/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17585642
i want chainlink to moon also. but i dont see how anything that you drew has to do with anything. because one box is the same the other box will be the same like are you serious

>>17586252
elliot waves, but there are other waves that could be drawn, the 5th wave is the longest often in forex, so he is extending that conclusion to crypto, not completely worthless, but elliot waves are very subjective

hes new

>>17586353
good one u total pwnt him lol

>>17585642
one more dip below $3.00 before $10.00 moon mission?

>>17586369
4th wave doesn't even need to go that low

That would actually mean that I have quite a lot of money. So I dont see it happening

>>17586369
we have pretty decent support at 4.40
if support isnt broken in this correction then expect the bounce to reach 10 sooner
microsoft and consensys news is only just hittin normie radars now
check the order books and volume
both are healthy with new money

the token itself is going to be at least 3 months behind any developments and integrations the team is making
we wont see price action above 50 until we have actual use cases that are earning reward
which has to come after staking
which we can expect Q3 this year
2020 is the year
1k eoy is fud

>>17586369
This is what I'm thinking. Alot of weak hands would sell.

>>17586325
That’s the thing. Elliot waves are a 100 years old antiquated trading system that are from such a different time they don’t even apply to forex the same today. Same with fibs and all the ideas of levels. 9/10 whatever you trading passes up and does the exact fucking opposite of what you were expecting.

>>17586408
>we can expect
no you can't. this will probably take way longer.

Obviously it’s speculative, short it

for the crackheads

>>17586252
Have you not ever heard of fractals, anon?

> Eliot Roger Waves
The supreme gentleman of TA meme lines

>>17586536
Then do the meme TA and trade in the opposite direction of I’m your analysis

>>17585642
Lmao
Not even $10?
My analysis is literally perfect, we’re going to $50, in the next 3 days.

>>17587068
OH GOD IM GONNAAA COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMM

Just went all in on a link long at 4.75, wish me luck my frens

>>17587100
Kek

>>17587320
I never understand why people long on US overnights. Europoors and browns they share a continent with always let it drop ~5% overnight. Should've waited until 4-6am est, or have some reasonable/survivable leverage.

75x only bro

>>17585642
pretty sad that you faggot needs a 10x to cross $40 here and you think it's gonna happen this year.

flip into UND and be saved.

its over, we can't get over $5, too many sell walls and whales. we need a big announcement, yesterdays shit didn't cut it. probably going back to $4 now

>>17587068
>calculated by tradingview
WHOA
TRADINGVIEW THEMSELVES CALCULATED THIS
BROS
STRAP IN

sleepin, chippin away at that sell wall

>>17587423
Is it too late to invest in link at 4$?

once we flip $5 SR, im going to buy some coke

>>17586536
fibs work though lol

that screenshot was $1 ago, zzz

y'all see that gainz candle

>>17587384
Bro this shit always dumps all day, and then when I wake up it's a higher price. US east coast here. I also wake up at like 11am though so whatever

>>17587499
2021 - Is it too late to invest in link at 98$?

>>17587068
you joke but elliot wave retards actually think like this lmao

i mean it could happen, moonface

>>17587724
Moon ID. Gonna make it.

>>17585642
so we're going down to $3 first?

>>17587724
>LINK at $980*
Missing a zero there bud

>>17587499
You either expect link to be worth more than $4 at some point in the future...or you don’t. It’s that fucking simple

>>17586369
might not go that low anymore, depends on bitcorn

>>17586369
I hope. I wanna buy some more.
I got in late and I'm a moneylet, so I only have 46 Links.

>>17588257

this

Elliot wave posting must have the memetic value as Bain posting.
> Ship on approach to San Francisco
> Infected aboard
> One ded
> The ship is named the "Princess Supreme"

redpilled

>>17588272
how does 46k sound to you within a couple years?

>>17588331
I mean, I doubt it'll go that high, but considering the few shekels I've invested, I'm pretty much in it until it either crashes forever or moons so whatever. A couple of years' salary's alright if it gets there.

675 days left of bull market zzz