/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16642961
priced in

>>16642961
Oh Krishna!

It's literally a link to the same article from June.
>the absolute state

Scam

>>16642961
> Published Jun 13, 2019

>>16642961
lmao 6 month old news

>>16642975
no it isnt lmfao... cope no linker

>>16642961
>oh shit it is da same article from june, i think i will pop my second ipa today to celebrate this! (shhh don't tell my wifey)

>>16642990
Yes it is. Still nice to see they haven’t forgotten about link.

does this mean I'll have a chance to sell at $4 again and not pull the trigger

>>16643016
delet

Links back to the same 6 month old nothing burger. Pathetic.

>>16643016
Let us ponder this over a sip of the Ganges.

Looool Looool Looool nothing new oh my god the state of link

Market sell all of your LINK immediately.

THANKS GOOGLE

Looks like STINK paid for another Twitter advertisement. Could’ve at least pulled something new out of their asses but what do you expect when they used the same slides 3 years now?

>>16643016
If we get to $4, then $6 is practically guaranteed. Anybody that sells at previous ATH is a certified fool.

>>16643094
Now they're gonna push the "Google Partnership" article for the next 3 years. This is just the first rerun

>>16643101
Good to take profits if you bought a lot under 50 cents. Buy a nice dinner at a fancy restaurant or something.

>>16643134
>https://medium.com/@VIBEHUBNEWS/chainlink-integrating-with-vibe-ecosystem-to-provide-oracle-services-for-game-developers-1566841066ff

Why bother with iexec when Chainlink nodes can process offchain computations?

Bullish news for Chainlink? I'm selling

Its literally crashing ahahha faggots

>>16643178
high throughput off-chain enviroment is not chainlink, simpleton

>>16643204
It could be. What's stopping a node operator from offering that capability?

>>16642961
this is it, frens.

strap in. all systems go. destination: alpha centauri

Literally dumping

>>16643222
lack of consensus mechanism for computations, it is different from consensus from some data feeds or other basic shit

>>16642961
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE THEY DID IT AGAIN BOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSSSSSS

Good god I'm so excited for you boys

>>16643016
I really want to swing my Link stack but I'm terrified that I might fuck up.

>>16642975
baka Chainlink bagholder is running the Google cloud twitter account

buzzwords

>>16643339
don't even think about it, fren. not now

Old shit.

>>16643417
translation:
>p-pls Google Cloud, ples to stop tweeting about Chainlink ;__;

>>16642961
>it leads to the old article
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
the dumb fuck at google didn't sell when it was $4
HAHAHAHAHAHA
so fucking pathetic

>>16642961

SerGay pooped his diapers again.

STIFF

>>16643339
You would. I finally sold at $1.23 after it dumped for a month after mainnet. I bought back at $2, $2.50, $3.50, and some at $4, then held for the small correction except it wasn't small and it's been going for half a year.

>>16643456
That's Google Cloud's main twitter account you tard.

looks like the bagholding google intern is trying to pump his bags again to dump on retards

too bad it ain't working again kek

>>16643501
who do you think runs it, "google"?
No, there's some specific employee with bags.

>>16642961
hope you sold at $4

>>16643515
>pushing your own bags on a trillion dollar company's twitter feed
>it has no effect
I'd kill myself.

>>16643515
>>16643537
>it's not actually google cloud!!

Copelets, when will they learn.

>>16643515
Based and insider pilled

>>16643545
No it is actually google cloud but it doesn't matter because "google cloud" is just some guy on the team saying how you could use google cloud with his bag's project. Social teams for major products are 2-4 people.

>t. IBM fag out of Littleton MA where we have social teams for digital marketing products.

>>16643465
I mean, you did sell after a month of decline. People who sold at $4 to buy back in had to wait an agonizingly long amount of time to get to its lowest point to buy back in, but they're doing well. I probably won't do it though since I'm a pussy.

>>16643564
>getting in-depth promotion from Google Cloud means nothing!!

>>16643574
>in-depth
It's a link to an old article and even that one isn't in-depth. This is just the social team reminded you that you can use Google Cloud while using ChainLink.

>>16643598
>it isn't in-depth
In-depth enough to literally show where the Link token fits in.

>>16642961
this is some sort of sell/buy signal for the you know you know crowd. hope it pumps like last time.

>>16643606
this is pretty in depth, guy

>>16643627
Yes it is.

>>16642961
i wish this faggot at google would stop trying to pump his fucking bags.

>>16643636
yes, a multi billion dollar international world famous company is just gonna let some employee try to pump his bags using their tweeter feed. and not once, but twice.

>>16643636
Imagine Chainlink having the clout to pay off the many people who oversee Google Cloud's main line of external communication.
That would be even more bullish than what's actually going on lmao.

Google Cloud doesn't tweet anything unless it's been approved by mgmt.

>*dumps 2%*
Face it linkies no amount of hype can pump your bags anymore. See you when we retest 0

>priced in
And it links to their 6 month old article. Someone on the Google team wants to pump their bags

>>16643719
Thank you Sundar

>>16643044
Underrated kek

>>16643515
>No, there's some specific employee with bags.
You can do better than this if you really try, I'm sure. Fucking hope so anyway because that's terrible cope.

>>16643728
Yes, you're right. But if you're not..... can't even imagine what's to come.

>>16643755
It's dumping. That's what's to come

>>16643728
t. wishful thinker
Reminders like this are very commonplace.
For instance: https://twitter.com/GCPcloud/status/1197900045800095744

Maybe if you actually had business experience you'd know this.

>>16643753
>cope
yes I really feel horrible missing this enormous pump

what you don't realize is that this is proof that the old article is completely meaningless. It's literally just one guy that exploits his position.

>>16643767
>It's literally just one guy that exploits his position.
Well he's not doing a very fucking good job of it, is he? So what's more likely: You're being retarded or correct?

>>16643767
>It's literally just one guy that exploits his position.
Yes, one guy who apparently controls Google Cloud's two main lines of external communication: their blog page and their Twitter.
lmao

>>16643787
Your proof that this is a legitimate company interest, and not some dude blatantly shilling, is that it dropped 2% after he shilled?

>>16643656
>>16643659
it's literally just "the social media guy" in charge of their twitter. All he's doing here is retweeting old news to pump his shit.

>>16643719
Bollocks.

>>16643836
>tech companies don't take online communication seriously
AAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
THE TEARS ARE ENDLESS

>>16643836
probably will get demoted soon just like Fernado

>>16643858
>thinking you need permission to link to your company's own blogpost
Have you never met a social media team before?

>>16643816
You're either correct or retarded. We both know what the answer is. Simple as that.

>>16643883
>y-you don't need permission to tweet on Google Cloud's behalf using their main twitter account!!
stop anon I can only take so much

>>16643898
What you think is happening:
>Hire someone
>Their purpose is tweet posting
>They need to ask the manager before posting something
>The manager is suppose to fact check their research and tweets, repeating all of the work, and not just post the tweet himself

What really happens:
>Skip all that shit
>The authority you see as the manager's actually belongs to the person who posts the tweet
>That's literally why they're hired.

>>16643925
Just look at all this rationalizing you're doing.

Google Cloud is interested in Chainlink and continues to promote this nascent technology.
Simple as.

>>16643898
>it's Christmas
>hey Jason you don't have anyone right? you can work the twitter on Christmas. Don't fuck anything. I know, just retweet old articles.

>>16643945
Keep the cope coming.
I am never fulfilled.

>>16643938
Google Cloud isn't using ChainLink, Google Cloud is advertising TO ChainLink users. Read the article. You're the target, they want you running a node using their BigQuery integration. They're trying to sell to ChainLink users, and they only did it the once back in June. This guy is linking to that article.

>>16642961
So what?

>>16643972
Again, look at all that rationalization you're doing.

It's been six months my fren.
I know it's painful for you to see Google Cloud continuously promoting Chainlink, but at some point you're going to have to start coping.
For your mental health.

>>16643972
COOOOOOOOOOPE

>>16643983
>it's been 6 months
6 months of dumping

>>16644080
Link was nearly half its current price when Google Cloud happened.

>>16644099
Google Cloud put it back up to mainnet numbers. It pumped to $4 from Coinbase listing you mong, check the chart times.

>>16643606
has nothing to do with chainlink. link in that picture is literal like linking something together. learn how to read retard.

>>16644113
ok now this is good satire

>>16642961
chainlink is a scam you fucking retards.

it's a ripoff of ripples codius.

>>16643044
Checked underrated comment

>>16644111
What the fuck are you yapping about.
Link was about 1.10 USD right before the Google Cloud news.
That's nearly half its current price.

>>16644269
And that doesn't mean anything. The Coinbase announcement put it up, Google's blogpost isn't the reason it's double right now Coinbase's is.

>>16644282
Holy fuck are you having a stroke?

You said the Google news was followed by "6 months of dumping", even though Link is currently nearly double what it was 6 months ago.

>>16643972
>Google Cloud is advertising TO ChainLink users. Read the article. You're the target
Huh. If that's the case, then it seems that Google sees legitimate value in Chainlink. Enough so that they go out of their way to work directly with the team and, as you said, try to "target" the Chainlink community for future business.

This it very bullish no matter which way you look at it. Your fud attempt is low energy and just plain sad. Imagine spending your time on this obscure site desperately trying to fud a project that you supposedly are against. And you probably do it for free.
Pathetic

There’s a lot of cope on both sides lmao. If LINK gets mainstream adoption and moons, it’s really going to fucking moon.

>>16642997
What's wrong with IPA you fag?

>posting old fake news articles
>thinking this is bullish
Kys linklets

>>16643972
>google is trying to capture the chainlink market
>chainlink has no users
alright now which one is it

>>16644312
>replying to retarded fud
Save your breath fren. No one with more than 1k takes them seriously.

>>16643515
holy shit lol get a fucking life

>>16644296
No I didn't you retard I said ChainLink has been dumping for 6 months, which it has. You inserted an extra parameter and then called your own claim a lie.

>>16644400
Not that guy, but it’s an injection of more phytoestrogen into liquid phytoestrogen.

>>16643101
This. If it gets back to $4 my guess is it goes to $10

>>16643101
based

>>16643972
just wanted to add that this is some good, high quality cope

>>16642961

>Can

Too bad Chainlink isn't used for anything.

>>16643570
I sold at $3.9 and bought back in 10 minutes later because I was scared lol. Could've doubled up if I had just waited.

>>16643972
>>16644080
>>16644113
>>16644119
>>16644429
>>16645320
Jesus Christ the amount of coping in this thread is fucking delicious

>>16642961
JESUS CHIRST JUST BLOW THE FUCK UP ALREADY YOU FUCKING SCAM

LINK CAN CURE CANCER AND IT WONT PUMP OVER $3

YOU MORONS ARE COMPLETELY DELUDED IF YOU BELIEVE 1k EOY

>>16645177
It's been six months since the Google news, tardboy.

>>16645400
we have to suppress it so idiots like you sell first. what fun would going to the moon be if a bunch of faggots like you came along?

How is this favorable for those who invested in chainlink? ELI5 please

>>16645499
Visit infowars.com today and see for yourself.

>>16645499
You are retarded.

>>16645499
It's not, stay away.

>>16644111
Those digits. Ughhh

Imagine thinking this token will give normies life changing gains. It’s over, normies bought this on Coinbase so it will never moon