/biz/ - Business & Finance

Greg Maxwell BTFO.

Blockstream shills will try to bury this

>>16830927
lol
creg couriers certainly cast no shadow, for sure

>>16830868
Im rock hard stiff

if this week ends and its yet another nothing burguer from satoj, will you shills finally kill yourselves?

>>16831117
Are you even a real person?

>>16831148
dont worry its just 01G having a mental breakdown

>confirmed

inb4 a tragedy struck, the courrier slipped on a banan peel, craig's dog ate the keys etc.
this shitcoin will tank so hard this week. I can't wait.

>>16831152
>
01G?

eh, bsv supporter but looks like 2 things taken out of context, anyone have full cap from slack?

>>16831188
nice false flag nigger

>>16830868

My village and family rejoices at good news of the arrival.

next week then ;)

>>16830868
Faketoshi makes you shills work weekends? Sad.

>>16830868
>sending fake mails to himself is hard

Imagine the dump when this shit finally turns out to be the biggest absolute nothingburger of the past and present decades lmao

Imagine betting against Satoshi

>>16832058
Imagine the dump when one guy has billions in crypto and sells it all

>>16830868
$1200 by EONW

>>16830868
Can this faggot just OD already

>>16832309
There will be a dump, in fact this is fun. Watching people getting rekt is always fun. In fact, if nothing happens, then this market is definitely comatose and worthless

This cunt has delivered nothing since 2015. Guess he ain't got nothing too. What did y'all cunts expect, a fairy tail?

>>16832376
No one deserves to get rekt more than the BTC segwit soi fags and all the rest of the crypto scammers in those circles.

CRAIG GIVE US THE APOCALYPSE, LET THEM ALL GO TO FUCKING ZERO AND LET JUSTICE BE DONE

>>16832392
>>16832392

STIFF

this is just the beginning. Wait until Feb m8 and see the power bitcoin can be

hypothetically speaking, and operating under the assumption that greg isn't a pompous lying buffoon, if the faggot crashes BTC with a giant market sell I will take out a loan to buy up as much BTC as possible.

Lads I'm seriously the memed mythical creator of shitcoin. Quick buy BSV and maybe I'll show proof of stake if you play your cards right.

>>16832476
Greg is a criminal shill

Basically, if Craig does prove he's toshi, BSV will either match or beat btc.

If he doesn't, even a delay will cause it to crash.

Anon, what's a bonded courier?

>>16832376
>this market is definitely comatose and worthless
No shit. We don't need all these shitcoins. We just need some kind of cash system that people can develop on and scales massively. I bet once someone does something like that businesses will jump on board. Not to sell token scams, but to try out different business models with a new technology. Just imagine it. Someday I'm sure that'll happen.

>>16832476
Do you mean creg?

>>16832879
it means insured delivery basically
company lose it = they pay

>>16832922
Do we know who would be held liable if they failed to deliver? How would it be enforced?

>>16832879
Very good observation.

If I sent printed keys to my wallet and sent through fedex, would their insurance that is optional, cover the money?

Answer is probably not. The contract would explain what their liable for and for how much.

Liers usually add more detail than needed, when telling a story.

>>16832950
lmao craig has taken out multiple contracts on the couriers head just so he can pass the buck onto some poor delivery company

>>16832950
they aren’t going to be held liable for failing to deliver Craig’s imaginary keys, there’s no proof they ever existed to begin with

where does he post this stuff now days OP?

>>16833147
Slack

>>16830868
Someone post a clearer version of this? Context. Csw and phrasing important stuff clearly are water & oil.

>order pajeets to make a list of OG wallets until the total sum is 1M
>”here is the list. No keys tho”
Winning. BSV to the moon!!!!

>>16831034
yup they are completely shadowless

>>16830868
>My retarded rules didn't pass Nakamoto consensus and I had to fork 2 (two) times! Btw I'm Satoshi Nakamoto and my fork is BitcOin!!!

>>16832922
i guess they have to pay $10k if hey "lose" 1 million btc
not that i believe they exist just find it ironic

>>16830868
assuming CSW produces the addresses, what's the next move? he "loses" half his BTC holdings to the Kleimans who can't access or sell them due to Craig obviously not being able to access them?

it all seems so pointless and Craig just gets to keep lying with no real punishment

>>16833534
It's like posting "premined shitcoin" in every premined shitcoin thread, but not because nobody cares and you're wrong.

>>16833568
>Nobody cares!!!
>My retarded rules didn't pass Nakamoto consensus and I had to fork 2 (two) times! Btw I'm Satoshi Nakamoto and my fork is BitcOin!!!

>>16831034
craig is the courier

>>16833592
>m night shyamalan

>>16833565
>assuming CSW produces the addresses, what's the next move?
if he produces addresses the owners of those addresses will be very pissed and vocal
unless he took his time and used onchain analysis to find satoshis addresses in actual in which case the show will go on

>>16833565
>what's his next move

>>16833683

>>16833632
No they wont, because those addresses will be redacted and wont be made public until after the case ends. Maybe he even wins the case, still never signs with any keys, and the show goes on.

>>16833691
explain to a brainlet plx

I think I just stiffed myself. wat do?

>>16830868
ANYDAY NOW LMFAO

I am extremely stiff

>>16831117
This please

>>16831117
no they won't because there will be another shitty explanation. they will also push the date down further.

>>16834261
https://medium.com/@adam_selene/the-segwit-15-attack-b0ecbb926777

a miner can move a segwit bitcoin without the signature of the private key in possession of it without a hard fork and legally. It is neither legal or possible without a hardfork in real bitcoin.

This changes the economics of btc so that it may become more profitable to stop signalling acceptance of segwit taking segwit bitcoins as a fee

If there was only one fork this attack would be more unlikely to happen as people say the miners would lose more in their investment to conduct this attack than they would receive from it but that is not the situation.

As craig says >>16833683 if he does this
he will make money from taking segwit bitcoins
he will make money from selling his btc
he will make money from shorting btc
he will destroy his competition

he is incentivised to make this attack as are the other miners. Bitcoin is secured by economic incentives not computer science segwit created this irreversible vulnerability

>>16831117
if it pumps another 100% in a week, will you corekeks finally kill yourselves?

>>16834362
What about the $1200 EOY? Is $300 dollars now the peak? lmfao

>>16834356
Thanks anon

>>16834366
he was talking about the chinese calendar obviously

Even if he is satoshi, people want bitcoin. Not bsv, although bsv would fit a cash to cash system better, bitcoin has become a storage of wealth

>>16834446
>people want bitcoin
segwit is not bitcoin

>>16834446

When this is all over the ticker will be what Satoshi originally called it: BitCoin (BC)

That's the plan

>>16834281
This