[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 56 KB, 637x921, 1519273615124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16092559 No.16092559 [Reply] [Original]

Cup and handle invalidated. Double top formed. GET THE FUCK OUT, THIS SHIT IS ABOUT TO TANK

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>> No.16092574

dr:ns

>> No.16092575

>>16092559
or instead of being a cowardly scared beta pussy like OP you buy on the dips and get bigger stacks built up

>> No.16092606

>>16092559
How do you tell the difference?

>> No.16092622
File: 91 KB, 638x676, link_infantry.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16092622

>>16092559
I am not selling my LINK dude, not until I can stake it.

>> No.16092636

cup and handle on the six month
cheggum

>> No.16092645

AAAAAAAAAA TOILET BOWL AND FLUSHER FORMING ON THE 15S CHART GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT NOW WHILE YOU HAVE TIME

>> No.16092662
File: 165 KB, 680x1066, 1572272782602.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16092662

>>16092622
GL with that

>> No.16092672
File: 61 KB, 1000x800, thumbsup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16092672

>>16092662
Thank you

>> No.16092747

>>16092559
Did you actually look at the graph. I don’t think you did.

>> No.16092851
File: 624 KB, 700x1244, UWeDEF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16092851

>>16092559
Y...you dont really h...hate me do you anons?

>> No.16093155
File: 482 KB, 638x1020, 38e13865dd2e9b5e9536b733ee7c8d83.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16093155

>>16092851
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>> No.16093163

>>16092662
does anyone over 14 years old find this funny?

>> No.16093561
File: 8 KB, 183x275, D7F10E87-5DE0-4950-A169-F3250F937ED3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16093561

>>16092645
>did someone say dump?