[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 1.46 MB, 1080x1208, 1582224802615.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17815544 No.17815544 [Reply] [Original]

What's the best, most centrist and big-brained, unbiased goto news cite?

>> No.17815553

>unbiased
lmao

>> No.17815563

4chan /pol/ or zerohedge

>> No.17815571

Read biased sites and then figure out where the middle is

>> No.17815586

>>17815563
>pol
>unbiased
Yeah they really do a good job of weighing different viewpoints and expressing arguments as nuanced power dynamics rather than in black and white terms.

>> No.17815591
File: 1.38 MB, 1080x1595, 1584009235676.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17815591

>>17815563
>pol is centrist

>> No.17815611

Zerohedge

Everything else is stupidly biased and you have to filter it through that. Even ZH is biased but relatively based.

>> No.17815641

>>17815563
>>17815611
ZH is based af don't get me wrong and I do share their bearish sentiment however they were getting ahead of themselves in the past and now it appears as if they became the boy in the who cried wolf story.

>> No.17816380

>>17815563
>>17815641
This. ZH was reporting on coronavirus on 2 Jan...

>> No.17816396

Alex Jones and Al-Jazeera

>> No.17816413

>>17815544
>centrist
>big-brained
Centrism is the most debilitating mental disorder. Why the fuck would you want that?

>> No.17816468

Reuters

>> No.17816484

CNBC

would have said Reuters a few years ago but they’re quite globalistic still

>> No.17816703

>>17815544
outside.go

>> No.17816748

>>17815544
Go outside, observe what is happening and develope skills to understand and analysis it.
Never ask or listen to anyone's opinion, if you need information from someone, listen but afterwards destill what you can confirm and reject everything else.

>> No.17816918

>>17815591
is that lenny henry?

>> No.17816947

>>17815544
https://justthenews.com/

>> No.17816955

The truth is right wing

>> No.17816965

>>17815544
CSPAN

>> No.17816974

redfish

>> No.17816986

>>17816468
This is the only acceptable answer. It's also where most other news outlets get their sources from.

>> No.17817015

>>17815544
>centrist
>big-brained
Anon, i...

>> No.17817025

Al-Jazeera, zero hedge, alex jones (skip 90%) , Crypto Chico is #1

>> No.17817026

>>17816947
Interesting site, thanks!

>> No.17817185

>>17815544
Your premise is flawed. In America we have capitalism; money is power. So any reporting is done in the context of a market-driven society. In between the Republicans and the Democrats is still an area that is still right wing.

There's no way around it. You can either do your own research by checking article sources, read from multiple outlets, or you can just follow one set of talking heads. You can't expect any company driven by clicks and cash to be "unbiased."

>> No.17817210

>>17815544
wall street journal

>> No.17817227
File: 66 KB, 675x601, 1584017767381.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17817227

>>17815544
I only go to the Drudge Report since it aggregates top news stories from different outlets, nothing is unbiased but you can at least read a little bit of everything. It does lean Republican though.

>> No.17817312

>>17815544
so you're looking for news that doesn't trigger you

there's no easy answer to this. learn critical analysis and humility.

>> No.17817538

>>17815544
why did they recolor Fry's hair, what does that contribute to the meme

>> No.17817564

>>17817538
Because fuck Yancy

>> No.17818648
File: 61 KB, 397x508, queen-elizabeth-this.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17818648

>>17817564

>> No.17818726

>>17816380
ZH was also reporting on a million other fucking retarded conspiracies, literally throwing a handful of darts at the board every day

>> No.17818727

>>17817227
Drudge isnt "republican". He's a jew obsessed with celebrities and faggots, his only right win opinion he cares about is abortion

>> No.17819702

Npr

>> No.17819749

>>17815544
C-SPAN. They literally stream and offer zero opinions.

>> No.17819789
File: 243 KB, 1200x1306, chad centrist.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17819789

>>17817015
Yes

>> No.17819845

>>17819789
>>17815544

based. Children took over the political sphere and decided that whoever shouts the loudest and becomes the most emotional about their point of view is crowned the winner.

>> No.17820000

>>17815544

In the past Al Jazeera English was excellent. Not sure if it’s still around or if it’s just not accessible in the US because they’re pushing the US version or their general version, both of which are cancer, but previously AJ Eng. was run almost entirely by/for Western diplomatic staff/civil servants and usually was extremely unbiased as a totally independent wing of the network based out of Qatar I think.

You could get news there you wouldn’t find anywhere else and usually an hour or so before it hit the big sites. Made me some money back in the day for sure.

Reuters used to be good and ranked by many as the most unbiased, but after Black Stone got involved heavily in a separate wing of their buiz they moved to full CNN/Fox News fear culture reporting.

Bloomberg is reasonably good at cutting out the garbage but isn’t free.

Blogs by academics are also a good source on whatever subject you’re looking to get the real story on, but it’s time intensive to find them.

Overall I’d say the absolute best (though unfortunately not free) is the Financial Times. Very condensed and no pandering necessary due to it being a paid service.
In general if you want excellent content, you’re going to have to pay.

>> No.17820073
File: 68 KB, 431x450, okkid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17820073

>>17820000
>Reuters used to be good and ranked by many as the most unbiased, but after Black Stone got involved heavily in a separate wing of their buiz they moved to full CNN/Fox News fear culture reporting.

>> No.17820235

>>17820073
It wasn’t really BStone that pushed it, more a symptom. They had to sell a quarter stake in that buiz because they were having severe money issues. The average tard doesn’t want overly analytical neutral content which requires background knowledge to understand, and the average smart boi is willing to pay for good info. Remaining a free service, it was inevitable the move to editorial.

So they followed the model that Fox News pioneered and CNN MSNBC copied of pushing more opinionated emotional content to garner more readership.

>> No.17820314
File: 284 KB, 1248x1643, D01C01F7-CA3B-4AF0-95BE-DDFE4BF2E959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17820314

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Try the economist, the podcasts are good and free.

>> No.17820531

>>17820314
Used to be good. As you can see right in that image, they’ve turned into political shills with a clear set of motivations, furthest down the list of which is reflecting reality unbiasedly in their reporting.

>> No.17821129

>>17820531
Of course they have an agenda, but it’s generally a centrist leaning one that favors the stability that favors wealthy Londoners, hence their critical views of brexit.

What’s wrong with the cover art? Too alarmist? Too critical of the Xinese? Note that this was early February when most still said “just a flu”

>> No.17821215

RealClearPolitics

>> No.17821567
File: 520 KB, 888x894, 1579943072712.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17821567

>>17820314
I won't eat bugs

>> No.17821814

>>17816468
This here, it's the only place I get any news from now.

>> No.17821970

>>17816918
its Ainsley Harriott