/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16109031
For me, it's when he registered bitcoin domains. Just before coming out, he registered B1TC01N.CO and B1TC01N.ORG:
https://whois.domaintools.com/b1tc01n.co
https://archive.li/YMy8s

He's so much obviously Satoshi, I'm totally not a shill.

>>16109031
unironically the last 5 years convinced me he is most definitely not. he would have been unable to fetch coffee for satoshi as he is incompetent and inept to a whole other degree than usual.

>>16109031
idk just the overwhelming mountain of evidence he has produced you would have to be a literal retard to question him at this point. I think the faggots who say hes not satoshi are just larpers and doing it ironically while quietly stacking BSV desu

>>16109031
Satoshi said he remember reading his own white paper for the first time. Inception. He is Satoshi.

>>16109031
After everything I have seen, I would bet my life that he is not Satoshi.

reading documents from the kleiman case
you'd have to be a brainlet not to know he was at the very least a part of team satoshi

>>16109053
nope we just have a different standard for evidence than you that's all.

>>16109031
Binance ban. I start research and buy 21 BSV few days after. Now im 60% BSV

>>16109082
like i said he couldn't even be the "coffee guy". btw i have to watch ready player one again... that shit has little surprises for you no matter how many times you watch.

>>16109155
this. also that faggot greg maxwell and (((blockstream)))

>>16109155
Binance ban got me into BSV as well lol

sorry BTC is dead LN is in early alpha and you still need to use normal chain to open/close channels. BSV is the last hope for crypto. BSV is satoshi vision read old posts and whitepaper.
CSW is 0%/33%/50%/100% SN who cares?

>>16109231
Imagine using false dichotomies to push your faggot glownigger.

>>16109256
sweet astroturfing for (((blockstream))) faggot. you sucking gregs cock too?

>>16109231
Why are node operators such faggots? The blockchain is only 250 GB in size.
I have 40 TB of storage, if you interested enough in running a node I don't understand why you wouldn't have at least half of that already unless you're a NEET.

>>16109194
More like got you stuck with bags HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

That was a glorious week for crypto

>>16109322
No one falls for your false dichotomies anymore, stupid glownigger.

>>16109331
The price of BSV did a 4x after the Binance ban.

>>16109337
did you even sleep last night greg? it's all so tiresome

>>16109360
>more false dichotomies
Glow harder.

>>16109047
>>16109163
>inept
>not even the coffee guy
somebody so inept as you say wouldn't have his name and contributed to pic related. which is from a book for scada systems which are used in national facilities for nations water/electricity/nuclear power plants etc.

>>16109355
Because you now have to travel deep into the forest of Mumbai to buy this shit coin so Calvin was able to pump it with ease

Fail of the year for sure went to csw

>>16109323
For some reason they want to run nodes on raspberry pis.

>>16109428
and then there's this
>https://www.itworld.com/article/2734356/is-it-really-possible-to-hack-a-747-s-engines-in-flight-.html

>>16109384
>says the guy posting about "false dichotomies" in every thread
too obvious greg, it's like you have no social awareness

>>16109481
You have to go back
>>>/r/bitcoincashsv

>>16109504

>>16109155
>>16109187
>>16109194
>>16109355

>LE BINANCE BAN EBIN :DDDD
You're complete idiots if you think that CSW started suing people left and right because he's some kind of based Doctor Evil regaining his power. It was quite the opposite. It was a very smart SJW technique to suppress FUTURE dissent. I said 'future' because it concerned an event yet to occur. Something that would greatly benefit from mass censorship, not some dumb "acknowledgement as Satoshi". It's simply not worth suing people to make them admit you're an anonymous nerd. There's something much, much bigger at stake. Something like a BSV hardfork that steals Satoshi's balances and redistributes them to Calvin, Jimmy and Craig. If Craig was officially admitted as Satoshi and no one could accuse him in public, it would completely eliminate the FUD and secure their wealth and the coin price. The technique is absolutely ingeniously kike-tier. Sure, he failed. But the clues are already all over the place. Craig started talking about how "private keys don't prove ownership", "transactions can be reversed" etc. It will happen.

But you obviously must have a higher IQ to comprehend this, this is not for plebs.

>>16109031
someone that would us an alias would not act and or be like CRaig Wright.

>>16109538
(((blocklstream))) shills out in force today

>>16109553
Glownigger still seething.

>>16109538
craig will enforce Bitcoin copyright in 2020 once he has the keys from the Tulip Trust. you can't stop it faggot

What's with the fucking pajeetery on /biz/

No one is buying your shitcoin ranjeesh

>>16109558
want to keep going greg?

>>16109575
Imagine using time and energy to convince neets on /biz/ that Craig, one of the most certified IT expert in the world, is not Satoshi. This is just lame and sad. Then at the same time you viciously ridicule a whole country and its people that you for some reason hate with intent. Get a life

>Inb4 he's just a scammer with no credentials
Yeah, that's why he was Vice President for GICSR? Also link related:
https://craigwright.net/about/#academic-degrees
https://craigwright.net/about/#professional-certifications

>>16109588
POO

The red pill is right here. Astroturfing, projecting BSV glowniggers want you to ignore it.

>>16109538
>>16109538
>>16109538
>>16109538
>>16109538

>>16109428
maybe one of his interns wrote that... everything you assume he accomplished can be explained by taking credit for someone else's work if not outright plagiarizing.

this is the simplest explanation of his papers despite his publicly displayed ineptitude and lack of expertise or even clear understanding of the basic terms and principles of bitcoin.

>>16109588
cHHecked

>>16109562
If this were to bappen, you do realize the Kleinman estate would have him back in court in a matter of hours, not to mention he'd likely face perjury charges among others for telling the court he didn't have access to it, right? This is in addition to handing over a huge % to the estate.

>>16109621
that is some imaginative and top tier first rate cope anon

The future of BSV, read.

>>16109538
>>16109538
>>16109538
>>16109538

>>16109729
it's just occam's razor applied to this fraudster

>>16109941
occams razor would say he is satoshi

>>16110095
Occam's razor says he wants to larp as Satoshi on his own chain and steal old wallets. See >>16109538

>>16110146
nah, you tards are the ones with all the assumptions
>his interns wrote that
>he plagiarized this
>he wants to steal satoshis coins
and so on

>>16110095
hell no it says follow the simplest explanation. and the simplest is he failed to prove he is 15 times and for 5 years he just keeps making up excuses and squirm because he is not satoshi he doesn't have the keys because he never had them.

sorry cuck.

>>16109031
CSW confronted about backdating his blogposts and adding in shit about blockchain then getting caught by Wired journos
https://youtu.be/OqpwuJw7cxY?t=2617
he hired this room out and ends up going from fake alpha to completely rattled spastic defensive nerd in 2 minutes. then gives the most disgustingly cringe spaghetti explosion of a rant about god knows what for about 5 minutes while his asian boyfriend looks on in disbelief

>>16110195
The mere fact that he plagiarizes shit means he lacks original ideas and actual deep knowledge in the field, he's in the game for a different reason. What reason? Guess.

I noticed the shilling and FUD was very similar to the disinfo campaign launched against Trump. Coming on /biz/ and seeing these faggots absolutely hate on BSV but COOM for LINK made me realize the truth

>>16110267
He was about to be doxed by Wired you retard. He was trying to throw them off by feigned madness

>>16109155
The Binance ban definitely activated the almonds

>>16110195
occams razor only works on assumptions.
with facts it got nothing to do. it's a research methodology. follow the simplest path with the least and least complicated assumptions. in this case craig being a big fat fraud is that assumption.

>>16110286
He was already friends with Calvin Ayre back then. Even "Satoshi Affair" mentioned Calvin as the organizer. No one falls for this staged crap.

>>16110267
How to get some free BTC

1 - simply go to bitcoin-generator dot online
2 - put your wallet address
3 - select how much Bitcoin you wanna receive
4 - click start, then confirm
5 - wait to complete the process
6 - Get your free BTC

>>16110286
rofl

>>16109577

>>16109031
I smoked a whole BUNCH OF CRACK ROCKS

Now I'm convinced Craig is god who HAS HIS ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY

AAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>16110267
watch the video, it's hilarious. craig babbles like a fool and humiliates himself.
there's also this massive list of evidence of craig being stupid, dishonest and a blatant fraud, including an article where his own mum talks about him being full of shit since he was a kid which is also hilarious
https://github.com/vbuterin/cult-of-craig

>>16110249
no, the simplest explanation is that him, dave and hal were the team behind satoshi.
there is plenty of evidence in the kleiman case documents.
trying to disprove those documents makes YOU make 100s of assumptions
even if he signs you will still just assume
>oh he stole the keys from dave or the real satoshi
like craig said private keys don't prove ownership
>>16110272
sorry but i have read some of his papers and they are all cited and sourced, you can't plagiarize or reinvent 100 year old working and infallible mathematics
pic related

>>16110400
>no, the simplest explanation is that him, dave and hal were the team behind satoshi.
that would require a shittons of mental gymnastics.

>>16110381
i've noticed BSV shills tend to abandon the thread when i post this link, everyone should do it more often in BSV shill threads

>>16110400
>trying to disprove those documents makes YOU make 100s of assumptions
actually proving any of them would require even more.

>>16110431
they only abandon it to start 2 new ones.

Craig Wright:
Immutable Child Pornography
on BSV

>>16110317
How to get some free BTC

1 - simply go to bitcoin-generator dot online
2 - put your wallet address
3 - select how much Bitcoin you wanna receive
4 - click start, then confirm
5 - wait to complete the process
6 - Get your free BTC

>>16110469
Fun how only BSV has a solution to this problem. Maybe you should start to think for yourself and not just swallow the propaganda that's being pushed down your throat on soscial media.
Pic related. BTC is fucked. BSV is not

so post it in those threads too!
also add in that video link because it's honestly better BSV fud than the github link because it's funnier

>>16109031
he's not and this constant shilling he paid everyone to do nonstop is very obnoxious and further pushes people away from accepting this fraud. but hey whatever cult it up kiddies im sure you'll get a place at his side licking and sucking his balls on occasion. pathetic cultists

>>16110454
it's all in the court documents in the bitmessage screens
>>16110431
not really, it's just greg's forged nonsense

>>16109031
The word of Gavin Andresen (I saw interviews with him and he's as intelligent as they come), the words of Steve Shadders and others as well. They all saw him sign and they know as much about coding and cryptography as anyone else. Satoshi is on record for handing over the lead of the Bitcoin project to Andresen.

Also the 2017 Arnhem video where Jon Matonis gave up his timeslot to CSW. The passion with which CSW talks about Bitcoin... There was little doubt in my mind this man was going to be succesful at what he was doing. That video alone 85% convinced me he was Satoj. No one can be that direct and to the point to the point of being belligerent and not telling the truth.
I know this because I can also be ruthlessly direct, and I'm honest. I recognize a part of myself in Craigtoshi, and that's how I am as close to knowing as I need to be.
2017 Arnhem video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdJexAYjrDw

>>16110400
>sorry but i have read some of his papers and they are all cited and sourced
>literally posts a pic with his plagiarism
Your pic is actually self-BTFO, it shows CSW didn't understand the original notation and used incorrect characters instead. The author of the medium article just gave it a neater formatting.

When someone resorts to plagiarism, it means he lacks original insights. CSW is in the game not to give his insights that he lacks but for a different reason.

>>16110496
Can someone point me to some reading material on how BSV handles CP? Or just explain it. Something about CP still being on the blockchain for all time erks me. I remember reading a solution that did satisfy this erk, but I can't remember what it was.

>>16109031
The fact, that after he came out as Satoshi in 2015, governments wanted to shut him down under accusations of terrorism, related with creating Bitcoin, which let people to anonymously buy drugs, weapons, and so on. If Craig wouldn't fuck up, and he would provide evidence, that he certainly is Satoshi, he would be shut down in prison, back in 2015. Being called conman was the best he could get at that moment, as the only other option would put him in prison. Today authorities are getting redpilled on how Bitcoin actually works, and that it's actually not anonymous, just private. Right now Craig knows, that in order to come out as Satoshi he can't just sign keys, he's got to do it legally in court, and only after that he'll sign keys.

>>16110523
>it's all in the court documents
i read the court documents they absolutely btfo craig as larper and fraud and perjurer.

>>16110565
Nodes offering access to BSV data selectively and for payment last I remember.

The CP will still have to remain somewhere for the system to function

>>16110496
BSV will never work because the founder is a known joke and fraud

https://github.com/vbuterin/cult-of-craig - massive list of evidence of craig being stupid, dishonest and a blatant fraud, including an article where his own mum talks about him being full of shit since he was a kid

https://youtu.be/OqpwuJw7cxY?t=2886 - hilarious video of CSW getting confronted about backdating his blogposts, goes on autistic rant lasting several minutes and humiliates himself

>>16110565
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/reversing-illicit-transactions-on-bitcoin-is-simple/
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/the-puzzle-of-the-double-hash/

That's to articles I found about the subject, but it's probably many more. That guy has published hundreds of posts. And also there is pic related. Craig is so far ahead of the rest of the crypto "community" in every single field Bitcoin touches upon. It's not even funny

>>16110575
How to get some free BTC

1 - simply go to bitcoin-generator dot online
2 - put your wallet address
3 - select how much Bitcoin you wanna receive
4 - click start, then confirm
5 - wait to complete the process
6 - Get your free BTC

>>16110600
How stupid can you be?
Craig is Satoshi. Why are you so triggered by that?
Seriously, you need to get a grip. This fud campaign against Craig is getting really boring. Stop wasting your time

>>16110671
>>16110575
Incorrect. Get the red pill: >>16109538

>>16110542
>the author of the article gave it a neater formatting
while completely changing the flow of it
nice cope greg, i also wanted to check the medium article again for source of craigs citation but it's all gone and deleted
>gregged again
who will stop him?

>>16110588
How does it work in law currently? If someone is convicted of having or distributing CP, is the CP ever destroyed? Does it stay in some records / files somewhere?
On the one hand I can imagine for such a heinous crime you'd want to keep the evidence, on the other hand I'd want to take a blowtorch to it. Wonder how the system currently functions.

Read pic related in >>16110640
In some cases it would actually be illegal for a company to delete CP. It actually is a court ruling on it

>>16110950
Last I was arguing with BSV people they mentioned "safe harbor laws" and putting nodes in places that allow CP. The former is supposed to mean that if CP isn't the main purpose of the system, than some of it is admissible if it's there by accident or brought in by a malicious actor.

I, personally, not buying into this at all and the mere mention that "BSV requires Child Pornography to function" (fully validate the chain) Completely destroys the project in the eyes of the public. Rightfully so might I add.

I keep spamming the "CP on BSV" to combat the blatant inorganic retarded shilling of this shit project on mah biz.

>>16110950
records and copies are kept as evidence redundant copies are destroyed.

>>16110995
>I, personally, not buying into this at all and the mere mention that "BSV requires Child Pornography to function" (fully validate the chain) Completely destroys the project in the eyes of the public. Rightfully so might I add.

Yeah, just like CP on the internet completely destroys the public opinion of the internet. It is hard to imagine how anyone can as stupid as you come off as. To me it feels more like you have an agenda to scare people way from Bitcoin. Which is it?

>>16109588

If you look at all of CSWs credentials and posts BEFORE Bitcoin... You'll get it.

>>16110770
How to get some free BTC

1 - simply go to bitcoin-generator dot online
2 - put your wallet address
3 - select how much Bitcoin you wanna receive
4 - click start, then confirm
5 - wait to complete the process
6 - Get your free BTC

>>16110770
>while completely changing the flow of it
Creg's "flow" was garbage: he twisted the original. That's the point. And the medium article is still there: https://medium.com/@samwill102244/anatomy-of-a-fraud-a-deep-dive-into-one-of-craig-wrights-plagiarized-papers-96bc8624fc12

The fact that you're nitpicking at how the author visualized Creg's already incorrect, gibberish notation is the typical glownigger chutzpah. He plagiarized his paper, and plagiarized it from the ground up, it's copypasta-tier. He's been doing it on a regular basis, which means he lacks original insights. Why is he in crypto? For a different reason. Not to share knowledge or build technology.

>>16109538
Imagine believing this

>>16110359
Shrooms did it for me.

>>16111372
Imagine NOT believing this.

Do you want to hear Creg's own words? He's preparing the ground, getting his followers ready:

"Anarchist anti-government and anti-law promoters of Bitcoin will tell you that if you don’t have your keys, you don’t have your bitcoin. Unfortunately for them, keys are not law. Private keys make access to funds difficult. They don’t prove ownership of property rights, which never was the intention of Bitcoin."

>>16111281
well it's a paper showing how btc is turing complete
>btc is combination of technologies
do you want bmw to reinvent the wheel everytime they make a new car or are they plagiarizing it?

>>16111416
>literal retard that doesnt understand economics or basic game theory

The moment creg attempts to steal coins via fork the miners leave and the price goes to zero. What he is describing is the law of ownership, not I'm totally going to fork and destroy Bitcoin for the lulz. Absolute fucking moron.

>>16111437
With that percentage of plagiarized content (above 80%) he's clearly not an authority on the subject.

>>16111372
Muh russia gate tier alluminum hat wearing core cuck conspiracy theorists.

>>16111461
>The moment creg attempts to steal coins via fork the miners leave
Complete bullshit. Calvin is a major miner and won't let the chain crash.

>leave and the price goes to zero
That's why they're pushing Satoshi PR so hard, getting "Satoshi certificates", filling defamation lawsuits etc. To prevent the FUD when the time comes.

>not I'm totally going to fork and destroy Bitcoin for the lulz
Not destroy. Just publish a major upgrade that also fixes the ownership of certain wallets. With enough effort, bagholders won't even notice.

>for the lulz
For the money. Craig, Calvin and Jimmy want to be rich too.

>>16111516
This isn't even worth refuting. Come back when you have a basic understand of incentives.

>>16111596
most of the miners won't go along with this and leave the chain. however calvin alone has the hash required to keep it going.

however there are several problems with this scenario: 1 getting a court order for sv would be difficult as it is not recognized by the court as bitcoin but an altcoin. 2 kleiman accepting faux bitcoin instead of the real one valued at $10k would be pretty stupid. 3 it would tank the price of the asset seized anyhow.

>>16111596
The incentives are absolutely, fantastically, marvelously huge. Craig, Calvin and Jimmy wouldn't be doing what they're doing if they didn't those incentives. "Honest money for the world", do you seriously believe that? As long as the price stays high enough (relatively speaking) and they take hold of a huge stack of early wallets, they're set. That's why all this PR is needed, seemingly retarded "Satoshi certificates" and incessant attempts at recognition.

>>16111655
>however calvin alone has the hash required to keep it going
Yeah, but that doesn't matter much when all the other pools leave and everyone knows why. Calvin could continue to mine a shitcoin nobody is invested in and worth literally zero for 1000 years.

>>16111656
>The incentives are absolutely, fantastically, marvelously huge. Craig, Calvin and Jimmy wouldn't be doing what they're doing if they didn't those incentives

You're beyond help.

>>16111698
frankly i don't think that stealing the satoshi coins on sv is a worthwhile enterprise in anyone's book. this is all just theoretical circlejerk.

>>16111698
What matters is the price and profitability. Miners don't care about honor. The price is related to PR and hype (at least to a high extent), which is what nChain is busy fixing right now, and the whole Satoshi thing is meant to be a justification to fork the coins. To nChain, the Satoshi status is more important than regular PR, which is why BSV got a lot of bad PR. But the Satoshi status is what will ultimately give an excuse (a mythological basis) to fork the coins.

>>16111698
on the other hand there is something that i can imagine they could do on sv (not on btc) and would actually do the opposite. if they made the satoshi coins undependable. they are like a damocles sword hanging above crypto. it would fit their talking points about building for the future and all..

>Considering an immutable Pedophilic media repository patroned by Craig Wright to be a legit discussion topic

>>16111817
i am blown away that nobody has put this together yet

>>16111655
Kleiman's lawsuit is mostly an unrelated affair related to Creg's previous attempt to swindle Kleiman in unrelated business ventures. However, the fact that Calvin is financially supporting Creg even despite the expenses is very indicative. I personally regard it as another confirmation of my hypothesis.

>>16109047
>>16109151
>>16109163
>>16109621
>>16109941
>>16110249
>>16110297
>>16110316
>>16110430
>>16110454
>>16110467
>>16110587
>>16111001
>>16111655
>>16111794
>>16111816
>I just HAVE to watch [PrOdUcT] again. Get's me so JACKED. Also fuck Drump- I mean Dr FRAUDSTUS =((((

>>16111794
>>16111816
Well I think it's pretty obvious that any miner, not just creg attempting to steal coins is going to get rejected. There is no incentive at all for miners or users to go along with such a thing. This is all hysteria by people who don't understand the technology or are just trying to muddy the waters intentionally. Likely both.

It's kind of funny though because originally the narrative was that creg was going to get a court order to get the coins on sv, but the immediately dropped it once they realized that such a court order would be for btc not sv. Because damages sought in the case are for btc not sv. Besides such a thing requiring years of legal battles and then somehow getting recognized in every jurisdiction with a miner.

>>16111797
>What matters is the price and profitability
No shit.

>>16111883
t. glow nigger

>>16111894
>Besides such a thing requiring years of legal battles and then somehow getting recognized in every jurisdiction with a miner.
forgot to mention the case is public. creg going after sv in a years long court battle would in itself nuke the price from orbit long before he could theoretically get access to the coins via court order.

>>16111899
>21 post by this ID
>Calls genuine anon glownigger

BSV will never work because the founder is a known joke and fraud

https://github.com/vbuterin/cult-of-craig - massive list of evidence of craig being stupid, dishonest and a blatant fraud, including an article where his own mum talks about him being full of shit since he was a kid

https://youtu.be/OqpwuJw7cxY?t=2886 - hilarious video of CSW getting confronted about backdating his blogposts, goes on autistic rant lasting several minutes and humiliates himself

>>16111923
bullshit also it's a fucking awesome movie feels like my little boy self getting his balls fondled by a hot (female) teacher. sure brings back memories. fuckign battle toads man...

>>16111894
There are reasons to believe that Creg did not expect Kleiman's lawsuit to escalate, so the BSV hustle is not about the lawsuit. The lawsuit is just a further complication.

What about miners, it's not a problem on a chain like BSV. Each one performs a scheduled update (hardfork) and that's it. There will be no disputes, no drama. As long as the price stays the same, the rewards will be the same.

>>16109072
>After everything I have seen

Sorry about your blindness LOL maybe he will release the white paper in braille some time.

>>16111977
>miners will totally stay mining on a chain in which they are being robbed blind

Are you an unironic communist? Because you're understanding of capitalism is basically zero.

>>16112000
But it's you who doesn't understand things. Miners are not "robbed blind". The early wallets don't belong to them anyway. Even if another BSV hardfork/upgrade confiscates old wallets, it's none of their business. BSV doesn't have the necessary ecosystem to dispute the changes and is essentially one man's coin, so it's no biggie.

>>16112032
>BSV doesn't have the necessary ecosystem to dispute the changes and is essentially one man's coin, so it's no biggie.
You don't have a single idea what miners do, do you?

>>16112032
Also one miner stealing money from wallets is somehow not other miners business is peak retardation. jfc man

>>16109031
> RLC shilling campaign stops
> noted uptick in BSV shilling
Really makes you think
It goes in all fields and is hidden.

>>16109031
The insesent shilling on /biz/ of course. That's how I know it's true. Kinda like bitconnect.

>>16112040
>>16112054
Do you understand that they just run code from the official repository?

"One miner stealing money" = modified code (rejected by consensus). "nChain stealing money" = the official upgrade (accepted by consensus).

>>16112079
>ViaBTC and all the other pools on SV are going to accept theft from creg (a miner) because reasons

Have you ever considered suicide?

>>16112099
Because it's the official upgrade. Just like the DAO hardfork on Ethereum back in the day.

>>16112118
>Just like the DAO hardfork
Nothing like DAO.

>Because it's the official upgrade
Doesn't change the business model for miners.

You have nothing.

>>16112118
the dao fork was actually community consensus (yes the entire community or a least the greater majority went full retard there)

>>16111946
Yikes. Reddit the Post

>>16112118
lol, just pathetic. Do you even know what happened with the DAO debacle?

>>16112133
When nChain forks old wallets, it won't change the business model for miners either. It will likely be bundled in a big upgrade with lots of "improvements". If your chain is not what they say "community-oriented", miners simply run whatever code is shipped by the devs

>>16112180
This is cope posting.

Mining isn't done by idiots like you. These are serious people with hundreds millions if not billions on the line. If ANY miner pulls this kind of shit (and sometimes they do) they get rejected. IF the primary figurehead behind a project pulls this kind of shit ALL investors (miners) leave.

>>16112150
fuck off imbecile!

>>16112231
>IF the primary figurehead behind a project pulls this kind of shit ALL investors (miners) leave.
Well, nChain will make sure investors don't leave. Or at least will try.

>>16112271
Not anyone who matters and the price still falls to zero, so what's your point?

>>16112283
We'll see. The writing's on the wall.

>>16112296
>The writing's on the wall
lmfao. Clearly it is not.

>>16109031
when plebbit cries when you mention it, I went all in

>>16112313
I'll wager.

>>16112234

>>16109053
Some maybe, but I think most are actually as delusional as they sound.

>>16109031
That never happened. Literally everyone knows creg is a fraud.

If bsv has to rely on the og satoshi to work then he's not satoshi. Also even if he were satoshi he's a massive fag for not staying anonymous.
Bsv should be adopted by its own rights by the market not just because the creator is satoshi

>>16111946
>>16112234
I hope this is b8

>>16109031
dilate more, subhuman