/biz/ - Business & Finance

now #78 coin

>>16121413
soon 2 b #77 and then $77 coin

>>16121389
So i did my research on this coin and I'm fucking pissed that I didn't do it sooner. It's quite clear where this coin is going, and that's straight to the top 10. It is actually digital oil like these faggots are saying because you trade RLC for a real product(computations, data, etc) and you know as they say today "data is the new oil" so you are literally holding an asset that is digital oil.

WHAT THE FUCK BIZ THIS IS THE NEXT ETH

>>16121476

it has a lower circulating supply than ETH, literally unironically in the next 5 years this could go to $1000....

>>16121486
It has a supply similar to LTC...so it's LTC + ETH level gains...Holy fucking shit.
Could this thing unironically go to 5-10k a coin in the future? LTC went to 420$ and ETH went to 1400$...RLC is clearly better than LTC... so 400$ minimum within 12 months is entirely possible. I just convinced myself to go all in.

>>16121486

yes, RLC has smaller total circulating supply than ETH, and ETH price is now $ 184, and RLC price is $ 0.67

Btc rlc and link are all anyone should own and maybe ETH but fucking vitalik sucks and I could see it failing to moon for a long time.

Wish I had listened earlier about rlc

>>16121526
>>16121502
>>16121486
For those wondering what 'similar' 'smaller' etc means here is the circulating supply for those coins
>ETH: 108 million
>RLC: 80 million
>LTC: 64 million
And we all know what price ranges ETH and even that copy paste scam LTC were able to reach...

>>16121580
I own a decent bag of rlc, so I’m not fudding. But circulating supply is in no way an indicator of potential performance.

Anyway, I’m super bullish on rlc, let’s not fuck this one up with Twitter fags spamming stupid shit at every person on the internet - ala link.

>>16121619
Of course circulating supply is an arbitrary number and not tied to performance whatsoever.
But market cap still is something that is compared in any market and similarish circulating supply implies similar prices are possible if the coin is viewed as important or successful as those big coins.
Although of course the 1000x gain needed for that to happen especially in a timespan of 1 or 2 years is simply not possible on a market psychology level.

>>16121389
No, pajeets.
The 20 spam threads an hour campaign didn't work. No one cares about your shitcoin outside of the time where most people dumped this garbage on you at $2. Please feel free to kill yourselves at any point in time not that many people will notice.
It goes in all fields and is hidden.

Reminder that these are the RLC shills

>>16121674
Reminder that you are the pajeet that cares enough to use a VPN to fud RLC

i dont understand why this is mooning

>>16121758
because you are a fucking brainlet and will not make it

>made 1k already
2DAMOON

>>16121798
Link does oracles better
Golem does computing better
What does iexec bring to the table?
I sense this is all a p&d

>>16121816
>Link does oracles better
>Golem does computing better
Imagine thinking any of this is true LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
Fucking brainlet

>>16121661
IMMMM COMMMMMINNGGGGGGGGG

>>16121758
Because its literally the strongest project in crypto>>16121816
>no they dont
>lmao no
>literally everything (decentralized or

>>16121816
source: my aids deseased asshole