[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 632 KB, 977x1221, 1575036239453.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16412360 No.16412360 [Reply] [Original]

>I spoke to one of the scientists, a shy, unexcitable man in his late fifties, who has been working on this technology for several years. He and Pedersen are old-school IT people, quiet-spoken and completely uninterested in the limelight. Both of them thought Wright was working at a different level from everybody else. The scientist, who spoke to me from the beginning on condition that he wouldn’t be named, worried about Wright’s attention to detail and about his conspiratorial nature, but he had no doubts about Wright’s command of the big picture. The scientist was helping to oversee all the white papers and patent applications and managing a large team of IT specialists and mathematicians. I asked him if he was worried about the R3 consortium’s work on blockchain technology. ‘They are going to fail,’ he said. ‘They don’t have Satoshi. There is a panic out there, a misunderstanding about how the blockchain and bitcoin works. They hire people who know about bitcoin and are attempting to buy into it rather than being left behind. I’ve read some patent applications that are pending, applied for by the Bank of America. What I saw was ultimately unimpressive in comparison to what Craig is trying to do with the blockchain.’

>The scientist described how the staff try to get the ideas out of Wright’s head. ‘You can’t say: “Explain this to me.” If you ask a question like that, he’ll just go off on giant tangents. First, he’ll have difficulty explaining what’s in his head. Often he’s just coming up with ideas on the spot that he’ll throw into conversation. You want to try to get yes and no answers from him.'

>He described moments when everyone in the research team thought what Wright was saying was impossible. It couldn’t be done, the software wasn’t up to it, the blockchain couldn’t scale to the task, and then suddenly everyone would understand what he was saying and appreciate its originality

>> No.16412369

>>16412360
>originality
Not that it works, just that the idea is original because its so fucking retarded that a functioning person would never remotely suggest an idea as stupid and destined to fail as Craig.

>> No.16412389

>>16412360
> Dear Satoshi, I wrote you, but you still ain't callin'

>> No.16412399

>>16412360
imagine staging a fucking picture like that

>> No.16412400

>>16412369
Cope

>> No.16412402

>>16412360
>‘You can’t say: “Explain this to me.” If you ask a question like that, he’ll just go off on giant tangents. First, he’ll have difficulty explaining what’s in his head.
very typical behavior of a conman. rambles incoherently constantly trying to change the subject an avoid in-depth detail which outs him as a fraud.
just sold 1000 bsv. thanks.

>> No.16412521

>>16412360
>The scientist, who spoke to me from the beginning on condition that he wouldn’t be named
yeah, odd that. isn't it

>> No.16412669

>>16412399
All the world's a stage
>till they start asking you awkward questions, then, you run away

>> No.16413062

>>16412360
OP you could stop being such a faggot and at least link to the source, Andrew O Hagans Satoshi Affair.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n13/andrew-ohagan/the-satoshi-affair
its a very interesting read and funny enough corecucks use small parts from it to fud BSV when the entire 40page article is a massive redpill and basically concludes that Craig is either the real deal or running the lost and most elaborate scam in human history.

>> No.16413069

>>16413062
*longest and most elaborate

>> No.16413093

>>16413062
Yeah I remember when I read that cause corecucks was using it to say he was a scam. I read the whole thing and it made me more confident. Like I give a fuck what someone mother says about him. Imagine that being the baseline for success. Well your mother said you're not good at this so we won't hire you.

>> No.16413102

Just sign, craig

just sign

>> No.16413131

>>16413093
it made me more confident too but it also raised a lot of questions.
like at the end of the article craig went back to lurking in the shadows and ntrust was dissolving his office. why is he back in the limelight now and how is the connection nchain - ntrust.
it seems like him and kleiman were into some shady shit and the article mentions craig met ross ulbright and might have been involved in silk road. why is he now always railing against silk road and ulbricht? it seems like hes no saint either.
and what about the tulip trust? according to the article he has only 350k btc left maybe less.
its weird because on one hand I do believe hes the real deal, just from all the background he gave on the origins of bitcoin, the history with hashcash, bmoney, blacknet and all that shit. on the other hand even o hagan said hes clearly lying and witholding truths and full of shit in some aspects. I do hope one day we will get a tell all book where we actually get the full story with all the details.

>> No.16413395
File: 61 KB, 977x592, NPD.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16413395

>>16413131
>even o hagan said hes clearly lying and withholding truths and full of shit
Friendly Reminder: O'Hagan was invited by nTrust to write that article. As a journalist, his reputation is (and remains) beyond repute and the fact that pretty much everyone who has crossed paths with creg path agrees, he's full of fucking shit, is basically all you'll ever need to know. When he's (as agreed by everyone) full of shit and already been caught, repeatedly, faking evidence to make him look like more Satoshi (falsifying blogposts etc) - why then in fuck would you believe a single word this cunt says ? And that in any aspect, never mind the particularly Satoshi related.
>>16413102
All Aboard the Cluetrain already: he can't

>> No.16413445
File: 109 KB, 1200x677, 1558821100435.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16413445

>>16412369
>>16412399
>>16412521
>>16412669
Seething
>>16413395
>his reputation is (and remains) beyond repute
>beyond repute
Pajeet or nignog detected.

>> No.16413467

>>16413445
>Pajeet or nignog detected.
sometimes better to keep your mouth shut, people might just suspect you're an idiot. As opposed to opening it and confirming the fact.

>> No.16413496

>>16412360
sounds like high functioning ADHD, which elon musk also seems to struggle with. i can empathize with the constant, non-stop flow of ideas interrupting your ability to communicate, i just wish mine were any good

>> No.16413509

>>16413467
lmao is this a bot?
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/repute
For those of you out in Rio Rhinelander, the correct pairing is "beyond reproach"

>> No.16413524
File: 57 KB, 348x503, 1574791057970.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16413524

>>16413395
Do you never get tired of this Gregory?

>> No.16413543

>>16413524
The jew fears the muslim

>> No.16413584
File: 49 KB, 1523x498, wew_lad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16413584

>>16413509
>sometime and a dictionary later
made you go look up it tho
>>16413524
>I shall be.. Anyday Now™
hows that libel against McCormack coming along then ? Them staples will have rusted of their own accord, time creg gets that before a court. I understand entirely why he's hiding from that one tho - Moar! Lawyers, losses, expenses, public humiliation -tut tut, eh ?