/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17116707
you
just
win

>>17116707
Fucking based

>>17116707
It’s fake

>>17116707
fake as fuck

You got me, i’m going all in. Fuck it!!

>>17116707
Priced in since November

>>17116707
Why post fake tweets? BAKA

>>17116707
This is it, boys

>>17116707
Fake larp fag

Let the dump begin

https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1225473289180631041

https://blog.etherisc.com/etherisc-to-leverage-chainlink-oracles-for-decentralized-flight-insurance-product-9559b64d79c7

https://fdd-chainlink.etherisc.com/

Imagine taking the time to photoshop this. At least make the content believable.

>>17116733
>>17116740
>>17116750
>>17116766
>>17116758
>>17116797
Wtf

>>17116789
NANI?!

>>17116789
Fake and gay as hell

>>17116789
Lol fuck off with your gay ass fake links

W

>>17116888
I

I

>>17116707
POC = Peed On Chainlink

>CTRL+F chainlink
>0 results

MODS DELETE THIS FAKE LARP

Lmfao stinkies actually believing this obvious fake. Desperate.

>>17116707
fake, delete please mods

>>17116707
Etherisc is gonna be huge. Vitalik shilled this project to Elon as a major usecase for ethereum.They had a bunch of advisors, who were also advisors for Chainlink

>>17116789
>https://fdd-chainlink.etherisc.com/
im sorry, but this site looks ugly.

>>17116959
where to buy DIP?

>>17116959
yeah what a great idea to expose yourself to crypto volatility to potentially save few bucks if your flight is late

>>17116733
>>17116740
>>17116758
>>17116766
>>17116797
>>17116859
>>17116886
>>17116906
>>17116911
>>17116913
>>17116915
What the fuck is this tranny psy op? Fuck off back to your degenerate furry discord servers. Stealth mode is long gone

>>17116707
repill me on what this does? you buy insurance and chainlink oracles relay whether the event insured happened or not? assuming the event happens who pays me the money? etherisc?

>>17116975
It's a POC, frontend doesn't need to look sexy at this point.

what i don't understand is that all this shit was possible 2 years ago and chainlink hasn't changed anything. the part they were going to change was a decentralized and trustless data feed for shit like this, it still doesn't exist. it's just some cherry picked node operators who get bribed by sergey to send data to a contract.

Its funny how when ChainLink suddenly BTFOs all of the FUD the trannies have posted, they just short circuit and start claiming someone created a parallel fake twitter with the same domain name to fake this tweet. It really puts into perspective how many anons here are fuding their own investment. From the looks of this thread, its a sizeable percentage of them.

I thought this was on testnet a fucking year ago? WTF?

>>17116899
N

>>17117094
it takes little effort and passes the time

>>17116993
on idex.
>>17116998
You're not exposed to any volatility as a client though. I suggest you read the whitepaper

>>17116707
Dilate

Love isn't always on time

>>17116789
>An error has occurred
>Unexpected token < in JSON at position 0
is this adoption?

>>17116707
So a use-case AXA gave up on that they're now working on with some literal who. And the worst part is that they're so proud of it. Probably took someone a whole 45 minutes to build.

$0.5 EOY

>>17116789

Uhm, so what is this? I dont even know anything at this point

>>17116707
I'm so fucking tired of this shit

>HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODL THE LINE

>>17117220
a project that takes 40 minutes to build. but its big news because people take this now to mean chainlink has real usecase

>>17116707
You just win. No. WE just win! We're all gonna make it!!! LINKIES STAYS STINKY $1K EOY

What the fuck is the different between this and this from a YEAR AND A HALF AGO

https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1048390792371294210?lang=en

You trannies are fucking discussing. Still seething over googles. Get over it. If I ever find any of you irl you will have hell to pay.

>>17116707
Only moderately bullish about this.

I predicted this announcement would happen soon; etherisc has been a breadcrumb for a long time and in a recent podcast Sirgay said they would announce something insurance-related soon. It had to be either a real world large enterprise, or a shitty "decentralized insurance" startup. It was predictably the latest. I thought it would be a weather crop insurance product announcement first though because that's the use case he often references.

Now the way I see it, this PoC it by itself worthless. Etherisc is a small startup and I can only assume not generating any profit, they don't have the business and customer base the large firms generate. This is just another what if PoC and won't be adopted because there's no demand for this type of product, as of now anyway. And no demand, no adoption, no oracle requests. DeFi might be a legit market but parametric insurance for the most part is a meme, and that's because it's retail oriented. You'd have to explain to the customer purchasing a ticket why this insurance policy is trustless because blockchain and decentralized oracles, etc. on an individual basis, and for a contract that's only really worth a few hundreds dollars, in a market where the customer base doesn't trust the insurance party as a principle, regardless of the underlying infrastructure's promises. I'm not pulling this out of my ass, it's what the guy in charge of AXA Fizzy flight insurance said about his experience. And the kicker is, AXA has recently quietly shut down the Fizzy branch because it wasn't working. No one talked about it. Now ask yourself, if an insurance giant like AXA with the customer base, reputation and marketing budget at its disposal couldn't sell this product, what chances does a no name startup with no other offerings and established base has?

Having said that, bullish because it gives LINK more snowballing credibility beyond DeFi and perhaps other firms will notice and pursue.

>>17117152
I skimmed it. Suffice to say I'm still not bullish on this project as the WP makes no mention of how they plan to deal with frontrunning. Seems like a disaster waiting to happen.

>>17117329
First rational post I've seen on here in months

>>17117339
kys discord tranny

>>17117329
Pro-tip
>this isn’t the insurance announcement sirgay was speaking about

>>17117329
excellent assessment

>>17116789
fake account and fake site
still, this one was very well made, almost got me

>>17117350
dude I'm all in on link I just wouldn't put stock on a one off startup that isn't even live yet

ETH block latency is highly exploitable by front runners, if they have a large debt pool bot builders are going to be licking their fucking chops at risk free gains

>>17117329
We could have announcements like this all year of PoC's running on the fucking testnet. The reality of the situation, is link is still heavily under development and the DeFi ecosystem is holding its breath on eth 2.0 right now.

None of it will mean anything without users. How do you get normans to mass adopt microservices like etherisc? They need to already own crypto.

I want to see aesthetic, no-brain UX's for these products before I can feel bullish about adoption. That is just how the mind of the average user works.

>>17116707
This is the first time ever i really considered buying Chainlink

>>17117329
its like watching the first person to jump into the pool. every one is waiting to see if the water is right for a good swim or if its too cold still. thins are getting warmer

>>17117383
Because some literal who is running a POC? That's what finally swayed you? What the fuck?

>>17117379
This so much. Too many people still have the 2017 mindset where promises about the future will make something moon. They're probably right, but I only foresee speculative gains until there are retard proof dapps built on ETh.

>>17117329
sergay said it will need + 5 yrs minimum after product release. wether he meant mainnet in this case (than everyone should come back 2024) or fully implemented staking, mixicles and thres. sig. even longer. 2026 maybe 2028 in the worst case

You link fags have gotten so boring and uncreative.

>>17117440
>until there are retard proof dapps built on ETh

How hard can it really be? We should make some biz dapps

>>17117379
>None of it will mean anything without users. How do you get normans to mass adopt microservices like etherisc? They need to already own crypto.
Well in AXA's case it was in fiat and it was easy to get on their website but it was still a separate product. But what they need is to make business deals to integrate directly with travel agencies and retail flight purchase platforms. No one wants to buy a flight insurance policy separately, you just want to check a little box that says "add automated flight delay insurance for 5 extra bucks yes/no" to your order checkout when you purchase. And that's the hard part obviously. How do you make the customers even aware of this? How do you negotiate with all these different flight providers to integrate this product to their offer? AXA couldn't do it.

I think something like crop insurance sounds less feasible because IoT precision for stuff like weather isn't there yet compared to an API that gives a definite yes or no answer or an exact time input, like how do you precisely make a contract with rain density, wind speed etc, but it's at least the kind of market where these firms could feasibly sell these products to their customer base.

I’m a real nigga and I got hoes, clothes, and doughs. And imma keep it 100 with yall gay white bois: this don’t mean shit. Ain nan nigga in the world finna buy “flight insurance.” My cousin Tyresius smoke crack ay day and he gots better business ideas than this oh dick ina booty Piece Of Crap shit.

Real talk.

>>17117485
extremely hard. as i mentioned above, the immutability of smart contracts presents a lot of problems that are present in tradional systems. if your system is exploitable, you are total fucked and it's irreversible. This is part of the reason there a so few decent user facing apps out there. If your shit isn't perfect you get absolute JUST'D in short order.

>>17116707
Oh my God

Fucking pump to $20 already christ. I'm tired of waiting for the retarded masses to realize how valuable this is.

I just axed Tyresius what he think about flight insurance and he say “why don’t you insure deez nuts.” I really do think testicular insurance a better idea den flight insurance.

Y’all cracka be tryna have babies when you like 70 years old. Might as well insure yo nut sack or jizzle sauce uh sun. Make mo money den flight insurance.

Real Talk.

>>17117370
Kys tranny. But first, tell us where you heard of this "front runner" meme

>>17116707
>that number 707

Ambrosus is way ahead of chainlink concerning crop/drought insurance.

>>17117440
I am almost entirely in Link, bought some Kleros sale and staked as a juror, the UX is easy and nearly no brain. You need to use metamask, but metamask has become even easier to use over a short period of time.
>>17117534
Yup, a user needs to be able to check a box and have their Usd fed into a token swap + put into the contract without knowing all of that is happening.
>>17117579
If you weren't a retard you would have watched Ari Juels' talks on frontrunning. Stop replying to fud if you think they're retarded, it just makes you look retarded too.

>>17116789
Yes ,thank you for making posting the twitter url's it would be if tweets was real. A scam very elaborationated indeed. O.P., would you please delete this thread and all of your other chainlink threads now.

>>17117205
Fuck, Jason Parser is back.

wow impressive. altcoins>nothing ever happens

>>17116707
DELETE THIS THREAD
RIGHT NOW

>>17116789
MY FUCKING LINKIES ARE GONE! WTF DID THAT WEBSITE DO!!! HELP! DO NOT CLICK

>>17116789
>twittter.com

ha nice try nice fake site fake tweet

>>17116959
>Etherisc is gonna be huge. Vitalik shilled this project to Elon as a major usecase for ethereum.
holy shit

>>17117534
>IoT precision for stuff like weather isn't there yet
Thermometers have been a thing for centuries dude

>>17116707
Somebody post this to reddit so we can pump over $3 finally

Breaking $3 will bring forth a new paradigm.

>>17116707

KYS FAGGOT

>>17118061
It's a bit more complex than that smartass, it's about the ability to assess crop damage like after a big storm, there's also the question of fraud etc.

>>17118211
Just like the last 5 times it cracked $3 amarite?

>>17117329
What if its not about selling an insurance product but the cost savings in handling claims now that it is fully automated.

>>17118243
This time it will be different

>$2.91

>>17117534
i think what we need is that this is the only way insurance is done in the first place
if you try to sell this to a usual norman he wont get it thats why axa couldn't really sell it because retards don't understand what it does
if axa only had smartcontracts by default without needing costumers special approvment then we see adoption
but its a step in the right direction

>>17116707
>crashing this plane

>>17117329
im starting to think im going to have to learn solidity and make something in order for chainlink to have any usecas.

>>17117036
I'm only see a nigger that's believe his shitcoin will make him a billionaire

>>17117252
>HOOOODL THE LINE MY REDDIT FRIENDS

>>17117578
Based larper

>>17116750
Nov 2017

1k EOY died in 2018 stinkyfaggots, lol.

>>17116707
>Priced in

>>17117329
Took the thoughts out of my mind.

>>17117315
Incredibly based

>>17120044
The real question is why Fizzy quit. My guess is that it's not worth the effort chasing bad actors around.

>>17117036
They're mad because they sold their linkies for a generic shitcoin

>>17119134
Rebbit hates linky. They say it's a 4chan pump and dump scam.

>>17120292
It was a pure proof of concept, I don't even think they intended it to actually succeed. The product was only available for flights originating or arriving from an airport in France or Italy. My guess is they were having a hard time justifying trying to create other products centered around blockchains and the potential legal issues.

I didn't expect them to implement insurance this quick.

>>17116707
Priced in

>>17117309
>https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1048390792371294210?lang=en

Is this even playing anymore or did it just get dumped?

>>17117309
From what it looks like, Etherisc has a product that is now in the market as opposed to the proof of concept you linked.

It's OK to buy some link now at 2,9?

>>17121415
buy @ $3.24

>>17121433
Checked