/biz/ - Business & Finance

shut up with this "ether holders had it so ez" nonsense. most of the early eth buyers sold at $10 and necked themselves

>>17613683

I'm saying, they had to wait 890 days from ICO for it to go from under 1$ to $1400.

LINK meanwhile is at 890 days and still yet to break $5

>>17613708
>>17613668
Its almost like you should base your analysis around the halving and not days since ICO

If BTC did a 20x right now as it did while Eth moved up, and if Link did 9750% on its sat pairing, it would equal 200$ chainlink.

So if all conditions matched Eth, we'd be at only 200$

>>17613738
This

Days since ico is meaningless since btc was trending downwards while link has been mooning. Imagine if it had been on a bullrun like eth.

>>17613708
Fuck off and sell you lazy zoomer.
You're making money off the research and work of others, you don't deserve a thing you impatient twat.
Take your $100 link stack and buy an emoji off tiktok or something

>>17613763
>Imagine if it had been on a bullrun like eth
you won't have to imagine, just watch the rest of this year.

>>17613770

yeah shut up faggot. Probably been stalking Link longer than you.


Just pointing out some interesting perspective

>>17613797
Please god let this be true.

T. 17000 linkies and LP ico.

>>17613802
>stalking link
I've literally been in the ico, worked on chainlink after chatting with Sergey and continued buying when all you zoomers shit yourselves with FUD.
Go flex elsewhere with your <100k stack pajeet

>>17613802
>>17613738
>>17613708
Since I think you're being genuine on these critiques of using Eth's breakout model on Link, I'll offer my perspective. You should base the model around the halving and not days since ICO, and Link moved up 9000% already from the bottom of a multi year bear market. Ethereum never experienced a bear market during its price discovery phase. I don't think there's a sat value you can use here that would truly make sense. Compare Link's market cap over the last year (including this month) to Ether market cap between Mar '16 to Mar'17 and you'll see why the model makes sense. Hope this helps.

>>17613885

>I literally been in the ICO, and chatted with my idol Sergey! meanwhile you were out being a normie! how dare you!

>>17613921
So you are saying it'd be more accurate to start off that model from the halving event, and whatever gains eth made from then apply it to chainlink post (this halving) for a somewhat comparable projection?

Tbh, it's hard to make them anyway. I'd say we are something like Eth at 20$ now, f you compare market caps and free supply and the overall conditions etc.

Eth had a big 20$ resistance that took pretty much the exact same time to attempt again (July 2016 -March 2017).

the biggest blackpill about chainlink is simply that it's useless. it cant be used for anything yet, and it never will. it's a shitty erc-20 token, the likes of which have all completely disappeared from the market. LINK was kept afloat by hopium and memes - a copious mix i'll grant you - but if you really look at it from a truly dispassionate perspective, you can see that it is nothing. it's worse than vaporware.

i'm glad some of you, including myself, have made money from it up till now, but there's no way this project is ever going to do anything practical in the real world. the sooner you realize that, the better.

>>17613802
>Just pointing out some interesting perspective
It’s not interesting at all. You’re just a retard

>>17613668

>>17614010
>So you are saying it'd be more accurate to start off that model from the halving event, and whatever gains eth made from then apply it to chainlink post (this halving) for a somewhat comparable projection?
Yes, but Link will be ahead of Ethereum because we've been around for longer. I think we're going to Eth's mar '17 this month, with baseline protocol having a similar effect to the EEA
>Tbh, it's hard to make them anyway. I'd say we are something like Eth at 20$ now, f you compare market caps and free supply and the overall conditions etc.
>Eth had a big 20$ resistance that took pretty much the exact same time to attempt again (July 2016 -March 2017).
I completely agree with these takes. $5 is our $20 and after we break it, we will probably go straight to double digits.

>>17614022
I think this pasta will become the Trump Nuclear codes pasta for Chainilnk

>>17614080
>I think we're going to Eth's mar '17 this month
*think we're going to see Eth's Mar '17 this month

>>17613708
Im sorry, but im 99% sure that no coin will 1400x anymore, ever. Or maybe in 50 years