/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18209571
>creg why not just login to bct and post there...
>also why did your writing styles change so much over the years...
"oh...uuuhh....well....uhh....that actually wasn't even satoshi....that was an imposter."

>>18209571
I dont get it. He's saying he's not Satoshi now?

>>18209838
he's saying "whoever that was that posted on bitcoin talk from 2010-2012 wasn't me...it was was an imposter"

He is not satoshi and will keep this charade going on for inifinity

>>18209571
different day
same ole bullshit

What can any of you prove that he isn’t Satoshi. Not guess, prove. I am buying BSV and BTC. You can’t be certain.

>>18209972
I am certain you will lose money buying BSV.

>>18210011
Why

>>18209972
if you really believe he is satoshi it means you SHOULDN'T buy bsv.
the whole reason why satoshi was anonymous was because it was understood that movements with leaders always fail, because leaders can be killed, pressured, corrupted.
this should be your biggest sell message for bsv. its doomed if thats true.

>>18210034
*looks over at BTC* lmao, ok bud

is this an April fools joke?
it's suck a horrible joke for him, since it's making fun of his lie

>>18210058
btc has no leaders fag.

>>18210019
Very low hashrate, shitfork of a shitfork.

>>18209571
its all so tiresome

>>18210011
>I am certain you will lose money buying Segwit Scamcoin (BTC)

>>18210034
Why are you so worried about my financial investments anon? Why go at these lengths to make me sell BSV? Do you just care so much about my financial well being

>>18210085
Download a Bitcoin client from 2012 or so, let it sync. Which chain does it sync to anon? The one it syncs to is the real Bitcoin.
I'll give you a hint, it's not BSV and it's not BCH.

>>18210034
You’re totally correct. Someone who doesn’t just spew out bullshit. What you say is fact imo.

>>18210110
really not worried. in fact i larp on most bsv threads as very pro bsv. I'm excited by the idea of low iq tards being wiped out and missing out on the citadels.

>>18210070
umm what is blockstream

>>18209838
no he's saying someone other than him made the username and posted pretending to be him (Satoshi)?

>>18210073
hashrate always changes. even BCH used to have a ton of hashrate but miners left to BTC. soon after halvening miners will move to BSV to keep their profits up

>>18210019
because bsv being based around frauds and fairytales as per OP should maybe give you some pause for thought. This mentally-ill deluded conman clown who lies every time his mouth moves is 'Chief Scientist', for fucks sake. And here really is as far as your analysis needs to go

>>18210195
Delusional.

https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969&SearchText=

"I am willing to testify under oath.
Regards,
Dr Craig S Wright, LLM, PhD"

tick tock

I come back to /biz/ after 6 months and people still believe BSV - Fucking hell

This guy is a a fraud have you all been wilfully ignoring his train wreck of a court case? Shitcoin Vision is done

BSVtards falling en masse for a literal attention whore.

>>18210213
Jeez you shills glow so hard. Try not being such a beta faggot when you try to insult Craig

>>18210159
Proof that projects with leaders always fail kek

>>18210297
Go back to Israel for another 6months

>>18210240
>hashrate is a constant
>shows graph of changing hashrate over time
uhhhhhh

>>18210346
They are mad because he's already proved to the key players that he's Satoshi, and everything is moving forward.

They are coming to the slow realization that their opinion on whether CSW or not has 0 weight or influence on the course of events. Hence why CSW has felt 0 need to prove to these idiots anything.

>>18210240
>>18210386
nvm you think i'm delusional bc of what i said abuot BSV. i put my money where my mouth is

>>18210398

>They are mad because he's already proved to the key players that he's Satoshi

Where is proof? Please point me to it so I can eat my hat. I will honestly look at it with an open mind

>>18210118
Lel Sanjay vision and btrash faggots btfo

>>18210463
There has been plenty posted here over the years, I'm not going to aggregate it for you. What's in it for me? I shared some new news here with other people who have done their own homework but I'm not your research assistant. Good luck

>>18209571
>CSW says he was never Satoshi on bitcointalk
no shit sherlock

>>18210159
nothing relevant

>>18210543

"plenty of proof over the years" No there fucking hasn't been, or we'd all know it by now

Thanks for validating my earlier post, CSW is a fraud

CSW is a fraud. BSV is dead.

>>18210629
Don't be mad I didn't waste my time like you wanted me to.

That I could see your obvious bullshit, your response makes it clear you never had an "open mind"

Stay butt hurt you manipulative woman

>>18210629
i second this we haven't seen a single fucking thing that qualifies as proof. only moving goalposts and emotional appeals and autistic spergouts.

>>18210164
what he's actually saying is that most of the posts are a copies of what he wrote on an earlier forum, which were migrated to Bitcointalk; in other words what he originally wrote was originally migrated there, but the Bitcointalk account was never his, only the one from the original forum

>>18210672
i third this, he hasn't signed anything

>>18210719
one more of his twisted unrealistic tales.
entire discussions were manufactured over time with great care to make it appear spontaneous...
who would have thought...

>>18210118
BASED
CREGLETS ETERNALLY BTFO

>>18210118
i'm not sure a 2012 client is capable of syncing with the network... but maybe a 2015 or 2016 should be able to.

>>18210738
>entire discussions were manufactured over time with great care to make it appear spontaneous...
no, the discussions were real, but originally took place on an earlier forum
did you even bother to read his article?

>>18210671

haha, this is pathetic. I would have had an open mind, all you had to do is say:

"Check out Craigs post on 'so-so.com' or look up 'random keyword' - you did neither except whine. So cough up a small hint of a trail for me to look up or fuck off and admit there is 0 proof

>>18210118
lel thats some craig level logic. I wish someone asked that from him.

CSW is a fraud and willl eventually be ridiculed to suicide

>>18210772
Nope, you have 0 value to me, fuck off

>>18210796
BSV has zero value lmao

>>18210719
so he''s freely making shit up because somewhere in the post/pipeline, there is proof coming down it CAN'T have been him on bitcointalk, gottya. SO, he cant sign, has no keys, has no BTC (other than his 14 (four-teen) on Gox), is a proven liar and forger, can't login to bitcointalk (and was NEVER him anyway), is paid to LARP by nChain and talks a load of shite in general, BUT he's Satoshi because Dude, trust me?
>itsstillfuckingtiresome.jpg

>>18209898
>will keep this charade going on for inifinity
You mean until bitcoin crashes since it is technically unable to function as a currency. I don't think he'd be interested in it at that point.

>>18209571
You are a retard. Satoshi = NSA
Not some scammer. You will realize soon now. Now is the time

>>18209571
it was sourceforge originally and posts were migrated
look at wayback machine for bitcointalk.org

>>18210770
of course not gonna waste time reading the bollocks creg spergs together. even when he tells the truth about something he still manages to lie about something else.
i'm just gonna go with him being a liar and a fraud until proven otherwise and no forum post can prove shit either way because they are technically easier to forge than the word documents he submits to court.
we gonna need to see some proper digital signatures or nothing changes. don't listen to tards that say otherwise.
that said i'm not gonna believe a fucking thing he says. statistically it's gonna be a lie.

>>18210796

Aww, anon. You have value to me

>>18210738
He said that the conversations were moved wholesale from their original location to the forum, you moron.
>5 posts by this ID
CSW derangement fags are the worst

>>18210862
your loss
hopefully you will one day look back on your willful ignorance and make amends to your own personality

>>18210884
>He said
not gonna believe whatever he says. if he said the sky is blue i would double check. how about you post some proof?

>>18210884

>>18209571
Didn't BSVtards screencap a post from bitcointalk of Satoshi using the word "bloody" as evidence of Craig being Satoshi? LMAO'ing at your lives.

>>18210891
i'm reasonably sure the wilful ignorance is yours anon. bsv is bullshit variant. it's not a legit scaling solution it's vandalism they only fucked with chain params and destroyed capability so far.

>>18210912
>>18210857

>>18210912
the narrative changes every day

>>18210938
Bitcoin (BSV) works perfectly, and big blocks combined with SPV was always the intended scaling solution
it most certainly doesn't have "destroyed capability", the main network is likely capable of easily handling 100 MB to 1 GB blocks right this very moment, unlike BTC which implodes as soon as anyone starts to actually actively use it (when the massive BTC selloff happens the network will probably simply freeze and stop working)

>>18210912
>https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/5/
click original post and tell me what happens

>>18211008
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5#msg28
>Welcome to the new Bitcoin forum!
>The old forum can still be reached here:
>http://bitcoin.sourceforge.net/boards/index.php
gasp

>>18210986
bsv is crap and spv doesn't work on a minority hash shitfork as in not reliable or secure or trustless

>>18210906
>>18210912
>Reading comprehension so low it must be measured on a negative scale

>>18209972
Prove I'm not Satoshi, go ahead

>>18210986
Lol, it doesn't even work as intended. Too many hiccups. And as soon as calvin is tired of financing this shit, it'd be dead. Instantly.

>>18211060
So try hack it

>>18211060
literally just parroting laughable talking points
that's not how Nakamoto consensus works at all, since you can't use the hash power expended on BTC to reorg blocks on BSV, you'd have to actually move hash rate over, but as we've already seen for the past few weeks even doing that does nothing
>>18211072
my reading comprehension is just fine, I was referring to the morons suffering from Craig derangement syndrome, to whom you were referring

>>18211102
it works perfectly, there are tons of applications already utilizing it, particularly the fact that microtransactions are possible (as they always were back in the day, if any of you morons were around back then)

something just occurred to me...
the coding style of one the mistakes he makes it's like a signature.
we could train some machine learning algo to identify satoshis coding style. we have a big sample. it's plausible he participated in other opensource projects after he abandoned the satoshi handle. maybe we can find him.
a few words and phrases in forum posts are nothing compared to this.

>>18211072
You're the one with the shit reading comprehension, I'm calling out the BSVjeets who kept posting the screencap of a Satoshi post on bitcointalk where Satoshi used the word "bloody" and they circled it as somehow proof that it was Craig you absolute street shitter

>>18210986

>when the massive BTC selloff happens the network will probably simply freeze and stop working
>probably

It won't, it doesn't work like that. It's a structured network, it compensates for fluctuations in use without crashing or freezing. Fees go up to assign importance and blocks get added in 10 minute increments.

Check out Blockstreams upcoming developments, liquid atomic swaps, mimble wimble, schnorr signatures and Taproot. All increasing Bitcoins capacity and functions

>>18211113
>since you can't use the hash power expended on BTC to reorg blocks on BSV
you absolute brainlet the hashpower can jump chains within 5 seconds.
the nakamoto consensus only works as intended and is only byzantine fault tolerant if majority of hash honestly participates. which is not true for bsv only for btc.

>>18211149
the point is that his posts were migrated over from the original Bitcoin forum at sourceforge, you absolute brainlet
he did indeed use the word "bloody", specifically the phrase "bloody hard", but the Bitcointalk forum is just a clone of the old forum

>>18211137
lads let's out the real satoshi on /biz/

>>18211172
cope

>>18211161
>control large mining operation worth hundreds of millions of dollars
>commit economic suicide by moving your hash rate to BSV and using it to attack the network
you didn't quite think that one through, did you
the absolute state of brainlets

>>18211206
>didn't read or understand what was actually going on
>makes smug comment demonstrating his complete ignorance
>gets BTFO
>"cope"

>>18211215
>commit economic suicide
oh no it's economically completely viable
all you have to do is short the shitcoin
there is no way a malicious 51 attack doesn't crash the price of a crypto asset. no fucking way. but if it doesn't then you can sell what you mine after forcing other miners easily off chain you got all the new shitcoins. but of course it would crash with no survivors.

>>18211113
Meant to quote the guy above you. Sorry mate, just saved your kino CSW derangement nojack image for later.

>>18210986
Blockchain sucks dude. The only way it "scales" is to commit more resources to it through storage and bandwidth costs. For that overhead you only get a linear increase. It is brainlet scaling.
Look at statechains as a layer 2 used to create channel factories. The real Bitcoin can scale to billions of transactions per second and trustlessly swap UTXO off chain with blind signing servers. The base chain is just a settlement layer and will be expensive, which is the only way to compensate miners over the long run and still maintain decentralization. Big blocks centralize the nodes to an unsustainable level, and limitless block size guarantees that there will be ZERO transaction fee. So why the fuck would miners contribute to it if they make nothing and spend out the ass to maintain massive data center nodes?

>https://medium.com/@rossimarco/satoshis-back-at-least-for-a-nour-46e753b3031e
why didn't he post on bitcointalk huh?

>>18211207
that would be hilarious
on the other hand i don't really want to fuck with the dude. but still...

>>18211206
>Savagely BTFOd
>"c-c-cope"

>>18211127
No one uses that shit. Almost all transactions are a pointless weather app.
The miners and few businesses around BSV are all nChain organisations. It's a centralized shitcoin.

>>18211245
>oh no it's economically completely viable
it's not, hence why it in reality doesn't actually happen
keep coping, brainlet
>>18211259
wrong on all counts
>Big blocks centralize the nodes to an unsustainable level
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532#msg6306
>The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users. The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate.
>—Satoshi
even with terabyte blocks, that's just ~50 petabytes of data each year, and even 5 years ago large data centers had a storage capacity, of a lot more than that, even more now, and storage is becoming cheaper than many other metrics in computing
there will be hundreds of such data centers acting as transaction processors (miners) worldwide, one or more in every large economy, with no actor likely to control more than a few percent of total hash rate, in other words completely decentralized
>limitless block size guarantees that there will be ZERO transaction fee
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48#msg329
>In a few decades when the reward gets too small, the transaction fee will become the main compensation for [mining] nodes. I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.
>—Satoshi
wrong again, since transaction fees will literally be the only compensation miners get for processing transactions
no miner will accept transactions without a transaction fee, limitless blocksize doesn't mean "free storage space for all", it means "as long as you pay the fee, we'll include your transaction no matter what"
seriously, you brainlets aren't even trying to understand how Bitcoin actually is intended to work anymore

>>18209972

based and redpilled.

own an equal amount of BTC/BCH/BSV. got the forks for free, still the safest bet imo-

>>18211369
>it's not, hence why it in reality doesn't actually happen
just wait and see. funny thing is being an obscure shitcoin kinda protects sv for now. because it all depends on ones ability to short it with leverage in a way that he knows he will get the money whatever happens. so a miner would carefully prepare his plan and put considerable amount of planning and preparation into his move he would have to build up his short position as he starts shadow mining for a catastrophic reorg.
the strategy is low risk in certain periods but never completely without risk.

the main motivation behind this would probably not profiteering but to fucking destroy the shitcoin. it would only take about 2-3% of bitcoins hashpower to obliterate it.

>>18211501
yes, sure buddy, miners will hatch this plan in the veil of the night and unleash their fury any moment now
jesus, just when I thought you couldn't get more delusional

>>18210398
>They are coming to the slow realization that their opinion on whether CSW or not has 0 weight or influence on the course of events
you're right
the only thing that matters is how much does Calvin washtrades before the CG conferences


>he's already proved to the key players
no

>and everything is moving forward
no
you're still at 2%
at the CG London, you managed to get to 5, passing BCH
doesn't matter long term, see how you're back at 2 and can't get to 3

also the real bitcoin is now 4000 yottaheash ahead of the shitforks.

that's
4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
it will take a few decades for a shitfork to catch up to that by that time bitcoin will mog them even worse of course.

>>18211137
they already have run machine learning algo on all his texts and came up with a 67% match
craig then proceeded to start attacking said person because of his inferiority complex

>>18211524
it's doable and would be profitable which is the point. it can happen there is no doubt and because it can happen sv ""consensus"" is not byzantine fault tolerant which means spv doesn't work on it.

try to digest that... sv is extremely fucked.

>>18211608
that's completely irrelevant, and not how Nakamoto consensus works
hash which has already been expended on BTC cannot be used to reorg BSV
Nakamoto consensus is the mechanism whereby BTC miners determine which is the valid BTC chain at any given time, and separately how BSV miners determine which is the valid BSV chain at any given time

>>18211616
i remember stylistics analysis gave much higher matches to nick an ian and gavin

>>18211630
it is doable, but it would not be profitable, it would be economic suicide, and anyone who isn't a delusional moron is easily able to see that

All bullsit. All of it. BSV our scam. Satoshi Nakamoto = NSA project. And that is all there is to it.

>>18211635
>that's completely irrelevant
it's not irrelevant and yes it is how the nakamoto consensus works. the longest chain with the most cumulative proof of work is bitcoin. the only objective measure we have. everything else is subjective whining.
and also the nakamoto consensus is meaningless and pointless unless done right. but you don't even understand consensus so you will not get this most likely.

>>18209972
You also can’t prove that Bill Murray isn’t Satoshi. You’re a special kind of retarded

>>18211686
yes, the longest chain on a given network, not between to completely different networks which are being mined on separately, you absolute brainlet
read this again until you get it: >>18211635

>>18209571
His shitcoin is going to make me a quadrillionaire.
Unless of course if it doesn't, kek.
Probably in Zimbabwan dollars btw (though I think it's still a lot).

>>18211661
>but it would not be profitable
dude a single catastrophic reorg that costs an exchange money will send it to single digits immediately as the news travels with the speed of light. anyone short on sv on a reputable and safe let alone regulated exchange will make a fucking killing easily. it's also a rinse and repeat after a lot of miners have been fucked out of their earnings in retrospect a mass abandonment of the chain by ""honest"" miners will inevitably happen leaving the attacker to do as he pleases. any attempt to hardfork away from majority hash is doomed to fail.

>>18211724
it's what bitcoin is. if you admit your shitfork is not bitcoin we got nothing else to discuss. except for why your shitfork is not byzantine fault tolerant and why spv doesn't work on it as intended.

>>18211569
Why do core tards think pumping hash means anything? Why would BSV having 50x the hash be of any benefit? Bitcoin wasn't invented to just compute exponentially harder hash puzzles.

>>18211747
never going to happen, keep living in your delusional dreamworld
>>18211768
no, once again, Nakamoto consensus is the mechanism to determine the valid chain amongst miners mining on a given network
>>18211635
read it again and again until you finally get it

>>18211790
I'm talking about price
your marketcap is 2% of BTC
and bearish long term, unless something happens

>>18210891
>willful ignorance
Uh not likely. Dude you need to be willfully biased to believe Craig Wright. So many of his lies have been unraveled. Some so damaging that is is genuinely impressive that he keeps this lie going. The detection of altered email headers proving his emails were sent long after they were made to look was the nail in the coffin for me.
Anyone who who gets caught altering metadata to make fraudulent evidence for financial gain should be banned from making money in these industries. It's a miracle you guys still follow him or the projects.

Even the bitcoincashSV contains strong elements of scams - the 'genesis fork' removed P2SH implementation which means 'Anyone' could 'claim' unclaimed Bsv which existed on the bitcoin chain prior to 2017. Millions of bsv could be virtually claimed without private keys. It's a shame actually. Although.. part of me wants people to learn the hard way.

>>18211891
You realize that was all evidence submitted by Ira side and not Craig right?

>>18210986
>implodes
>massive bitcoin selloff
>network freeze and stop working
You do not seem to understand how the network operates... or how people usually sell bitcoin... What you seem to forget is uses existing infrastructure (the internet?), doesn't rely on its on closed system or hardware.. It cannot 'freeze'. Shit it doesn't even need to rely on the internet thanks to blockstream uplink. Also people trade Bitcon OFFCHAIN. Rarely do people 'sell off' on chain. Lastly, if you wanted use of a scaling solution, what the fuck are you doing, using a system that relies on 10 minute blocks? Isn't that fucking retarded? Because it is. Scaling doesn't mean size, it means speed and security too. And BitcoinCashSV has removed all the security features provided by bitcoin devs. Pointlessly, because there has never been a problem with bitcoin.

>>18211891
Here is an example of everyone thinking CSW is submitting forged docs when it's actually Is. https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/comments/er35af/comment/ff1lgc1?context=3

Look at top comment, all people have to do is actually go look at the source (Court) themselves instead of believing the crypto influencers and crypto "news" outlets. It's not hard...

>>18212112
they have done this endlessly
greg on suicide watch

>>18210719
>>18209880
>>18209838
>>18209571

Lmao. He's literally trying to gaslight people into thinking Satoshi didn't invent Bitcoin.

He's such a fucking freak and a literal psychopath

>>18212202
You couldn't have been further from missing the point. Go back to eating crayons

>>18212202
that's not even remotely what he's saying
he makes it very clear that he is Satoshi throughout the entire post, even to the point of repeatedly writing "Satoshi (I)", he's just making it clear that he posted on the original SourceForge forum, and that the Bitcointalk forum just migrated the posts from there, in other words that Craig does not control the Bitcointalk Satoshi account since it's just a clone of the original forum
talk about poor reading comprehension (or possibly not actually reading it at all)

For fucks sakes... bsv is a scam. pure and simple. get rest already or go leave it be. It is a scam. It is NOT the real bitcoin. It is NOT anything but a fucking scam. you braindead fucking imbeciles

>>18212283

>>18212066
more like linear scaling (brainlet tier) vs exponential scaling via layers on base protocol (the smart way)

>>18211798
>no, once again, Nakamoto consensus is the mechanism to determine the valid chain amongst miners mining on a given network
no it also determines what is bitcoin and what is not bitcoin.
because the nakamoto consensus only exists on bitcoin not the cheap chink knock offs.

>>18211724
>admitting BSV is a completely different network
Anon please zoom me at the end of your shift

t. Calvin

>>18212066
>because there has never been a problem with bitcoin.
das right which is why bsv went backwards to the whitepaper version and removed all of team roger ver's fuckery and blockstream's jewry from it

>>18212409
is that supposed to imply that that's a concession?
no one has ever denied that BTC and BSV has split into two different networks, that's exactly the point, hence why there's a separate Nakamoto consensus for each of them
BTC has been rendered a dysfunctional shitcoin, while BSV is Bitcoin, and works as it was always intended to

>>18212112
we know craig tried to scam ira and ira submitted the fraudulent documents craig gave him. we also know craig submitted to court an other conflicting fraudulent document. he made 2 fakes not 1. in fact he made about 20 thousand fake documents.

>>18210719
that makes more sense. so what he's saying is not that groundbreaking but idiots are saying it's proof he's not satoshi

>>18211736
Zimbabwe has a population of 14,862,924, so if you have at least 5 BSV you'll be good. Not taking into account the other countries

>>18212441
forgot pic related

>>18212014
>Craig supplies forged docs to Ira during discovery
>Ira passes them through to the Court
>somehow the forgery is Ira’s fault

>>18211790

I figure it is because they are suggesting that BTC miners could temporarily switch to BSV to drive up the difficulty level, and in that sense, having a lot of hash on a competing network is a threat to the ecosystem of BSVs network?

This thread made me buy 6 more BSV. Only ETH, ANS, and LINK has been fudded this hard.

>>18212591
Go back 10+ years, the entire world was a threat to Bitcoin when mining was cpu and gpu based. Nothing has changed, it's just a very low IQ fear mongering argument.

>>18210772

i have lots of evidence that supports craig is satoshi. I think the redpill place to start is https://youtu.be/ATapuAYgEeI

>>18212754

samefag here. not saying i agree with it, just thats my interpretation of what is viewed as the threat.

>>18212958
Ya, I get it.

I just don't understand how people are incapable of seeing like, more than 2-3 moves ahead.

So you have a hashwar on a chain and "hijack it" Now what? Everything on that hijacked chain is now worth 0 because nobody will trust it or use it, it has no value.

People will see the BTC tards flooding in with their hashpower trying to hijack the chain, and just follow the BSV original chain instead which still carries value.

So BTC fags can continue burning through money to maintain their shit chain that has 0 prospects of ever being worth anything, while BSV good actors just continue to maintain the original until the butthurt BTC fags go away.

It's not rocket science. People forget that the hijacked chains *HAS ZERO VALUE* hence why it's never been done, because it's not economically viable, it's just suicide.

look, it's really so simple.

if people want proof that Craig is Satoshi, think about this: he is being sued in an open civil federal court case over the rights to half of the Satoshi coins mined from 2009 to 2013.

Craig was recently found in contempt of court for not producing documents required of him (which he did not have access to at the time) and as a result, the judge ordered that Craig pay legals fees for the plaintiffs for just those three days of additional hearings and cross-examination and any required additional preparation which due to Craig having been found in contempt of court.

For just those three days, the total legal costs were $145,000 and that is just for the opposing counsel.

Consider that this case has been going on since the middle of 2018.

Why the fuck would anyone ever defend themselves at such an enormous cost to themselves if they didn't ACTUALLY HAVE THE COINS IN THE FIRST PLACE?

>>18212314
The real Bitcoin is called Bitcoin and it is and has always been an NSA project you dumb meme poster

>>18210110
Most people who warn you against buying BSV don't care about your financial wellbeing, they're just frustrated to see scam artists prosper.

>>18210665
God damnit (((they))) always win...

>>18213226
Huh that's cool so when will he sign?

>>18213226
Ayre pays the fees for Creg to larp as Satoj because it benefits the status of his shitcoin.

I don't actually believe this, but BTC cucks do. They need complex conspiracy theories stacked on top of each other or else their entire worldview collapses. It must be surprisingly easy to live life like this. You have a life very similar to normal people, except without the added difficulty of having to be right. It would almost brilliant if it wasn't parasitic behavior.

>>18213525
It's remarkable to watch.

Over the years they have drifted further and further from reality, twisting and turning down some convoluted path.

They are so far gone that now when they look back at reality, they see how distant it is from their world view, how many contradictions it has, how it requires so many twists and turns to get to that destiny (conclusion) that the only logical explanation to them is it's a conspiracy or a hoax, and anyone who believes in it must be conspiracy theorists.

It's pretty sad but admittedly hilarious at the same time.

>>18211369
based and satoshipilled

>>18210011
Cope

>>18210118
So which is it? I'm not going to spin up a Bitcoin node just to play your game...

Is it Bitcoin Diamond?
Bitcoin Gold?
Dogecoin?

>>18213430
I don't know when or if Craig will move the coins. He is very crafty. Look no farther than his getting out of paying tax by not transfering bitcoins in 2009 but simply shuffling their assignment of rights. That created a lot of confusion in the Australian Tax Office, according to public documents in the Kleiman case, and in the end, the ATO decided that they owed HIM a refund.

He got a private ruling onthe natter. It cost $3.2 mill.

Look, even just the whiff of a bonded courier moved the price 4x. If he actually signed or moved his coins, who really knows. BSV would immediately go into price discovery.

My point is that it is so much more likely that he is Satoahi than not. He is swearing under oath. He also isn't seeking to profit at all. He's not soliciting investment at all. He doesn't even give a fuck if peoplebelieve him or not. He's simply protecting the protocol in a manner that is consistent with what Satoshi also argued.

Otherwise rational people don't see how obvious it is just like the way Native Americans didn't see the European ships.

Guess where my money is going when people's emotional reaction to something conflicts with their ability to form an honest judgement about it?

Just look at eveything Craig has ever said. His main narrative entirely revolves around anti-fraud. He is the one advocating for KYC/AML/CDD.

He loathes fraud in all forms, so much so that he designed bitcoin to be able to catch and track criminals like Ross Ulbricht etc

Everyone completely dismisses him. I literally can't bring it up to people in the crypto space that haven't already been redpilled.

In the mean time, he is quietly developing the underlying infrastructure on which everything will depend.

That is to say, if you believe in bitcoin as outlined in the whitepaper.

>>18211665
You know Craig worked for the NSA right?

>>18213975
shhh dont tell him

That old fart craig is an irrelevant fraud.