/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18538670
Billionaires? Nah nigha we trillionaires now

>>18538670
we will make movies about us

>>18538670
Nerds who got lucky that'll be the narrative because niggas will start hatin' OP

>>18538670
how much is enough.please tell me???

Sandro Salsano, where is my money?

>>18538707

10k link

>>18538719
fuck i only got 100

mmmm maybe ill buy 200 more

>>18538719
thats 50kCAD

jesus.time to panhandle

>>18538670
They'll make
>Two anons One Link
>Linkatse

I have 550 linkies is that enough to make it bros? I spent everything I had on the dip

I'm trying to convince my parents to let me buy more with their stimulus check since my mom makes a fair amount of money and doesn't need it, and shes said she would put 1k in

>>18538900

no. 10k is to make it with Link.

Maybe you can invest what you gain elsewhere wisely after to make it

>>18539129
Anon you're supposed to hype me up not beat me down

No one on here has a suicide stack anyways

>>18538688
How about a quadrillion?

>>18538900
most people here say 10K is a make it stack but thats honestly just a circle jerk at this point... the real answer is no one actually knows... the only sensible advice I have is to continue DCA into link .. there are way too many variables to make an accurate prediction

>>18539392
Says who? A suicide stack is only 1k. Many people have that

They're already making porn of us, so it's possible.

>>18539392
I have a suicide stack plus another 1200 linkies I got through leveraging myself at the bottom

>>18539471
We do know and it’s 1k

>>18539471

It's not a circle Jerk. It's always been 10k and it's based on the 1000$ EOY meme.

ie 10k link to make it if they are $1,000 each.

Maybe you can make it with 5k Link if you invest it elsewhere after. In act, i'd think you would have to be a retard to be unable to make it with even $3,000,000 available to you.

10K Link just makes it idiot proof. Make it without doing anything else.

>>18539511
My point is if chainlink actually becomes the standard in the mechanics of how smart contracts operate AND if smart contracts become mainstream 1k is fud

>>18538670

>>18539549
See >>18539573

>>18539584
lulz

>>18539573

true. Not denying that. You'll jsut be waiting decades

Most people who got in under $1 and have 10k stacks will sell most of it at 1000$ which will likely crash its first bubble and is enough for the OGs to make it anyway so they wont care about holding out for 10,0000,0000,000 per Link

>>18539549
Agreed. Realistically, 1k at $1,000 is a make it stack if you're not a nigger or brainlet. $1M to invest in your younger years will make you very, very wealthy even if you just put it into boomer indices

>>18539638
>the greatest pump and dump scheme of our lifetimes

>>18539692
Sorry that you missed out. But think of it this way: 3.50 is still very very cheap.

>>18539662


1,000,000$ into boomer stocks = roughly 7% returns per year over long period.

You'll pay 20% of it to capital gains.
inflation is roughly 3% long term.

So If you only take out 4% per year of the gains on 1 million that is 40k USD. tax 20%(i have no idea what burger taxes are like, just know capital gains her) then you have 32K USD per year for nothing. If you are a wagecuck then you are set.

You can then invest in properties if you want, and collect the passive income. in 10 years that would be enough to have a good 2-3 properties without being leveraged up to your fucking neck.

That is with a suicide stack.
As you can see, it's not enough to "make it" very fast but its enough to have a petty easy life and not be left wanting for anything.

Now if you did that with a make it stack of 10k that's technically over 300K USD per year.

>>18538670
just wait till chainlink is all over mainstream finance and /biz/ is mentioned on Bloomberg

>>18539692

KEK. imagine when it reaches $1,000 and all the normies fomo at the prophecy price, and then suddenly thousands of Neet frogs dump their long held stacks of hundreds of thousands to millions of Link and decimate the price of the first bubble.

>>18539692
this >>18539709
forget pride don't fuck up a chance to get rich while it's still there cause it might not be for much longer

>>18538670
>nerds that got lucky?

Dont get lucky, just trade- buy low, sell high ...
Stop being brainlet.

The Matrix v 4.0 is about to load up. v3 ended with the artificial and completely unnecessary shut down of the world economy.

Sometimes I forget I have 10k link amd try to make money through other wreckless scheme like options.

My link is like a hedge against all the other bullshit I'm in. I just really hope the prophecy is fulfilled bizbros

>>18539491
Post portfolio
>>18539472
I thought a suicide stack was 10k


Hopefully I can convince my parents to let me use their trumpbux to buy more

>>18539724
>32K USD per year for nothing
You do have to reinvest for a 1k stack to make it. Compounding will turn that 32k / year into 100k / year pretty quick though (not biz quick, but lifetime quick). So yes, you are right. It's not a make it stack in the sense that you've made it right away, but it's enough to ensure any halfway competent person *can* make it in their lifetime

>>18539778
>just swing it, bro, trust me
I'd hang you myself but I just know that I won't even need to

>>18539866

I suppose if you did let it compound for a decade without taking the principle out tht would be better.
Just made the assumption that you want to retire straight away when Link hits 1k or something.


You are correct though. that is why 1K link has always been a "suicide" stack.
It's enough to still make it if you try, and not commit sashimi.

>>18539853

>>18538670
Vietnamese cartoons

>>18538670
What would the movie even be about?

>>18539866
>>18539573

Consider this

Assuming chainlink does become the standard for smart contracts mechanics and goes to the moon, would it not be a safe bet to reinvest that money in ETH, as that IS the standard for crypto smart contracts, do you think it would be fair to cash out of link and put it all into ETH before the bubble pops, or just go with future proof boomer stocks like Microsoft?

A second thought, if link and ETH are smart contract necessities, how would you feel about selling at lets say 900 per coin, wait for it to get to 1k and crash, then reinvest. If it was at that amount of money, that means that smart contracts are universal and used for countless things. The link bubble would pop but due to excessive use in smart contracts, it wont be dead forever and will begin to rise again. Or is that a retarded line if thinking

>>18539958
I imagine something like The Big Short

>>18539939
>nge/chainlink serial cartoon when?

>>18539904
I thought we clarified suicide stack is 10k, goober

>>18539988
Checked. I will probably sell 7% of my link at a time at certain price points (e.g. $100, $250, $500, etc.) until I've sold approximately half my link and create a slush fund. From this slush fund, I will most likely pull about half of it out and reinvest the other half in crypto during dips. I will continue this process over and over until I've pulled about half my gains completely out of crypto and into other investments.

>>18540047
No, the poster you were talking to here >>18539129 clearly says 10k is a "make it" stack. Suicide is and always has been 1k

>>18539988
I suppose you could reinvest it into ETH but at that point you're making the assumption ETH will remain the dominant smart contract platform (which is an iffy bet as some "experts" like Szabo are beginning to doubt it). I think it's safer to stay in Chainlink as its blockchain agnostic and no other oracle service really compares/rivals it.

In terms of your second thought I suppose you could do that but it's pretty much a gamble... personally if we reach that point I'm going to sell 90% of my stack and invest it into some boomer investment vehicles such as real estate and let the other 10% ride.

>>18540064
Interesting, never considered selling off pieces at certain points, ill keep that in mind.

As far as reinvesting goes, that's why I mention eth, its hard to deny smart contracts are the future, so I can definitely see putting money back into that as it dips along with other crypto. I don't plan on doing real estate investing, as I actually have a soul, so its either re investing in the big crypto as a method, or just going all in on Microsoft since the are future proof. Do you have anything specific in mind, fren?
>>18540154
Didn't know ETH was beginning to be doubted, thanks for the pro tip. I just hate the idea of real estate investing, it just seems fucking wrong to me. My mother is in the real estate business and she is partnered with fuck tons of real estate investors. Maybe its just because I hate landlords, but to be fair pretty much all her investors are in houses and not scummy complexes, and these houses are million dollar ranch homes in Colorado. I don't know man, just doesn't seem right.

>>18540244

Eth is no longer a sure thing.

They are going to have to completely abandon Eth 1.0 for 2.0. It's basically a new item from the ground up. They have only just got through the theoretical side of the roadmap in 3 years.
I repeat, they have barely started the meat of the work. It's probably 5 years away.

>>18539958
it would focus on the life of a loser neet virgin who is well into his 40s by the time the movie is made. it would tell the story of his earlier isolated, sad life & how it was transformed after he discovers an obscure mongolian basket weaving forum on the internet where one day a strange insider posts about ..chainlink, at a time before it was known to the rest of the world (of course when the movie is made, chainlink will be as well known as apple or Microsoft or Samsung). it contrast this early period with what happens to him when link moons to 1000$ within the space of 18 months, and his 50k stack is now worth 50,000,000

>>18539781
Facts

>>18540284
So what you're saying is only link is eternal

>>18540379
Not that anon but I would say LINK is the best play there is right now and has the most room for growth... can’t say for certain if that will always be the case

>>18540379

Everything Needs Links solution.

Longing link is basically longing everything in crypto with exponential less risk.

>>18540342
This is good, but it doesn't quite feel right. In my opinion, the destination really should take a back seat to the journey. Having some loser neet as the main character makes sense, but it wouldn't be bad to maybe add one or two other people who are separate from the main character (like in The Big Short). Showing important moments in chainlink's history like the 2017 bull run and the subsequent crash, mainnet, etc. and how their lives are at each moment. All the characters should be struggling in different ways, but maybe one character sells the bottom and offs himself by the end of the movie. And maybe the other side character sells too early, but is still fairly well of from his investment.
And there absolutely needs to be mentions of Sergey throughout the film, mainly in passing, which culminate in a scene toward the end where our main character meets Sergey for the first time in person and thanks him for everything. To which Sergey probably wouldn't say much, maybe just nod and keep on walking out of the conference.