/biz/ - Business & Finance

Good memories are worth all the money in the world.

>>15856294
Same although I did try to get bitcoins a few times when they were those prices but it was to technical for me and I couldn’t.

>>15856294
>tfw you remember 4chan people constantly posting about buy chainlink for $1....$3.50....7$...
>all you did was make low price BTC nostalgia threads

>>15856515
i got more links than you do guy

>>15856803
no you dont

>>15856294
>that one anon who used GameStop preorders as a pseudo bank account

>>15856954
no, you don't

>>15856515
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>>15856294
perhaps the real profit was the friends we made along the way anon

>>15857106
Jim Profit was trying to tell us this since the beginning.

>>15856294
Go away oldfag

>>15856294
BTC true believers in 2011 were somewhat like link marines in the fud era. Nobody understood blockchain, in BTC thread after BTC thread people showed up, laughed and fudded without knowing what it even is