/biz/ - Business & Finance

Maybe no timeline besides this, but you underestimate our wishful thinking skills mate

>>16029025
You better start believing in clown worlds OP,
you're in one

>>16029041
Wishful thinking doesn't make money and your cyber coins are for children.

>>16029044
kek

>>16029025
Ride the clown! *honk* *honk*

>>16029025
What if I bought like $12,000?

>>16029025
this is unironically the only thing preventing me from going all-in into LINK. it's at the point where it seems too popular with too many people on here. there's no fucking chance a bunch of losers are going to post 100k+ profits from this, timelines like this don't exist. maybe less than 10 people would be believable, but everyone on /biz/ is in on chainlink at this point. timelines where this many losers make it don't exist, i've never seen it happen, there is no precedent.

>>16029025
What is 2017

>>16029025
>bro remember that "bit coin" thing you told me about a few years ago?
>its in the news now
>yeah i bought some with paypal
>in fact i still have the laptop i bought them on
>oh wow
>hey you wanna buy matching lambos?

>>16029130
if someone can convince me that let's say 50-100 people (a conservative estimate) from here are going to be pulling 100k+ profits from chainlink in the future, i'll sell all my BTC holdings and put everything into chainlink. my brain says it's possible based on chainlink's fundamentals, but i've legit never seen a historical precedence where a large group of losers or misfits (if you're on 4chan you're either one or both) are capable of pulling something like this off. it doesn't happen historically. this is what's currently making me more conservative than i'd like to be, i just don't see historical evidence that a movement like this is possible.

>>16029179
this is first time conditions were right for something like this to happen

>>16029025
you're wrong and sadly, you're not autistic, so it's not that good to be true

>>16029130
It happened already with Bitcoin and Ethereum.

>>16029179
it happened when /v/ found minecraft and no one else knew about it, then it became billion dollar title, same happened with /pol/ and trump. fuck, same thing was /tv/ and game of thrones, first people ever to obsess over that show was necbeards on /tv/, before they even cast it there were daily threads anticipating it before normies were in. Same thing is happening with chainlink. trust the hivemind.

>>16029222
i doubt more than 50 people from here made 100k+ with it, most probably sold earlier

>>16029230
Most people here will end up selling link long before the top too. What's your point?

>>16029130
To be fair you've only experienced one timeline first hand, are you really qualified to say what is or isn't likely in all timelines?

>>16029222
bitcoin seemed more like plain luck, unless you really did believe it could potentially hold the same stature as gold or something. i just thought it was a cool thing and sold for 10x gains or something like most people.

biz was not in agreement about the potential of ethereum and is still not in agreement

most of biz understands LINKs potential

>>16029263
you have to go back

>>16029230
i’ve made over 100k with an average buy in of 35 cents... was at 25 cents pre google

but then again i also make 150k a year, have a great life and probably won’t sell until it truly is life changing money

>>16029272
its pretty clear that not everybody here is retarded

>>16029041
omfg this, meme magic is real, and ourr wishful thinking is just too strong for reality, we might trenscend it

>>16029130
We already made heaps bro
Your gains will be miniscule compared to anyone in it from a year or two ago

You’ll still have gains though

>>16029025
But Mario, that's a logical fallacy.

>>16029272
truly based and linkpilled see you on the bugattiland linkbro

>>16029044
checkked

>>16029044
Welcome to the cruel parable of endlessness.

>>16029179
Maybe we're the first ones in our civilization, maybe it's already happened we just don't have the knowledge. Maybe it never happened and it's about to happen for the first time. Maybe it won't happen at all. I'm all in and I'd rather lose than miss out.

>>16029226
Better example would be baneposting and /tv/ and then the les bains plane crash "with no survivors" according to news reports

>>16029025
Slow and Steady

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BLX/oKh54NhX-Bitcoin-Halving-and-Charting/

>>16029025
Who the fuck do you think got rich off bitcoin, ethereum, alt season 2017? A bunch of normans? Gtfo you faggot retard, back to your Starbucks and wagecucking.

on one hand i don't want the singularity to happen because you faggots on here are salty losers who don't deserve money as they will not use it to better themselves or society.
on the other hand i'm all in with a /madeit/ stack and that's due to this board and this board alone

>>16029179
Isn’t that exactly what happened with bitcoin though?

You are right it never happens to poor idiots because they need 2 things.

The understanding that it has value

The strength to hold

Both together are incredibly rare

Maybe I'm wrong, now that I think about it. Back during the internet boom, while normies were laughing at the idea of the internet, yet all the nerdy losers jumped on board. Think of how many unwashed nerds made megabucks during the dotcom boom

>>16029025
You do understand high functioning autism is literally the next evolution (Buffet, Gates, Musk, Zuck, etc)?

>>16029025
You're in it, dummy

4chan autists already became millions with BTC, ETH, XMR and ANS. This is just the next one. And there will be more.

>>16029062
So green sticks arent real? Okay. I mean btc just pumped 16% overnight but whatever. Must be fake

>>16029230
Im up 400k, not selling

>>16029179
>if someone can convince me that let's say 50-100 people (a conservative estimate) from here are going to be pulling 100k+ profits from chainlink in the future, i'll sell all my BTC holdings and put everything into chainlink

what you can actually do is turn around and leave

>>16029025
this already happened in 2017

>>16029179
>i just don't see historical evidence that a movement like this is possible.
>historical evidence
>historical evidence

>>16029179
This happened with literally every crypto that went over 100x. Just how fucking new are you?

>>16030023
This. Functional autism is a blessing in a world of lemmings, and it is literally becoming fashionable to be "autistic"

>>16029025
it's already happened retard

>>16030959
Lightning dont strike twice

>>16029025
Which is why it will happen, but not before I accumulate a make it stack. Sorry frens I know you already want to make it and stop working but you're gonna have to be patient. This is my destiny.

>>16029025
at this point the millionaires are priced out. The ones who will make it bought under .40

>>16029044
Based

>>16030093
HOW PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE RICH WITH CHAINLINK IF THAT SHIT IS JUST SPAMMED BY POORFELLAS HERE EVERYDAY, theres nothing new about chainlink your retard.

>>16031044
0.21 here

>>16030977
>what is 2013
It did strike twice. Third time incoming.

>>16031362
do I still have time bro?

>>16029025
except

for

THIS TIMELINE!

>>16029179

> ignoring the fact we were on to Bitcoin, Ether, Antshares and just about every moonshot going in the last 3-5 years

How to spot a newfag. I was selling drawings on /a/ for Bitcoins back in 2014

In this timeline crypto hodlers who're unironically racists get the short end of the stick. I'm quite alright with that. Get fucked stinkies!!!

It happened here before OP
+ less then 80k link wallets exist.
Still LOTS of growth potential it’s easy to see why so many of us are happy. It’s almost unbelievable the hand we were delt and how we played it

>>16029025
couple hundreds maybe not
couple thousands definitely possible