[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 9 KB, 400x400, qvSHhRyC_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17445560 No.17445560 [Reply] [Original]

The fucking concern about LINK is that BTC can shit the bed at any moment and LINK will go down with it. No matter of fundamentals, no matter of partners and speakers at their conference...

What do we need for LINK to moon ? We need staking and an actual 10-20% staking rewards, so basically we need a fully adopted network which is possible will not happen in the near future since we are missing a vital part of the network such as service agreements, public staking etc... We need to get out of this centralized "demo" of a decentralized network and i feel it wont be in the near future... maybe Q4 2020 or 2021... and stop lying to yourself and look at the overall progress...

BTC - 2 years of development - fully working decentralized network
ETH - 2 years of development - fully working decentralized network
LINK - 2,5 years of development (not counting the smartcontract.com thats been developing oracles since 2015 - when LINK was not even an idea) - and still not a sign of a fully decentralized network, just couple of KYCd nodes

Are normie nodes a meme ? We could freely mine BTC by that time, we could freely mine ETH by that time, what can we do with LINK so far and in the near future ?

Where are all the larps saying 2018 2019 will be "big" ? Drunkanon ? Landlord ? Riddleanon ? Wagyulink ? Sherlocklink ?

its not a fud, but a reality check frens.

>> No.17445596
File: 7 KB, 225x225, 1580556784402s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17445596

>>17445560
>he didn't sell above $4

>> No.17445605
File: 30 KB, 400x400, 1582208428603.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17445605

>>17445560
bro. swingies get the rope and no coiners get the block.

1000 eoy

>> No.17445613

>>17445560
Didn't read; not selling.

>> No.17445614

Seething stinky linky didn’t sell the top the 2nd time ahhhahaha
>dopamine running low

>> No.17445621
File: 578 KB, 1956x1079, Screenshot_20200221-155323_YouTube.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17445621

>>17445560
The concern with LINK is that it's a normie coin now that's being shilled by the likes of Trevon James and titty crypto youtubers like pic related

There's no one dumber left to sell LINK higher to, and LINK whales (hint: none of them are on /biz/) are using the liquidity the normies who remain in crypto and finally decided to get into LINK at $4+ are generating to dump their bags

If you believe LINK will moon from here without a gigantic shake-out, you also believe Trevon James and Tits McAirhead in the pic will make it. Protip: They won't

>> No.17445626

Thought there was speculation that staking might be available in sept?

>> No.17445633

>>17445621
>no oxford comma
FUCKING DROPPED

>> No.17445640
File: 285 KB, 1080x1297, Screenshot_20200211-160928_Twitter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17445640

>>17445621
And pic related 2

>> No.17445657

This token is another scam. You can make money with this shit, but you should left the "$1000 EOY" dreams aside.