/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17282650
I don't need $1000 to make it tho. $100 would be more than enough.

>>17282650
this isn't up to date, the figures are all wrong for where link is right now

>>17282778
It’s coming for ripple’s spot. Don’t see how it won’t dethrone it

>>17282878
I don’t have the file but really doesn’t matter. Btc will top between 150k and 250k sometime in 2021 so just look at the top 10 for that

>>17282650
if you think i know how to read this you aremistaken

>>17282925
Bottom right

>>17282905
okay but you wrote bitcoin instead of chainlink on the bottom row?

>>17282925
>>17282991
>t. average chainlink investor

>>17282890
i cannot wait for the seethe on twitter as they attack each other

>>17282925

There are instructions written on the left

>>17282905
surely also the bitcoin dominance will affect prices - if it is going to be lower like some are predicting then how could you reflect this in your chart?

>just wait 1 more year

>>17282905
why do you think bitcoin will go that high in the next 2 years?

>>17283238
I didn’t make the chart but it could be improved by cutting off the entire top half.
Link also has actual use case so that alone will be more than enough to decouple from btc

>>17283277

No, when the chart started link was at rank 78. The upper rows are essential to see how far we’ve come

>>17283277
Agreed. Pls someone update this chart and post it.

>>17283269
Tons more Normie fomo, MSM shilling, investment banks, Facebook coin, and link usage ofc
Why is that high to you? What do you predict?

>>17283277
i am not good enough at excel to make such a formula that you could input variables such as market cap vs btc market dominance
I imagine sites such as cmc have tools for this though

>>17282905
lmfao, no it wont. BTC tops at 50k, cheggum

>>17283260
i know how you feel bro
im back to studying finance for another year or two. feels pointless but thats what my parents want

>>17283342

Bitcoin to 50k and link in the top ten puts us at 77$ at least. I would honestly nut to death.

>>17283303
We can jerk off to our trials and tribulations after making it. Having to zoom in on this ant text is not conducive to the power of positive thought

>>17283322
not contradicting you just curious. I could see bitcoin rising to that level and even higher as the world population increases, but i think there is going to be a lot of structural resistance to it. The 2017 bullrun made a lot of millionaires and even some billionaires off of crypto, and i think the world system could accommodate that level of upheaval. I don't know if it could handle the creation of hundreds of billionaires.

>>17282925
How do you figure out how to invest in the 4th industrial revolution, years before it unfolds, yet you can't read a simple chart?

>>17283394
you will be able to afford some decent glasses then gramps

>>17283418
You’re the one who asked for more room on the chart retard, try to remember to wipe your ass too

>>17283414
we did a lot of spoonfeeding for the retards along the way. You don't have to be smart to make it, you just have to be right.

>>17283413
few will truly make it, remember the battle isn’t over even if you have a stack you’re happy with
>selling too early
>waiting until peak FOMO and then your exchange is down for maintenance
>losing passwords/keys to theft/fire/flood/squirrel/forgetting
>sending to wrong address
>coronavirus

>>17283437
implying i ever wipe

700k dump incoming! You're a retard if you don't sell right now.

Those who fud want your linkies. They missed out and are miserable. Don’t fall for it.

>>17283269
There is big VC money coming into crypto, once that gets rolling and marketed, the normies will see that crypto is the new TSLA.

>>17283413
I also think this is starting from the wrong assumptions. Btc doesn’t care about how many billionaires exist, neither does crypto as a whole. It is solely based on value and link is going to be creating it in unknown territory. As for btc i see people becoming less trusting of large traditional institutions (equifax breach for example) and when they hear about it rising again many more will be open to it

>>17283533
Based pajeet

stinkies are gonna be seething when this goes in the dumpster. there'll be livetsreamed suicides all over.
some of you are actually brainlets.
1,000 link = 300 BILLION market cap.
Sure, your little token is worth more than the yearly GDP of first world countries.. NOT.

>>17283349
>studying finance
Should've went into finnacial engineering

>>17283602
One of the differences between link and btc in my perspective is the purpose and goal of each. bitcoin is a direct attack on central banking and monetary policy, and it was always intended to be that.
Link is designed to facilitate the current system, improve it, and make it cheaper and more efficient. That's the main reason i'm so enthusiastic about link - it works with the system and not against it.
I can see bitcoin having a place in the world system in a supporting role, but you have to remember we live in a world where 9/11 happened as an excuse to start the middleast war, libya was destroyed because they wanted a gold standard (and merkel wanted migrants), ect. We are ruled by very bad people who do very bad things, and they will do very bad things to make sure it stays that way. Link assists them and enriches us, bitcoin attacks them and enriches us and the chinese.

>>17283649
Brainlet argument. Is bitcoin worth 177 billion? No probably not. Doesn't mean I can't sell a bitcoin for ~$9700 right now.

>>17282778
$25 would be ok with me but I doubt it reaches that high.

>>17283777
Except it is, it is being used, it has proven usecases, it's useful.
Link has some useability, perhaps it even deserves a place in the top 20.
It's not gonna go above 50B, and it will not end 2021 above 10B Mcap.

>>17283772
So you’re implying btc will be made “banned” by countries? You know that’s happened multiple times already right

>>17283881
I'm not even particularly trying to defend link it just riles me when people compare crypto marketcaps to the real world. There are loads of complete shitcoins with marketcaps in the billions yet if they were real listed companies they'd be worth fuck all.

Can we have someone edit this? Make it cleaner, and just focus on the top 10? Nobody cares about #100 and so on

>>17283902
no, you're still thinking of official actions. there are a lot of things they could do. force you to give up your keys via torture. drone strike mining operations. get the public behind them with a terror attack paid for by bitcoin and force seizure. They've done stuff like this in the past.
I don't know if it will happen but i think its a reasonable scenario to think of.

>>17282650
10 trillion really lol

>>17283463
But being right IS being smart.

>>17283920
Nice digits before.
Yeah and it will mostly go down in flames.

>>17283981
You’re psycho. An nuclear bomb detonated at altitude is more of a threat to bitcoin.

>>17283981
That’s just going to make people use something like Monero. I hardly believe that’s a desirable outcome as they’d rather keep track of everyone instead.

>>17283394

The point of this chart isn’t muh 1000 positive thought, it’s obviously to put realistic constraints on estimates of link’s price. Maybe you should just make a folder with all the ‘size of derivatives market’ images and jack off to that while drooling?

>>17284241
And falling out of the top 15 is realistic to you how?

>>17284273

Fair point. Alright I’ll update it tonight and tighten number of the coin ranks

TOP FUCKING KEK

your chart is shit and you’re shit lmao

>>17283463
thank you for spoonfeeding us

will you fucking incels post a 4k image of your hopium charts already, jesus christ

>>17284852
do you not know how to save a jpg ?

$5 sibos 17
$10 eoy 17
$100 eoy 18
$1000 eoy 19
are you faggots EVER going to hit a target?

>>17284852
lmaooo get chart raped faggot. update your shit chart to today's numbers or kys.

>>17285116
Yes and it'll happen so rapidly most of us will be unable to react in time

>>17283649
How much money is there in the world? Why is the amount of money in derivatives alone much greater than all the money in the world? Think really hard about that one and you just might realize why stupid retard thoughts a retard like you have is fucking stupid, gay, and niggery. What you mention is like saying the price of link is solely determined by the price of tea in China. In reality both of those are completely unrelated to link.

>>17283649
Europe's global GDP is 18 trillion

>>17282650
So you’re saying all link needs is .04-1% of the derivatives market to be upwards of $12,000/link?

Bullish
Not even accounting staking

>>17285269
There are "infographics" going aroung showing absurd and meaningless prices, but they're based on GDPs and the derivatives market, so they could hint at a possible and real future
In their context a hundred linkies is a make it stack

>>17282650

>>17285347
So you’re saying that if the derivatives breadcrumbs with ISDA and SWIFT aren’t a lie we are fucking rich?