/biz/ - Business & Finance

What do you think

>>16214711
y....yes?

>>16214767
I wish m9

You will get to buy a nice reliable car with 32 ETH then. 2 mil pounds is troll moonboi talk and you know it. Unless the pound has a total value collapse.

if you successfully trade them back and forth with some altcoin pumps throughout the 10 years maybe then.
Optimistically speaking eth might reach 2-5k.
Realistically speaking eth will not go over 1k.
Either way you need AT LEAST 500 of them to "make it"

If you want a chance at making 2mil with only 6000usd your best bet would be some cheaper coins like link, rlc, nkn, ftm or whatever is being shilled rn. But even then, better go to a casino and put all in on a 2 digits 2 times. You will have basically the same odds and wont have to wait 10 years to either lose it all or make it

>>16214984

ETH is going to 10k at least during the next bullrun. So you need 100 OP for 1MM

>>16215065
ETH is not suited to be worth 10k, unless btc fucking dies, which is really not happening. At least not without taking all other crypto with it.

>>16215247
well I mean BTC has no scaling pipeline so if there's a need for crypto ETH is the best candidate to fill it

>>16215549
>he doesn’t know
Sir...

>>16214703
no? you do realize the price is gonna tank today right?
eth is going $75 in a months time.

>>16214703
ETH was B.002 in 2016 ... B.02 now ... will B.2 be the average during the next bear/bull run (after the next ath)? Meaning if btc is 100k+ then eth would be 20k+, right?

>>16215888
no, this fluctuates

>>16214703
no fucktard. jesus christ these goddamned eth moonboy hopium threads are bearish as fuck for this failing project. the reguarity and intensity of these desperation threads is increasing exponentially... the writing is on the board.

>>16215549
>so if there's a need for crypto ETH is the best candidate to fill it
citation needed

>>16216655
you see anyone else attacking layer 1 scaling and is more likely to get there before ETH?

seeing as bitcoin is content with not attacking the problem at all it shouldn't be very controversial to conclude that ETH is the best contender to facilitate mainstream adoption

>>16216804
Or, you know, the whole things is just a failed experiment and we can live without dapps.

>>16214703

>inflationary shitcoin to make more shitcoins

doubtful sir

>>16214703
You need 1000

>>16217092
ETH is a superset of BTC...

if you want scalable transactions you need a scalable layer one; with sharding we are looking at a thousandfold increase in throughput on layer one - there is literally no reason to use BTC for transactions if ETH can scale, because it'll be a orders of magnitude faster and cheaper to do it with ETH (not to mention the layer 2 scaling possibilities with a high throughput layer 1)

>>16214984
>your best bet would be some cheaper coins like link, rlc, nkn, ftm

>>16218647
Classic reaction imagine

>>16217330
>footnotes: [1] unless you need immutable blockchain features

>>16216804
>you see anyone else attacking layer 1 scaling and is more likely to get there before ETH?
yes

>>16217330
>if ETH can scale
yep... IF. currently ETH devs do not have a clear understanding of how to achieve this. vitalik likes to philosophize about this