/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16666852
The core dev team and the retarded miners who were too scared to change a hardcoded constant in the software they run.

>>16666890
kek which chain has the most proof of work accumulated?

>>16666903
If the definition of bitcoin was most accumulated PoW, then in 2009 and 2010 Hashcash or some anon's freshmen cryptography project would have been bitcoin. Comforting oversimplifications lead to poverty.
>>>/whitepaper/

>>16666852
Bitmain

>>16666943
nt moshe but off-topic. it's not *any* chain that has the most PoW but obviously the ones that traceback to the genesis block.

>Messages are broadcast on a best effort
basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest
proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.

:D::D:D:DD OOH FUGGGG. even if you conjecture that Bitcoin is whatever the social consensus is you have lost. literally no one thinks BCH is dA rEaL BiTcOiN. it's just another chain.

>>16666852
I did this

>>16667035
so if pow length moves due to whatever reason to another "chain" as you call it you¨ll accept it as the dA rEaL BiTcOiN?

Under any other name, bitcoin cash wouldn’t draw the criticism and negativity it has today. People talk shit while I send/receive sats with dirt cheap transaction fees that go right the fuck through as promised. What else is there?

>>16666943
>le "my interpretation of the whitepaper" cope
sorry for your loss cashie!

>>16667035
Nice way of trying to wiggle out of the fact that cumulative PoW is meaningless, but sadly you're still wrong because at some point in the future the miners could create a new genesis block based on an existing UTXO which could just as easily be "bitcoin."
>>16667149
Actually, people like him will throw in the towel earlier than that. All it will take is current PoW/price to flip. He and his ilk won't even wait for cumulative PoW to catch up because it will be obvious at some point that it inevitably will.
More to the point: claims of "most PoW" are meaningless is these kinds of discussions because PoW/price is a lagging indicator.
>>16667202
>It's just your interpretation
I love it when idiots come out and admit right off the bat they have nothing of substance to say

>>16667240
anon, I though I was cryptic enough to not show my flag. I salute you. Selene Mark IV.

>>16667188
To be fair, BCH is fast as fuck in comparison to BTC. But if we’re basing value off of tx time then NANO and LTC should be more valuable

>>16667188
Also, Roger may be a massive douchebag but at least he’s not CW

>>16667240
your interpretation is made with a bias
leaving out the most important part and completely ignoring how the actual implementation made by satoshi himself worked.

>>16667561
No KYC required to trade, new, future options popping up on eris X, SLP technology to tokenize anything with ease and a 200million dollar war chest going into 2020. Bitcoin cash will be fine as will any other project with a pragmatic use case the continues to evolve.

>>16667771
That comtinues*

How many BCH to make it? Is 50 enough?

>>16666962
i think this is correct. its been so long that im not 100% sure though.

>>16666962
Bitmain funded it, Bitcoin ABC wrote the code, led by Amaury Sechet.

>>16666852
bitmain
asicboost
that's basically the only reason

Blockstream. Bitcoin ABC is controlled opposition. Greg Maxwell himself shilled and implemented its replay protection as freetrader

>>16667793
One Bitcoin (BSV) and you'll make it before 2025