delusional.

>>18540404
You literally can if you put your LINK as collateral in Binance or on AAVE, borrow $ or BTC and buy LINK with it. Heck you could even borrow shitcoins like XRP, sell it for $ and then buy LINK. This way you are shorting shitcoins like XRP while longing LINK with leverage.

>>18540527
You wish. Sorry you sold. It isn't too late to buy in again. Even at 5 bucks, it will still be a bargain.

>>18540575
Oh and look at that, anytime it hits that ceiling, the price tanks. It's as if the god damn pile of shit is crippled. Literally can't moon or else the whole god damn mempool is clogged to shit and fees that destroy the whole premise of bitcoin

>>18540117
>follows the BTC pair
anon some coins should be tracked by thier USD value, fuck your saroshis

>>18540618
lmao nigger, notice how your argument is constantly moving?

>>18540686
It's been the same exact argument. BTC is crippled. It literally clogs up the mempool when the price starts to go up. If it mooned again like it used to, it would take 3 months for transactions to get put into a block. You tards proved exactly what I was saying.

>>18540359
>tfw you heard someone say the same thing verbatim about ETH a long time earlier

>>18540272
if jessica can't dump us (we actually pumped) then random twitter nobodies won't do shit

It’s a scam.

>>18540117
The most beautiful chart in the history of TA. God, I'm so excited for all you little stinkers.

>>18540117
Too poor and balls deep on oil anyways. Fuck shitcoins if it's still around in a year then maybe

>>18540117
I've cashed out all my linkies for bat bois.

>>18540117
Premined shittoken

>>18540117
oh god christ im balls deep

>>18540720
nigger, it went to $13,000 this past july and it was fine fees were like a dollar or two

>>18540252
Newfag

>>18540939
>it was fine
>fees were like a dollar or two

Corecucks...

>>18540974
i agree that scalability on bitcoin is fucked long term. but it can still easily go to 100k and covering your eyes to that fact and screaming how the mempool will get clogged is just retarded

>>18540906
Why not a 50/50 split? Diversify your meme energy.

>>18540939
And if it moons, the fees will be way higher. The shit is literally crippled. Are you trying to convince me or get reassurance on the retarded investment you've made?

>>18541042
i'm pointing out how retarded your logic is that price = clogged mempool. just look at the mempool over the past 2 years. we've crossed over 10k multiple times and the mempool was nowhere near as clogged as it was in 2017.

>>18541038
dat batboi FOMO

>>18540117
I have no time for games of musical chairs.

>>18541099
because you'll lose the game you faggot

>>18541035
No utility means its fucked. There is nothing that will take btc to 100k besides hyperinflation.

>>18541042
again, to point how retarded you are, the mempool was just as clogged at $2,000 in may 2017 as it was at $20,000 in dec 2017

>>18541088
You stupid nigger, it literally correlates and if it moons then it'll be a shit show. Bitcoin was not a name or a trendy brand. It's a tool. If you break the tool that will kill it's value and eventually it will go away.

>>18541143
You literally have no idea what you're talking about. Transactions = clogged mempool. Not high price = clogged mempool. Bitcoin could climb up to $100,000 and the mempool could be perfectly fine

>>18541095
>>18541038
No lie I've been stacking LINK exclusively since 2018 but this is the first time I've been thinking of buying something else. Might divert my next coinbase payment to buy one of these shiny fuckers.

>>18541136
Wrong. Transaction count is not the mempool backlog.

oh thats an easy one! because link is shit

>>18541186
HAHAHA it's literally the unconfirmed transactions

>>18541179
Except the transaction volume has gone up every time the price has mooned.

>>18540117
I'm all in on Imperial and already staking so...

>>18541212
The transaction count is the number of transactions put in a block in a given amount of time. The mempool backlog is the number of transactions that are waiting to get put into a block you dumb fuck. The two are literally opposites. You fucks need to learn this shit before you buy this garbage. God damn retards.

>>18541250
>what are unconfirmed transactions
is anyone else reading this?

>>18541278
The link that you tards provided was literally, transaction count. Not the unconfirmed transactions, moron.

>>18540117
I sold around 4.80 and wanted to buy back cheaper, what I did. DCA now at 1.2. 2968 LINK reporting in

>>18540117
I dont know enough about it and it all sounds like a different language when talking about it

Im interested not looking to get rich quick. why should I invest?

Have you niglets seen this yet? Soon you'll be able to use your LINK to get DAI to buy more LINK via Maker. Pretty spicy. Aave really put the fire under Maker's asshole.

>>18541179
There is no way this shitcoin goes to 100k and nobody is using it. That's asinine.

>>18541733
imagine getting cucked this hard by Aave

>>18540203
>>18540207
>>18540212
>>18540246

;DDDDDDDDDDDDDD