/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18518986
Literally everyone will partner with LINK eventually

Im just waiting for steaking fellow linker

This is like partnership #761 OP. We're just all so numb to it now.

>>18518986
Decentralised + Partnerships = Oxymoron
Chainlink is clearly not decentralised.. No wonder why Vitalik distances himself from this shitshow, you retards are trying to reinvent the middleman for your own profit.

>>18519321
You don’t know what decentralized means, do you?

>>18519321
>blocks your path

>>18519332
KYC oracles?

>>18519348
Ahhh yes, the EEA. If I remember correctly they started the whole partnership trend in early 2017. Completely moronic

>>18519355
there is a difference between decentralized and distributed you cringe fuck

>>18519387
OK, so you're actually retarded
Good luck

>>18519355
KYC doesn’t mean it’s not decentralized. What you mean is „anonymous“. And anything anonymous will be banned soon, because only pedos use it anyway. Are you a pedofile?

>>18519465
whats a pedofile?
some kind of file on your computer that is juvenile?

>>18519394
>>18519465
interesting interesting, can you show me where it says any of this in the chainlink white paper?

>>18519548
Page 1

>>18519615
interesting, but nowhere on page 1 does it reference KYC oracles, maybe I'm missing something?

Who?

>>18519332
>>18519465
>>18519615
Yes, it LITERALLY does mean it's centralized. Learn to code, you have dunning–kruger.

Vitalik literally said Chainlink is centralized. It is a proven fact. Your norman non-programmer opinion is irrelevant, you're not qualified to say what is decentralized or not. You've never written a line of code in your life and don't understand what sybil resistance is.

>>18518986
Sir Gay betrayed us all. We were supposed to all be in this together.

>>18518986
at this point its nothing interesting anymore. just another one bent the knee

>>18519850
You must be the same faggy dunning-kruger poster from yesterday.

>>18519387

>>18519850
Chainlink's first line of defense in terms of security is its decentralization.

Vitalik is just being a butthurt jealous faggot, like when he told people to sell their Neo because he felt threatened.

>>18520412
>Chainlink's first line of defense in terms of security is its decentralization.
No, it is literally centralized. Learn to code, you have dunning–kruger.

Vitalik literally confirmed it's centralized.

You're not a programmer, you're not qualified to say what's decentralized or not.

>>18520164
Have you learned to code yet? Vitalik has. He confirms it's centralized.

>>18520449
>Vitalik literally confirmed it's centralized.
No, he once said it's "too centralized FOR ME"
There's a large difference, retard

>>18520449
>No, it is literally centralized.
How can it be "centralized" when it always had multiple independent nodes?

>Vitalik literally confirmed it's centralized.
He said the "security model" is too centralized for him.
But Chainlink's basic security model is having multiple independent nodes; which is the very definition of decentralization.