/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16350589
>electing someone will cause this

Trump ran on anti war.

>>16350589

She wouldn't be able to get anything done either, just look at Trump.

Why the fuck would you want to stop war? You want all our badass weaponry to waste away in the garage? What if we have to fight another world superpower and have nothing but inexperienced soldiers?

>>16350589
It would be a great help to the economy, and don't let the neocons tell you otherwise.
War spending is sometimes necessary, but it is unproductive.

>>16350605
A real anti war candidate would address the causes of war.

>>16350651
explain how weakening the military helps an economy

Help

>>16350633
>Why the fuck would you want to stop war?
Because it gets people killed. Also it's very expensive.

>You want all our badass weaponry to waste away in the garage?
That's better than destroying it in action and having to spend billions to replace it.

>What if we have to fight another world superpower and have nothing but inexperienced soldiers?
Inexperienced soldiers are better than dead ones, Anon. And soldiers can get experience from peacekeeping duties. Anyway, stooping wars would mean you wouldn't have to fight another world superpower.

>>16350657
Weakening the military doesn't itself help the economy, but cutting military spending does because the money can be diverted to more productive uses.

>>16350657
Not going to war does not weaken the military. If anything, constantly being at war (irrelevant, asymmetrical wars at that) fatigues and decreases readiness.

>>16350657
Note also that stopping wars does not equate to weakening the military.

>>16350666
Fren, the west saying lets stop war doesnt mean the shitskins and chinks will stop
Speak softly and carry a big stick. Peace through strength is no meme

>>16350666
Money isnt a problem and barely anyone is getting killed because our war technology is so advanced


>>16350673
>>16350679
Oh ok so if we go to war with China our soldiers with 0 experience in actual warfare will do so well. Suuure

>>16350671
>more productive uses
Like supporting niggers and dumb socialists? America has enough money for anything it wants to do

i think we should stop beating around bush and just start annexing our neighbors.
cartels? the wall? how about marshall law on the entire mexico.

>>16350613
>Trump

>>16350699
>Oh ok so if we go to war with China our soldiers with 0 experience in actual warfare will do so well. Suuure
Our soldiers has 0 experience in actual, symmetrical, warfare with the kind of wars we fight now.

Experience has its advantages but it's not worth the price of fighting an actual war for the sake of fighting a war.

>>16350589
what is this chick's platform and why should I vote for her over Yang?

>>16350589
Tulsi will not only take away Dem votes but unify our country. I fucking love her

>>16350589
If the US could keep strategic control and arms exports stable without wars, it'd be fine. Chances are you're better off with the wars though. Just less risk.

>>16350605
>address the real cause of war
You mean a candidate who would name the J-
>poster was shut down

based

>they still believe in celebrities and the media circus that is "political discourse"

>voting blacks and woman into office will make the world more peaceful
kys

>>16350589
It's all a big illusion, Not ONE of these politicians are going to do anything productive to making our laws and government better. I'll start voting again when I see a politician talking about exiling the kikes and kicking them out of congress and the united states.

War is good for economy.

>>16351094
Very antiwar-wants to pay for infrastructure with peace dividend. Pro environment, pro national healthcare, pro border security, anti political correctness.

>>16350688
Theodore Roosevelt was furiously horny for war and also indirectly but nearly entirely caused the immigration problem himself. Read into it, the more you know

I can't believe all these bootlickers who buy into the military industrial complex lies about it's christ like status in the financial sector

>>16350589
more taxes hurt economy

Apparently the first Rothschild made the fortune that started the dynasty because he was holding a bunch of money for the British to hire mercenary soldiers to fight France and he bet it all on a stock tip he had insider knowledge on.

>>16350589
Depends, the interventionism is an extension of Post-WW 2 treaties. Without the interventionism, the US wouldn't be the leaders of World Trade. A by-product of interventionism will be endless wars. No honest person can sit there and not agree that if the United States didnt deploy its aircraft carriers to occupy the trade lanes and maintain resource chains, that everyone would still let us rule. Shit the EU would fucking stab us in the back if it had its chance.

>>16350633
ooyyyy vveeeeyyy