/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16683334
>BSV is Bitcoin
It really unironically is isn't it?

>>16683334
>BSV is Bitcoin
Long term, YES.

>>16683360
It is, but unironically.

>>16683360
it can't be because it's a fork of bch and bch was never bitcoin.

>>16683501

>>16683501
Segwit is a fork. Ticker symbols aren't Bitcoin.

>>16683525
This chart could use dates.

>>16683501
>it can't be because it's a fork
Anon, I...

>>16683525
no matter how many bullshit lies you wrap up in these shitty ""info""graphics they won't change reality.

>>16683617
no it can1t be because it's a fork of bch which was a minority fork of bitcoin(clearly not bitcoin thus) and broke the nakamoto consensus by fucking with the consensus algo and intentionally introducing new opcodes that were illegal under the old ruleset to avoid getting reorged..

>>16683638

>>16683655
no matter how many bullshit lies you wrap up in these shitty ""info""graphics they won't change reality. bch was never bitcoin and a fork of bch an never be bitcoin.

>>16683664

>>16683674
no matter how many bullshit lies you wrap up in these shitty ""info""graphics they won't change reality. bch was never bitcoin and a fork of bch an never be bitcoin. not can a minority pow fork of bitcoin can ever claim the mantle.

>>16683691

>>16683700
too bad bitcoin was always proof of work never proof of shitty ""info""graphics and retarded lies.

>>16683334
BSV is the only project that will remain two years from now, and I will only do business with my BSV brothers. What is your LinkedIn sir?

>>16683649
>bitcoin(clearly not bitcoin thus)
More proof "le BSVjeet" meme is projection
>>16683638
>>16683664
>>16683691
Anyone remember when Bitcoin Cash was going to zero because "it breaks muh core conesansus." Now here we are with three competing forked ledgers and the coretards have no choice but to make their own infographics that barely conceal the fact that their segshit chain is the true shitfork.

>>16683706

>>16683710
well bch is pretty dead now but still mogging sv badly. this alone speaks volumes.

>>16683715
too bad you disregard satoshis words with your actions. btw he said that after he already explained himself and provided a link. unlike you fags who never could prove your point.

>>16683710
>it breaks muh core conesansus
it's called the nakamoto consensus you dimwit

>>16683745

>>16683768
again proof of work and consensus not proof of shitty whitepapers not proof of copyright registrations not proof of tweets or proof of on-stage theatrics.

proof of fucking work. that's it.

>>16683802

>t. guy stuck in 2015

Your arguments are stale and debunked, and you clearly gave up years ago on trying to think for yourself

>>16683525
there's one problem with your make belief story
the whitepaper came after the code
lol
and the white paper is merely an explanation of the code
code is law

>>16683649
>small blockers fuck with protocol
>SV continues original protocol unhindered

IN STONE

>>16683360
Yes

>>16683708
niggerfaggot1488@linkedin

>>16686569
You shills are fked

>>16683727
>mogging sv badly
Laggard market conditions doesn't mean shit famalam.

Name a single exciting thing about bchbois. Nobody cares or bothers arguing about bch because its irrelevant.

>>16685084
>code is law

>>16685084
>code is law

Law is law, retard.

>>16685084
>Muh cole slaw

>>16683334
Satoshi is right again fuck