/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17236700
Uhhh HELLO BASED AND CKECKED DEPARTMENT???

I’D LIKE TO FILE A REPORT

check deez

Inb4 tranny fud

>there are established billion $ companies that think chainlink does anything

>>17236700
youre 2 days late

>>17236700
again? it's proven fake

WAIT A MINUTE
JOOOOOOOOOOST

>>17236735
Tranny fud: engaged.
This is the actual confirmation you hay-munching ungulate.

sweet, so staking comes before q3.
I wanna steak my stinkies

>>17236700
C-can I h-have a y-you pwease??....

>>17236743
Linkies gonna get JOOSTED

>>17236742
See the link, it's over fudbutt.

>>17236700
>"ChainLink may not be incorporated into any contract. It is not a commitment to deliver any material, code, or functionality"
nice try stinkers

>>17236755
Yeah, JOOSTED upwards.

>>17236725
Checkerooni, my doodey

Literally a photoshopped image. Quite the detective I am not you though bud. Is this all you chainlink day dreamers do is looking for clues down the rabbit hole? Pretty sad I must say

>>17236754
(Yuo)

>>17236799
>Literally a photoshopped image.
Open the link you tard.

>>17236764
This was funnier before without the different logos, because of the implication that only utter imbeciles that fell for the memes but didn't know shit AND high IQ fags who know (or think) that LINK will be very successful bought it, instead of "muh only smart people bought it before"

>>17236813
Low iq: thinks its good
Average iq: thinks its a scam
High iq: thinks its a scam but knows that doesn't matter

>>17236860
Sergey IQ: Invent scam to dump stinkies on linkies.

>>17236700
Literally who

>>17236909
Sergey IQ: get hired to be the face of the mark of the beast because your initials are SN which helps to astroturf the narrative youre satoshi nakamoto

>>17236917
good jokes anon

>>17236743
It's pronounced "yo-st" but with a longer o.

>>17236994
yoast

>>17236700
not even that can get link to pump, we truly are in a bear market, if this happened in 2017 we would be in the $xxx

>>17237007
better sell while you can anon :^3

>>17236981
Name one thing oracle actually does.

>>17237020
Be the second-biggest software company in the world by sales, profits, assets, and market value?

>>17237018
I'm never selling, just saying there won't be no triple digit linkies, I still believe we can hit $10 or maybe $20

>>17237038
$8 is the hard top for this shitcoin. Won't go any higher. $10, even $20 is a stretch desu.

>>17236700
What Oracles? I don't see them. Can you tell me where they are? Better yet, can you show them to me?

Wasn't it clear it was real? It's not a big deal though.

>>17237059
Screencapped for future shit talking on nolinkers

>>17237085
>Oracle itself integrating Chainlink into its backend
>"not a big deal"

>>17237059
you can't swing me either way I know what i'm holding already better try someone else

>>17237090
Screencapped so I can laugh at shitstinkers when this dead cat bounce zero volume pump retraces back to $0.50 where it belongs.

>>17237111
shut up tranny

>>17237108
Tell me who's using oracle blockchain

>>17237150
anon, Oracle is the second-biggest software company IN THE WORLD

>>17237120
You're already screencapped since 2017

>>17237152
Answer the question, Ranjesh. Who's using oracles blockchain platform? Gravelcoin? Shitstinkers BTFO yet again

>>17237162
>Answer the question, Ranjesh. Who's using oracles blockchain platform?
Here's your answer.

>>17237173
>avoiding the question
Thank you for confirming your stupidity Madhavatiya.

>>17236981
Oracle is not needed.

>>17237200
>second-biggest software company in the world
>"b-b-but who's using it???"

Pretty much everyone to be honest.

why isn't oracle/chainlink sharing this info? we would pump straight to $10

>>17237220

>>17237252
The presentation was just put online like an hour ago, and it's still sleepy time in the US.

>>17237252
maybe they will within a few days

>>17237292
Hell it's nearly 2 am in San Francisco.

>>17237059
You don't think it can get to the old market cap of ICX? In a bigger bullrun no less. If you believe that you literally are retarded

>>17237326
>You don't think it can get to the old market cap of ICX?
How funny reading this now that ICX partnered with Chainlink.

>>17237173
Not a good look lmao

>>17237955
what?

>>17237252
Because they don’t care whether link holders get rich lol. They’re so beyond the whole “crypto scene,” link just makes moves and doesn’t care to tell anyone. But when it dawns on the masses....the singularity is real fren